Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Turbulence modulation in particle-laden stationary homogeneous isotropic turbulence using one-dimensional turbulence

Marco Fistler*

Alan Kerstein

David O. Lignell

Michael Oevermann

  • Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg 41296, Sweden

  • Consultant, 72 Lomitas Road, Danville, California 94526, USA

  • Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA

  • Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg 01968, Germany and Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg 41296, Sweden

  • *marco.fistler@chalmers.se

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 044308 – Published 28 April, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.044308

Abstract

Turbulence modulation in particle-laden stationary homogeneous isotropic turbulence is investigated using one-dimensional turbulence (ODT), a low-dimensional stochastic flow simulation model. For this purpose, ODT is extended in two ways. First, a forcing scheme that maintains statistical stationarity is introduced. Unlike direct numerical simulation (DNS) of forced turbulence, the ODT framework accommodates forcing that is not directly coupled to the momentum equation. For given forcing the ODT energy dissipation rate is therefore the same in particle-laden cases as in the corresponding single-phase reference case. Second, previously implemented one-way-coupled particle phenomenology is extended to two-way coupling using the general ODT methodology for flow modulation through interaction with any specified energy and momentum sources and sinks. As in a DNS comparison case for Reλ=70, turbulence modulation is diagnosed primarily on the basis of the fluid-phase kinetic-energy spectrum. Because ODT involves subprocesses with straightforward physical interpretations, the ODT mechanisms of particle-induced turbulence modulation are clearly identified and they are plausibly relevant to particle-laden Navier-Stokes turbulence. ODT results for the ratio of particle-phase and fluid-phase kinetic energies as a function of particle Stokes number and mass loading are reported for the purpose of testing these predictions in the future when these quantities are evaluated experimentally or using DNS.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. K. D. Squires and J. K. Eaton, Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids A 2, 1191 (1990).
  2. M. Boivin, O. Simonin, and K. D. Squires, Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 375, 235 (1998).
  3. A. Ferrante and S. Elghobashi, On the physical mechanisms of two-way coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 15, 315 (2003).
  4. P. Gualtieri, F. Picano, G. Sardina, and C. M. Casciola, Clustering and turbulence modulation in particle-laden shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 715, 134 (2013).
  5. S. Lain and M. Sommerfeld, Turbulence modulation in dispersed two-phase flow laden with solids from a Lagrangian perspective, Intl. J. Heat Fluid Flow 24, 616 (2003).
  6. A. H. Abdelsamie and C. Lee, Decaying versus stationary turbulence in particle-laden isotropic turbulence: Turbulence modulation mechanism, Phys. Fluids 24, 015106 (2012).
  7. G. Mallouppas, W. K. George, and B. G. M. van Wachem, New forcing scheme to sustain particle-laden homogeneous and isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 25, 083304 (2013).
  8. M. Tanaka and D. Teramoto, Modulation of homogeneous shear turbulence laden with finite-size particles, J. Turb. 16, 979 (2015).
  9. M. Uhlmann, An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows, J. Comp. Phys. 209, 448 (2005).
  10. J. K. Eaton, Two-way coupled turbulence simulations of gas-particle flows using point-particle tracking, Intl. J. Multiphase Flow 35, 792 (2009).
  11. J. G. M. Kuerten, Point-particle DNS and LES of particle-laden turbulent flow - a state-of-the-art review, Flow Turb. Comb. 97, 689 (2016).
  12. M. Boivin, O. Simonin, and K. D. Squires, On the prediction of gas-solid flows with two-way coupling using large eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids 12, 2080 (2000).
  13. Y. Xu and S. Subramaniam, A multiscale model for dilute turbulent gas-particle flows based on the equilibration of energy concept, Phys. Fluids 18, 033301 (2006).
  14. O. Simonin, Statistical and Continuum Modeling of Turbulent Reactive Particulate Flows, Lecture Series (von Kármán Institute of Fluid Dynamics, Belgium, 1996).
  15. G. Ahmadi and D. Ma, A thermodynamical formulation for dispersed multiphase turbulent flows. ii. simple shear flows for dense mixtures, Intl. J. Multiphase Flow 16, 323 (1990).
  16. S. Sundaram and L. R. Collins, A numerical study of the modulation of isotropic turbulence by suspended particles, J. Fluid Mech. 379, 105 (1999).
  17. A. M. Ahmed and S. Elghobashi, On the mechanisms of modifying the structure of turbulent homogeneous shear flows by dispersed particles, Phys. Fluids 12, 2906 (2000).
  18. F. Doisneau, M. Arienti, and J. Oefelein, On Multi-Fluid models for spray-resolved LES of reacting jets, Proc. Comb. Instit. 36, 2441 (2017).
  19. V. Eswaran and S. B. Pope, An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence, Comp. Fluids 16, 257 (1988).
  20. J. A. K. Horwitz and A. Mani, Accurate calculation of stokes drag for point-particle tracking in two-way coupled flows, J. Comp. Physics 318, 85 (2016).
  21. S. Sundaram and L. R. Collins, Numerical considerations in simulating a turbulent suspension of finite-volume particles, J. Comp. Physics 124, 337 (1996).
  22. A. R. Kerstein, One-dimensional turbulence: Model formulation and application to homogeneous turbulence, shear flows, and buoyant stratified flows, J. Fluid Mech. 392, 277 (1999).
  23. A. R. Kerstein, W. T. Ashurst, S. Wunsch, and V. Nilsen, One-dimensional turbulence: Vector formulation and application to free shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 447, 85 (2001).
  24. A. Movaghar, M. Linne, M. Oevermann, F. Meiselbach, H. Schmidt, and A. R. Kerstein, Numerical investigation of turbulent-jet primary breakup using one-dimensional turbulence, Intl. J. Multiphase Flow 89, 241 (2017).
  25. A. Movaghar, M. Linne, M. Herrmann, A. Kerstein, and M. Oevermann, Modeling and numerical study of primary breakup under diesel conditions, Intl. J. Multiphase Flow 98, 110 (2017).
  26. J. R. Schmidt, J. O. L. Wendt, and A. R. Kerstein, Non-equilibrium wall deposition of inertial particles in turbulent flow, J. Stat. Phys. 37, 233 (2009).
  27. G. Sun, D. O. Lignell, J. C. Hewson, and R. G. Craig, Particle dispersion in homogeneous turbulence using the one-dimensional turbulence model, Phys. Fluids 26, 103301 (2014).
  28. G. Sun, J. C. Hewson, and D. O. Lignell, Evaluation of stochastic particle dispersion modeling in turbulent round jets, Intl. J. Multiphase Flow 89, 108 (2017).
  29. M. Fistler, A. Kerstein, and M. Oevermann, A new LES subgrid-scale approach for turbulence modulation by droplets, ICLASS 14th Triennial International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Chicago, USA, 2018 (ICLASS, 2018).
  30. D. O. Lignell, V. B. Lansinger, J. Medina, M. Klein, A. Kerstein, H. Schmidt, M. Fistler, and M. Oevermann, One-dimensional turbulence modeling for cylindrical and spherical flows: Model formulation and application, Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn. 32, 495 (2018).
  31. P. Bradshaw and W. A. Woods, An Introduction to Turbulence and its Measurement (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1971).
  32. W. T. Ashurst and A. R. Kerstein, One-dimensional turbulence: Variable density formulation and application to mixing layers, Phys. Fluids 17, 025107 (2005).
  33. R. Clift, J. R. Grace, and M. E. Weber, Bubbles, Drops and Particle (Academic Press, New York, 1978).
  34. S. Elghobashi and G. C. Truesdell, Direct simulation of particle dispersion in a decaying isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 242, 655 (1992).
  35. L. Schiller and A. Naumann, Über die grundlegenden Berechnungen bei der Schwerkraftaufbereitung, Zeitschrift des Verein Deutscher Ingenieure 77, 318 (1933).
  36. S. Elghobashi, On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows, Appl. Sci. Res. 52, 309 (1994).
  37. A. R. Kerstein and S. K. Krueger, Clustering of randomly advected low-inertia particles: A solvable model, Phys. Rev. E 73, 025302(R) (2006).
  38. S. K. Krueger and A. R. Kerstein, An economical model for simulating turbulence enhancement of droplet collisions and coalescence, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sys. 10, 1858 (2018).
  39. A. R. Kerstein, Linear-eddy modeling of turbulent transport. Part 6. Microstructure of diffusive scalar mixing fields, J. Fluid Mech. 231, 361 (1991).
  40. E. Borel, Les probabilités dénombrables et leurs applications arithmétiques, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo 27, 247 (1909).
  41. A. H. Abdelsamie and C. Lee, Decaying versus stationary turbulence in particle-laden isotropic turbulence: Heavy particle statistics modifications, Phys. Fluids 25, 033303 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation