Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Drag upon a sphere suspended in a low magnetic-Reynolds number MHD channel flow

Jules Delacroix

Laurent Davoust*

  • Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (EPM) Group, Materials and Processes Science and Engineering Laboratory (SIMaP), Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble-INP)/Université Grenoble-Alpes/CNRS, 38402 Saint Martin d'Hères, France and Laboratoire d'Etudes et d'Expérimentations pour les Accidents Graves (LEAG), CEA Cadarache, 13108 St-Paul-lez-Durance, France

  • Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (EPM) Group, Materials and Processes Science and Engineering Laboratory (SIMaP), Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble-INP)/Université Grenoble-Alpes/CNRS, 38402 Saint Martin d'Hères, France

  • *Corresponding author: laurent.davoust@simap.grenoble-inp.fr

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 123701 – Published 5 December, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.123701

Abstract

A permanent magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) channel flow past a stationnary sphere is investigated, with a static magnetic field transversally applied and no-slip conditions taken into account. The sphere is subject to laminar flow conditions with the Reynolds number ranging from the Stokes regime up to values corresponding to the inertial regime (Rep=130 at most for the particle Reynolds number). The maximum value of the Hartmann number is Ha=200. After a brief review of the existing literature of three-dimensional (3-D) MHD flows past an obstacle, a 3-D numerical approach is developed, which is systematically compared to asymptotic predictions (Ha = 0, Ha). Atypical flow patterns are made evident, especially characterized by the gradual emergence of Hunt's wake for a sufficiently large particle Stuart number Np. Some original correlations are put forward for the wake length and the drag coefficient. Finally, an original scaling law highlighting the significant influence of the outer magnetic field on the transition between different MHD flow regimes is drawn up.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (54)

  1. A. H. A. Hamid, W. K. Hussam, and G. J. Sheard, Combining an obstacle and electrically driven vortices to enhance heat transfer in a quasi-two-dimensional mhd duct flow, J. Fluid Mech. 792, 364 (2016).
  2. B. D. Plouffe and S. K. Murthy, Perspective on microfluidic cell separation: A solved problem? Anal. Chem. 86, 11481 (2014).
  3. J. W. Haverkort and T. W. J. Peeters, Magnetohydrodynamic effects on insulating bubbles and inclusions in the continuous casting of steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 41, 1240 (2010).
  4. S. Smolentsev, N. B. Morley, M. A. Abdou, and S. Malang, Dual-coolant lead-lithium (DCLL) blanket status and R&D needs, Fusion Eng. Des. 100, 44 (2015).
  5. R. Moreau, Magnetohydrodynamics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1990), Chaps. 1, 4, 5, pp. 1–31, 110–150, 179–189.
  6. A. H. A. Hamid, W. K. Hussam, and G. J. Sheard, Heat transfer augmentation of a quasi-two-dimensional MHD duct flow via electrically driven vortices, Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A 70, 847 (2016).
  7. W. K. Hussam, A. H. A. Hamid, Z. Y. Ng, and G. J. Sheard, Effect of vortex promoter shape on heat transfer in MHD duct flow with axial magnetic field, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 134, 453 (2018).
  8. J. H. Pendergrass, L. A. Booth, D. R. Peterson, and S. A. W. Gerstl, The lithium boiler - A 1500 to 2000 K fusion reactor blanket concept for process heat and/or electric power generation, in 14th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Vol. 2 (American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1979), pp. 1597–1607.
  9. J. D. Bender and M. A. Hoffman, A two-phase flow cooling concept for fusion reactor blankets, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, LLNL Report UCRL-78892, 1977 (unpublished).
  10. M. Takahashi, A. Inoue, M. Aritomi, and M. Matsuzaki, Studies on magnetohydrodynamic flow characteristics and heat transfer of liquid metal two-phase flow cooling systems for a magnetically confined fusion reactor, Fusion Eng. Des. 27, 663 (1995).
  11. C. Zhang, S. Eckert, and G. Gerbeth, The flow structure of a bubble-driven liquid-metal jet in a horizontal magnetic field, J. Fluid Mech. 575, 57 (2007).
  12. X. Miao, D. Lucas, Z. Ren, S. Eckert, and G. Gerbeth, Numerical modeling of bubble-driven liquid metal flows with external static magnetic field, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 48, 32 (2013).
  13. S. Eckert, G. Gerbeth, and O. Lielausis, The behaviour of gas bubbles in a turbulent liquid metal magnetohydrodynamic flow. Part II: Magnetic field influence on the slip ratio, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 26, 67 (2000).
  14. K. Takatani, Mathematical modeling of incompressible MHD flows with free surface, ISIJ Int. 47, 545 (2007).
  15. J. Zhang and M.-J. Ni, Direct simulation of single bubble motion under vertical magnetic field: Paths and wakes, Phys. Fluids 26, 102102 (2014).
  16. J. Zhang, M.-J. Ni, and R. Moreau, Rising motion of a single bubble through a liquid metal in the presence of a horizontal magnetic field, Phys. Fluids 28, 032101 (2016).
  17. K. Jin, P. Kumar, S. P. Vanka, and B. G. Thomas, Rise of an argon bubble in liquid steel in the presence of a transverse magnetic field, Phys. Fluids 28, 093301 (2016).
  18. C. Zhang, S. Eckert, and G. Gerbeth, Experimental study of single bubble motion in a liquid metal column exposed to a dc magnetic field, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 31, 824 (2005).
  19. J. Sommeria and R. Moreau, Why, how, and when MHD turbulence becomes two-dimensional, J. Fluid Mech. 118, 507 (1982).
  20. M. Frank, L. Barleon, and U. Müller, Visual analysis of two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Fluids 13, 2287 (2001).
  21. B. Mück, C. Günther, U. Müller, and L. Bühler, Three-dimensional MHD flows in rectangular ducts with internal obstacles, J. Fluid Mech. 418, 265 (2000).
  22. J. C. R. Hunt and G. S. S. Ludford, Three-dimensional MHD duct flows with strong transverse magnetic field. Part 1. Obstacles in a constant area channel, J. Fluid Mech. 33, 693 (1968).
  23. J. W. Haverkort and T. W. J. Peeters, Magnetohydrodynamics of insulating spheres, Magnetohydrodynamics 45, 111 (2009).
  24. V. Dousset, Numerical simulations of MHD flows past obstacles in a duct under externally applied magnetic field, Ph.D. thesis, Coventry University, Coventry, UK, 2009 (unpublished).
  25. R. Clift, J. R. Grace, and M. E. Weber, Bubbles, Drops, and Particles (Academic Press, New York, 1978), Chaps. 2 and 3, pp. 16–68.
  26. A. Maheshwari, R. P. Chhabra, and G. Biswas, Effect of blockage on drag and heat transfer from a single sphere an an in-line array of three spheres, Powder Technol. 168, 74 (2006).
  27. R. M. Wham, O. A. Basaran, and C. H. Byers, Wall effects on flow past solid spheres at finite Reynolds number, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 864 (1996).
  28. T. V. S. Sekhar, T. V. R. Ravikumar, and H. Kumar, MHD flow past a sphere at low and moderate Reynolds numbers, Comput. Mech. 31, 437 (2003).
  29. V. Dousset and A. Pothérat, Characterization of the flow past a truncated square cylinder in a duct under a spanwise magnetic field, J. Fluid Mech. 691, 341 (2012).
  30. J. C. R. Hunt, Bluff body drag in a strong transverse magnetic field, Magnetohydrodynamics 6, 35 (1970).
  31. J. Reitz and L. Foldy, The force on a sphere moving through a conducting fluid in the presence of a magnetic field, J. Fluid Mech. 11, 133 (1961).
  32. A. Pothérat, J. Sommeria, and R. Moreau, Effective boundary conditions for magnetohydrodynamic flows with thin Hartmann layers, Phys. Fluids 14, 403 (2002).
  33. J. A. Shercliff, Steady motion of conducting fluids in pipes under transverse magnetic fields, J. Fluid Mech. 49, 136 (1953).
  34. O. Andreev, Y. Kolesnikov, and A. Thess, Visualization of the Ludford column, J. Fluid Mech. 721, 438 (2013).
  35. G. Branover, N. Slyusarev, and A. Tsinober, Drag of a sphere in a magnetohydrodynamic flow, Magnetohydrodynamics 2, 149 (1966).
  36. N. T. Baker, A. Pothérat, L. Davoust, F. Debray, and R. Klein, Controlling the dimensionality of low-Rm MHD turbulence experimentally, Exp. Fluids 58, 79 (2017).
  37. M. Bertherat, T. Odievre, M. Allibert, and P. Le Brun, A radioscopic technique to observe bubbles in liquid aluminium, Light Met. 3, 861 (2002).
  38. J. A. Shercliff, A Textbook of Magnetohydrodynamics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965), Chap. 2, pp. 9–30.
  39. Y. Plevachuk, V. Sklyarchuk, S. Eckert, G. Gerbeth, and R. Novakovic, Thermophysical properties of the liquid Ga-In-Sn eutectic Alloy, J. Chem. Eng. Data 59, 757 (2014).
  40. T. Liu, P. Sen, and C.-J. Kim, Characterization of nontoxic liquid-metal alloy galinstan for applications in microdevices, J. Microelectromech. S. 21, 443 (2012).
  41. T. E. Tezduyar and R. Shih, Numerical experiments on downstream boundary of flow past cylinder, J. Eng. Mech. 117, 854 (1991).
  42. J. Delacroix and L. Davoust, On the role of surface rheology in a magnetohydrodynamic swirling flow, Phys. Fluids 27, 062104 (2015).
  43. S. V. Patankar, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow (Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1980).
  44. D. W. Marquardt, An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11, 431 (1963).
  45. Y. Saad and M. H. Schultz, GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7, 856 (1986).
  46. P. R. Amestoy, I. S. Duff, J.-Y. L'Excellent, and J. Koster, A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 23, 15 (2001).
  47. P. H. Roberts, Singularities of Hartmann layers, Proc. R. Soc. London A 300, 94 (1967).
  48. C. Zhang, V. Shatrov, J. Priede, S. Eckert, and G. Gerbeth, Intermittent behavior caused by surface oxidation in a liquid metal flow driven by a rotating magnetic field, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 42, 1188 (2011).
  49. J. Delacroix and L. Davoust, Electrical activity of the Hartmann layers relative to surface viscous shearing in an annular magnetohydrodynamic flow, Phys. Fluids 26, 037102 (2014).
  50. J. Delacroix, L. Davoust, and K. Patouillet, Low Rm magnetohydrodynamics as a means of measuring the surface shear viscosity of a liquid metal: A first attempt on galinstan, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 015103 (2018).
  51. A. Reusken and Y. Zhang, Numerical simulation of incompressible two-phase flows with a Boussinesq-Scriven interface stress tensor, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 73, 1042 (2013).
  52. J.-H. Pan, N.-M. Zhang, and M.-J. Ni, The wake structure and transition process of a flow past a sphere affected by a streamwise magnetic field, J. Fluid Mech. 842, 248 (2018).
  53. T. A. Johnson and V. C. Patel, Flow past a sphere up to a Reynolds number of 300, J. Fluid Mech. 378, 19 (1999).
  54. M. Sahin and R. G. Owens, A numerical investigation of wall effects up to high blockage ratios on two-dimensional flow past a confined circular cylinder, Phys. Fluids 16, 1305 (2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation