- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Saturation mechanism of the fluctuation dynamo at PrM ≥ 1

Amit Seta1,2,*, Paul J. Bushby2, Anvar Shukurov2, and Toby S. Wood2

  • 1Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2611, Australia
  • 2School of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom

  • *amit.seta@anu.edu.au
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 043702 – Published 21 April, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.043702

Abstract

The presence of magnetic fields in many astrophysical objects is due to dynamo action, whereby a part of the kinetic energy is converted into magnetic energy. A turbulent dynamo that produces magnetic field structures on the same scale as the turbulent flow is known as the fluctuation dynamo. We use numerical simulations to explore the nonlinear, statistically steady state of the fluctuation dynamo in driven turbulence. We demonstrate that as the magnetic field growth saturates, its amplification and diffusion are both affected by the back-reaction of the Lorentz force upon the flow. The amplification of the magnetic field is reduced due to stronger alignment between the velocity field, magnetic field, and electric current density. Furthermore, we confirm that the amplification decreases due to a weaker stretching of the magnetic field lines. The enhancement in diffusion relative to the field line stretching is quantified by a decrease in the computed local value of the magnetic Reynolds number. Using the Minkowski functionals, we quantify the shape of the magnetic structures produced by the dynamo as magnetic filaments and ribbons in both kinematic and saturated dynamos and derive the scalings of the typical length, width, and thickness of the magnetic structures with the magnetic Reynolds number. We show that all three of these magnetic length scales increase as the dynamo saturates. The magnetic intermittency, strong in the kinematic dynamo (where the magnetic field strength grows exponentially), persists in the statistically steady state, but intense magnetic filaments and ribbons are more volume-filling.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (97)

  1. B. M. Gaensler, M. Haverkorn, L. Staveley-Smith, J. M. Dickey, N. M. McClure-Griffiths, J. R. Dickel, and M. Wolleben, The magnetic field of the large magellanic cloud revealed through Faraday rotation, Science 307, 1610 (2005).
  2. A. Fletcher, R. Beck, A. Shukurov, E. M. Berkhuijsen, and C. Horellou, Magnetic fields and spiral arms in the galaxy M51, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, 2396 (2011).
  3. M. Houde, A. Fletcher, R. Beck, R. H. Hildebrand, J. E. Vaillancourt, and J. M. Stil, Characterizing magnetized turbulence in M51, Astrophys. J. 766, 49 (2013).
  4. F. Govoni and L. Feretti, Magnetic fields in clusters of galaxies, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 1549 (2004).
  5. A. A. Schekochihin and S. C. Cowley, Turbulence, magnetic fields, and plasma physics in clusters of galaxies, Phys. Plasmas 13, 056501 (2006).
  6. R. Beck, Magnetic fields in spiral galaxies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 24, 4 (2016).
  7. R. Beck, A. Brandenburg, D. Moss, A. Shukurov, and D. Sokoloff, Galactic magnetism: Recent developments and perspectives, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34, 155 (1996).
  8. L. M. Widrow, Origin of galactic and extragalactic magnetic fields, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 775 (2002).
  9. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory, Phys. Rep. 417, 1 (2005).
  10. R. M. Kulsrud and E. G. Zweibel, On the origin of cosmic magnetic fields, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 046901 (2008).
  11. C. Federrath, Magnetic field amplification in turbulent astrophysical plasmas, J. Plasma Phys. 82, 535820601 (2016).
  12. F. Rincon, Dynamo theories, J. Plasma Phys. 85, 205850401 (2019).
  13. P. Tzeferacos, A. Rigby, A. F. A. Bott, A. R. Bell, R. Bingham, A. Casner, F. Cattaneo, E. M. Churazov, J. Emig, F. Fiuza, C. B. Forest, J. Foster, C. Graziani, J. Katz, M. Koenig, C. K. Li, J. Meinecke, R. Petrasso, H. S. Park, B. A. Remington, J. S. Ross, D. Ryu, D. Ryutov, T. G. White, B. Reville, F. Miniati, A. A. Schekochihin, D. Q. Lamb, D. H. Froula, and G. Gregori, Laboratory evidence of dynamo amplification of magnetic fields in a turbulent plasma, Nat. Commun. 9, 591 (2018).
  14. A. P. Kazantsev, Enhancement of a magnetic field by a conducting fluid, Soviet J. Exper. Theor. Phys. 26, 1031 (1968).
  15. Ya. B. Zel'dovich, A. A. Ruzmaikin, S. A. Molchanov, and D. D. Sokoloff, Kinematic dynamo problem in a linear velocity field, J. Fluid Mech. 144, 1 (1984).
  16. S. Childress and A. D. Gilbert, Stretch, Twist, Fold: The Fast Dynamo, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 37 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1995).
  17. A. Seta, P. Bhat, and K. Subramanian, Saturation of Zeldovich stretch-twist-fold map dynamos, J. Plasma Phys. 81, 395810503 (2015).
  18. A. A. Ruzmaikin, D. D. Sokoloff, and A. M. Shukurov (Eds.), Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 133 (Springer, Berlin, 1988).
  19. R. M. Kulsrud and S. W. Anderson, The spectrum of random magnetic fields in the mean field dynamo theory of the Galactic magnetic field, Astrophys. J. 396, 606 (1992).
  20. A. Shukurov and D. Sokoloff, Astrophysical dynamos, in Les Houches, Session LXXXVIII, Dynamos, Vol. 88, edited by P. Cardin and L. F. Cugliandolo (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 251–299.
  21. R. Pakmor, F. A. Gómez, R. J. J. Grand, F. Marinacci, C. M. Simpson, V. Springel, D. J. R. Campbell, C. S. Frenk, T. Guillet, C. Pfrommer, and S. D. M. White, Magnetic field formation in the Milky Way like disk galaxies of the Auriga project, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, 3185 (2017).
  22. A. H. Minter and S. R. Spangler, Observation of turbulent fluctuations in the interstellar plasma density and magnetic field on spatial scales of 0.01 to 100 parsecs, Astrophys. J. 458, 194 (1996).
  23. A. Seta, Cosmic ray propagation in turbulent galactic magnetic fields, Ph.D. thesis, Newcastle University, 2019.
  24. A. Ruzmaikin, D. Sokoloff, and A. Shukurov, The dynamo origin of magnetic fields in galaxy clusters, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 241, 1 (1989).
  25. K. Subramanian, A. Shukurov, and N. E. L. Haugen, Evolving turbulence and magnetic fields in galaxy clusters, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 366, 1437 (2006).
  26. P. Bhat and K. Subramanian, Fluctuation dynamos and their Faraday rotation signatures, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 429, 2469 (2013).
  27. F. Vazza, G. Brunetti, M. Brüggen, and A. Bonafede, Resolved magnetic dynamo action in the simulated intracluster medium, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 474, 1672 (2018).
  28. F. Cattaneo, On the origin of magnetic fields in the quiet photosphere, Astrophys. J. 515, L39 (1999).
  29. J. Pietarila Graham, R. Cameron, and M. Schüssler, Turbulent small-scale dynamo action in solar surface simulations, Astrophys. J. 714, 1606 (2010).
  30. P. J. Bushby and B. Favier, Mesogranulation and small-scale dynamo action in the quiet Sun, Astron. Astrophys. 562, A72 (2014).
  31. M. Rempel, Numerical simulations of quiet sun magnetism: On the contribution from a small-scale dynamo, Astrophys. J. 789, 132 (2014).
  32. Ya. B. Zeldovich, A. A. Ruzmaikin, and D. D. Sokoloff, The Almighty Chance (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
  33. A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, S. F. Taylor, J. L. Maron, and J. C. McWilliams, Simulations of the small-scale turbulent dynamo, Astrophys. J. 612, 276 (2004).
  34. S. L. Wilkin, C. F. Barenghi, and A. Shukurov, Magnetic Structures Produced by the Small-Scale Dynamo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 134501 (2007).
  35. A. Shukurov, A. P. Snodin, A. Seta, P. J. Bushby, and T. S. Wood, Cosmic rays in intermittent magnetic fields, Astrophys. J. Lett. 839, L16 (2017).
  36. A. Seta, A. Shukurov, T. S. Wood, P. J. Bushby, and A. P. Snodin, Relative distribution of cosmic rays and magnetic fields, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 4544 (2018).
  37. T. A. Enßlin and C. Vogt, Magnetic turbulence in cool cores of galaxy clusters, Astron. Astrophys. 453, 447 (2006).
  38. M. Meneguzzi, U. Frisch, and A. Pouquet, Helical and Nonhelical Turbulent Dynamos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1060 (1981).
  39. Nils Erland L. Haugen, A. Brandenburg, and W. Dobler, Simulations of nonhelical hydromagnetic turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 70, 016308 (2004).
  40. J. Cho and D. Ryu, Characteristic lengths of magnetic field in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Astrophys. J. 705, L90 (2009).
  41. F. Cattaneo and S. M. Tobias, Dynamo properties of the turbulent velocity field of a saturated dynamo, J. Fluid Mech. 621, 205 (2009).
  42. C. Federrath, G. Chabrier, J. Schober, R. Banerjee, R. S. Klessen, and D. R. G. Schleicher, Mach Number Dependence of Turbulent Magnetic Field Amplification: Solenoidal Versus Compressive Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 114504 (2011).
  43. B. Favier and P. J. Bushby, Small-scale dynamo action in rotating compressible convection, J. Fluid Mech. 690, 262 (2012).
  44. S. Sur, C. Federrath, D. R. G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee, and R. S. Klessen, Magnetic field amplification during gravitational collapse—Influence of turbulence, rotation, and gravitational compression, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 423, 3148 (2012).
  45. A. Beresnyak, Universal Nonlinear Small-Scale Dynamo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 035002 (2012).
  46. C. Federrath, J. Schober, S. Bovino, and D. R. G. Schleicher, The turbulent dynamo in highly compressible supersonic plasmas, Astrophys. J. 797, L19 (2014).
  47. S. Sur, P. Bhat, and K. Subramanian, Faraday rotation signatures of fluctuation dynamos in young galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, L72 (2018).
  48. S. Boldyrev and F. Cattaneo, Magnetic-Field Generation in Kolmogorov Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 144501 (2004).
  49. A. A. Schekochihin, N. E. L. Haugen, A. Brandenburg, S. C. Cowley, J. L. Maron, and J. C. McWilliams, The onset of a small-scale turbulent dynamo at low magnetic Prandtl numbers, Astrophys. J. 625, L115 (2005).
  50. A. A. Schekochihin, A. B. Iskakov, S. C. Cowley, J. C. McWilliams, M. R. E. Proctor, and T. A. Yousef, Fluctuation dynamo and turbulent induction at low magnetic Prandtl numbers, New J. Phys. 9, 300 (2007).
  51. A. B. Iskakov, A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, J. C. McWilliams, and M. R. E. Proctor, Numerical Demonstration of Fluctuation Dynamo at Low Magnetic Prandtl Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 208501 (2007).
  52. A. Brandenburg, N. E. L. Haugen, Xiang-Yu Li, and K. Subramanian, Varying the forcing scale in low Prandtl number dynamos, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 2827 (2018).
  53. https://github.com/pencil-code.
  54. It is also common to define the hydrodynamic and magnetic Reynolds number with respect to the forcing wave number instead of the driving length scale. Then the Reynolds numbers are smaller by a factor 2π than the values we quote.
  55. P. Bhat and K. Subramanian, Fluctuation dynamo at finite correlation times and the Kazantsev spectrum, Astrophys. J. 791, L34 (2014).
  56. P. Bhat and K. Subramanian, Fluctuation dynamos at finite correlation times using renewing flows, J. Plasma Phys. 81, 395810502 (2015).
  57. A. Vincent and M. Meneguzzi, The spatial structure and statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 225, 1 (1991).
  58. C. Federrath, On the universality of supersonic turbulence, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 1245 (2013).
  59. A. H. Waelkens, A. A. Schekochihin, and T. A. Enßlin, Probing magnetic turbulence by synchrotron polarimetry: Statistics and structure of magnetic fields from Stokes correlators, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1970 (2009).
  60. F. Cattaneo, D. W. Hughes, and E.-J. Kim, Suppression of Chaos in a Simplified Nonlinear Dynamo Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2057 (1996).
  61. Eun-jin Kim, Nonlinear dynamo in a simplified statistical model, Phys. Lett. A 259, 232 (1999).
  62. A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, G. W. Hammett, J. L. Maron, and J. C. McWilliams, A model of nonlinear evolution and saturation of the turbulent MHD dynamo, New J. Phys. 4, 84 (2002).
  63. K. Subramanian, Unified Treatment of Small- and Large-Scale Dynamos in Helical Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2957 (1999).
  64. K. Subramanian, Hyperdiffusion in Nonlinear Large- and Small-Scale Turbulent Dynamos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 245003 (2003).
  65. S. I. Braginskii, Transport processes in a plasma, Rev. Plasma Phys. 1, 205 (1965).
  66. L. Malyshkin and R. M. Kulsrud, Magnetized turbulent dynamos in protogalaxies, Astrophys. J. 571, 619 (2002).
  67. A. Brandenburg, R. L. Jennings, Å. Nordlund, M. Rieutord, R. F. Stein, and I. Tuominen, Magnetic structures in a dynamo simulation, J. Fluid Mech. 306, 325 (1996).
  68. J. Mason, F. Cattaneo, and S. Boldyrev, Dynamic Alignment in Driven Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 255002 (2006).
  69. S. Servidio, W. H. Matthaeus, and P. Dmitruk, Depression of Nonlinearity in Decaying Isotropic MHD Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 095005 (2008).
  70. M. K. Verma, Statistical theory of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: Recent results, Phys. Rep. 401, 229 (2004).
  71. R. Kumar, M. K. Verma, and R. Samtaney, Energy transfers and magnetic energy growth in small-scale dynamo, Europhys. Lett. 104, 54001 (2013).
  72. F. Plunian, R. Stepanov, and P. Frick, Shell models of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Phys. Rep. 523, 1 (2013).
  73. M. K. Verma and R. Kumar, Dynamos at extreme magnetic Prandtl numbers: Insights from shell models, J. Turbul. 17, 1112 (2016).
  74. D. A. St-Onge, M. W. Kunz, J. Squire, and A. A. Schekochihin, Fluctuation dynamo in a weakly collisional plasma, arXiv:2003.09760.
  75. P. H. Roberts, An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics (Longmans, Green, and Co., London, 1967).
  76. H. Minkowski, Volumen und oberfläche, Math. Ann. 57, 447 (1903).
  77. J. Schmalzing, T. Buchert, A. L. Melott, V. Sahni, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and S. F. Shandarin, Disentangling the cosmic web. I. Morphology of isodensity contours, Astrophys. J. 526, 568 (1999).
  78. T. Leung, N. Swaminathan, and P. A. Davidson, Geometry and interaction of structures in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 710, 453 (2012).
  79. V. Zhdankin, S. Boldyrev, J. C. Perez, and S. M. Tobias, Energy dissipation in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: Coherent structures or “nanoflares”? Astrophys. J. 795, 127 (2014).
  80. A. Kapahtia, P. Chingangbam, S. Appleby, and C. Park, A novel probe of ionized bubble shape and size statistics of the epoch of reionization using the contour Minkowski tensor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 011 (2018).
  81. S. Bag, R. Mondal, P. Sarkar, S. Bharadwaj, and V. Sahni, The shape and size distribution of H II regions near the percolation transition, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 1984 (2018).
  82. S. Bag, R. Mondal, P. Sarkar, S. Bharadwaj, T. Roy Choudhury, and V. Sahni, Studying the morphology of HI isodensity surfaces during reionization using Shapefinders and percolation analysis, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 2235 (2019).
  83. J. Schmalzing and K. M. Gorski, Minkowski functionals used in the morphological analysis of cosmic microwave background anisotropy maps, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 297, 355 (1998).
  84. S. Bharadwaj, V. Sahni, B. S. Sathyaprakash, S. F. Shandarin, and C. Yess, Evidence for filamentarity in the Las Campanas Redshift survey, Astrophys. J. 528, 21 (2000).
  85. I. Makarenko, A. Fletcher, and A. Shukurov, 3D morphology of a random field from its 2D cross-section, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, L55 (2015).
  86. P. K. Joby, P. Chingangbam, T. Ghosh, V. Ganesan, and C. D. Ravikumar, Search for anomalous alignments of structures in Planck data using Minkowski tensors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2019, 009 (2019).
  87. M. W. Crofton, On the theory of local probability, applied to straight lines drawn at random in a plane: The methods used being also extended to the proof of certain new theorems in the integral calculus, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London I 158, 181 (1868).
  88. D. Legland, K. Kiêu, and M-F. Devaux, Computation of Minkowski measures on2D and 3D binary images, Image Anal. Stereol. 2, 83 (2011).
  89. V. Sahni, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and S. F. Shandarin, Shapefinders: A new shape diagnostic for large-scale structure, Astrophys. J. Lett. 495, L5 (1998).
  90. K. Subramanian, Can the turbulent galactic dynamo generate large-scale magnetic fields? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 294, 718 (1998).
  91. For PrM>1, fast magnetic reconnection at very high ReM might alter the shape of the structures [12]; see Sec. 6 for further discussion.
  92. G. L. Eyink, Stochastic flux freezing and magnetic dynamo, Phys. Rev. E 83, 056405 (2011).
  93. Nils Erland L. Haugen, A. Brandenburg, and A. J. Mee, Mach number dependence of the onset of dynamo action, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 353, 947 (2004).
  94. A. Brandenburg, Nonlinear small-scale dynamos at low magnetic Prandtl numbers, Astrophys. J. 741, 92 (2011).
  95. G. Sahoo, P. Perlekar, and R. Pandit, Systematics of the magnetic-Prandtl-number dependence of homogeneous, isotropic magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, New J. Phys. 13, 013036 (2011).
  96. François Rincon, F. Califano, A. A. Schekochihin, and F. Valentini, Turbulent dynamo in a collisionless plasma, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 3950 (2016).
  97. D. A. St-Onge and M. W. Kunz, Fluctuation dynamo in a collisionless, weakly magnetized plasma, Astrophys. J. 863, L25 (2018).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 043702– Published 21 April, 2020
  • Received 28 October 2019
  • Accepted 17 March 2020
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2020 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation