- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Helical turbulent nonlinear dynamo at large magnetic Reynolds numbers

F. Rincon*

  • CNRS, IRAP, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France and Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP: Toulouse, France

  • *francois.rincon@irap.omp.eu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, L121701 – Published 20 December, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.L121701

Abstract

The excitation and further sustenance of large-scale magnetic fields in rotating astrophysical systems, including planets, stars, and galaxies, is generally thought to involve a fluid magnetic dynamo effect driven by helical magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. While this scenario is appealing on general grounds, it, however, currently remains largely unconstrained, notably because a fundamental understanding of the nonlinear asymptotic behavior of large-scale fluid magnetism in the astrophysically relevant but treacherous regime of large magnetic Reynolds number Rm is still lacking. We explore this problem using local high-resolution simulations of turbulent magnetohydrodynamics driven by an inhomogeneous helical forcing generating a sinusoidal profile of kinetic helicity, mimicking the hemispheric distribution of kinetic helicity in rotating turbulent fluid bodies. We identify a transition at large Rm to a nonlinear state, followed up to Rm≃3×103, consisting of strong, saturated small-scale magnetohydrodynamic turbulence and a weaker, traveling coherent large-scale field oscillation. This state is characterized by an asymptotically small resistive dissipation of magnetic helicity, by its spatial redistribution across the equator through turbulent fluxes driven by the hemispheric distribution of kinetic helicity, and by the tentative presence in the tangled dynamical magnetic field of plasmoids typical of reconnection at large Rm.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. H. K. Moffatt, Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978).
  2. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory, Phys. Rep. 417, 1 (2005).
  3. A. Shukurov, Galactic dynamos, in Mathematical Aspects of Natural Dynamos, edited by E. Dormy and A. M. Soward (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2007), p. 313.
  4. P. H. Roberts and E. M. King, On the genesis of the Earth's magnetism, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 096801 (2013).
  5. P. Charbonneau, Solar dynamo theory, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 251 (2014).
  6. A. S. Brun and M. K. Browning, Magnetism, dynamo action and the solar-stellar connection, Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 14, 4 (2017).
  7. F. Rincon, Dynamo theories, J. Plasma Phys. 85, 205850401 (2019).
  8. M. Steenbeck, F. Krause, and K.-H. Rädler, A calculation of the mean electromotive force in an electrically conducting fluid in turbulent motion, under the influence of Coriolis forces, Z. Naturforschung 21a, 369 (1966), English translation: P. H. Roberts, and M. Stix, report NCAR-TN/IA-60, p. 29 (1971).
  9. K. H. Rädler, On the electrodynamics of turbulent fields under the influence of Coriolis forces, Monatsber. Dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 11, 194 (1969), English translation: P. H. Roberts, and M. Stix, report NCAR-TN/IA-60, p. 291 (1971).
  10. K. H. Rädler, A new turbulent dynamo. I., Monatsber. Dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 11, 272 (1969), English translation: P. H. Roberts, and M. Stix, report NCAR-TN/IA-60, p. 301 (1971).
  11. H. K. Moffatt and M. R. E. Proctor, The role of the helicity spectrum function in turbulent dynamo theory, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 21, 265 (1982).
  12. E. N. Parker, Hydromagnetic dynamo models., Astrophys. J. 122, 293 (1955).
  13. H. K. Moffatt, Turbulent dynamo action at low magnetic Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 435 (1970).
  14. F. Krause and K. H. Rädler, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980).
  15. M. Meneguzzi, U. Frisch, and A. Pouquet, Helical and Nonhelical Turbulent Dynamos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1060 (1981).
  16. A. Brandenburg, The inverse cascade and nonlinear alpha-effect in simulations of isotropic helical hydromagnetic turbulence, Astrophys. J. 550, 824 (2001).
  17. A. Brandenburg, Simulations of galactic dynamos, in Magnetic Fields in Diffuse Media, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 407, edited by A. Lazarian, E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, and C. Melioli (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015), p. 529.
  18. A. P. Kazantsev, Enhancement of a magnetic field by a conducting fluid, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 53, 1806 (1967) [Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 1031 (1968)].
  19. Y. B. Zel'dovich, A. A. Ruzmaikin, S. A. Molchanov, and D. D. Sokolov, Kinematic dynamo problem in a linear velocity field, J. Fluid Mech. 144, 1 (1984).
  20. A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, S. F. Taylor, J. L. Maron, and J. C. McWilliams, Simulations of the small-scale turbulent dynamo, Astrophys. J. 612, 276 (2004).
  21. Nils Erland L. Haugen, A. Brandenburg, and W. Dobler, Simulations of nonhelical hydromagnetic turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 70, 016308 (2004).
  22. A. B. Iskakov, A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, J. C. McWilliams, and M. R. E. Proctor, Numerical Demonstration of Fluctuation Dynamo at Low Magnetic Prandtl Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 208501 (2007).
  23. R. M. Kulsrud and S. W. Anderson, The spectrum of random magnetic fields in the mean field dynamo theory of the galactic magnetic field, Astrophys. J. 396, 606 (1992).
  24. S. Boldyrev, A solvable model for nonlinear mean field dynamo, Astrophys. J. 562, 1081 (2001).
  25. S. Boldyrev, F. Cattaneo, and R. Rosner, Magnetic-Field Generation in Helical Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 255001 (2005).
  26. F. Cattaneo and D. W. Hughes, Nonlinear saturation of the turbulent α effect, Phys. Rev. E 54, R4532 (1996).
  27. A. H. Boozer, Magnetic helicity and dynamos, Phys. Fluids B 5, 2271 (1993).
  28. P. Bhat, K. Subramanian, and A. Brandenburg, A unified large/small-scale dynamo in helical turbulence, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 240 (2016).
  29. P. Bhat, Saturation of large-scale dynamo in anisotropically forced turbulence, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 2249 (2022).
  30. N. F. Loureiro, A. A. Schekochihin, and S. C. Cowley, Instability of current sheets and formation of plasmoid chains, Phys. Plasmas 14, 100703 (2007).
  31. D. A. Uzdensky, N. F. Loureiro, and A. A. Schekochihin, Fast Magnetic Reconnection in the Plasmoid-Dominated Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 235002 (2010).
  32. C. Dong, L. Wang, Y.-M. Huang, L. Comisso, and A. Bhattacharjee, Role of the Plasmoid Instability in Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 165101 (2018).
  33. G. L. Eyink, A. Lazarian, and E. T. Vishniac, Fast magnetic reconnection and spontaneous stochasticity, Astrophys. J. 743, 51 (2011).
  34. G. L. Eyink, Stochastic flux freezing and magnetic dynamo, Phys. Rev. E 83, 056405 (2011).
  35. H. K. Moffatt, Magnetic relaxation and the Taylor conjecture, J. Plasma Phys. 81, 905810608 (2015).
  36. H. K. Moffatt, Helicity and celestial magnetism, Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20160183 (2016).
  37. F. Cattaneo, G. Bodo, and S. M. Tobias, On magnetic helicity generation and transport in a nonlinear dynamo driven by a helical flow, J. Plasma Phys. 86, 905860408 (2020).
  38. A. A. Schekochihin, MHD turbulence: A biased review, arXiv:2010.00699.
  39. H. Ji, Turbulent Dynamos and Magnetic Helicity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3198 (1999).
  40. E. G. Blackman and G. B. Field, Constraints on the magnitude of α in dynamo theory, Astrophys. J. 534, 984 (2000).
  41. N. Kleeorin, D. Moss, I. Rogachevskii, and D. D. Sokoloff, Helicity balance and steady-state strength of the dynamo generated galactic magnetic field, Astron. Astrophys. 361, L5 (2000).
  42. H. Ji and S. C. Prager, The α dynamo effects in laboratory plasmas, Magnetohydrodynamics 38, 191 (2002).
  43. E. T. Vishniac and J. Cho, Magnetic helicity conservation and astrophysical dynamos, Astrophys. J. 550, 752 (2001).
  44. A. Brandenburg, W. Dobler, and K. Subramanian, Magnetic helicity in stellar dynamos: New numerical experiments, Astron. Nachr. 323, 99 (2002).
  45. A. Hubbard and A. Brandenburg, Magnetic helicity flux in the presence of shear, Astrophys. J. 727, 11 (2011).
  46. A. Hubbard and A. Brandenburg, Catastrophic quenching in αΩ dynamos revisited, Astrophys. J. 748, 51 (2012).
  47. A. Brandenburg, Magnetic helicity and fluxes in an inhomogeneous alpha squared dynamo, Astron. Nachr. 339, 631 (2019).
  48. A. Brandenburg and W. Dobler, Large scale dynamos with helicity loss through boundaries, Astron. Astrophys. 369, 329 (2001).
  49. D. Mitra, D. Moss, R. Tavakol, and A. Brandenburg, Alleviating α quenching by solar wind and meridional flows, Astron. Astrophys. 526, A138 (2011).
  50. F. Del Sordo, G. Guerrero, and A. Brandenburg, Turbulent dynamos with advective magnetic helicity flux, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 429, 1686 (2013).
  51. A. Brandenburg, The inverse cascade in turbulent dynamos, in Dynamo and Dynamics, a Mathematical Challenge (Springer, Berlin, 2001), p. 125.
  52. D. Mitra, R. Tavakol, P. J. Käpylä, and A. Brandenburg, Oscillatory migrating magnetic fields in helical turbulence in spherical domains, Astrophys. J. Lett. 719, L1 (2010).
  53. D. Mitra, S. Candelaresi, P. Chatterjee, R. Tavakol, and A. Brandenburg, Equatorial magnetic helicity flux in simulations with different gauges, Astron. Nachr. 331, 130 (2010).
  54. R. Arlt and A. Brandenburg, Search for non-helical disc dynamos in simulations, Astron. Astrophys. 380, 359 (2001).
  55. G. Lesur and P.-Y. Longaretti, Impact of dimensionless numbers on the efficiency of magnetorotational instability induced turbulent transport, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 378, 1471 (2007).
  56. D. J. Galloway and M. R. E. Proctor, Numerical calculations of fast dynamos in smooth velocity fields with realistic diffusion, Nature (London) 356, 691 (1992).
  57. S. M. Tobias and F. Cattaneo, Shear-driven dynamo waves at high magnetic Reynolds number, Nature (London) 497, 463 (2013).
  58. A. Brandenburg, S. Candelaresi, and P. Chatterjee, Small-scale magnetic helicity losses from a mean-field dynamo, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1414 (2009).
  59. D. N. Hosking, A. A. Schekochihin, and S. A. Balbus, Elasticity of tangled magnetic fields, J. Plasma Phys. 86, 905860511 (2020).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, L121701– Published 20 December, 2021
  • Received 30 August 2021
  • Accepted 29 November 2021
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2021 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation