Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Interaction of synthetic jets with a massively separated three-dimensional flow field

Nicholas Rathay* and Michael Amitay

  • Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, USA

  • *Currently at General Electric Research Center.
  • amitam@rpi.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 034702 – Published 24 March, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.034702

Abstract

The interaction of an array of finite span synthetic jet actuators with a massively separated flow was explored experimentally over a cantilevered, swept, and tapered model having a deflected control surface. The synthetic jet actuators were placed slightly upstream of the control surface hinge-line of the wind tunnel model. The flow physics associated with the interaction of multiple jets and the separated crossflow over the control surface was investigated using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Experiments were conducted at two spanwise regions along the model, where separation severity varied. At the outboard region, the baseline flow field was characterized by a severe separation that was quasiuniform in the spanwise direction. At the inboard measurement domain, separation was milder but increased in severity in the outboard direction. When a single jet was activated, separation was reduced downstream and outboard of the jet orifice. In addition, spanwise velocity was augmented outboard of the jet's structures at the outboard measurement domain from an oblique vortex that was observed at the spanwise location where separation severity increased (as the flow approached the baseline state). In the inboard region, this vortex was not observed and the spanwise velocity decreased with a single jet active. When more jets were actuated along the span, the overall severity of separation decreased at both locations. Despite this, in the outboard region, the spanwise velocity near the surface was enhanced, and the strength of the jets’ vortical structures decreased as more jets were activated (i.e., they negatively impacted one another). On the contrary, at the inboard region, the jets beneficially affected each other. These differences were hypothesized to be related to the oblique vortices that were distinguishable outboard but not inboard with all jets active.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. S. G. Anders, W. L. Sellers III, and A. E. Washburn, Active flow control activities at NASA Langley, AIAA Paper No. 2004-2623 (2004).
  2. L. N. Cattafesta III and M. Sheplak, Actuators for active flow control, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 247 (2011).
  3. B. L. Smith and A. Glezer, The formation and evolution of synthetic jets, Phys. Fluids 10, 2281 (1998).
  4. A. Glezer and M. Amitay, Synthetic Jets, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 503 (2002).
  5. B. L. Smith and G. W. Swift, A comparison between synthetic jets and continuous jets, Exp. Fluids 34, 467 (2003).
  6. T. Van Buren and M. Amitay, Comparison between finite-span steady and synthetic jets issued into a quiescent fluid, Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 75, 16 (2016).
  7. M. Amitay and F. Cannelle, Evolution of finite span synthetic jets, Phys. Fluids 18, 054101 (2006).
  8. C. Yao, F. J. Chen, and D. Neuhart, Synthetic jet flowfield database for computational fluid dynamics validation, AIAA J. 44, 3153 (2006).
  9. R. B. Kotapati, R. Mittal, and L. N. Cattafesta III, Numerical study of a transitional synthetic jet in quiescent external flow, J. Fluid Mech. 581, 287 (2007).
  10. T. Van Buren, E. Whalen, and M Amitay, Vortex formation of a finite-span synthetic jet: High Reynolds numbers, Phys. Fluids 26, 014101 (2014).
  11. T. Van Buren, E. Whalen, and M. Amitay, Vortex formation of a finite span synthetic jet: Effect of rectangular orifice geometry, J. Fluid Mech. 745, 180 (2014).
  12. A. Crook and N. Wood, Measurements and visualizations of synthetic jets, AIAA Paper No. 2001-0145 (2001).
  13. S. Zhong, M. Jabbal, H. Tang, L. Garcillan, F. Guo, N. Wood, and C. Warsop, Towards the design of synthetic-jet actuators for full-scale flight conditions, Flow Turbul. Combust. 78, 283 (2007).
  14. D. K. Wu and M. A. Leschziner, Large-eddy simulations of circular synthetic jets in quiescent surroundings and in a turbulent cross-flow, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 30, 421 (2009).
  15. R. Mittal, P. Rampunggoon, and H. S. Udaykumar, Interaction of a synthetic jet with a flat plate boundary layer, AIAA Paper No. 2001-2773 (2001).
  16. T. Van Buren, C. Leong, M. Beyar, and M. Amitay, Three-dimensional interaction of a finite-span synthetic jet in a crossflow, Phys. Fluids 28, 037105 (2016).
  17. D. R. Smith, Interaction of a synthetic jet with a crossflow boundary layer, AIAA J. 40, 2277 (2002).
  18. M. Watson, A. J. Jaworski, and N. J. Wood, Contribution to the understanding of flow interactions between multiple synthetic jets, AIAA J. 41, 747 (2003).
  19. M. A. Leschziner and S. Lardeau, Simulation of slot and round synthetic jets in the context of boundary-layer separation control, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 369, 1495 (2011).
  20. D. C. McCormick, Boundary layer separation control with directed synthetic jets, AIAA Paper No. 2000-0519 (2000).
  21. M. Amitay and A. Glezer, Role of actuation frequency in controlled flow reattachment over a stalled airfoil, AIAA J. 40, 209 (2002).
  22. M. Amitay, D. R. Smith, V. Kibens, D. E. Parekh, and A. Glezer, Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators, AIAA J. 39, 361 (2001).
  23. M. DeSalvo, E. Whalen, and A. Glezer, High-lift enhancement using active flow control, AIAA paper 2012 (2012).
  24. D. Greenblatt and A. E. Washburn, Influence of finite span and sweep on active flow control efficacy, AIAA J. 46, 1675 (2008).
  25. T. Holl, E. Wassen, and F. Thiele, Active separation control on a high-lift configuration using segmented actuation slots, AIAA paper No. 2010-4249 (2010).
  26. O. Sahni, J. Wood, K. E. Jansen, and M. Amitay, Three-dimensional interactions between a finite-span synthetic jet and a crossflow, J. Fluid Mech. 671, 254 (2010).
  27. Y. Elimelech, J. D. Vasile, and M. Amitay, Secondary flow structures due to interaction between a finite-span synthetic jet and a 3D cross flow, Phys. Fluids 23, 094104 (2011).
  28. J. D. Vasile and M. Amitay, Interactions of an array of finite span synthetic jets and a crossflow, AIAA J. 51, 2503 (2013).
  29. B. H. Maines, B. R. Smith, D. Merrill, S. Saddoughi, and H. Gonzalez, Synthetic jet flow separation control for thin wing fighter aircraft, AIAA Paper No. 2009-885 (2009).
  30. N. Rathay, M. Boucher, M. Amitay, and E. Whalen, Application of synthetic jets to enhance the performance of a vertical tail, SAE Int. J. Aerospace 6, 169 (2013).
  31. N. Rathay, M. Boucher, M. Amitay, and E. Whalen, Performance enhancement of a vertical tail using synthetic jet actuators, AIAA J. 52, 810 (2014).
  32. K. E. Jansen, M. Rasquin, J. A. Farnsworth, N. Rathay, M. C. Monastero, and M. Amitay, Interaction of a synthetic jet with separated flow over a vertical tail, AIAA J. 56, 2653 (2018).
  33. T. J. Mueller and M. B. Stephen, Experimental studies of separation on a two-dimensional airfoil at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA J. 20, 457 (1982).
  34. A. K. Prasad, Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry, Exp. Fluids 29, 103 (2000).
  35. N. Rathay, M. Boucher, M. Amitay, and E. Whalen, Parametric study of synthetic-jet-based flow control for performance enhancement of a vertical tail, AIAA J. 52, 2440 (2014).
  36. D. I. Poll, Spiral vortex flow over a swept-back wing, Aeronaut. J. 90, 185 (1986).
  37. F. F. Grinstein, Vortex dynamics and entrainment in rectangular free jets, J. Fluid Mech. 437, 69 (2001).
  38. I. Wygnanski, P. Tewes, and L. Taubert, Applying the boundary-layer independence principle to turbulent flows, J. Aircraft 51, 175 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation