- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Generalized Newtonian fluid flow in porous media

Christopher A. Bowers* and Cass T. Miller

  • Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA

  • *bowersca@live.unc.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 123302 – Published 6 December, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.123302

Abstract

Single-fluid-phase porous medium systems are typically modeled at an averaged length scale termed the macroscale, and Darcy's law is typically relied upon as an approximation of the momentum equation under Stokes flow conditions. Standard approaches for modeling macroscale single-fluid-phase flow of generalized Newtonian fluids (GNFs) extend the standard Newtonian model based upon Darcy's law using an effective viscosity and assuming that the intrinsic permeability is invariant with respect to fluid properties. This approach results in a need to perform an experiment for a non-Newtonian fluid, the introduction of effective parameters that are not tied to known microscale physics, and uncertainty regarding the dependencies of the fitted empirical parameter on system properties. We use the thermodynamically constrained averaging theory (TCAT) to examine the formulation and closure of a macroscale model for GNF flow that is consistent with microscale conservation principles and the second law of thermodynamics. A direct connection between microscale and macroscale quantities is used to formulate an expression for interphase momentum transfer for GNF flow in porous medium systems. Darcy's law is shown to approximate momentum transfer from the fluid phase to the solid phase. Momentum transfer is found to depend on the viscosity at the solid surface, which is only invariant for Newtonian flow. TCAT is used to derive a macroscale equation for the hydraulic resistance based on accessible fluid and solid properties. This hydraulic resistance may be used in the same way that hydraulic conductivity is typically used to model flow at the macroscale, and it includes parameters that can be calculated a priori, without the need to carry out microscale simulations, or experiments, for any GNF. The TCAT approach is validated for four model isotropic and anisotropic media and five Cross-model fluids. The traditional shift factor and effective viscosity are related to the newly derived TCAT model, shedding new light on this common empirical approach. The results from this work form a basis for the modeling of GNF flow in porous medium systems under Stokes flow, which is predictive given the rheological properties of the GNF and the resistance observed for Newtonian flow.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (100)

  1. A. Skelland, Non-Newtonian Flow and Heat Transfer (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1967).
  2. F. A. Morrison, Understanding Rheology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2001).
  3. R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart, and E. N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2002).
  4. T. Sochi, Non-Newtonian flow in porous media, Polymer 51, 5007 (2010).
  5. M. M. Cross, Rheology of non-Newtonian fluids: A new flow equation for pseudoplastic systems, J. Colloid Sci. 20, 417 (1965).
  6. D. V. Boger, Demonstration of upper and lower Newtonian fluid behavior in a pseudoplastic fluid, Nature (London) 265, 126 (1977).
  7. V. Subbaraman, R. A. Mashelkar, and J. Ulbrecht, Extrapolation procedures for zero shear viscosity with a falling sphere viscometer, Rheol. Acta 10, 429 (1971).
  8. R. P. Chhabra and P. H. T. Uhlherr, Estimation of zero-shear viscosity of polymer solutions from falling sphere data, Rheol. Acta 18, 593 (1979).
  9. T. Sochi, Analytical solutions for the flow of Carreau and Cross fluids in circular pipes and thin slits, Rheol. Acta 54, 745 (2015).
  10. M. Zhang, M. Prodanovic, M. Mirabolghasemi, and J. Zhao, 3D microscale flow simulation of shear-thinning fluids in a rough fracture, Transp. Porous Media 128, 243 (2019).
  11. S. C. Hauswirth, C. A. Bowers, C. P. Fowler, P. B. Schultz, A. Dye Hauswirth, T. M. Weigand, and C. T. Miller, Modeling cross model non-Newtonian fluid flow in porous media, J. Contam. Hydrol. 235, 103708 (2020).
  12. M. Peyrounette, Y. Davit, M. Quintard, and S. Lorthois, Multiscale modelling of blood flow in cerebral microcirculation: Details at capillary scale control accuracy at the level of the cortex, PLoS One 13, e0189474 (2018).
  13. N. Bessonov, A. Sequira, S. Simakov, Y. Vassilevskii, and V. Volpert, Methods of blood flow modelling, Math. Modell. Nat. Phenom. 11, 1 (2016).
  14. K. Sriram, M. Intaglietta, and D. M. Tartakovksy, Non-Newtonian flow of blood in aterioles: Consequences for wall shear stress measurements, Microcirculation 21, 628 (2014).
  15. S. Chakraborty, Dynamics of capillary flow of blood into a microfluidic channel, Lab Chip 5, 421 (2005).
  16. M. Rabby, A. Razzak, and M. M. Molla, Pulsatile non-Newtonian blood flow through a model of arterial stenosis, Procedia Eng. 56, 225 (2013).
  17. J. A. F. Gerrard, M. F. Perutz, A. Roch, and G. I. Taylor, Measurement of the velocity distribution along a vertical line through a glacier, Proc. R. Soc. A 213, 546 (1952).
  18. C. Ancey and M. Meunier, Estimating bulk rheological properties of flowing snow avalanches from field data, J. Geophys. Res. 109, F01004 (2004).
  19. C. Ancey, Plasticity and geophysical flows: A review, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 142, 4 (2007).
  20. A. C. Barr, R. T. Pappalardo, and S. Zhong, Convective instability in ice I with non-Newtonian rheology: Application to the icy Galilean satellites, J. Geophys. Res. 109, E12008 (2004).
  21. G. Hulme, The interpretation of lava flow morphology, Geophys. J. Int. 39, 361 (1974).
  22. Y. S. Wu, An approximate analytical solution for non-Darcy flow toward a well in fractured media, Water Resour. Res. 38, 1023 (2002).
  23. I. Sonder, B. Zimanowski, and R. Buttner, Non-Newtonian viscosity of basaltic magma, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 (2006).
  24. E. Lev, M. Spiegelman, R. J. Wysocki, and J. A. Karson, Investigating lava flow rheology using video analysis and numerical flow models, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 247-248, 62 (2012).
  25. A. A. Osiptsov, Fluid mechanics of hydraulic fracturing: A review, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 156, 513 (2017).
  26. W. Norman, R. Jasinski, and E. Nelson, Hydraulic fracturing process and compositions, U.S. Patent No. 5,551,516 (1996).
  27. R. Barati and J.-T. Liang, A review of fracturing fluid systems used for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131 (2014).
  28. A. C. Barbati, J. Desroches, A. Robisson, and G. H. McKinley, Complex fluids and hydraulic fracturing, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 7, 415 (2016).
  29. C. Xie, W. Lv, and M. Wang, Shear-thinning or shear-thickening fluid for better EOR? A direct pore-scale study, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 161, 683 (2018).
  30. C. L. Perrin, P. M. J. Tardy, K. S. Sorbie, and J. C. Crawshaw, Experimental and modeling study of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid flow in pore network micromodels, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 295, 542 (2006).
  31. T. C. Buchley and D. L. Lord, What to learn about hydraulic fracturing fluids, Oil Gas J. 71, 84 (1973).
  32. J. Chen and X. Lu, Numerical investigation of the non-Newtonian pulsatile blood flow in a bifurcation model with a nonplanar branch, J. Biomech. 39, 818 (2006).
  33. J. Mejia, R. Mongrain, and O. F. Bertrand, Accurate prediction of wall shear stress in a stented artery: Newtonian versus non-Newtonian models, J. Biomech. Eng. 133, 074501 (2011).
  34. M. I. Billen and G. Hirth, Newtonian versus non-Newtonian upper mantle viscosity: Implications for subduction initiation, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L19304 (2005).
  35. P. R. S. Mendes, Dimensionless non-Newtonian fluid mechanics, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 147, 109 (2007).
  36. R. L. Thompson and E. J. Soares, Viscoplastic dimensionless numbers, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 238, 57 (2016).
  37. P. D. M. Spelt, T. Selerland, C. J. Lawrence, and P. D. Lee, Flows of inelastic non-Newtonian fluids through arrays of aligned cylinders. part 1. creeping flows, J. Eng. Math. 51, 57 (2005).
  38. P. Coussot, Yield stress fluid flows: A review of experimental data, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 211, 31 (2014).
  39. D. Bauer, L. Talon, Y. Peysson, H. B. Ly, G. Batot, T. Chevalier, and M. Fleury, Experimental and numerical determination of Darcy's law for yield stress fluids in porous media, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 063301 (2019).
  40. K. S. Sorbie, P. J. Clifford, and E. R. W. Jones, The rheology of pseudoplastic fluids in porous media using network modeling, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 130, 508 (1989).
  41. T. Tosco, D. L. Marchisio, and F. Lince, Extension of the Darcy-Forchheimer law for shear-thinning fluids and validation via pore-scale flow simulations, Transp. Porous Media 96, 1 (2013).
  42. T. J. Sadowshi and R. B. Bird, Non-Newtonian flow through porous media I. Theoretical, Trans. Soc. Rheol. 9, 243 (1965).
  43. G. Chauveteau, Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores: Influence of pore size on rheological behavior, J. Rheol. 26, 111 (1982).
  44. R. Parnas and Y. Cohen, Power-law fluids in porous media, Chem. Eng. Commun. 53, 3 (1987).
  45. R. E. Hayes, A. Afacan, B. Boulanger, and A. V. Shenoy, Modelling the flow of power law fluids in a packed bed using a volume-averaged equation of motion, Transp. Porous Media 23, 175 (1996).
  46. S. Liu and J. H. Masliyah, Non-linear flows in porous media, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 86, 229 (1999).
  47. A. R. Castro and G. Radilla, Non-Darcian flow of shear-thinning fluids through packed beads: Experiments and predictions using Forchheimer's law and Ergun's equation, Adv. Water Resour. 100, 35 (2017).
  48. S. Berg and J. Wunnik, Shear rate determination from pore-scale flow fields, Transp. Porous Media 117, 229 (2017).
  49. N. Zamani, I. Bondino, R. Kaufmann, and A. Skauge, Computation of polymer in situ rheology using direct numerical simulation, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 159, 92 (2017).
  50. A. R. Castro, Extending Darcy's law to the flow of yield stress fluids in packed beds: Method and experiments, Adv. Water Resour. 126, 55 (2019).
  51. F. Zami-Pierre, R. de Loubens, M. Quintard, and Y. Davit, Transition in the Flow of Power-Law Fluids Through Isotropic Porous Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 074502 (2016).
  52. M. K. Hubbert, Darcy's law and the field equations of the flow of underground fluids, Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. Eng. 207, 222 (1956).
  53. W. G. Gray and K. O'Neill, On the development of Darcy's law for the general equations for flow in porous media, Water Resour. Res. 12, 148 (1976).
  54. S. P. Neuman, Theoretical derivation of Darcy's Law, Acta Mech. 25, 153 (1977).
  55. S. Whitaker, Flow in porous media I: A theoretical derivation of Darcy's law, Transp. Porous Media 1, 3 (1986).
  56. J. M. Nordbotten, M. A. Celia, H. K. Dahle, and S. M. Hassanizadeh, Interpretation of macroscale variables in Darcy's law, Water Resour. Res. 43, W08430 (2007).
  57. W. G. Gray, C. T. Miller, and B. A. Schrefler, Response to comment on “Averaging theory for description of environmental problems: What have we learned?” Adv. Water Resour. 52, 331 (2013).
  58. J. P. Singh, S. Padhy, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, and D. L. Koch, Flow of power-law fluids in fixed beds of cylinders or spheres, J. Fluid Mech. 713, 491 (2012).
  59. W. G. Gray and C. T. Miller, Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 3. Single-fluid-phase flow, Adv. Water Resour. 29, 1745 (2006).
  60. W. G. Gray and C. T. Miller, Introduction to the Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory for Porous Medium Systems (Springer, Switzerland, 2014).
  61. C. T. Miller and W. G. Gray, Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 4. Species transport fundamentals, Adv. Water Resour. 31, 577 (2008).
  62. W. G. Gray and C. T. Miller, Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 5. Single-fluid-phase transport, Adv. Water Resour. 32, 681 (2009).
  63. W. G. Gray and C. T. Miller, Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 7. Single-phase megascale flow models, Adv. Water Resour. 32, 1121 (2009).
  64. A. S. Jackson, C. T. Miller, and W. G. Gray, Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 6. Two-fluid-phase flow, Adv. Water Resour. 32, 779 (2009).
  65. W. G. Gray, A. L. Dye, J. E. McClure, L. J. Pyrak-Nolte, and C. T. Miller, On the dynamics and kinematics of two-fluid-phase flow in porous media, Water Resour. Res. 51, 5365 (2015).
  66. I. V. Rybak, W. G. Gray, and C. T. Miller, Modeling two-fluid-phase flow and species transport in porous media, J. Hydrol. 521, 565 (2015).
  67. C. T. Miller, W. G. Gray, C. E. Kees, I. V. Rybak, and B. J. Shepherd, Modeling sediment transport in three-phase surface water systems, J. Hydraul. Res. 57, 439 (2019).
  68. G. Sciumé, S. E. Shelton, W. G. Gray, C. T. Miller, F. Hussain, M. Ferrari, P. Decuzzi, and B. A. Schrefler, Tumor growth modeling from the perspective of multiphase porous media mechanics, Mol. Cell. Biomech. 9, 193 (2012).
  69. G. Sciumé, S. Shelton, W. G. Gray, C. T. Miller, F. Hussain, M. Ferrari, P. Decuzzi, and B. A. Schrefler, A multiphase model for three-dimensional tumor growth, New J. Phys. 15, 015005 (2013).
  70. C. T. Miller, W. G. Gray, and B. A. Schrefler, A continuum mechanical framework for modeling tumor growth and treatment in two- and three-phase systems, Arch. Appl. Mech. (2021), doi: 10.1007/s00419-021-01891-8.
  71. S. R. Williams and A. P. Philipse, Random packings of spheres and spherocylinders simulated by mechanical contraction, Phys. Rev. E 67, 051301 (2003).
  72. J. Riegel, W. Mayer, and Y. van Havre, Freecad, https://www.freecadweb.org/.
  73. L. S. Caretto, A. D. Gosman, S. V. Patankar, and D. B. Spalding, Two calculation procedures for steady, three-dimensional flows with recirculation, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics, edited by H. Cabannes and R. Temam, Vol. 19 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1973), p. 60.
  74. C. Greenshields, OpenFOAM User Guide version 6 (OpenFOAM Foundation, London, 2018).
  75. U. Ayachit, The ParaView Guide Community Edition (Kitware, New York, NY, 2019).
  76. M. Icardi, G. Boccardo, D. L. Marchisio, T. Tosco, and R. Sethi, Pore-scale simulation of fluid flow and solute dispersion in three-dimensional porous media, Phys. Rev. E 90, 013032 (2014).
  77. C. T. Miller and W. G. Gray, Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 2. Foundation, Adv. Water Resour. 28, 181 (2005).
  78. C. T. Miller, F. J. Valdés-Parada, and B. D. Wood, A pedagogical approach to the thermodynamically constrained averaging theory, Transport Porous Meda 119, 585 (2017).
  79. W. G. Gray and C. T. Miller, TCAT analysis of capillary pressure in nonequilibrium, two-fluid-phase, porous medium systems, Adv. Water Resour. 34, 770 (2011).
  80. W. G. Gray and C. T. Miller, A generalization of averaging theorems for porous medium analysis, Adv. Water Resour. 62, 227 (2013).
  81. W. G. Gray and C. T. Miller, On the algebraic and differential forms of Darcy's equation, J. Porous Media 14, 33 (2011).
  82. J. Bear, Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media (Elsevier, New York, 1972).
  83. G. de Marsily, Quantitative Hydrogeology: Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1986).
  84. C. Pan, M. Hilpert, and C. T. Miller, Pore-scale modeling of saturated permeabilities in random sphere packings, Phys. Rev. E 64, 066702 (2001).
  85. A. Fadili, P. M. J. Tardy, and J. R. A. Pearson, A 3D filtration law for power-law fluids in heterogeneous porous media, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 106, 121 (2002).
  86. L. Orgeas, Z. Idris, C. Geindreau, J.-F. Bloch, and J.-L. Auriault, Modelling the flow of power-law fluids through anisotropic porous media at low-pore Reynolds number, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 4490 (2006).
  87. V. Di Federico, M. Pinelli, and R. Ugarelli, Estimates of effective permeability for non-Newtonian fluid flow in randomly heterogeneous porous media, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 24, 1067 (2010).
  88. J. R. A. Pearson and P. M. J. Tardy, Models for flow of non-Newtonian and complex fluids through porous media, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 102, 447 (2002).
  89. C. N. Basset, M. R. Abou Najm, A. Ammar, R. D. Stewart, S. C. Hauswirth, and G. Saad, Physically based model for extracting dual-permeability parameters using non-Newtonian fluids, Vadose Zone J. 18, 1 (2019).
  90. S. C. Hauswirth, M. R. Abou Najm, and C. T. Miller, Characterization of the pore structure of porous media using non-Newtonian fluids, Water Resources Research 55, 7182 (2019).
  91. H. E. Fayed, N. A. Sheikh, and O. Iliev, On laminar flow of non-Newtonian fluids in porous media, Trans. Porous Media 111, 253 (2016).
  92. N. Kaur, R. Singh, and R. K. Wanchoo, Flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids through packed beds: An experimental study, Trans. Porous Media 90, 655 (2011).
  93. L. Orgéas, C. Geindreau, J. L. Auriault, and J. F. Bloch, Upscaling the flow of generalised Newtonian fluids through anisotropic porous media, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 145, 15 (2007).
  94. J. K. Woods, P. D. M. Spelt, P. D. Lee, T. Selerland, and C. J. Lawrence, Creeping flows of power-law fluids through periodic arrays of elliptical cylinders, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 111, 211 (2003).
  95. L. Patacchini and R. de Loubens, A class of physically stable non-linear models of flow through anisotropic porous media, Trans. Porous Media 97, 409 (2013).
  96. I. Fatt, The network model of porous media: I. Capillary pressure characteristics, Trans. AIME 207, 144 (1956).
  97. S. Erol, S. J. Fowler, V. Harcouet-Menou, and B. Laenen, An analytical model of porosity-permeability for porous and fractured media, Trans. Porous Media 120, 327 (2017).
  98. Q. Xiong, T. G. Baychev, and A. P. Jivkov, Review of pore network modelling of porous media: Experimental characterisations, network constructions and applications to reactive transport, J. Cont. Hydrology 192, 101 (2016).
  99. T. Sweijen, S. M. Hassanizadeh, B. Chareyre, and L. Zhuang, Dynamic pore-scale model of drainage in granular porous media: The pore-unit assembly method, Water Res. Research 54, 4193 (2018).
  100. H. Adloo and B. Abbasi, Some insights into the use of pore network simulations for predicting single-phase fluid flow in model porous media, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 25, 61 (2021).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 123302– Published 6 December, 2021
  • Received 22 November 2019
  • Accepted 15 November 2021
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2021 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation