- Invited
- Access by Xinjiang University
Horizontal axis wind turbine testing at high Reynolds numbers
Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 110504 – Published 18 November, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.110504
Abstract
Detailed studies of modern large-scale wind turbines represent a significant challenge. The immense length scales characteristic of these machines, in combination with rotational effects, render numerical simulations and conventional wind tunnel tests unfeasible. Field experiments can give us important insight into the aerodynamics and operation, but they are always accompanied by large amounts of uncertainty, due to the changing nature of the inflow and the lack of accurate control of the test conditions. Here, a series of experiments is presented, using an alternative method that enables us to represent and study much of the physics governing the large-scale wind turbines in small-scale models. A specialized, compressed-air wind tunnel is used to achieve dynamic similarity with the field-scale, but under accurately controlled conditions of the laboratory. Power and thrust coefficients are investigated as a function of the Reynolds number up to , at tip speed ratios representative of those typical in the field. A strong Reynolds number dependence is observed in the power coefficient, even at very high Reynolds numbers (well exceeding those occurring in most laboratory studies). We show that for an untripped rotor, the performance reaches a Reynolds number invariant state at , regardless of the tip speed ratio. The same model was also tested with scaled tripping devices, with a height of only , to study the effect of transition on the rotor performance. In the tripped case, the Reynolds number dependence was eliminated for all tested cases, suggesting that the state of the boundary layer is critical for correct predictions of rotor performance.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Collections
This article appears in the following collection:

2019 Invited Papers
Physical Review Fluids publishes a collection of papers associated with the invited talks presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics.
Article Text
References (28)
- J. Cotrell, T. Stehly, J. Johnson, J. O. Roberts, Z. Parker, G. Scott, and D. Heimiller, Analysis of transportation and logistics challenges affecting the deployment of larger wind turbines: Summary of results, Tech. Rep. TP-5000-61063, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, 2014.
- T. G. Herges, D. C. Maniaci, B. T. Naughton, T. Mikkelsen, and M. Sjöholm, High resolution wind turbine wake measurements with a scanning lidar, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 854, 012021 (2017).
- D. Simms, S. Schreck, M. Hand, and L. J. Fingersh, NREL unsteady aerodynamics experiment in the NASA-Ames wind tunnel: A comparison of predictions to measurements, Report TP-500-29494, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, 2001.
- Power Performance of Electricity-Producing Wind Turbines Based on Nacelle Anemometry, Tech. Rep. IEC 61400-12, International Electrotechnical Commission, 2017.
- H. Glauert, Airplane propellers, in Aerodynamic Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1935), pp. 169–360.
- H. A. Madsen, R. Mikkelsen, S. Øye, C. Bak, and J. Johansen, A detailed investigation of the blade element momentum (BEM) model based on analytical and numerical results and proposal for modifications of the BEM model, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 75, 012016 (2007).
- G. A. M. van Kuik, J. Peinke, R. Nijssen, D. Lekou, J. Mann, J. N. Sørensen, C. Ferreira, J. W. van Wingerden, D. Schlipf, P. Gebraad, H. Polinder, A. Abrahamsen, G. J. W. van Bussel, J. D. Sørensen, P. Tavner, C. L. Bottasso, M. Muskulus, D. Matha, H. J. Lindeboom, S. Degraer, O. Kramer, S. Lehnhoff, M. Sonnenschein, P. E. Sørensen, R. W. Künneke, P. E. Morthorst, and K. Skytte, Long-term research challenges in wind energy—a research agenda by the European Academy of Wind Energy, Wind Energ. Sci. 1, 1 (2016).
- L. Vermeer, J. Sørensen, and A. Crespo, Wind turbine wake aerodynamics, Progr. Aerospace Sci. 39, 467 (2003).
- J. Schepers and H. Snel, Model experiments in controlled conditions, Report ENC-E-07-042, ECN, 2007.
- J. G. Schepers, K. Boorsma, A. Bon, C. Kim, and T. Cho, Results from Mexnext: Analysis of detailed aerodynamic measurements on a 4.5 m diameter rotor placed in the large German Dutch Wind tunnel DNW, Tech. Rep. ECN-M-11-034, Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten, NL, 2011.
- S. Schreck, T. Sant, and D. Micallef, Rotational Augmentation Disparities in the MEXICO and UAE Phase VI Experiments, Conference Paper NREL/CP-500-47759 (https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/47759.pdf, 2010).
- J. M. Jiménez, J. J. Allen, and A. Smits, Preliminary velocity measurements in the wake of a submarine model, DLR-Mitteilung No. 3, 1229 (2001).
- J. M. Jiménez, M. Hultmark, and A. J. Smits, The intermediate wake of a body of revolution at high Reynolds numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 659, 516 (2010).
- A. Ashok, T. Van Buren, and A. Smits, Asymmetries in the wake of a submarine model in pitch, J. Fluid Mech. 774, 416 (2015).
- M. Vallikivi, M. Hultmark, and A. J. Smits, Turbulent boundary layer statistics at very high Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 779, 371 (2015).
- M. A. Miller, J. Kiefer, C. Westergaard, and M. Hultmark, Model wind turbines tested at full-scale similarity, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 753, 032018 (2016).
- M. A. Miller, S. Duvvuri, I. Brownstein, M. Lee, J. O. Dabiri, and M. Hultmark, Vertical axis wind turbine experiments at full dynamic similarity, J. Fluid Mech. 844, 707 (2018).
- M. A. Miller, S. Duvvuri, W. D. Kelly, and M. Hultmark, Rotor solidity effects on the performance of vertical-axis wind turbines at high Reynolds numbers, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1037, 052015 (2018).
- M. V. Zagarola, Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 1996.
- R. M. Reynolds, Preliminary results of an investigation of the effects of spinner shape on the characteristics of an NACA D-type cowl behind a three-blade propeller, including the characteristics of the propeller at negative thrust, Tech. Rep. NACA RM A53J02, DTIC Document, 1953.
- M. O. L. Hansen, Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, 3rd ed. (Earthscan, London, UK, 2007), Vol. 17.
- A. L. Braslow and E. C. Knox, Simplified method for determination of critical height of distributed roughness particles for a boundary layer transition at mach numbers from 0 to 5, Tech. Rep. 4363, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley, VA, 1958.
- I. H. Abbott and A. E. Von Doenhoff, Theory of Wing Sections, Including a Summary of Airfoil Data (Courier, New York, NY, 1959).
- M. Drela, in XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils, Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, Lecture Notes in Engineering, Vol. 54, edited by T. J. Mueller (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989).
- S. P. Radzevich and D. W. Dudley, Handbook of Practical Gear Design (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1994).
- J. E. Shigley, R. G. Budynas, and C. R. Mischke, Mechanical Engineering Design (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2004).
- R. F. Mikkelsen, Actuator disk methods applied to wind turbines, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2004.
- A. S. Bahaj, A. F. Molland, J. R. Chaplin, and W. M. J. Batten, Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank, Renew. Energy 32, 407 (2007).