Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of finite Reynolds number on self-similar crossing statistics and fractal measurements in turbulence

Michael Heisel*

  • Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California in Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA

  • *heisel@ucla.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 014604 – Published 18 January, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.014604

Abstract

Stochastic simulations are used to create synthetic one-dimensional telegraph approximation (TA) signals based on turbulent zero crossings, where the interval between crossings is governed by a power-law probability distribution with exponent α. The power-law exponent is determined for statistics of simulated TA signals, namely, the box-counting fractal dimension D1, the energy spectrum exponent βTA, and the intermittency exponent μTA. For the binary TA signal with no variability in amplitude, the parameters are related linearly as D1=2βTA=1μTA. The relations are unchanged if the crossing interval distribution has a finite power-law region (i.e., inertial subrange) representing a flow with a finite Reynolds number. However, the finite distribution yields statistics that are not truly scale invariant and distorts the linear relation between the statistic exponents and α. The behavior is due to finite-size effects apparent from the survival function, or the complementary cumulative distribution, which for finite Reynolds number is only approximately self-similar and has an effective exponent differing from α. An expression presented for the effective exponent recovers the expected relations between α and the TA statistics. The findings demonstrate how a finite Reynolds number can affect indicators of self-similarity, fractality, and intermittency observed from single-point measurements.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. A. N. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 301 (1941).
  2. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows, 1st ed. (Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 2000).
  3. E. W. Montroll and G. H. Weiss, Random walks on lattices. II, J. Math. Phys. 6, 167 (1965).
  4. M. E. J. Newman, Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law, Contemp. Phys. 46, 323 (2007).
  5. B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, 1st ed. (Freeman and Company, New York, 1982).
  6. R. F. Voss, Random fractal forgeries, in Fundamental Algorithms for Computer Graphics, edited by R. A. Earnshaw (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985), pp. 805–835.
  7. P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of the 1/f Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987).
  8. P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Self-organized criticality, Phys. Rev. A 38, 364 (1988).
  9. H. J. Jensen, Self-Organized Criticality: Emergent Complex Behavior in Physical and Biological Systems (Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1998).
  10. B. B. Mandelbrot, Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier, J. Fluid Mech. 62, 331 (1974).
  11. K. R. Sreenivasan, Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 539 (1991).
  12. P. L. Miller and P. E. Dimotakis, Stochastic geometric properties of scalar interfaces in turbulent jets, Phys. Fluids 3, 168 (1991).
  13. A. A. Praskovsky, J. F. Foss, S. J. Kleis, and M. Y. Karyakin, Fractal properties of isovelocity surfaces in high Reynolds number laboratory shear flows, Phys. Fluids A 5, 2038 (1993).
  14. H. J. Catrakis and P. Dimotakis, Mixing in turbulent jets: Scalar measures and isosurface geometry, J. Fluid Mech. 317, 369 (1996).
  15. E. Villermaux and C. Innocenti, On the geometry of turbulent mixing, J. Fluid Mech. 393, 123 (1999).
  16. K. P. Iyer, J. Schumacher, K. R. Sreenivasan, and P. K. Yeung, Fractal iso-level sets in high-Reynolds-number scalar turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 044501 (2020).
  17. G. Pickering, J. M. Bull, and D. J. Sanderson, Sampling power-law distributions, Tectonophysics 248, 1 (1995).
  18. S. M. Burroughs and S. F. Tebbens, Upper-truncated power laws in natural systems, Pure Appl. Geophys. 158, 741 (2001).
  19. H. J. Catrakis and P. E. Dimotakis, Scale Distributions and Fractal Dimensions in Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3795 (1996).
  20. H. J. Catrakis, Distribution of scales in turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 62, 564 (2000).
  21. H. W. Liepmann, Application of a theorem on the zeros of stochastic functions to turbulence measurements, Helv. Phys. Acta 22, 119 (1949).
  22. K. R. Sreenivasan, A. Prabhu, and R. Narasimha, Zero-crossings in turbulent signals, J. Fluid Mech. 137, 251 (1983).
  23. P. Kailasnath and K. R. Sreenivasan, Zero crossings of velocity fluctuations in turbulent boundary layers, Phys. Fluids 5, 2879 (1993).
  24. A. Bershadskii, J. J. Niemela, A. Praskovsky, and K. R. Sreenivasan, “Clusterization” and intermittency of temperature fluctuations in turbulent convection, Phys. Rev. E 69, 056314 (2004).
  25. D. Cava, G. G. Katul, A. Molini, and C. Elefante, The role of surface characteristics on intermittency and zero-crossing properties of atmospheric turbulence, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 117, D01104 (2012).
  26. P. Perlekar, S. S. Ray, D. Mitra, and R. Pandit, Persistence Problem in Two-Dimensional Fluid Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 054501 (2011).
  27. M. Chamecki, Persistence of velocity fluctuations in non-Gaussian turbulence within and above plant canopies, Phys. Fluids 25, 115110 (2013).
  28. S. Chowdhuri, T. Kalmár-Nagy, and T. Banerjee, Persistence analysis of velocity and temperature fluctuations in convective surface layer turbulence, Phys. Fluids 32, 076601 (2020).
  29. K. R. Sreenivasan and A. Bershadskii, Clustering properties in turbulent signals, J. Stat. Phys. 125, 1141 (2006).
  30. K. Y. Huang, G. G. Katul, and M. Hultmark, Velocity and temperature dissimilarity in the surface layer uncovered by the telegraph approximation, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 180, 385 (2021).
  31. M. Heisel, G. G. Katul, M. Chamecki, and M. Guala, Velocity asymmetry and turbulent transport closure in smooth- and rough-wall boundary layers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 104605 (2020).
  32. M. A. Badri Narayanan, S. Rajagopalan, and R. Narasimha, Experiments on the fine structure of turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 80, 237 (1977).
  33. R. Perline, Strong, weak and false inverse power laws, Stat. Sci. 20, 68 (2005).
  34. S. G. Saddoughi and S. V. Veeravalli, Local isotropy in turbulent boundary layers at high Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 268, 333 (1994).
  35. D. A. Russell, J. D. Hanson, and E. Ott, Dimension of Strange Attractors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1175 (1980).
  36. J. Theiler, Estimating fractal dimension, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1055 (1990).
  37. A. M. Obukhov, Some specific features of atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 13, 77 (1962).
  38. A. S. Monin and A. M. Yaglom, Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence, 1st ed. (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1975), Vol. II.
  39. K. R. Sreenivasan and R. A. Antonia, The phenomenology of small-scale turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 435 (1997).
  40. U. Frisch, P.-L. Sulem, and M. Nelkin, A simple dynamical model of intermittent fully developed turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 87, 719 (1978).
  41. H. G. E. Hentschel and I. Procaccia, The infinite number of generalized dimensions of fractals and strange attractors, Phys. D (Amsterdam, Neth.) 8, 435 (1983).
  42. B. B. Mandelbrot, Information theory and psycholinguistics, in Scientific Psychology: Principles and Approaches, edited by B. B. Wolman and E. Nagel (Basic Books, New York, 1965), pp. 550–562.
  43. P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Characterization of Strange Attractors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 346 (1983).
  44. J. Laherrère and D. Sornette, Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales, Eur. Phys. J. B 2, 525 (1998).
  45. T. Higuchi, Relationship between the fractal dimension and the power law index for a time series: A numerical investigation, Phys. D (Amsterdam, Neth.) 46, 254 (1990).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation