Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Onset of three-dimensionality in supersonic flow over a slender double wedge

Sidharth GS*, Anubhav Dwivedi, Graham V. Candler, and Joseph W. Nichols

  • Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

  • *Corresponding author: sidharth_gs@hotmail.com

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 093901 – Published 19 September, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.093901

Abstract

We investigate the onset of three-dimensionality in a Mach 5 slender-double-wedge flow as the turn angle at the compression corner increases. Beyond a critical angle, the two-dimensional flow destabilizes to three-dimensional perturbations and results in growth of spanwise periodic flow structures. We carry out global linear stability analysis to identify the critical turn angle and the nature of the associated three-dimensional instability. At the critical angle, an unstable mode is present in the separation bubble and the reattached boundary layer. The mode is associated with streamwise streaks in wall temperature downstream of the corner. The existence of the unstable mode and its growth rate are confirmed with direct numerical simulations. It is found from budget analysis that streamwise deceleration of the recirculating flow plays a dominant role in the three-dimensional instability. Wave-maker analysis suggests that the instability does not have a centrifugal origin. Linear stability analysis of the steady-state flow at an angle beyond bifurcation is also carried out. The spanwise wavelength of the most unstable mode obtained at this turn angle compares well with experimental observations.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (71)

  1. J. Olejniczak, M. J. Wright, and G. V. Candler, Numerical study of inviscid shock interactions on double-wedge geometries, J. Fluid Mech. 352, 1 (1997).
  2. A. Roghelia, H. Olivier, I. Egorov, and P. Chuvakhov, Experimental investigation of Görtler vortices in hypersonic ramp flows, Exp. Fluids 58, 139 (2017).
  3. J. J. Ginoux, On some properties of reattaching laminar and transitional high speed flows, Von Karman Institute Report No. 53, 1969.
  4. G. Simeonides and W. Haase, Experimental and computational investigations of hypersonic flow about compression ramps, J. Fluid Mech. 283, 17 (1995).
  5. V. I. Zapryagaev, I. N. Kavun, and I. I. Lipatov, Supersonic laminar separated flow structure at a ramp for a free-stream Mach number of 6, Prog. Flight Phys. 5, 349 (2013).
  6. F. Schrijer, Investigation of Görtler vortices in a hypersonic double compression ramp flow by means of infrared thermography, Quant. Infrared Thermogr. J. 7, 201 (2010).
  7. L. Yang, H. Zare-Behtash, E. Erdem, and K. Kontis, Investigation of the double ramp in hypersonic flow using luminescent measurement systems, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 40, 50 (2012).
  8. Y. Ishiguro, H. Nagai, K. Asai, and K. Nakakita, Visualization of hypersonic compression corner flows using temperature- and pressure-sensitive paints, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2007, paper 2007-0118, doi:10.2514/6.2007-118.
  9. M. Bleilebens and H. Olivier, On the influence of elevated surface temperatures on hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interaction at a heated ramp model, Shock Waves 15, 301 (2006).
  10. R. Benay, B. Chanetz, B. Mangin, L. Vandomme, and J. Perraud, Shock wave/transitional boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow, AIAA J. 44, 1243 (2006).
  11. S. Willems, A. Gülhan, and J. Steelant, Experiments on the effect of laminar-turbulent transition on the SWBLI in H2K at Mach 6, Exp. Fluids 56, 49 (2015).
  12. G. R. Inger, Three-dimensional heat-and mass-transfer effects across high-speed reattaching flows, AIAA J. 15, 383 (1977).
  13. L. De Luca, G. Cardone, D. A. De La Chevalerie, and A. Fonteneau, Viscous interaction phenomena in hypersonic wedge flow, AIAA J. 33, 2293 (1995).
  14. D. A. de la Chevalerie, A. Fonteneau, L. De Luca, and G. Cardone, Görtler-type vortices in hypersonic flows: The ramp problem, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 15, 69 (1997).
  15. H. Görtler, On the three-dimensional instability of laminar boundary layers on concave walls, NACA Technical Memorandum No. 1375, 1954.
  16. P. Hall, The linear development of Görtler vortices in growing boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 130, 41 (1983).
  17. S. Matsumura, S. P. Schneider, and S. A. Berry, Streamwise vortex instability and transition on the hyper-2000 scramjet forebody, J. Spacecr. Rockets 42, 78 (2005).
  18. A. Roghelia, P. Chuvakhov, H. Olivier, and I. Egorov, Experimental investigation of Görtler vortices in hypersonic ramp flows behind sharp and blunt leading edges, 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Denver, 2017, paper 2017–3463, doi:10.2514/6.2017-3463.
  19. Y. Zhuang, H.-J. Tan, Y.-Z. Liu, Y.-C. Zhang, and Y. Ling, High resolution visualization of Görtler-like vortices in supersonic compression ramp flow, J. Visual. 20, 505 (2017).
  20. S. Priebe and M. P. Martín, Low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave–turbulent boundary layer interaction, J. Fluid Mech. 699, 1 (2012).
  21. S. Priebe, J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, and M. P. Martín, Low-frequency dynamics in a shock-induced separated flow, J. Fluid Mech. 807, 441 (2016).
  22. L. M. Brown, R. R. Boyce, N. Mudford, and S. O'Byrne, in Proceedings of the 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference (AIAA, Reston, 2009), Vol. 1, paper 7205-1.
  23. H. Görtler, Dreidimensionale instabilität der ebenen staupunktströmung gegenüber wirbelartigen störungen, in 50 Jahre Grenzschichtforschung, edited by H. Görtler and W. Tollmien (Springer Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1955), p. 304.
  24. G. Hämmerlin, Zur instabilitätstheorie der ebenen staupunktströmung, in 50 Jahre Grenzschichtforschung (Ref. [23]), p. 315.
  25. A. J. P. Fletcher, A. I. Ruban, and J. D. A. Walker, Instabilities in supersonic compression ramp flow, J. Fluid Mech. 517, 309 (2004).
  26. K. W. Cassel, A. I. Ruban, and J. D. A. Walker, An instability in supersonic boundary-layer flow over a compression ramp, J. Fluid Mech. 300, 265 (1995).
  27. A. Dwivedi, J. W. Nichols, M. R. Jovanovic, and G. V. Candler, Optimal spatial growth of streaks in oblique shock/boundary layer interaction, Eighth AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Conference, Denver, Colorado, paper 2017-4163, doi:10.2514/6.2017-4163.
  28. V. Theofilis, Global linear instability, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 319 (2011).
  29. J.-C. Robinet, Bifurcations in shock-wave/laminar-boundary-layer interaction: Global instability approach, J. Fluid Mech. 579, 85 (2007).
  30. N. Hildebrand, A. Dwivedi, J. W. Nichols, M. R. Jovanović, and G. V. Candler, Simulation and stability analysis of oblique shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions at Mach 5.92, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 013906 (2018).
  31. V. Theofilis, S. Hein, and U. Dallmann, On the origins of unsteadiness and three-dimensionality in a laminar separation bubble, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 358, 3229 (2000).
  32. D. Rodriguez and V. Theofilis, Structural changes of laminar separation bubbles induced by global linear instability, J. Fluid Mech. 655, 280 (2010).
  33. F. Gallaire, M. Marquillie, and U. Ehrenstein, Three-dimensional transverse instabilities in detached boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 571, 221 (2007).
  34. D. Barkley, M. Gabriela M. Gomes, and R. D. Henderson, Three-dimensional instability in flow over a backward-facing step, J. Fluid Mech. 473, 167 (2002).
  35. G. A. Bres and T. Colonius, Three-dimensional instabilities in compressible flow over open cavities, J. Fluid Mech. 599, 309 (2008).
  36. R. Caljouw, An experimental investigation of a three-dimensional hypersonic flow on a double ramp geometry using stereo-PIV, Master's thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2007 .
  37. A. M. Knisely and J. M. Austin, Geometry and test-time effects on hypervelocity shock-boundary layer interaction, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, paper 2016-1979, doi:10.2514/6.2016-1979.
  38. J. R. Komives, I. Nompelis, and G. V. Candler, Numerical investigation of unsteady heat transfer on a double wedge geometry in hypervelocity flows, 44th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, paper 2014-2354, doi:10.2514/6.2014-2354.
  39. I. Nompelis and G. V. Candler, Numerical investigation of double-cone flows with high enthalpy effects, in Proceedings of the Sixth European Symposium Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, edited by L. Ouwehand (European Space Agency, Noordwijk, 2009).
  40. S. GS, A. Dwivedi, G. V. Candler, and J. W. Nichols, Global linear stability analysis of high speed flows on compression ramps, 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Denver, 2017, paper 2017–3455.
  41. A. Sansica, N. D. Sandham, and Z. Hu, Forced response of a laminar shock-induced separation bubble, Phys. Fluids 26, 093601 (2014).
  42. A. Sansica, N. D. Sandham, and Z. Hu, Instability and low-frequency unsteadiness in a shock-induced laminar separation bubble, J. Fluid Mech. 798, 5 (2016).
  43. A. Dwivedi, S. GS, G. V. Candler, J. W. Nichols, and M. R. Jovanović, Input-output analysis of shock boundary layer interaction, 48th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 2018, paper 2018-3220, doi:10.2514/6.2018-3220.
  44. D. R. Lindquist and M. B. Giles, Validity of linearized unsteady Euler equations with shock capturing, AIAA J. 32, 46 (1994).
  45. E. Kreiselmaier and B. Laschka, Small disturbance Euler equations: Efficient and accurate tool for unsteady load prediction, J. Aircr. 37, 770 (2000).
  46. C. J. Mack and P. J. Schmid, A preconditioned Krylov technique for global hydrodynamic stability analysis of large-scale compressible flows, J. Comput. Phys. 229, 541 (2010).
  47. K. C. Hall, W. S. Clark, and C. B. Lorence, in Proceedings of the ASME 1993 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1993), paper V001T03A035.
  48. R. W. MacCormack, Numerical Computation of Compressible and Viscous Flow (AIAA, Reston, 2014).
  49. R. W. MacCormack and G. V. Candler, The solution of the Navier-Stokes equations using Gauss-Seidel line relaxation, Comput. Fluids 17, 135 (1989).
  50. P. K. Subbareddy and G. V. Candler, A fully discrete, kinetic energy consistent finite-volume scheme for compressible flows, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 1347 (2009).
  51. P. K. Subbareddy, M. D. Bartkowicz, and G. V. Candler, Direct numerical simulation of high-speed transition due to an isolated roughness element, J. Fluid Mech. 748, 848 (2014).
  52. C. Zhang and R. J. LeVeque, The immersed interface method for acoustic wave equations with discontinuous coefficients, Wave Motion 25, 237 (1997).
  53. J. Piraux and B. Lombard, A new interface method for hyperbolic problems with discontinuous coefficients: One-dimensional acoustic example, J. Comput. Phys. 168, 227 (2001).
  54. T. R. Fogarty and R. J. LeVeque, High-resolution finite-volume methods for acoustic waves in periodic and random media, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 17 (1999).
  55. S.-E. Kim, B. Makarov, and D. Caraeni, A multi-dimensional linear reconstruction scheme for arbitrary unstructured grids, 16th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, 2003, paper 2003–3990.
  56. E. Shima, K. Kitamura, and T. Haga, Green-gauss/weighted-least-squares hybrid gradient reconstruction for arbitrary polyhedra unstructured grids, AIAA J. 51, 2740 (2013).
  57. I. Nompelis, T. W. Drayna, and G. V. Candler, Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics 2005 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006), pp. 389–395.
  58. R. B. Lehoucq, D. C. Sorensen, and C. Yang, ARPACK Users' Guide: Solution of Large-Scale Eigenvalue Problems with Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1998).
  59. X. S. Li and J. W. Demmel, SuperLU_DIST: A scalable distributed-memory sparse direct solver for unsymmetric linear systems, ACM Trans. Math. Software 29, 110 (2003).
  60. I. Nompelis, G. V. Candler, and M. S. Holden, Effect of vibrational nonequilibrium on hypersonic double-cone experiments, AIAA J. 41, 2162 (2003).
  61. P. Bookey, C. Wyckham, and A. J. Smits, Experimental investigations of Mach 3 shock-wave turbulent boundary layer interactions, 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, paper 2005–4899.
  62. J.-P. Dussauge, P. Dupont, and J.-F. Debiève, Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10, 85 (2006).
  63. B.-T. Chu, On the energy transfer to small disturbances in fluid flow (part I), Acta Mech. 1, 215 (1965).
  64. K. J. George and R. I. Sujith, On Chu's disturbance energy, J. Sound Vib. 330, 5280 (2011).
  65. P. J. Schmid and L. Brandt, Analysis of fluid systems: Stability, receptivity, sensitivity: Lecture notes from the FLOW-NORDITA summer school on advanced instability methods for complex flows, Stockholm, Sweden, 2013, Appl. Mech. Rev. 66, 021003 (2014).
  66. F. Giannetti and P. Luchini, Structural sensitivity of the first instability of the cylinder wake, J. Fluid Mech. 581, 167 (2007).
  67. D. Sipp and L. Jacquin, Three-dimensional centrifugal-type instabilities of two-dimensional flows in rotating systems, Phys. Fluids 12, 1740 (2000).
  68. M. R. Malik, Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability, J. Comput. Phys. 86, 376 (1990).
  69. V. Theofilis and T. Colonius, An algorithm for the recovery of 2- and 3D biglobal instabilities of compressible flow over 2D open cavities, 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Orlando, Florida, paper 2003-4143, doi:10.2514/6.2003-4143.
  70. S. Mittal, Stability of flow past a cylinder: Energy budget of eigenmodes, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 63, 533 (2010).
  71. D. Fabre, L. Jacquin, and J. Sesterhenn, Linear interaction of a cylindrical entropy spot with a shock, Phys. Fluids 13, 2403 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation