- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Universal nature of rapid evolution of conservative gravity and turbidity currents perturbed from their self-similar state

Santiago L. Zúñiga1,2,3,*, Jorge S. Salinas4, S. Balachandar4, and Mariano I. Cantero1,2,3

  • 1Instituto Balseiro, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
  • 2Centro Atómico Bariloche, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
  • 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
  • 4Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA

  • *santiago.zuniga@ib.edu.ar
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 043801 – Published 22 April, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.043801

Abstract

The results of six highly resolved direct and large eddy simulations of gravity and conservative turbidity currents are presented to illustrate the point that the rapidly varying evolution of these currents follow a universal cyclic sequence of four states. The demarcation between these four states is determined by the bulk Richardson number and the acceleration/deceleration of the flow. We describe in detail the identification process of these states, together with the associated three-dimensional structure of the current. The exact depth-averaged momentum balance is computed and used to explain the intricate details of the nonmonotonic rapid evolution of the current between the different states. Finally, the balance of turbulent kinetic energy and concentration flux are computed to explain how and why the current evolves through the cyclic sequence of states. We also explore the mechanism by which the current can exit the cyclic sequence and slowly evolve towards self-similar supercritical or subcritical states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. J. S. Salinas, M. I. Cantero, M. Shringarpure, and S. Balachandar, Properties of the body of a turbidity current at near-normal conditions: 1. Effect of bed slope, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 124, 7989 (2019).
  2. J. S. Salinas, M. I. Cantero, M. Shringarpure, and S. Balachandar, Properties of the body of a turbidity current at near-normal conditions: 2. Effect of settling, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 124, 8017 (2019).
  3. G. Parker, Y. Fukushima, and H. M. Pantin, Self-accelerating turbidity currents, J. Fluid Mech. 171, 145 (1986).
  4. G. Parker, M. Garcia, Y. Fukushima, and W. Yu, Experiments on turbidity currents over an erodible bed, J. Hydraul. Res. 25, 123 (1987).
  5. J. S. Salinas, S. Zúñiga, M. Cantero, M. Shringarpure, J. Fedele, D. Hoyal, and S. Balachandar, Slope dependence of self-similar structure and entrainment in gravity currents, J. Fluid Mech. 934, R4 (2022).
  6. M. García and G. Parker, Experiments on the entrainment of sediment into suspension by a dense bottom current, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 4793 (1993).
  7. C. J. Dallimore, J. Imberger, and T. Ishikawa, Entrainment and turbulence in saline underflow in Lake Ogawara, J. Hydraul. Eng. 127, 937 (2001).
  8. F. Necker, C. Härtel, L. Kleiser, and E. Meiburg, High-resolution simulations of particle-driven gravity currents, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 28, 279 (2002).
  9. R. L. Fernandez and J. Imberger, Bed roughness induced entrainment in a high Richardson number underflow, J. Hydraul. Res. 44, 725 (2006).
  10. M. Cantero, J. R. Lee, S. Balachandar, and M. García, On the front velocity of gravity currents, J. Fluid Mech. 586, 1 (2007).
  11. O. E. Sequeiros, H. Naruse, N. Endo, M. H. García, and G. Parker, Experimental study on self-accelerating turbidity currents, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 114, C05025(2009).
  12. M. A. Islam and J. Imran, Vertical structure of continuous release saline and turbidity currents, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 115, C08025(2010).
  13. J. S. Salinas, T. Bonometti, M. Ungarish, and M. I. Cantero, Rotating planar gravity currents at moderate Rossby numbers: Fully resolved simulations and shallow-water modelling, J. Fluid Mech. 867, 114 (2019).
  14. J. S. Salinas, M. I. Cantero, E. A. Dari, and T. Bonometti, Turbulent structures in cylindrical density currents in a rotating frame of reference, J. Turbul. 19, 463 (2018).
  15. B. Kneller, M. M. Nasr-Azadani, S. Radhakrishnan, and E. Meiburg, Long-range sediment transport in the world's oceans by stably stratified turbidity currents, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 121, 8608 (2016).
  16. E. Meiburg and B. Kneller, Turbidity currents and their deposits, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 135 (2010).
  17. M. Cantero, S. Balachandar, and M. García, Highly resolved simulations of cylindrical density currents, J. Fluid Mech. 590, 437 (2007).
  18. C. Cenedese and C. Adduce, Mixing in a density-driven current flowing down a slope in a rotating fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 604, 369 (2008).
  19. O. E. Sequeiros, B. Spinewine, R. T. Beaubouef, T. Sun, M. H. García, and G. Parker, Characteristics of velocity and excess density profiles of saline underflows and turbidity currents flowing over a mobile bed, J. Hydraul. Eng. 136, 412 (2010).
  20. O. E. Sequeiros, Estimating turbidity current conditions from channel morphology: A Froude number approach, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 117, C04003(2012).
  21. J. S. Salinas, S. Balachandar, and M. I. Cantero, Control of turbulent transport in supercritical currents by three families of hairpin vortices, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 063801 (2021).
  22. J. S. Salinas, S. Balachandar, M. Shringarpure, J. Fedele, D. Hoyal, S. Zúñiga, and M. I. Cantero, Anatomy of subcritical submarine flows with a lutocline and an intermediate destruction layer, Nat. Commun. 12, 1649 (2021).
  23. J. Salinas, S. Balachandar, M. Shringarpure, J. Fedele, D. Hoyal, and M. Cantero, Soft transition between subcritical and supercritical currents through intermittent cascading interfacial instabilities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 18278 (2020).
  24. M. García and G. Parker, Experiments on hydraulic jumps in turbidity currents near a canyon-fan transition, Science 245, 393 (1989).
  25. A. Fildani, W. R. Normark, S. Kostic, and G. Parker, Channel formation by flow stripping: Large-scale scour features along the monterey east channel and their relation to sediment waves, Sedimentology 53, 1265 (2006).
  26. S. Kostic, O. Sequeiros, B. Spinewine, and G. Parker, Cyclic steps: A phenomenon of supercritical shallow flow from the high mountains to the bottom of the ocean, J. Hydro-Environ. Res. 3, 167 (2010).
  27. W. Rodi, G. Constantinescu, and T. Stoesser, Large-Eddy Simulation in Hydraulics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013)
  28. T. M. Özgökmen, T. Iliescu, and P. F. Fischer, Reynolds number dependence of mixing in a lock-exchange system from direct numerical and large eddy simulations, Ocean Modell. 30, 190 (2009).
  29. N. Jarrin, S. Benhamadouche, D. Laurence, and R. Prosser, A synthetic-eddy-method for generating inflow conditions for large-eddy simulations, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 27, 585 (2006).
  30. T. Okaze and A. Mochida, Cholesky decomposition–based generation of artificial inflow turbulence including scalar fluctuation, Comput. Fluids 159, 23 (2017).
  31. M. Lee and R. D. Moser, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ≈5200, J. Fluid Mech. 774, 395 (2015).
  32. S. Dong, G. E. Karniadakis, and C. Chryssostomidis, A robust and accurate outflow boundary condition for incompressible flow simulations on severely-truncated unbounded domains, J. Comput. Phys. 261, 83 (2014).
  33. J. W. Miles, On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 10, 496 (1961).
  34. T. Ellison and J. S. Turner, Turbulent entrainment in stratified flows, J. Fluid Mech. 6, 423 (1959).
  35. R. M. Dorrell, J. Peakall, S. E. Darby, D. R. Parsons, J. Johnson, E. J. Sumner, R. B. Wynn, E. Özsoy, and D. Tezcan, Self-sharpening induces jet-like structure in seafloor gravity currents, Nat. Commun. 10, 1381(2019).
  36. M. H. García, Experimental study of turbidity currents, M.s. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1985.
  37. M. H. García, Depositing and eroding sediment-driven flows Turbidity currents, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, 1990.
  38. J. Zhou, R. Adrian, S. Balachandar, and T. Kendall, Mechanics for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353 (1999).
  39. P. Chakraborty, S. Balachandar, and R. Adrian, On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes, J. Fluid Mech. 535, 189 (2005).
  40. A. F. Hussain, Coherent structures and turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 173, 303 (1986).
  41. M. M. Rogers and R. D. Moser, The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer: The Kelvin–Helmholtz rollup, J. Fluid Mech. 243, 183 (1992).
  42. M. Shringarpure, M. I. Cantero, and S. Balachandar, Dynamics of complete turbulence suppression in turbidity currents driven by monodisperse suspensions of sediment, J. Fluid Mech. 712, 384 (2012).
  43. I. Z. Naqavi, J. C. Tyacke, and P. G. Tucker, Direct numerical simulation of a wall jet: Flow physics, J. Fluid Mech. 852, 507 (2018).
  44. S. Kostic and G. Parker, The response of turbidity currents to a canyon–fan transition: Internal hydraulic jumps and depositional signatures, J. Hydraul. Res. 44, 631 (2006).
  45. Z. Nourmohammadi, H. Afshin, and B. Firoozabadi, Experimental observation of the flow structure of turbidity currents, J. Hydraul. Res. 49, 168 (2011).
  46. E. Khavasi, H. Afshin, and B. Firoozabadi, Effect of selected parameters on the depositional behaviour of turbidity currents, J. Hydraul. Res. 50, 60 (2012).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 043801– Published 22 April, 2022
  • Received 6 January 2022
  • Accepted 28 March 2022
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2022 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation