Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Controlling dispersive hydrodynamic wavebreaking in a viscous fluid conduit

Dalton V. Anderson*, Michelle D. Maiden, and Mark A. Hoefer

  • Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA

  • *Also at Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80302, USA.
  • Michelle.Maiden@Colorado.edu
  • hoefer@colorado.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 074804 – Published 17 July, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.074804

Abstract

The driven, cylindrical, free interface between two miscible Stokes fluids with high viscosity contrast have been shown to exhibit dispersive hydrodynamics. A hallmark feature of dispersive hydrodynamic media is the dispersive resolution of wavebreaking that results in a dispersive shock wave. In the context of the viscous fluid conduit system, the present work introduces a simple, practical method to precisely control the location, time, and spatial profile of wavebreaking in dispersive hydrodynamic systems with only boundary control. The method is based on tracking the dispersionless characteristics backward from the desired wavebreaking profile to the boundary. In addition to the generation of approximately steplike Riemann and box problems, the method is generalized to other, approximately piecewise-linear dispersive hydrodynamic profiles, including the triangle wave and N wave. A definition of dispersive hydrodynamic wavebreaking is used to obtain quantitative agreement between the predicted location and time of wavebreaking, viscous fluid conduit experiment, and direct numerical simulations for a range of flow conditions. Observed space-time characteristics also agree with triangle and N-wave predictions. The characteristic boundary control method introduced here enables the experimental investigation of a variety of wavebreaking profiles and is expected to be useful in other dispersive hydrodynamic media. As an application of this approach, soliton fission from a large, boxlike disturbance is observed both experimentally and numerically, motivating future analytical treatment.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. G. A. El and M. A. Hoefer, Dispersive shock waves and modulation theory, Phys. D 333, 11 (2016).
  2. P. Olson and U. Christensen, Solitary wave propagation in a fluid conduit within a viscous matrix, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 91, 6367 (1986).
  3. N. K. Lowman and M. A. Hoefer, Dispersive hydrodynamics in viscous fluid conduits, Phys. Rev. E 88, 023016 (2013).
  4. J. A. Whitehead and K. R. Helfrich, Wave transport of deep mantle material, Nature 336, 59 (1988).
  5. M. D. Maiden and M. A. Hoefer, Modulations of viscous fluid conduit periodic waves, Proc. Royal Soc. Lond A: Math. Phys. Engineer. Sci. 472, 20160533 (2016).
  6. D. R. Scott, D. J. Stevenson, and J. A. Whitehead, Observations of solitary waves in a viscously deformable pipe, Nature 319, 759 (1986).
  7. K. R. Helfrich and J. A. Whitehead, Solitary waves on conduits of buoyant fluid in a more viscous fluid, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam. 51, 35 (1990).
  8. N. K. Lowman, M. A. Hoefer, and G. A. El, Interactions of large amplitude solitary waves in viscous fluid conduits, J. Fluid Mech. 760, 372 (2013).
  9. M. D. Maiden, N. K. Lowman, D. V. Anderson, M. E. Schubert, and M. A. Hoefer, Observation of Dispersive Shock Waves, Solitons, and Their Interactions in Viscous Fluid Conduits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 174501 (2016).
  10. M. D. Maiden, D. V. Anderson, N. A. Franco, G. A. El, and M. A. Hoefer, Solitonic Dispersive Hydrodynamics: Theory and Observation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 144101 (2018).
  11. D. H. Peregrine, Calculations of the development of an undular bore, J. Fluid Mech. 25, 321 (1966).
  12. A. V. Gurevich and L. P. Pitaevskii, Nonstationary structure of a collisionless shock wave, JETP 38, 291 (1974) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 590 (1973)].
  13. G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1974).
  14. R. Courant and K. O. Friedrichs, Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1948).
  15. S. Trillo, M. Klein, G. F. Clauss, and M. Onorato, Observation of dispersive shock waves developing from initial depressions in shallow water, Phys. D 333, 276 (2016).
  16. G. Xu, M. Conforti, A. Kudlinski, A. Mussot, and S. Trillo, Dispersive Dam-Break Flow of a Photon Fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 254101 (2017).
  17. P. A. Praveen Janantha, P. Sprenger, M. A. Hoefer, and M. Wu, Observation of Self-Cavitating Envelope Dispersive Shock Waves in Yttrium Iron Garnet Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 024101 (2017).
  18. C. Chong, M. A. Porter, P. G. Kevrekidis, and C. Daraio, Nonlinear coherent structures in granular crystals, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 413003 (2017).
  19. B. Wetzel, D. Bongiovanni, M. Kues, Yi Hu, Z. Chen, S. Trillo, J. M. Dudley, S. Wabnitz, and R. Morandotti, Experimental Generation of Riemann Waves in Optics: A Route to Shock Wave Control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 073902 (2016).
  20. G. B. Whitham, Non-linear dispersive waves, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 283, 238 (1965).
  21. S. Trillo, G. Deng, G. Biondini, M. Klein, G. F. Clauss, A. Chabchoub, and M. Onorato, Experimental observation and theoretical description of multisoliton fission in shallow water, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 144102 (2016).
  22. N. Ghofraniha, L. Santamaria Amato, V. Folli, S. Trillo, E. DelRe, and C. Conti, Measurement of scaling laws for shock waves in thermal nonlocal media, Opt. Lett. 37, 2325 (2012).
  23. J. A. Whitehead and D. S. Luther, Dynamics of laboratory diapir and plume models, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 705 (1975).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation