Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Giant deviation of a relaxation time from generalized Newtonian theory in discontinuous shear thickening suspensions

Rijan Maharjan* and Eric Brown

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

  • *Corresponding author: rijan.maharjan@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 123301 – Published 5 December, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.123301

Abstract

We investigated the transient relaxation of a discontinuous shear thickening (DST) suspension of cornstarch in water. We performed two types of relaxation experiments starting from a steady shear in a parallel-plate rheometer, followed either by stopping the top plate rotation and measuring the transient torque relaxation or by removing the torque on the plate and measuring the transient rotation of the tool. We found that at low effective weight fraction ϕeff<58.8±0.4%, the suspensions exhibited a relaxation behavior consistent with a generalized Newtonian fluid in which the relaxation is determined by the steady-state relationship between shear stress and shear rate. However, for larger weight fraction 58.8%<ϕeff<61.0%, near the liquid-solid transition ϕc=61.0±0.7%, we found relaxation behaviors qualitatively and quantitatively different from the generalized Newtonian model. The regime where the relaxation was inconsistent with the generalized Newtonian model was the same where we found positive normal stress during relaxation, and in some cases we found an oscillatory response, suggestive of a solidlike structure consisting of a system-spanning contact network of particles. This regime also corresponds to the same packing fraction range where we consistently found discontinuous shear thickening in rate-controlled, steady-state measurements. The relaxation time in this range scales with the inverse of the critical shear rate at the onset of shear thickening, which may correspond to a contact relaxation time for nearby particles in the structure to flow away from each other. In this range, the relaxation time was the same in both stress- and rate-controlled relaxation experiments, indicating the relaxation time is more intrinsic than an effective viscosity in this range and is needed in addition to the steady-state viscosity function to describe transient flows. The discrepancy between the measured relaxation times and the generalized Newtonian prediction was found to be as large as four orders of magnitude, and extrapolations diverge in the limit as ϕeffϕc as the generalized Newtonian prediction approaches 0. This quantitative discrepancy indicates the relaxation is not controlled by the dissipative terms in the constitutive relation. At the highest weight fractions, the relaxation time scales were measured to be on the order of 1 s. The fact that this time scale is resolvable by the naked eye may be important to understanding some of the dynamic phenomenon commonly observed in cornstarch and water suspensions. We also showed that using the critical shear rate γ̇c at the onset of shear thickening to characterize the effective weight fraction ϕeff can more precisely characterize material properties near the critical point ϕc, allowing us to resolve this transition so close to ϕc. This conversion to ϕeff can also be used to compare experiments done in other laboratories or under different temperature and humidity conditions on a consistent ϕeff scale at our reference temperature and humidity environment.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. Y. S. Lee, E. D. Wetzel, and N. J Wagner, The ballistic impact characteristics of kevlar-woven fabrics impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid, J. Mat. Sci. 38, 2825 (2003).
  2. http://www.d3o.com/.
  3. H. A. Barnes, Shear-thickening (“dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids, J. Rheol. 33, 329 (1989).
  4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkS1ymQ73oc, http://www.wimp.com/pool-filled-with-non-newtonian-fluid-cornstarch-and-water/.
  5. E. Brown and H. M. Jaeger, Shear thickening in concentrated suspensions: Phenomenology, mechanisms, and relations to jamming, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 046602 (2014).
  6. F. S. Merkt, R. D. Deegan, D. I. Goldman, E. C. Rericha, and H. L. Swinney, Persistent Holes in a Fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 184501 (2004).
  7. S. von Kann, J. H. Snoeijer, D. Lohse, and D. van der Meer, Nonmonotonic settling of a sphere in a cornstarch suspension, Phys. Rev. E 84, 060401 (2011).
  8. E. Brown and H. M. Jaeger, Dynamic Jamming Point for Shear Thickening Suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 086001 (2009).
  9. E. Brown, H. Zhang, N. A. Forman, B. W. Maynor, D. E. Betts, J. M. DeSimone, and H. M. Jaeger, Shear thickening and jamming in densely packed suspensions of different particle shapes, Phys. Rev. E 84, 031408 (2011).
  10. N. J. Wagner and J. F. Brady, Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions, Phys. Today 62(10), 27 (2009).
  11. S. R. Waitukaitis and H. M. Jaeger, Impact-activated solidification of dense suspensions via dynamic jamming fronts, Nature (London) 487, 205 (2012).
  12. I. R. Peters and H. M. Jaeger, Quasi-2d dynamic jamming in cornstarch suspensions: Visualization and force measurements, Soft Matter 10, 6564 (2014).
  13. R. Maharjan, S. Mukhopadhyay, B. Allen, T. Storz, and E. Brown, Constitutive relation of the system-spanning dynamically jammed region in response to impact of cornstarch and water suspensions, arXiv:1407.0719.
  14. R. D. Deegan, Stress hysteresis as the cause of persistent holes in particulate suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 81, 036319 (2010).
  15. S. von Kann, J. H. Snoeijer, and D. van der Meer, Velocity oscillations and stop-go cycles: The trajectory of an object settling in a cornstarch suspension, Phys. Rev. E 87, 042301 (2013).
  16. O. Ozgen, E. Brown, and M. Kallman, Simulating the dynamic behavior of shear thickening fluids, arXiv:1510.09069.
  17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SEB0Nhx5TU.
  18. Y. S. Lee and N. J. Wagner, Dynamic properties of shear thickening colloidal suspensions, Rheol. Acta 42, 199 (2003).
  19. S. R. Raghavan and S. A. Khan, Shear-thickening response of fumed silica suspensions under steady and oscillatory shear, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 185, 57 (1997).
  20. E. Brown and H. Jaeger, The role of dilation and confining stress in shear thickening of dense suspensions, J. Rheol. 56, 875 (2012).
  21. N. Y. C. Lin, B. M. Guy, M. Hermes, C. Ness, J. Sun, W. C. K. Poon, and I. Cohen, Hydrodynamic and Contact Contributions to Shear Thickening in Colloidal Suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 228304 (2015).
  22. D. Lootens, H. Van Damme, and P. Hébraud, Giant stress fluctuations at the jamming transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 178301 (2003).
  23. A. Fall, F. Bertrand, G. Ovarlez, and B. Bonn, Shear thickening of cornstarch suspensions, J. Rheol. 56, 575 (2012).
  24. J. Mewis and N. J. Wagner, Colloidal Suspension Rheology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012).
  25. F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 7th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2009).
  26. D. Lootens, H. van Damme, Y. Hémar, and P. Hébraud, Dilatant Flow of Concentrated Suspensions of Rough Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 268302 (2005).
  27. R. Seto, R. Mari, J. F. Morris, and M. M. Denn, Discontinuous Shear Thickening of Frictional Hard-Sphere Suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 218301 (2013).
  28. J. R. Melrose and R. C. Ball, Continuous shear thickening transitions in model concentrated colloids: The role of interparticle forces, J. Rheol. 48, 937 (2004).
  29. J. F. Brady and J. F. Morris, Microstructure of strongly sheared suspensions and its impact on rheology and diffusion, J. Fluid Mech. 348, 103 (1997).
  30. M. Wyart and M. E. Cates, Discontinuous Shear Thickening Without Inertia in Dense Non-Brownian Suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 098302 (2014).
  31. I. R. Peters, S. Majumdar, and H. M. Jaeger, Direct observation of dynamic shear jamming in dense suspensions, Nature (London) 532, 214 (2016).
  32. H. Nakanishi, S.-i. Nagahiro, and N. Mitarai, Fluid dynamics of dilatant fluids, Phys. Rev. E 85, 011401 (2012).
  33. M. Hermes, B. M. Guy, W. C. K. Poon, G. Poy, M. E. Cates, and M. Wyart, Unsteady flow and particle migration in dense, non-Brownian suspensions, J. Rheol. 60, 905 (2016).
  34. A. Fall, A. Lemaitre, and G. Ovarlez, Discontinuous shear thickening in cornstarch suspensions, EPJ Web Conf. 140, 09001 (2017).
  35. J. R. Royer, D. L. Blair, and S. D. Hudson, Rheological Signature of Frictional Interactions in Shear Thickening Suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 188301 (2016).
  36. P. G. Weyand, D. B. Sternlight, M. J. Bellizzi, and S. Wright, Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements, J. Appl. Physiol. 89, 1991 (2000).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation