Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Vortex stretching and enstrophy production in high Reynolds number turbulence

Dhawal Buaria1,2,*, Eberhard Bodenschatz1,3,4, and Alain Pumir5,1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
  • 2Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, New York 11201, USA
  • 3Institute for Nonlinear Dynamics, University of Göttingen, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
  • 4Laboratory of Atomic and Solid-State Physics and Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
  • 5Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique, F-69342 Lyon, France

  • *dhawal.buaria@ds.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 104602 – Published 9 October, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.104602

Abstract

An essential ingredient of turbulent flows is the vortex stretching mechanism, which emanates from the nonlinear interaction of vorticity and strain-rate tensor and leads to formation of extreme events. We analyze the statistical correlations between vorticity and strain rate by using a massive database generated from very well-resolved direct numerical simulations of forced isotropic turbulence in periodic domains. The grid resolution is up to 122883, and the Taylor-scale Reynolds number is in the range 140–1300. In order to understand the formation and structure of extreme vorticity fluctuations, we obtain statistics conditioned on enstrophy (vorticity-squared). The magnitude of strain, as well as its eigenvalues, is approximately constant when conditioned on weak enstrophy; whereas they grow approximately as power laws for strong enstrophy, which become steeper with increasing Rλ. We find that the well-known preferential alignment between vorticity and the intermediate eigenvector of strain tensor is even stronger for large enstrophy, whereas vorticity shows a tendency to be weakly orthogonal to the most extensive eigenvector (for large enstrophy). Yet the dominant contribution to the production of large enstrophy events arises from the most extensive eigendirection, the more so as Rλ increases. Nevertheless, the stretching in intense vorticity regions is significantly depleted, consistent with the kinematic properties of weakly curved tubes in which they are organized. Further analysis reveals that intense enstrophy is primarily depleted via viscous diffusion, though viscous dissipation is also significant. Implications for modeling are nominally addressed as appropriate.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. U. Frisch, Turbulence: The Legacy of Kolmogorov (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  2. K. S. Sreenivasan and R. A. Antonia, The phenomenology of small-scale turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 435 (1997).
  3. C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan, The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation, J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429 (1991).
  4. J. Jiménez, A. A. Wray, P. G. Saffman, and R. S. Rogallo, The structure of intense vorticity in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 255, 65 (1993).
  5. T. Ishihara, T. Gotoh, and Y. Kaneda, Study of high-Reynolds number isotropic turbulence by direct numerical simulations, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 165 (2009).
  6. D. Buaria, A. Pumir, E. Bodenschatz, and P. K. Yeung, Extreme velocity gradients in turbulent flows, New J. Phys. 21, 043004 (2019).
  7. H. Pitsch and H. Steiner, Scalar mixing and dissipation rate in large-eddy simulations of non-premixed turbulent combustion, Proc. Combust. Inst. 28, 41 (2000).
  8. K. R. Sreenivasan, Possible effects of small-scale intermittency in turbulent reacting flows, Flow, Turb. Comb. 72, 115 (2004).
  9. S. Sundaram and L. R. Collins, Collision statistics in an isotropic particle-laden turbulent suspension. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations, J. Fluid Mech. 335, 75 (1997).
  10. G. Falkovich, A. Fouxon, and M. G. Stepanov, Acceleration of rain initiation by cloud turbulence, Nature (London) 419, 151 (2002).
  11. H. Tennekes and J. L. Lumley, A First Course in Turbulence (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972).
  12. J. Jiménez, Intermittency and cascades, J. Fluid Mech. 409, 99 (2000).
  13. M. Carbone and A. D. Bragg, Is vortex stretching the main cause of the turbulent energy cascade? J. Fluid Mech. 883, R2 (2020).
  14. A. Tsinober, An Informal Conceptual Introduction to Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
  15. C. Meneveau, Lagrangian dynamics and models of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 219 (2011).
  16. W. T. Ashurst, A. R. Kerstein, R. M. Kerr, and C. H. Gibson, Alignment of vorticity and scalar gradient with strain rate in simulated Navier-Stokes turbulence, Phys. Fluids 30, 2343 (1987).
  17. O. R. H. Buxton and B. Ganapathisubramani, Amplification of enstrophy in the far field of an axisymmetric turbulent jet, J. Fluid Mech. 651, 483 (2010).
  18. A. Pumir, H. Xu, and E. D. Siggia, Small-scale anisotropy in turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 804, 5 (2016).
  19. Y. Zhou, K. Nagata, Y. Sakai, Y. Ito, and T. Hayase, Enstrophy production and dissipation in developing grid-generated turbulence, Phys. Fluids 28, 025113 (2016).
  20. R. Betchov, An inequality concerning the production of vorticity in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 1, 497 (1956).
  21. T. Ishihara, Y. Kaneda, M. Yokokawa, K. Itakura, and A. Uno, Small-scale statistics in high-resolution direct numerical simulation of turbulence: Reynolds number dependence of one-point velocity gradient statistics, J. Fluid Mech. 592, 335 (2007).
  22. S. B. Pope, Lagrangian PDF methods for turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 23 (1994).
  23. R. C. Y. Mui, D. G. Dommermuth, and E. A. Novikov, Conditionally averaged vorticity field and turbulence modeling, Phys. Rev. E 53, 2355 (1996).
  24. M. Wilczek and R. Friedrich, Dynamical origins for non-Gaussian vorticity distributions in turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. E 80, 016316 (2009).
  25. P. L. Johnson and C. Meneveau, Large-deviation statistics of vorticity stretching in isotropic turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 93, 033118 (2016).
  26. P. K. Yeung, K. R. Sreenivasan, and S. B. Pope, Effects of finite spatial and temporal resolution in direct numerical simulations of incompressible isotropic turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 064603 (2018).
  27. J. Jiménez, Kinematic alignment effects in turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids A 4, 652 (1992).
  28. A. Pumir and E. D. Siggia, Collapsing solutions to the 3D Euler equations, Phys. Fluids A 2, 220 (1990).
  29. V. Eswaran and S. B. Pope, An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence, Comput. Fluids 16, 257 (1988).
  30. R. S. Rogallo, Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence, NASA Tech. Memo 81315 (1981).
  31. G. S. Patterson and S. A. Orszag, Spectral calculations of isotropic turbulence: Efficient removal of aliasing interactions, Phys. Fluids 14, 2538 (1971).
  32. D. Buaria, B. L. Sawford, and P. K. Yeung, Characteristics of backward and forward two-particle relative dispersion in turbulence at different Reynolds numbers, Phys. Fluids 27, 105101 (2015).
  33. D. Buaria and K. R. Sreenivasan, Dissipation range of the energy spectrum in high Reynolds number turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 092601(R) (2020).
  34. D. Buaria, A. Pumir, and E. Bodenschatz, Self-attenuation of extreme events in Navier-Stokes turbulence, arXiv:2009.08370 (2020).
  35. P. K. Yeung, S. B. Pope, A. G. Lamorgese, and D. A. Donzis, Acceleration and dissipation statistics of numerically simulated isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 18, 065103 (2006).
  36. A. Tsinober, E. Kit, and T. Dracos, Experimental investigation of the field of velocity gradients in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 242, 169 (1992).
  37. B. Lüthi, A. Tsinober, and W. Kinzelbach, Lagrangian measurements of vorticity dynamics in turbulent flow, J. Fluid Mech. 528, 87 (2005).
  38. J. M. Wallace and P. V. Vukoslavčević, Measurement of velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 157 (2010).
  39. R. M. Kerr, Higher-order derivative correlations and the alignment of small-scale structures in isotropic numerical turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 153, 31 (1985).
  40. M. Holzner, M. Guala, B. Lüthi, A. Liberzon, N. Nikitin, W. Kinzelbach, and A. Tsinober, Viscous tilting and production of vorticity in homogeneous turbulence, Phys. Fluids 22, 061701 (2010).
  41. Y. Choi, B. G. Kim, and C. Lee, Alignment of velocity and vorticity and the intermittent distribution of helicity in isotropic turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 80, 017301 (2009).
  42. P. E. Hamlington, J. Schumacher, and W. J. A. Dahm, Direct assessment of vorticity alignment with local and nonlocal strain rates in turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 20, 111703 (2008).
  43. K. K. Nomura and G. K. Post, The structure and dynamics of vorticity and rate of strain in incompressible homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 377, 65 (1998).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation