Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Control of flow around a low Reynolds number airfoil using longitudinal strips

Seunghyun Cho1, Jooha Kim2, and Haecheon Choi1,3,*

  • 1Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
  • 2School of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, Korea
  • 3Institute of Advanced Machines and Design, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

  • *choi@snu.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 113901 – Published 7 November, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.113901

Abstract

We suggest longitudinal strips attached to an airfoil surface as a new stall control device. Their effects on the stall characteristics and flow modifications are experimentally investigated. The airfoil considered is SD7003 and the Reynolds numbers are Re=60000 and 180 000 based on the chord length and freestream velocity. The drag and lift forces on the airfoil are measured by varying the angle of attack from α=0 to 16° with and without strips. The optimal strip configuration is determined using a response surface method. Without strip, abrupt stalls occur at α=11 and 12.5° for Re=60000 and 180 000, respectively, whereas broad stalls occur without much changing the stall angles by optimal strips. The lift coefficient and lift-to-drag ratio are significantly increased by the strips at post-stall angles of attack. A corner vortex is generated at each corner of strip near the leading edge. Clockwise and counterclockwise streamwise vortices are generated at the left- and right-facing corners, respectively, and they slowly move away from the corners while travelling downstream. These vortices provide additional momentum to the airfoil suction surface, resulting in fully attached flow above the strips and reattachment of flow above grooved surface. The longitudinal strips presented here are different from other devices such as the vortex generator, trip wire, burst control plate, and zigzag tapes used for the separation control of low Reynolds number airfoil, in that the strips are installed nearly on the whole airfoil surface but with their heights lower than the boundary layer thickness, and produce positive control effects at post-stall angles of attack but little affect the aerodynamic performance at prestall angles of attack.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. R. Austin, Unmanned Aircraft Systems: UAVs Design, Development and Deployment (Wiley, Reston, 2010), p. 5.
  2. T. J. Mueller and J. D. DeLaurier, Aerodynamics of small vehicles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 89 (2003).
  3. P. B. S. Lissaman, Low-Reynolds-number airfoils, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 223 (1983).
  4. M. Gad-el-Hak, Control of low-speed airfoil aerodynamics, AIAA J. 28, 1537 (1990).
  5. M. S. Selig, J. F. Donovan, and D. B. Fraser, Airfoils at Low Speeds (HA Stokely, Virginia, 1989).
  6. M. Gad-el-Hak, Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000), p. 150.
  7. R. Sosa, G. Artana, E. Moreau, and G. Touchard, Stall control at high angle of attack with plasma sheet actuators, Exp. Fluids 42, 143 (2007).
  8. D. Greenblatt, T. Schneider, and C. Y. Schüle, Mechanism of flow separation control using plasma actuation, Phys. Fluids 24, 077102 (2012).
  9. M. Sato, T. Nonomura, K. Okada, K. Asada, H. Aono, A. Yakeno, Y. Abe, and K. Fujii, Mechanisms for laminar separated-flow control using dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator at low Reynolds number, Phys. Fluids 27, 117101 (2015).
  10. K. B. M. Q. Zaman, Effect of acoustic excitation on stalled flows over an airfoil, AIAA J. 30, 1492 (1992).
  11. A. Bar-Sever, Separation control on an airfoil by periodic forcing, AIAA J. 27, 820 (1989).
  12. J. D. Nickerson Jr., A study of vortex generators at low Reynolds numbers, in 24th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1986), AIAA Paper No. 1986–0155.
  13. M. Kerho, S. Hutcherson, R. F. Blackwelder, and R. H. Liebeck, Vortex generators used to control laminar separation bubbles, J. Aircraft 30, 315 (1993).
  14. J. S. Delnero, J. M. Di Leo, M. E. Camocardi, M. A. Martinez, and J. L. Colman-Lerner, Experimental study of vortex generators effects on low Reynolds number airfoils in turbulent flow, Int. J. Aerodynamics 2, 50 (2012).
  15. H. Tebbiche and M. S. Boutoudj, Optimized vortex generators in the flow separation control around a NACA0015 profile, in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, Porto, Portugal, 2014, edited by Á. Cunha, E. Caetano, P. Ribeiro, and G. Müller, pp. 3219–3226, https://paginas.fe.up.pt/∼eurodyn2014/CD/papers/449_MS20_ABS_1618.pdf.
  16. A. F. Huber II and T. J. Mueller, The effect of trip wire roughness on the performance of the Wortmann FX 63–137 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers, Exp. Fluids 5, 263 (1987).
  17. C. A. Lyon, M. S. Selig, and A. P. Broeren, Boundary layer trips on airfoils at low Reynolds numbers, in Proceedings of the 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, Nevada (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1997), AIAA Paper No. 1997–0511.
  18. L. W. Traub, Experimental investigation of the effect of trip strips at low Reynolds number, J. Aircraft 48, 1776 (2011).
  19. K. Rinoie, M. Okuno, and Y. Sunada, Airfoil stall suppression by use of a bubble burst control plate, AIAA J. 47, 322 (2009).
  20. C. W. Wong and K. Rinoie, Bubble burst control for stall suppression on a NACA 631012 airfoil, J. Aircraft 46, 1465 (2009).
  21. Y. Nakamura, K. Rinoie, and Y. Sunada, Airfoil stall suppression by use of rectangular cross-section burst control plates, in Proceedings of the 50th Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2012), AIAA Paper No. 2012–0318.
  22. M. S. Selig and B. D. McGranahan, Wind tunnel aerodynamic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines, J. Solar Energy Engng. 126, 986 (2004).
  23. S. Mack, C. Brehm, B. Heine, A. Kurz, and H. F. Fasel, Experimental investigation of separation and separation control on a laminar airfoil, in Proceedings of the 4th Flow Control Conference, Seattle, Washington (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2008), AIAA Paper No. 2008–3766.
  24. K. Tongsawang and M. P. Thesis, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, 2015.
  25. J. C. Lin, Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation, Progr. Aerospace Sci. 38, 389 (2002).
  26. J. B. Barlow, W. H. Rae, Jr., and A. Pope, Low-speed Wind Tunnel Testing (Wiley, New York, 1999) p. 349.
  27. T. J. Mueller and T. F. Burns, Experimental studies of the Eppler 61 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers, in Proceedings of the 20th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, Florida (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1982), AIAA paper No. 1982–0345.
  28. M. S. H. Boutilier and S. Yarusevych, Effects of end plates and blockage on low-Reynolds-number flows over airfoils, AIAA J. 50, 1547 (2012).
  29. A. A. Giunta, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, 1997.
  30. R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002) p. 219.
  31. B. Mohammadi and O. Pironneau, Shape optimization in fluid mechanics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 255 (2004).
  32. M. C. Galbraith and M. R. Visbal, Implicit large eddy simulation of low-Reynolds-number transitional flow past the SD7003 airfoil, in Proceedings of the 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, Illinois (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2010), AIAA paper No. 2010–4737.
  33. J. M. Caram and A. Ahmed, Effect of Ribblets on turbulence in the wake of an airfoil, AIAA 29, 1769 (1991).
  34. S. J. Lee and Y. G. Jang, Control of flow around a NACA 0012 airfoil with a micro-riblet film, J. Fluids Structures 20, 659 (2005).
  35. M. J. Werle, R. W. Paterson, and W. M. Presz Jr., Trailing-edge separation/stall alleviation, AIAA 25, 624 (1987).
  36. H. W. Coleman and W. G. Steele, Experimentation, Validation, and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2009).
  37. M. S. Selig, J. J. Guglielmo, A. P. Broeren, and P. Giguère, Summary of Low Speed Airfoil Data (SoarTech Publications, Virginia, 1995).
  38. D. P. Hart, Super-resolution PIV by recursive local-correlation, J. Visual. 3, 187 (2000).
  39. J. Westerweel and F. Scarano, Universal outlier detection for PIV data, Exp. Fluids 39, 1096 (2005).
  40. N. Rostamzadeh, K. L. Hansen, R. M. Kelso, and B. B. Dally, The formation mechanism and impact of streamwise vortices on NACA 0021 airfoil's performance with undulating leading edge modification, Phys. Fluids 26, 107101 (2014).
  41. I. M. M. A. Shabaka and P. Bradshaw, Turbulent flow measurements in an idealized wing/body Junction, AIAA J. 19, 131 (1981).
  42. X. Yu, Z. Zhang, and B. Liu, The evolution of the flow topologies of 3D separations in the stator passage of an axial compressor stage, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 44, 301 (2013).
  43. F. Gand, J. C. Monnier, J. M. Deluc, and A. Choffat, Experimental study of the corner flow separation on a simplified junction, AIAA J. 53, 2869 (2015).
  44. H. P. Wang, S. J. Olson, R. J. Goldstein, and E. R. G. Eckert, Flow visualization in a linear turbine cascade of high performance turbine blades, J. Turbomach. 119, 1 (1997).
  45. L. Langston, Secondary flows in axial turbines—A review, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 934, 11 (2001).
  46. H. Zhang, S. Wang, and Z. Wang, Variation of vortex structure in a compressor cascade at different incidences, J. Propul. Power 23, 221 (2007).
  47. M. Y. Jabbari, R. J. Goldstein, K. C. Marston, and E. R. G. Eckert, Three dimensional flow at the junction between a turbine blade and end-wall, Wärme-und Stoffübertragung 27, 51 (1992).
  48. R. Hain, C. J. Kähler, and R. Radespiel, Dynamics of laminar separation bubbles at low-Reynolds-number aerofoils, J. Fluid Mech. 630, 129 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation