Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Non-normality and classification of amplification mechanisms in stability and resolvent analysis

Sean Symon*, Kevin Rosenberg, Scott T. M. Dawson, and Beverley J. McKeon

  • Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

  • *ssymon@caltech.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 053902 – Published 16 May, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.053902

Abstract

Eigenspectra and pseudospectra of the mean-linearized Navier-Stokes operator are used to characterize amplification mechanisms in laminar and turbulent flows in which linear mechanisms are important. Success of mean flow (linear) stability analysis for a particular frequency is shown to depend on whether two scalar measures of non-normality agree: (1) the product between the resolvent norm and the distance from the imaginary axis to the closest eigenvalue and (2) the inverse of the inner product between the most amplified resolvent forcing and response modes. If they agree, the resolvent operator can be rewritten in its dyadic representation to reveal that the adjoint and forward stability modes are proportional to the forcing and response resolvent modes at that frequency. Hence the real parts of the eigenvalues are important since they are responsible for resonant amplification and the resolvent operator is low rank when the eigenvalues are sufficiently separated in the spectrum. If the amplification is pseudoresonant, then resolvent analysis is more suitable to understand the origin of observed flow structures. Two test cases are studied: low Reynolds number cylinder flow and turbulent channel flow. The first deals mainly with resonant mechanisms, hence the success of both classical and mean stability analysis with respect to predicting the critical Reynolds number and global frequency of the saturated flow. Both scalar measures of non-normality agree for the base and mean flows, and the region where the forcing and response modes overlap scales with the length of the recirculation bubble. In the case of turbulent channel flow, structures result from both resonant and pseudoresonant mechanisms, suggesting that both are necessary elements to sustain turbulence. Mean shear is exploited most efficiently by stationary disturbances while bounds on the pseudospectra illustrate how pseudoresonance is responsible for the most amplified disturbances at spatial wavenumbers and temporal frequencies corresponding to well-known turbulent structures. Some implications for flow control are discussed.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. S. E. Turton, L. S. Tuckerman, and D. Barkley, Prediction of frequencies in thermosolutal convection from mean flows, Phys. Rev. E 91, 043009 (2015).
  2. K. Gudmundsson and T. Colonius, Instability wave models for the near-field fluctuations of turbulent jets, J. Fluid Mech. 689, 97 (2011).
  3. K. Oberleithner, L. Rukes, and J. Soria, Mean flow stability analysis of oscillating jet experiments, J. Fluid Mech. 757, 1 (2014).
  4. O. T. Schmidt, A. Towne, T. Colonius, A. V. G. Cavalieri, P. Jordan, and G. A. Brès, Wavepackets and trapped acoustic modes in a turbulent jet: Coherent structure eduction and global stability, J. Fluid Mech. 825, 1153 (2017).
  5. S. Beneddine, D. Sipp, A. Arnault, J. Dandois, and L. Lesshafft, Conditions for validity of mean flow stability analysis, J. Fluid Mech. 798, 485 (2016).
  6. D. Barkley, Linear analysis of the cylinder wake mean flow, Europhys. Lett. 75, 750 (2006).
  7. M. Provansal, C. Mathis, and L. Boyer, Bénard–von Kármán instability: Transient and forced regimes, J. Fluid Mech. 182, 1 (1987).
  8. K. R. Sreenivasan, P. J. Strykowski, and D. J. Olinger, Hopf bifurcation, Landau equation, and vortex shedding behind circular cylinders, in Proceedings of the Forum on Unsteady Flow Separation, edited by K. Ghia (ASME, New York, 1987), Vol. 1, pp. 1–13.
  9. B. R. Noack and H. Eckelmann, A global stability analysis of the steady and periodic cylinder wake, J. Fluid Mech. 270, 297 (1994).
  10. D. Sipp and A. Lebedev, Global stability of base and mean flows: A general approach and its applications to cylinder and open cavity flows, J. Fluid Mech. 593, 333 (2007).
  11. V. Mantič-Lugo, C. Arratia, and F. Gallaire, Self-Consistent Mean Flow Description of the Nonlinear Saturation of the Vortex Shedding in the Cylinder Wake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 084501 (2014).
  12. L. N. Trefethen, A. E. Trefethen, S. C. Reddy, and T. A. Driscoll, Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues, Science 261, 578 (1993).
  13. P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson, Stability and Transition in Shear Flows (Springer, Berlin, 2001).
  14. M. R. Jovanović and B. Bamieh, Componentwise energy amplification in channel flows, J. Fluid Mech. 534, 145 (2005).
  15. B. F. Farrell and P. J. Ioannou, Stochastic forcing of the linearized Navier-Stokes equations, Phys. Fluids 5, 2600 (1993).
  16. K. M. Butler and B. F. Farrell, Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow, Phys. Fluids A 4, 1637 (1992).
  17. B. J. McKeon and A. S. Sharma, A critical-layer framework for turbulent pipe flow, J. Fluid Mech. 658, 336 (2010).
  18. Y. Hwang and C. Cossu, Linear non-normal energy amplification of harmonic and stochastic forcing in the turbulent channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 664, 51 (2010).
  19. L. Lu and G. Papadakis, An iterative method for the computation of the response of the linearised Navier-Stokes equations to the harmonic forcing and application to forced cylinder wakes, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 74, 794 (2014).
  20. J. Jeun, J. W. Nichols, and M. R. Jovanović, Input-output analysis of high-speed axisymmetric isothermal jet noise, Phys. Fluids 28, 047101 (2016).
  21. O. T. Schmidt, A. Towne, G. Rigas, T. Colonius, and G. A. Brès, Spectral analysis of jet turbulence, arXiv:1711.06296.
  22. S. C. Reddy, P. J. Schmid, and D. S. Henningson, Pseudospectra of the Orr-Sommerfeld operator, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 53, 15 (1993).
  23. A. E. Trefethen, L. N. Trefethen, and P. J. Schmid, Spectra and pseudospectra for pipe Poiseuille flow, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 175, 413 (1999).
  24. P. J. Schmid, Nonmodal stability theory, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 129 (2007).
  25. P. J. Schmid and L. Brandt, Analysis of fluid systems: Stability, receptivity, sensitivity, Appl. Mech. Rev. 66, 024803 (2014).
  26. J. M. Chomaz, Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: Non-normality and nonlinearity, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 357 (2005).
  27. U. A. Qadri and P. J. Schmid, Frequency selection mechanisms in the flow of a laminar boundary layer over a shallow cavity, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 013902 (2017).
  28. P. Huerre and M. Rossi, Hydrodynamic instabilities in open flows, in Hydrodynamics and Nonlinear Instabilities, edited by C. Godrèche and P. Manneville (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
  29. P. Huerre and P. A. Monkewitz, Absolute and convective instabilities in free shear layers, J. Fluid Mech. 159, 151 (1985).
  30. P. A. Monkewitz, The absolute and convective nature of instability in two-dimensional wakes at low Reynolds numbers, Phys. Fluids 31, 999 (1988).
  31. F. Giannetti and P. Luchini, Structural sensitivity of the first instability of the cylinder wake, J. Fluid Mech. 581, 167 (2007).
  32. D. Sipp, O. Marquet, P. Meliga, and A. Barbagallo, Dynamics and control of global instabilities in open-flows: A linearized approach, Appl. Mech. Rev. 63, 030801 (2010).
  33. B. J. McKeon, The engine behind (wall) turbulence: Perspectives on scale interactions, J. Fluid Mech. 817, P1 (2017).
  34. T. Herbert, Parabolized stability equations, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 245 (1997).
  35. W. C. Reynolds and W. G. Tiederman, Stability of turbulent channel flow, with application to Malkus's theory, J. Fluid Mech. 27, 253 (1967).
  36. K. Taira, S. L. Brunton, S. T. M. Dawson, C. W. Rowley, T. Colonius, B. J. McKeon, O. T. Schmidt, S. Gordeyev, V. Theofilis, and L. S. Ukeiley, Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview, AIAA J. 55, 4013 (2017).
  37. P. Luchini and A. Bottaro, Adjoint equations in stability analysis, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 493 (2014).
  38. R. Moarref, A. S. Sharma, J. A. Tropp, and B. J. McKeon, Model-based scaling of the streamwise energy density in high-Reynolds-number turbulent channels, J. Fluid Mech. 734, 275 (2013).
  39. L. Brandt, D. Sipp, J. O. Pralits, and O. Marquet, Effect of base-flow variation in noise amplifiers: The flat-plate boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 687, 503 (2011).
  40. O. Marquet, M. Lombardi, J. M. Chomaz, D. Sipp, and L. Jacquin, Direct and adjoint global modes of a recirculation bubble: Lift-up and convective non-normalities, J. Fluid Mech. 622, 1 (2009).
  41. M. T. Landahl, A note on an algebraic instability of inviscid parallel shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 98, 243 (1980).
  42. W. M. F. Orr, The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part II: A viscous liquid, Proc. R. Irish Acad. Sec. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 27, 69 (1907).
  43. B. F. Farrell, Developing disturbances in shear, J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 2191 (1987).
  44. P. Meliga, E. Boujo, and F. Gallaire, A self-consistent formulation for the sensitivity analysis of finite-amplitude vortex shedding in the cylinder wake, J. Fluid Mech. 800, 327 (2016).
  45. M. Juniper, Absolute and convective instability in gas turbine fuel injectors, in Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Copenhagen (ASME, New York, 2012).
  46. I. Gelfand, Zur Theorie der Charaktere der Abelschen topologischen Gruppen, Rec. Math. N. S. 9, 49 (1941).
  47. L. N. Trefethen and M. Embree, Spectra and Pseudospectra: The Behavior of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2005).
  48. T. Gebhardt and S. Grossmann, Chaos transition despite linear stability, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3705 (1994).
  49. D. Barkley and R. D. Henderson, Three-dimensional Floquet stability analysis of the wake of a circular cylinder, J. Fluid Mech. 322, 215 (1996).
  50. F. Hecht, New development in freefem++, J. Numer. Math. 20, 251 (2012).
  51. M. Nayar and U. Ortega, Computation of selected eigenvalues of generalized eigenvalue problems, J. Comput. Phys. 108, 8 (1993).
  52. R. B. Lehoucq and D. C. Sorensen, Deflation techniques for an implicitly restarted Arnoldi iteration, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 17, 789 (1996).
  53. D. Sipp and O. Marquet, Characterization of noise amplifiers with global singular modes: The case of the leading-edge flat-plate boundary layer, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 27, 617 (2013).
  54. P. R. Amestoy, I. S. Duff, J.-Y. L'Excellent, and J. Koster, A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic shedding, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 23, 15 (2001).
  55. B. J. A. Zielinska, S. Goujon-Durand, J. Dušek, and J. E. Wesfreid, Strongly Nonlinear Effect in Unstable Wakes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3893 (1997).
  56. J. A. Weideman and S. C. Reddy, A matlab differentiation matrix suite, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 26, 465 (2000).
  57. M. J. P. Hack and P. Moin, Algebraic disturbance growth by interaction of Orr and lift-up mechanisms, J. Fluid Mech. 829, 112 (2017).
  58. J.-L. Bourguignon, Models of turbulent pipe flow, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 2012 (unpublished).
  59. F. Gómez, H. M. Blackburn, M. Rudman, A. S. Sharma, and B. J. McKeon, A reduced-order model of three-dimensional unsteady flow in a cavity based on the resolvent operator, J. Fluid Mech. 798, R2 (2016).
  60. B. J. McKeon, A. S. Sharma, and I. Jacobi, Experimental manipulation of wall turbulence: A systems approach, Phys. Fluids 25, 031301 (2013).
  61. K. K. Chen and C. W. Rowley, H2 optimal actuator and sensor placement in the linearised Ginzburg-Landau system, J. Fluid Mech. 681, 241 (2011).
  62. M. Luhar, A. S. Sharma, and B. J. McKeon, Opposition control within the resolvent analysis framework, J. Fluid Mech. 749, 597 (2014).
  63. B. Moore, Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 26, 17 (1981).
  64. C. W. Rowley, Model reduction for fluids using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 15, 997 (2005).
  65. A. Barbagallo, D. Sipp, and P. J. Schmid, Closed-loop control of an open cavity flow using reduced-order models, J. Fluid Mech. 641, 1 (2009).
  66. F. Gómez and H. M. Blackburn, Data-driven approach to design of passive flow control strategies, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 021901 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation