Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Subgrid-scale pressure field of scale-enriched large eddy simulations using Gabor modes

Ryan D. Hass

Aditya S. Ghate

Sanjiva K. Lele

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

  • Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 124607 – Published 30 December, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.124607

Abstract

With the continuing progress in large eddy simulations (LES), and ever increasing computational resources, it is currently possible to numerically solve the time-dependent and anisotropic large scales of turbulence in a wide variety of flows. For some applications this large-scale resolution is satisfactory. However, a wide range of engineering problems involve flows at very large Reynolds numbers where the subgrid-scale dynamics of a practical LES are critically important to design and yet are out of reach given the computational demands of solving the Navier Stokes equations; this difficulty is particularly relevant in wall-bounded turbulence where even the large scales are often below the implied filter width of modest cost wall modeled LES. In this paper we briefly introduce a scale enrichment procedure which leverages spatially and spectrally localized Gabor modes. The method provides a physically consistent description of the small-scale velocity field without solving the full nonlinear equations. The enrichment procedure is appraised against its ability to predict small-scale contributions to the pressure field. We find that the method accurately extrapolates the pressure spectrum and recovers pressure variance of the full field remarkably well when compared to a computationally expensive, highly resolved LES. The analysis is conducted both in a priori and a posteriori settings for the case of homogeneous isotropic turbulence.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (22)

  1. A. S. Ghate, Gabor mode enrichment in large eddy simulation of turbulent flows, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2018.
  2. J. Slotnick, A. Khodadoust, J. Alonso, D. Darmofal, W. Gropp, E. Lurie, and D. Mavriplis, CFD vision 2030 study: A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences, Technical Report NASA CR-2014-218178 (2014).
  3. A. S. Ghate, J. A. Housman, G.-D. Stich, G. Kenway, and C. C. Kiris, Scale resolving simulations of the nasa juncture flow model using the lava solver, in Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum (AIAA, 2020) p. 2735.
  4. P. R. Spalart, Philosophies and fallacies in turbulence modeling, Progr. Aerosp. Sci. 74, 1 (2015).
  5. A. S. Ghate and S. K. Lele, Subfilter-scale enrichment of planetary boundary layer large eddy simulation using discrete fourier-gabor modes, J. Fluid Mech. 819, 494 (2017).
  6. G. K. Batchelor, The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1953).
  7. A. Ghate, A. Towne, and S. Lele, Broadband reconstruction of inhomogeneous turbulence using spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and gabor modes, J. Fluid Mech. 888, R1 (2020).
  8. J. C. H. Fung, J. C. Hunt, N. Malik, and R. Perkins, Kinematic simulation of homogeneous turbulence by unsteady random fourier modes, J. Fluid Mech. 236, 281 (1992).
  9. J. Mann, The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 273, 141 (1994).
  10. A. S. Ghate and S. K. Lele, Gabor mode enrichment in large eddy simulations of turbulent flow, J. Fluid Mech. 903, A13 (2020).
  11. G. He, G. Jin, and Y. Yang, Space-time correlations and dynamic coupling in turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 51 (2017).
  12. F. Nicoud, H. B. Toda, O. Cabrit, S. Bose, and J. Lee, Using singular values to build a subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulations, Phys. Fluids 23, 085106 (2011).
  13. D. Carati, S. Ghosal, and P. Moin, On the representation of backscatter in dynamic localization models, Phys. Fluids 7, 606 (1995).
  14. T. Gotoh and D. Fukayama, Pressure Spectrum in Homogeneous Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3775 (2001).
  15. A. S. Monin and A. M. Yaglom, Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence, Vol. 2 (Courier Corporation, New York, 2013).
  16. W. K. George, P. D. Beuther, and R. E. Arndt, Pressure spectra in turbulent free shear flows, J. Fluid Mech 148, 155 (1984).
  17. The pressure gradient is here represented as only the y derivative of pressure. This being isotropic turbulence the other components are indistinguishable.
  18. It should be noted that the extremely large improvement in pressure variance is a bit misleading since these are instantaneous quantities and change from time step to time step. That said, the pressure is well represented by the LES and it is the pressure derivative that benefits the most from the enrichment procedure. This is evident by visually comparing the PDFs in Figs. 15 and 16.
  19. G. I. Park and P. Moin, Space-time characteristics of wall-pressure and wall shear-stress fluctuations in wall-modeled large eddy simulation, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 024404 (2016).
  20. S. T. Bose and G. I. Park, Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for complex turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 535 (2018).
  21. J. Towns, T. Cockerill, M. Dahan, I. Foster, K. Gaither, A. Grimshaw, V. Hazlewood, S. Lathrop, D. Lifka, G. D. Peterson, R. Roskies, J. Scott, and N. Wilkins-Diehr, XSEDE accelerating scientific discovery, Comput. Sc. Eng. 16, 62 (2014).
  22. S. B. Pope, Turbulent flows (Cambridge university press, 2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation