Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effective slip over partially filled microcavities and its possible failure

Zhouyang Ge1,*, Hanna Holmgren2, Martin Kronbichler3,†, Luca Brandt1,‡, and Gunilla Kreiss2,§

  • 1Linné FLOW Centre and SeRC (Swedish e-Science Research Centre), KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2Division of Scientific Computing, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Box 337, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
  • 3Institute for Computational Mechanics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstrasse 15, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany

  • *zhoge@mech.kth.se
  • kronbichler@lnm.mw.tum.de
  • luca@mech.kth.se
  • §gunilla.kreiss@it.uu.se

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 054201 – Published 17 May, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.054201

Abstract

Motivated by the emerging applications of liquid-infused surfaces (LIS), we study the drag reduction and robustness of transverse flows over two-dimensional microcavities partially filled with an oily lubricant. Using separate simulations at different scales, characteristic contact line velocities at the fluid-solid intersection are first extracted from nanoscale phase field simulations and then applied to micronscale two-phase flows, thus introducing a multiscale numerical framework to model the interface displacement and deformation within the cavities. As we explore the various effects of the lubricant-to-outer-fluid viscosity ratio μ̃2/μ̃1, the capillary number Ca, the static contact angle θs, and the filling fraction of the cavity δ, we find that the effective slip is most sensitive to the parameter δ. The effects of μ̃2/μ̃1 and θs are generally intertwined but weakened if δ<1. Moreover, for an initial filling fraction δ=0.94, our results show that the effective slip is nearly independent of the capillary number when it is small. Further increasing Ca to about 0.01μ̃1/μ̃2, we identify a possible failure mode, associated with lubricants draining from the LIS, for μ̃2/μ̃10.1. Very viscous lubricants (e.g., μ̃2/μ̃1>1), however, are immune to such failure due to their generally larger contact line velocity.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. K. Watanabe, Yanuar, and H. Udagawa, Drag reduction of Newtonian fluid in a circular pipe with a highly water-repellent wall, J. Fluid Mech. 381, 225 (1999).
  2. J. Ou, B. Perot, and J. P. Rothstein, Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces, Phys. Fluids 16, 4635 (2004).
  3. D. Schäffel, K. Koynov, D. Vollmer, H.-J. Butt, and C. Schönecker, Local Flow Field and Slip Length of Superhydrophobic Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 134501 (2016).
  4. C. Lee, C.-H. Choi, and C.-J. Kim, Superhydrophobic drag reduction in laminar flows: A critical review, Exp. Fluids 57, 176 (2016).
  5. C.-H. Choi and C.-J. Kim, Large Slip of Aqueous Liquid Flow Over a Nanoengineered Superhydrophobic Surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 066001 (2006).
  6. A. Steinberger, C. Cottin-Bizonne, P. Kleimann, and E. Charlaix, High friction on a bubble mattress, Nat. Mater. 6, 665 (2007).
  7. E. Karatay, A. S. Haase, C. W. Visser, C. Sun, D. Lohse, P. A. Tsai, and R. G. H. Lammertink, Control of slippage with tunable bubble mattresses, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8422 (2013).
  8. L. Bocquet and E. Lauga, A smooth future? Nat. Mater. 10, 334 (2011).
  9. D. Gentili, G. Bolognesi, A. Giacomello, M. Chinappi, and C. M. Casciola, Pressure effects on water slippage over silane-coated rough surfaces: pillars and holes, Microfluid Nanofluid 16, 1009 (2014).
  10. A. Giacomello, M. Chinappi, S. Meloni, and C. M. Casciola, Metastable Wetting on Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Continuum and Atomistic Views of the Cassie-Baxter-Wenzel Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 226102 (2012).
  11. J. Seo, R. Garcia-Mayoral, and A. Mani, Turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces: Flow-induced capillary waves, and robustness of air-water interfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 835, 45 (2018).
  12. J. S. Wexler, I. Jacobi, and H. A. Stone, Shear-Driven Failure of Liquid-Infused Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 168301 (2015).
  13. B. R. Solomon, K. S. Khalil, and K. K. Varanasi, Drag reduction using lubricant-impregnated surfaces in viscous laminar flow, Langmuir 30, 10970 (2014).
  14. B. J. Rosenberg, T. V. Buren, M. K. Fu, and A. J. Smits, Turbulent drag reduction over air- and liquid-impregnated surfaces, Phys. Fluids 28, 015103 (2016).
  15. A. A. Hemeda and H. Vahedi Tafreshi, Liquid-infused surfaces with trapped air (LISTA) for drag force reduction, Langmuir 32, 2955 (2016).
  16. I. Jacobi, J. S. Wexler, and H. A. Stone, Overflow cascades in liquid-infused substrates, Phys. Fluids 27, 082101 (2015).
  17. Y. Liu, J. S. Wexler, C. Schönecker, and H. A. Stone, Effect of viscosity ratio on the shear-driven failure of liquid-infused surfaces, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 074003 (2016).
  18. E. Lauga, and H. A. Stone, Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech. 489, 55 (2003).
  19. M. Sbragalia, and A. Prosperetti, A note on the effective slip properties for microchannel flows with ultrahydrophobic surfaces, Phys. Fluids 19, 043603 (2007).
  20. A. M. J. Davis and E. Lauga, Geometric transition in friction for flow over a bubble mattress, Phys. Fluids 21, 011701 (2009).
  21. C.-O. Ng and C. Y. Wang, Stokes shear flow over a grating: Implications for superhydrophobic slip, Phys. Fluids 21, 013602 (2009).
  22. C. Schönecker, T. Baier, and S. Hardt, Influence of the enclosed fluid on the flow over a microstructured surface in the Cassie state, J. Fluid Mech. 740, 168 (2014).
  23. T. V. Nizkaya, E. S. Asmolov, and O. I. Vinogradova, Gas cushion model and hydrodynamic boundary conditions for superhydrophobic textures, Phys. Rev. E 90, 043017 (2014).
  24. D. G. Crowdy, Perturbation analysis of subphase gas and meniscus curvature effects for longitudinal flows over superhydrophobic surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 822, 307 (2017).
  25. D. G. Crowdy, Slip length for transverse shear flow over a periodic array of weakly curved menisci, Phys. Fluids 29, 9 (2017).
  26. J. Davies, D. Maynes, B. W. Webb, and B. Woolford, Laminar flow in a microchannel with superhydrophobic walls exhibiting transverse ribs, Phys. Fluids 18, 087110 (2006).
  27. M. B. Martell, J. B. Perot, and J. P. Rothstein, Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 620, 31 (2009).
  28. Y. P. Cheng, C. J. Teo, and B. C. Khoo, Microchannel flows with superhydrophobic surfaces: Effects of Reynolds number and pattern width to channel height ratio, Phys. Fluids 21, 122004 (2009).
  29. L. P. Wang, C. J. Teo, and B. C. Khoo, Effects of interface deformation on flow through microtubes containing superhydrophobic surfaces with longitudinal ribs and grooves, Microfluid Nanofluid 16, 225 (2014).
  30. C. J. Teo and B. C. Khoo, Effects of interface curvature on Poiseuille flow through microchannels and microtubes containing superhydrophobic surfaces with transverse grooves and ribs, Microfluid Nanofluid 17, 891 (2014).
  31. J. Hyväluoma and J. Harting, Slip Flow Over Structured Surfaces with Entrapped Microbubbles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 246001 (2008).
  32. J. Hyväluoma, C. Kunert, J. Harting, Simulations of slip flow on nanobubble-laden surfaces, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 23, 184106 (2011).
  33. P. Gao and J. J. Feng, Enhanced slip on a patterned substrate due to depinning of contact line, Phys. Fluids 21, 102102 (2009).
  34. G. K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
  35. C. Huh and L. E. Scriven, Hydrodynamic model of steady movement of a solid/liquid/fluid contact line, J. Colloid Int. Sci. 35, 85 (1971).
  36. D. Jacqmin, Contact-line dynamics of a diffuse fluid interface, J. Fluid Mech. 402, 57 (2000).
  37. P. Johansson, A. Carlson, and B. Hess, Water-substrate physicochemistry in wetting dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 781, 695 (2015).
  38. M. Sbragaglia, R. Benzi, L. Biferale, S. Succi, and F. Toschi, Surface Roughness-Hydrophobicity Coupling in Microchannel and Nanochannel Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 204503 (2006).
  39. R. G. Cox, The dynamics of the spreading of liquids on a solid surface. Part 1. Viscous flow, J. Fluid Mech. 168, 169 (1986).
  40. M. Kronbichler and G. Kreiss, A phase-field microscale enhancement for macro models of capillary-driven contact point dynamics, J. Comp. Multiphase Flows. 9114 (2017).
  41. H. Holmgren and G. Kreiss, A computational multiscale model for contact line dynamics, arXiv:1709.04917 (2017).
  42. M. Kronbichler, A. Diagne, and H. Holmgren, A fast massively parallel two-phase flow solver for microfluidic chip simulation, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl. 32, 266 (2018).
  43. E. Olsson and G. Kreiss, A conservative level set method for two phase flow, J. Comput. Phys. 210, 225 (2005).
  44. W. Bangerth, R. Hartmann, and G. Kanschat, Deal. II—A general-purpose object-oriented finite element library, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 33, 24/1 (2007).
  45. W. Bangerth, D. Davydov, T. Heister, L. Heltai, G. Kanschat, M. Kronbichler, M. Maier, B. Turcksin, and D. Wells, The deal.II Library, Version 8.4, J. Numer. Math. 24, 135 (2016).
  46. We estimate the dimensional shear rate at the upper boundary of our computational domain from the experimental Hele-Shaw setup in Ref. [12] (2 ml/min through a cross-section of 180μm × 7 mm). Assuming a parabolic velocity profile, the reference velocity at H̃=20μm is Ũ= 0.016 m/s, leading to a shear rate of γ̃̇=800 s1. The characteristic contact line velocity is calculated as Ũc=σ̃/μ̃2, taking σ̃=0.02 kg/s2 and μ̃2=0.0076kg/ms, as in Ref. [40].

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation