Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Reynolds number effects in pipe flow turbulence of generalized Newtonian fluids

J. Singh*, M. Rudman, and H. M. Blackburn

  • Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia

  • *jagmohan.singh@monash.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 094607 – Published 28 September, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.094607

Abstract

The turbulent pipe flow of inelastic shear-thinning fluids has many practical applications; however, there is a deficit in understanding of how shear-thinning rheology modifies turbulence structure in the near-wall boundary layer (affecting shear stress and pressure drop) and in the core (affecting mixing). While previous direct numerical simulation studies have examined the effect of shear-thinning rheology at low Reynolds number (Reτ,max=323), the way in which these effects vary with Reτ was unknown. In particular, from earlier work it was unclear if inner-scaled mean axial velocity profiles for Newtonian and shear-thinning fluids could collapse to a common curve with increasing Reynolds number. Via direct numerical simulations of Newtonian and one shear-thinning rheology for friction Reynolds number Reτ=323750 (ReG=1000028000), the present study investigates how increasing Reynolds number modifies turbulent pipe flow of a power-law fluid with particular focus on the boundary layer profiles. The results show that the inner-scaled mean axial velocity profiles for Newtonian and shear-thinning fluids cannot collapse to a common curve with increasing Reynolds number, which is consistent with predictions from the Dodge-Metzner correlation [Dodge and Metzner, Turbulent flow of non-Newtonian systems, AIChE J. 5, 189 (1959)]. In inner-scaled coordinates, mean viscosity profiles are shown to become independent of Reynolds number except close to the pipe center. The contribution of viscosity fluctuations in the mean shear budget and in the mean flow and turbulence kinetic energy budget remains small at all Re. Both increasing Reynolds number and shear thinning influence the turbulence kinetic energy budget near the wall; however, the region where shear thinning is important is much wider than the region where increasing Reynolds number influences the results. The persistence of shear-thinning effects on turbulence modification in pipe flow requires consideration in the development of suitable turbulence models for such fluids. The current results suggest that the effect of shear-thinning rheology in turbulence models can be captured via a Reynolds-number-independent mean viscosity model in the inner region.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. R. Chhabra and J. Richardson, Non-Newtonian Flow and Applied Rheology, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2008).
  2. J. Singh, M. Rudman, H. M. Blackburn, A. Chryss, L. Pullum, and L. J. W. Graham, The importance of rheology characterization in predicting turbulent pipe flow of generalized Newtonian fluids, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 232, 11 (2016).
  3. A. B. Metzner and J. C. Reed, Flow of non-Newtonian fluids—Correlations for laminar, transition and turbulent flow regimes, AIChE J. 1, 434 (1955).
  4. N. El-Emam, A. Kamel, A. El-Shafei, and A. El-Batrawy, New equation calculates friction factor for turbulent flow on non-Newtonian fluids, Oil Gas J. 101, 74 (2003).
  5. D. W. Dodge and A. B. Metzner, Turbulent flow of non-Newtonian systems, AIChE J. 5, 189 (1959).
  6. E. J. Garcia and J. F. Steffe, Comparison of friction factor equations for non-Newtonian fluids in pipe flow, J. Food Process Eng. 9, 93 (1986).
  7. D. C. Bogue and A. B. Metzner, Velocity profiles in turbulent pipe flow. Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 2, 143 (1963).
  8. J. Singh, M. Rudman, and H. Blackburn, The influence of shear-dependent rheology on turbulent pipe flow, J. Fluid Mech. 822, 848 (2017).
  9. M. Rudman, H. M. Blackburn, L. J. W. Graham, and L. Pullum, Turbulent pipe flow of non-Newtonian fluids, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 118, 33 (2004).
  10. M. Rudman and H. M. Blackburn, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent non-Newtonian flow using a spectral element method, Appl. Math. Mod. 30, 1229 (2006).
  11. A. A. Gavrilov and V. Y. Rudyak, Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent flows of power-law fluids in a circular pipe, Thermoph. Aeromech. 23, 473 (2016).
  12. J. T. Park, R. J. Mannheimer, T. A. Grimley, and T. B. Morrow, Pipe flow measurements of a transparent non-Newtonian slurry, ASME J. Fluid Eng. 111, 331 (1989).
  13. F. T. Pinho and J. H. Whitelaw, Flow of non-Newtonian fluids in a pipe, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 34, 129 (1990).
  14. J. Singh, M. Rudman, and H. Blackburn, The effect of yield stress on pipe flow turbulence for generalised Newtonian fluids, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 249, 53 (2017).
  15. J. Singh, M. Rudman, and H. M. Blackburn, Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Perth, 2016 (Australasian Fluid Mechanics Society, 2016).
  16. R. I. Tanner and J. F. Milthorpe, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Numerical Methods in Thermal Problems, Seattle, 1983, edited by C. Taylor, J. A. Johnson, and W. R. Smith (Pineridge, Swansea, 1983), pp. 680–690.
  17. H. M. Blackburn and S. J. Sherwin, Formulation of a Galerkin spectral element–Fourier method for three-dimensional incompressible flows in cylindrical geometries, J. Comput. Phys. 197, 759 (2004).
  18. C. Chin, A. S. H. Ooi, I. Marusic, and H. M. Blackburn, The influence of pipe length on turbulence statistics computed from direct numerical simulation data, Phys. Fluids 22, 115107 (2010).
  19. J. Singh, Turbulent flow of generalised Newtonian fluids through pipes and open channels, Ph.D. thesis, Monash University, 2017.
  20. G. K. El Khoury, P. Schlatter, A. Noorani, P. F. Fischer, G. Brethouwer, and A. V. Johansson, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent pipe flow at moderately high Reynolds numbers, Flow Turb. Comb. 91, 475 (2013).
  21. C. Chin, J. Monty, and A. Ooi, Reynolds number effects in DNS of pipe flow and comparison with channels and boundary layers, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 45, 33 (2014).
  22. J. M. J. den Toonder and F. T. M. Nieuwstadt, Reynolds number effects in a turbulent pipe flow for low to moderate Re, Phys. Fluids 9, 3398 (1997).
  23. C. Chin, Numerical study of internal wall-bounded turbulent flows, Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne, 2011 .
  24. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
  25. J. Ahn, J. H. Lee, J. Lee, J.-h. Kang, and H. J. Sung, Direct numerical simulation of a 30R long turbulent pipe flow at Reτ=3008, Phys. Fluids 27, 065110 (2015).
  26. M. Zagarola, A. Perry, and A. Smits, Log laws or power laws: The scaling in the overlap region, Phys. Fluids 9, 2094 (1997).
  27. G. I. Barenblatt, Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics: Dimensional Analysis and Intermediate Asymptotics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996), Vol. 14.
  28. M. V. Zagarola and A. J. Smits, Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow, J. Fluid Mech. 373, 33 (1998).
  29. P. Gao and J. Zhang, New assessment of friction factor correlations for power law fluids in turbulent pipe flow: A statistical approach, J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 14, 77 (2007).
  30. H. R. Anbarlooei, D. O. A. Cruz, F. Ramos, and A. P. Silva Freire, Phenomenological Blasius-type friction equation for turbulent power-law fluid flows, Phys. Rev. E 92, 063006 (2015).
  31. F. T. Pinho, A GNF framework for turbulent flow models of drag-reducing fluids and a proposal for a kɛ type closure, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 114, 149 (2003).
  32. P. A. Davidson, Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).
  33. J. G. M. Eggels, Direct and large eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a cylindrical pipe geometry, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University, 1994.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation