Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Surface morphing for aerodynamic flows at low and stalled angles of attack

Ernold Thompson* and Andres Goza

  • Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

  • *ernoldt2@illinois.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 024703 – Published 7 February, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.024703

Abstract

In the current work, we numerically study the effect of traveling-wave surface morphing actuation. Although this actuation strategy has been studied at higher Reynolds numbers for an airfoil and a rectangular flat plate, its effects at low Reynolds numbers relevant to micro-air vehicles have not yet been investigated. We perform high-fidelity two-dimensional numerical simulations to study the effects of traveling wave surface morphing on the suction surface of NACA0012 at Re=1000. The kinematics of actuation are defined by wave number and wavespeed, both of which are varied over a wide range of values to include parameters that considerably change the lift dynamics as well as those that do not. We first study the effect of actuation at an angle of attack of α=5, where the unactuated flow is steady. The lift dynamics are found to align with the surface morphing kinematics, and there is a low-pressure minimum shown to be introduced into the flow-field by morphing that advects at a speed agnostic to the morphing parameters. Lift benefits are found to be maximal when the morphing kinematics align with this intrinsic flow speed. We then investigate the role of morphing in the presence of an unsteady, separated baseline flow (with intrinsic vortex-shedding processes) at α=15. At this higher angle of attack, we identify three distinct behavioral regimes based on the relationship between morphing and the underlying shedding frequency. Of these regimes, the most beneficial to mean lift is the lock-on regime, where the vortex-shedding dynamics align with the morphing kinematics. Lock-on was similarly found using this actuation strategy at higher Reynolds numbers, though in that setting the effect was to reduce separation, whereas at these lower Reynolds numbers the outcome is that vortex shedding persists with—in certain cases—significant lift benefits. We also identify other regimes where morphing can become out of phase with the vortex-shedding dynamics, termed here the interactive regime, and where morphing leaves the unactuated dynamics unaltered, termed here the superposition regime. At the higher angle of attack, parameters leading to lift benefits/detriments are explained in terms of the effect of morphing on the leading and trailing-edge vortex. Where appropriate, connections between the mechanisms at the higher angle of attack are drawn to the matching/disparity of timescales between morphing and lift-producing pressure signatures seen in the lower-angle-of-attack setting.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. M. Amitay, D. R. Smith, V. Kibens, D. E. Parekh, and A. Glezer, Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators, AIAA J. 39, 361 (2001).
  2. A. Glezer and M. Amitay, Synthetic jets, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 503 (2002).
  3. R. Raju, R. Mittal, and L. Cattafesta, Dynamics of airfoil separation control using zero-net mass-flux forcing, AIAA J. 46, 3103 (2008).
  4. J. Agashe, D. Arnold, and L. Cattafesta, Development of Compact Electrodynamic Zero-Net Mass-Flux Actuators (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2009).
  5. A. Glezer and T. M. Crittenden, Combustion-driven jet actuator (2003), US Patent 6,554,607.
  6. A. Cutler, B. Beck, J. Wilkes, J. Drummond, D. Alderfer, and P. Danehy, Development of a Pulsed Combustion Actuator for High-Speed Flow Control (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2012).
  7. T. M. Crittenden and S. Raghu, Combustion powered actuator with integrated high frequency oscillator, Int. J. Flow Contr. 1, 87 (2009).
  8. T. C. Corke, M. L. Post, and D. M. Orlov, SDBD plasma enhanced aerodynamics: Concepts, optimization and applications, Progr. Aerospace Sci. 43, 193 (2007).
  9. T. C. Corke, C. L. Enloe, and S. P. Wilkinson, Dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for flow control, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 505 (2010).
  10. E. Moreau, Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators, J. Phys. D 40, 605 (2007).
  11. D. Munday and J. Jacob, Active control of separation on a wing with oscillating camber, J. Aircraft 39, 187 (2002).
  12. G. R. Jones, M. J. Santer, G. Papadakis, and M. T. Debiasi, Active Flow Control at Low Reynolds Numbers by Periodic Airfoil Morphing (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2016).
  13. G. Jones, M. Santer, and G. Papadakis, Control of low Reynolds number flow around an airfoil using periodic surface morphing: A numerical study, J. Fluids Struct. 76, 95 (2018).
  14. P. J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, J. Fluid Mech. 656, 5 (2010).
  15. C. W. Rowley, I. Mezic, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Henningson, Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 641, 115 (2009).
  16. A. Akbarzadeh and I. Borazjani, A Numerical Study on Controlling Flow Separation via Surface Morphing in the form of Backward Traveling Waves (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2019).
  17. A. Akbarzadeh and I. Borazjani, Reducing flow separation of an inclined plate via travelling waves, J. Fluid Mech. 880, 831 (2019).
  18. A. Akbarzadeh and I. Borazjani, Controlling flow separation on a thick airfoil using backward traveling waves, AIAA J. 58, 3799 (2020).
  19. A. Akbarzadeh, I. Borazjani, and U. Ogunka, The Role of Amplitude on Controlling Flow Separation Using Traveling Wave Morphing (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2021).
  20. R. Nakanishi, H. Mamori, and K. Fukagata, Relaminarization of turbulent channel flow using traveling wave-like wall deformation, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 35, 152 (2012).
  21. H. Mamori, K. Iwamoto, and A. Murata, Effect of the parameters of traveling waves created by blowing and suction on the relaminarization phenomena in fully developed turbulent channel flow, Phys. Fluids 26, 015101 (2014).
  22. T. Min, S. M. Kang, J. L. Speyer, and J. Kim, Sustained sub-laminar drag in a fully developed channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 558, 309 (2006).
  23. A. M. Akbarzadeh and I. Borazjani, Large eddy simulations of a turbulent channel flow with a deforming wall undergoing high steepness traveling waves, Phys. Fluids 31, 125107 (2019).
  24. W. Kang, P. Lei, J. Zhang, and M. Xu, Effects of local oscillation of airfoil surface on lift enhancement at low reynolds number, J. Fluids Struct. 57, 49 (2015).
  25. J. M. Wiltse and A. Glezer, Manipulation of free shear flows using piezoelectric actuators, J. Fluid Mech. 249, 261 (1993).
  26. A. Seifert, S. Eliahu, D. Greenblatt, and I. Wygnanski, Use of piezoelectric actuators for airfoil separation control, AIAA J. 36, 1535 (1998).
  27. W.-P. Jeon and R. F. Blackwelder, Perturbations in the wall region using flush mounted piezoceramic actuators, Exp. Fluids 28, 485 (2000).
  28. L. N. Cattafesta III and M. Sheplak, Actuators for active flow control, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 247 (2011).
  29. P.-F. Lei, J.-Z. Zhang, W. Kang, S. Ren, and L. Wang, Unsteady flow separation and high performance of airfoil with local flexible structure at low reynolds number, Commun. Comput. Phys. 16, 699 (2014).
  30. O. M. Curet, A. Carrere, R. Waldman, and K. S. Breuer, Aerodynamic characterization of a wing membrane with variable compliance, AIAA J. 52, 1749 (2014).
  31. M. I. Hussein, S. Biringen, O. R. Bilal, and A. Kucala, Flow stabilization by subsurface phonons, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 471, 20140928 (2015).
  32. J. R. Bohnker and K. S. Breuer, Control of separated flow using actuated compliant membrane wings, AIAA J. 57, 3801 (2019).
  33. C. J. Barnes, C. L. Willey, K. Rosenberg, A. Medina, and A. T. Juhl, Initial Computational Investigation Toward Passive Transition Delay Using a Phononic Subsurface (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2021).
  34. T. Colonius and K. Taira, A fast immersed boundary method using a nullspace approach and multi-domain far-field boundary conditions, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197, 2131 (2008).
  35. D. Barkley, Linear analysis of the cylinder wake mean flow, Europhys. Lett. 75, 750 (2006).
  36. J. D. Eldredge and A. R. Jones, Leading-edge vortices: Mechanics and modeling, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 75 (2019).
  37. M. H. Dickinson and K. G. Gotz, Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low reynolds numbers, J. Exp. Biol. 174, 45 (1993).
  38. D. Sipp, Open-loop control of cavity oscillations with harmonic forcings, J. Fluid Mech. 708, 439 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation