Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Energy transport due to pressure diffusion enhanced by helicity and system rotation in inhomogeneous turbulence

Kazuhiro Inagaki* and Fujihiro Hamba

  • Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

  • *kinagaki@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 124601 – Published 3 December, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.124601

Abstract

It is known that turbulent energy is rapidly transferred in the direction of the rotation axis in a rotating system, in comparison with the nonrotating case. In this study, this phenomenon is investigated as a problem of energy diffusion expressed by the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model. The conventional gradient-diffusion approximation for the turbulent energy flux cannot account for the enhanced energy transport observed in rotating inhomogeneous turbulence. In experiments, inhomogeneity of turbulence is modeled with an oscillating grid, leading to the turbulent energy falling off away from the grid. To adequately describe the phenomenon, we propose a new model for the energy flux due to the pressure associated with the rotational motion of a fluid. The model of the energy flux is expressed to be proportional to the turbulent helicity, which is the statistically averaged value of the inner product of the velocity and vorticity fluctuations. This property is closely related to the group velocity of inertial waves in a rapidly rotating fluid. The validity of the model is assessed using a direct numerical simulation of inhomogeneous turbulence under rotation where the flow configuration is similar to the oscillating-gird turbulence. It is shown that most of the turbulent energy transport enhanced by the system rotation is attributed to the pressure diffusion term. The spatial distribution of the energy flux due to the pressure related to the system rotation is similar to that of the turbulent helicity with negative coefficient. Hence, the new model which is proportional to the turbulent helicity is able to qualitatively account for the enhanced energy flux due to the system rotation. Finally, the helical Rossby number is proposed to estimate the relative importance of the energy flux enhanced by the turbulent helicity and the rotation, in comparison to the conventional gradient-diffusion approximation.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. C. Cambon and L. Jacquin, Spectral approach to non-isotropic turbulence subjected to rotation, J. Fluid Mech. 202, 295 (1989).
  2. C. Cambon, N. N. Mansour, and F. S. Godeferd, Energy transfer in rotating turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 337, 303 (1997).
  3. Y. Morinishi, K. Nakabayashi, and Q. Ren, Dynamics of anisotropy on decaying homogeneous turbulence subjected to system rotation, Phys. Fluids 13, 2912 (2001).
  4. K. Yoshimatsu, M. Midorikawa, and Y. Kaneda, Columnar eddy formation in freely decaying homogeneous shear turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 677, 154 (2011).
  5. J. Bardina, J. H. Ferziger, and R. S. Rogallo, Effect of rotation on isotropic turbulence: Computation and modelling, J. Fluid Mech. 154, 321 (1985).
  6. M. Okamoto, Theoretical turbulence modelling of homogeneous decaying flow in a rotating frame, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 2854 (1995).
  7. C. G. Speziale, B. A. Younis, and S. A. Berger, Analysis and modelling of turbulent flow in an axially rotating pipe, J. Fluid Mech. 407, 1 (2000).
  8. S. Wallin and A. V. Johanson, An explicity algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 403, 89 (2000).
  9. N. Yokoi and A. Yoshizawa, Statistical analysis of the effects of helicity in inhomogeneous turbulence, Phys. Fluids A 5, 464 (1993).
  10. N. Yokoi and A. Brandenburg, Large-scale flow generation by inhomogeneous helicity, Phys. Rev. E 93, 033125 (2016).
  11. K. Inagaki, N. Yokoi, and F. Hamba, Mechanism of mean flow generation in rotating turbulence through inhomogeneous helicity, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 114605 (2017).
  12. E. J. Hopfinger and J.-A. Toly, Spatially decaying turbulence and its relation to mixing across density interfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 78, 155 (1976).
  13. S. C. Dickinson and R. R. Long, Laboratory study of the growth of a turbulent layer of fluid, Phys. Fluids 21, 1698 (1978).
  14. N. Matsunaga, Y. Sugihara, T. Komatsu, and A. Masuda, Quantitative properties of oscillating-grid turbulence in a homogeneous fluid, Fluid Dyn. Res. 25, 147 (1999).
  15. S. C. Dickinson and R. R. Long, Oscillating-grid turbulence including effects of rotation, J. Fluid Mech. 126, 315 (1983).
  16. P. A. Davidson, P. J. Staplehurst, and S. B. Dalziel, On the evolution of eddies in a rapidly rotating system, J. Fluid Mech. 557, 135 (2006).
  17. I. Kolvin, K. Cohen, Y. Vardi, and E. Sharon, Energy Transfer by Inertial Waves During the Buildup of Turbulence in a Rotating System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 014503 (2009).
  18. A. Ranjan and P. A. Davidson, Evolution of a turbulent cloud under rotation, J. Fluid Mech. 756, 488 (2014).
  19. F. S. Godeferd and L. Lollini, Direct numerical simulations of turbulence with confinement and rotation, J. Fluid Mech. 393, 257 (1999).
  20. A. Yoshizawa, Statistical analysis of mean-flow effects on the pressure-velocity correlation, Phys. Fluids 14, 1736 (2002).
  21. H. K. Moffatt, Dynamo action associated with random inertial waves in a rotating conducting fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 705 (1970).
  22. O. Kitoh, Experimental study of turbulent swirling flow in a straight pipe, J. Fluid Mech. 225, 445 (1991).
  23. W. W. Steenbergen, Turbulent pipe flow with swirl, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1995.
  24. R. Stepanov, P. Frick, V. Dulin, and D. Markovich, Analysis of mean and fluctuating helicity measured by To-moPIV in swirling jet, EPJ Web Conf. 180, 02097 (2018).
  25. D. K. Lilly, The structure, energetics and propagation of rotating convective storms. Part II: Helicity and storm stabilization, J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 126 (1986).
  26. A. T. Noda and H. Niino, A numerical investigation of a supercell tornado: Genesis and vorticity budget, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. 88, 135 (2010).
  27. K. H. Moffatt, Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978).
  28. F. Krause and K.-H. Rädler, Mean-field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980).
  29. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory, Phys. Rep. 417, 1 (2005).
  30. F. Hamba, Reynolds-averaged turbulence model for magnethydrodynamic dynamo in a rotating spherical shell, Phys. Plasmas 11, 5316 (2004).
  31. F. Widmer, J. Büchner, and N. Yokoi, Sub-grid-scale description of turbulent magnetic reconnection in magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Plasmas 23, 042311 (2016).
  32. F. Widmer, J. Büchner, and N. Yokoi, Characterizing plasmoid reconnection by turbulence dynamics, Phys. Plasmas 23, 092304 (2016).
  33. A. Yoshizawa, Statistical analysis of the derivation of the Reynolds stress from its eddy-viscosity representation, Phys. Fluids 27, 1377 (1984).
  34. T. Ariki, Covariance of fluid-turbulence theory, Phys. Rev. E 91, 053001 (2015).
  35. Y. Morinishi, K. Nakabayashi, and Q. Ren, A new DNS algorithm for rotating homogeneous decaying turbulence, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 22, 30 (2001).
  36. A. Yoshizawa, Hydrodynamic and Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulent Flows: Modelling and Statistical Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998).
  37. N. Yokoi, Modeling helicity dissipation-rate equation, in Progress in Turbulence VI, Springer Proceedings in Physics 165, edited by J. Peinke et al. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2016), pp. 93–96.
  38. A. Brissaud, U. Frisch, J. Leorat, M. Lesieur, and A. Mazure, Helicity cascades in fully developed isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 16, 1366 (1973).
  39. J. C. André and M. Lesieur, Influence of helicity on the evolution of isotropic turbulence at high Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 81, 187 (1977).
  40. J. Baerenzung, H. Politano, Y. Ponty, and A. Pouquet, Spectral modeling of turbulent flows and the role of helicity, Phys. Rev. E 77, 046303 (2008).
  41. S. Galtier, Weak inertial-wave turbulence theory, Phys. Rev. E 68, 015301 (2003).
  42. P. A. Davidson, Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation