Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Total mechanical energy transport lines and attractors in separating turbulent boundary layers

Wen Wu*, Rajat Mittal, and Charles Meneveau

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA

  • *wenwu.cfd@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 012601(R) – Published 23 January, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.012601

Abstract

In order to provide new insights into the energetics of turbulent boundary layer flows with separation, we compute and characterize energy transport lines, which are defined as the lines tangent to the total mechanical energy transport vector field. Separation is induced in a Reθ=490 turbulent boundary layer by imposing two types of transpiration velocity profiles at the top boundary of the computational domain: one with suction and blowing, and the other with suction only. For both separation bubbles, we find that energy transport lines can exhibit attractors, which are a manifestation of local dissipation in the flow. We identify several attracting sets along the bottom wall and attracting spiral nodes inside the separation bubbles and their corresponding basins of attraction. The size and positions of the energy basins of attraction help us understand where the available total mechanical energy is transported to due to the mean flow, and turbulent Reynolds and viscous stresses, before it is fully dissipated. The suction-and-blowing separation bubble leads to slightly smaller losses of total mechanical energy than those for a reference nonseparated boundary layer, while the suction-only case shows larger losses than the nonseparated boundary layer case.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (22)

  1. J. Meyers and C. Meneveau, Flow visualization using momentum and energy transport tubes and applications to turbulent flow in wind farms, J. Fluid Mech. 715, 335 (2013).
  2. S. Kimura and A. Bejan, The “heatline” visualization of convective heat transfer, J. Heat Transfer 105, 916 (1983).
  3. A. Önder and J. Meyers, Modification of vortex dynamics and transport properties of transitional axisymmetric jets using zero-net-mass-flux actuation, Phys. Fluids 26, 075103 (2014).
  4. D. Allaerts and J. Meyers, Gravity waves and wind-farm efficiency in neutral and stable conditions, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 166, 269 (2018).
  5. J. Schröttle, A. Dörnbrack, and U. Schumann, Gravity waves and wind-farm efficiency in neutral and stable conditions, Fluid Dyn. Res. 47, 035508 (2015).
  6. O. Lamberts, P. Chatelain, and Y. Bartosiewicz, New methods for analyzing transport phenomena in supersonic ejectors, Intl. J. Heat Fluid Flow 64, 23 (2017).
  7. Y. Fang, S. Poncet, and Y. Bartosiewicz, Analysis of transport phenomena in a two-phase CO2 supersonic ejector, in Proceedings of the 27th CANCAM (2019).
  8. W. Wu, C. Meneveau, and R. Mittal, Spatio-temporal dynamics of turbulent separation bubbles, J. Fluid Mech. 883, A45 (2020).
  9. Y. Na and P. Moin, Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 374, 379 (1998).
  10. P. R. Spalart and M. K. Strelets, Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble, J. Fluid Mech. 403, 329 (2000).
  11. H. Abe, Reynolds-number dependence of wall-pressure fluctuations in a pressure-induced turbulent separation bubble, J. Fluid Mech. 833, 563 (2017).
  12. W. Wu and U. Piomelli, Effects of surface roughness on a separating turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 841, 552 (2018).
  13. G. N. Coleman, C. L. Rumsey, and P. R. Spalart, Numerical study of turbulent separation bubbles with varying pressure gradient and Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 847, 28 (2018).
  14. T. Lund, X. Wu, and K. Squires, Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially- developing boundary layer simulations, J. Comput. Phys. 140, 233 (1998).
  15. P. R. Spalart, M. Strelets, and A. Travin, Direct numerical simulation of large-eddy-break-up devices in a boundary layer, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 27, 902 (2006).
  16. I. Orlanski, A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows, J. Comput. Phys. 21, 251 (1976).
  17. R. Mittal, H. Dong, M. Bozkurttas, F. Najjar, A. Vargas, and A. von Loebbecke, A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries, J. Comput. Phys. 227, 4825 (2008).
  18. W. Wu, J.-H. Seo, C. Meneveau, and R. Mittal, Response of a laminar separation bubble to forcing with zero-net mass flux jets, in Proceedings of the 2018 Flow Control Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum (AIAA 2018-4018) (AIAA, Atlanta, 2018).
  19. T. A. Zaki, From streaks to spots and on to turbulence: Exploring the dynamics of boundary layer transition, Flow Turb. Combust. 91, 451 (2013).
  20. P. R. Spalart and G. N. Coleman, Numerical study of a separation bubble with heat transfer, Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 16, 169 (1997).
  21. C. Chandrsuda and P. Bradshaw, Turbulence structure of a reattaching mixing layer, J. Fluid Mech. 110, 171 (1981).
  22. H. Abe, Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent boundary layer with separation and reattachment over a range of Reynolds numbers, Fluid Dyn. Res. 51, 011409 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation