Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Invited
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Revealing hidden information with quadratic products of acoustic field amplitudes

David R. Dowling*

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2133, USA

  • *drd@umich.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 110506 – Published 21 November, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.110506

Abstract

Acoustic waves are omnipresent in modern life and are well described by the linearized equations of fluid dynamics. Once generated, linear acoustic waves carry and collect information about their source and the environment through which they propagate, and this information may be retrieved by analyzing recordings of these waves. Because of this, acoustics is the primary means for imaging and remote sensing in otherwise opaque environments, such as the Earth's oceans and crust and the interior of the human body. For these information-retrieval tasks, acoustic fields are nearly always interrogated within their recorded frequency range or bandwidth. However, this frequency-range restriction is not general; acoustic fields may also carry hidden information at frequencies outside their bandwidth that can be revealed by analyzing the quadratic products of a pair of complex frequency-domain field amplitudes having different frequencies. The two unique quadratic field products, known as the frequency-difference and frequency-sum autoproducts, can be utilized for remote sensing at the difference and sum of the two constituent frequencies, respectively, even if these difference and sum frequencies lie outside the recorded field's bandwidth. Despite some fundamental limitations, forming and analyzing the autoproducts enables a variety of acoustic remote sensing applications that were long thought to be impossible. In particular, analysis of the frequency-difference autoproduct allows the detrimental effects of sparse-array recordings, random scattering, and other unknown source-to-receiver propagation effects to be suppressed when the recorded acoustic field has sufficient bandwidth. Examples and applications from laboratory and ocean propagation experiments are provided that involve frequencies from a few Hertz to more than 100 kHz and propagation distances from tens of centimeters to more than 100 km.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

2018 Invited Papers

Physical Review Fluids publishes a collection of papers associated with the invited talks presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics.

Article Text

References (24)

  1. A. D. Pierce, in Acoustics, Acoust. Soc. Am. (Am. Inst. of Phys. Woodbury, NY, 1989), pp. 6–20.
  2. Y. C. Fung, in Foundations of Solid Mechanics (Prentice-Hall, Edgewood Cliffs, NJ, 1965), pp. 186–187.
  3. B. M. Worthmann and D. R. Dowling, The frequency-difference and frequency-sum acoustic-field autoproducts, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141, 4579 (2017).
  4. J. E. Lipa, B. M. Worthmann, and D. R. Dowling, Measurement of autoproduct fields in a Lloyd's mirror environment, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143, 2419 (2018).
  5. S. H. Abadi, H.-C. Song, and D. R. Dowling, Broadband sparse-array blind deconvolution using frequency-difference beamforming, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 3018 (2012).
  6. B. M. Worthmann, H. C. Song, and D. R. Dowling, High frequency source localization in a shallow ocean sound channel using frequency difference matched field processing, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138, 3549 (2015).
  7. A. S. Douglass, H. C. Song, and D. R. Dowling, Performance comparisons of frequency-difference and conventional beamforming, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142, 1663 (2017).
  8. B. M. Worthmann, H. C. Song, and D. R. Dowling, Adaptive frequency-difference matched field processing for high frequency source localization in a noisy shallow ocean, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141, 543 (2017).
  9. S. H. Abadi, K. J. Haworth, K. P. Mercado-Shekhar, and D. R. Dowling, Frequency-sum beamforming in a random scattering environment, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 144, 198 (2018).
  10. F. Waleffe, The nature of triad interactions in homogeneous turbulence, Phys. Fluids A 4, 350.(1992).
  11. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000), pp. 606–609.
  12. L. Cohen, Time-frequency distributions-a review, Proc. IEEE 77, 941 (1989).
  13. L. Borcea, G. Papanicolaou, and C. Tsogka, Adaptive interferometric imaging in clutter and optimal illumination, Inverse Problems 22, 1405 (2006).
  14. P. J. Westervelt, Parametric acoustic array, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 535 (1963).
  15. M. J. Beran and G. B. Parrent, Theory of Partial Coherence (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964), Chap. 3.
  16. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference, and Diffraction of Light, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999), Chap. 10.
  17. D. Weissman, Two frequency radar interferometry applied to the measurement of ocean wave height, IEEE Trans. Ante. Prop. 21, 649 (1973).
  18. I. Popstefanija, D. S. McQueen, and R. E. McIntosh, A stepped-frequency delta-K microwave radar for oceanographic studies, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 31, 681 (1993).
  19. K. Sarabandi and A. Nashashibi, Analysis and Applications of Backscattered Frequency Correlation Function, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37, 1895 (1999).
  20. D. R. Dowling and K. G. Sabra, Acoustic remote sensing, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 221 (2015).
  21. F. B. Jensen, W. A. Kuperman, M. B. Porter, and H. Schmidt, Computational Ocean Acoustics, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 2011).
  22. L. Williamson, E. Haapaniemi, and D. R. Dowling, Sonar performance improvements using first reflections in matched-field processing, Naval Eng. J. 126, 103 (2014).
  23. W. S. Hodgkiss and J. C. Preisig, Kauai Acomms MURI 2011 (KAM11) Experiment, in Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics (ECUA’12) (Institute of Acoustics, Milton Keynes, UK, 2011), pp. 993–1000.
  24. P. F. Worcester, M. A. Dzieciuch, J. A. Mercer, R. K. Andrew, B. D. Dushaw, A. B. Baggeroer, K. D. Heaney, G. L. D’Spain, J. A. Colosi, R. A. Stephen, J. N. Kemp, B. M. Howe, L. J. Van Uffelen, and K. E. Wage, The North Pacific Acoustic Laboratory deep-water acoustic propagation experiments in the Philippine Sea, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 3359 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation