- Access by Xinjiang University
Inertial particles distribute in turbulence as Poissonian points with random intensity inducing clustering and supervoiding
Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 074302 – Published 18 July, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.074302
Abstract
This work considers the distribution of discrete inertial particles in turbulence. We demonstrate that even for weak inertia the distribution can be strongly different from the Poisson distribution that holds for tracers. We study the cases of weak inertia or strong gravity where single-valued particle flow holds in space. In these cases, the particles distribute over a random multifractal attractor in space. This attractor is characterized by fractal dimensions describing scaling exponents of moments of number of particles inside a ball with size much smaller than the viscous scale of turbulence. Previous studies used a continuum approach to the moments which requires having a large number of particles below the viscous scale. This condition often does not hold in practice; for instance, for water droplets in clouds there is typically one droplet per viscous scale. This condition is also hard to realize in numerical simulations. In this work, we overcome this difficulty by deriving the probability of having particles in a ball of small radius for which the continuum approximation may not hold. We demonstrate that the random point process formed by positions of particles' centers in space is a Poisson point process with log-normal random intensity (the so-called log Gaussian Cox process or LGCP). This gives in terms of the characteristic function of a log-normal distribution from which the moments are derived. This allows finding the correlation dimension relevant for statistics of particles' collisions. The case of zero number of particles provides the statistics of the size of voids—regions without particles—that were not studied previously. The probability of voids is increased compared to a random distribution of particles because preferential concentration of inertial particles implies voids in the deserted regions. Thus voids and preferential concentration are different reflections of the same phenomena. In the limit of tracers with zero inertia, described by the Poisson distribution, the typical void size is of the order of the mean interparticle distance. However, at small but finite inertia, the void size is larger than the mean interparticle distance by a factor that diverges in the continuum limit of infinite number of particles, manifesting strong deviations from the Poisson distribution. Thus, voids are very sensitive to inertia and limits of zero inertia and continuum may not commute. Further, the tail of the probability distribution of the void size is log normal, in contrast with faster than exponential decay of the Poisson distribution. Remarkably, at scales where there is no clustering (so pair-correlation function of concentration splits in the product of averages), there can still be an increase of the void probability so that turbulent voiding is stronger than clustering. These results can find applications in the long-time survival probability of reacting particles where the particle survives in the void of predators. The demonstrated double stochasticity (Poisson with random intensity) of the distribution originates in the two-step formation of fluctuations of the number of particles inside the volume under observation. First, turbulence randomly brings uncorrelated particles below the viscous scale with Poisson-type probability. Then, turbulence compresses the particles inside the observation volume. We confirm the predictions by numerical observations of inertial particle motion in a chaotic Arnold-Beltrami-Childress flow. Our work implies that the particle distribution in arbitrary weakly compressible flow with finite time correlations is a LGCP.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (48)
- R. Monchaux, M. Bourgoin, and A. Cartellier, Analyzing preferential concentration and clustering of inertial particles in turbulence, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 40, 1 (2012).
- S. Balachandar and J. K. Eaton, Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111 (2010).
- W. C. Reade and L. R. Collins, Effect of preferential concentration on turbulent collision rates, Phys. Fluids 12, 2530 (2000).
- G. Boffetta, A. Celani, F. De Lillo, and S. Musacchio, The Eulerian description of dilute collisionless suspension, Europhys. Lett. 78, 14001 (2007).
- J. Bec, L. Biferale, A. S. Lanotte, A. Scagliarini, and F. Toschi, Turbulent pair dispersion of inertial particles, J. Fluid Mech. 645, 497 (2010).
- G. Falkovich and A. Pumir, Intermittent distribution of heavy particles in a turbulent flow, Phys. Fluids 16, L47 (2004).
- J. Bec, L. Biferale, M. Cencini, A. Lanotte, S. Musacchio, and F. Toschi, Heavy Particle Concentration in Turbulence at Dissipative and Inertial Scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 084502 (2007).
- I. Fouxon, Y. Park, R. Harduf, and C. Lee, Inhomogeneous distribution of water droplets in cloud turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 92, 033001 (2015).
- H. Xu and E. Bodenschatz, Motion of inertial particles with size larger than Kolmogorov scale in turbulent flows, Phys. D (Amsterdam, Neth.) 237, 2095 (2008).
- E. Calzavarini, M. Cencini, D. Lohse, and F. Toschi (International Collaboration for Turbulence Research), Quantifying Turbulence-Induced Segregation of Inertial Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 084504 (2008).
- J. Chun, D. L. Koch, S. L. Rani, A. Ahluwalia, and L. R Collins, Clustering of aerosol particles in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 536, 219 (2005).
- U. Frisch, Turbulence: The Legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995).
- I. Fouxon, Distribution of Particles and Bubbles in Turbulence at a Small Stokes Number, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 134502 (2012).
- B. J. Devenish, P. Bartello, J.-L. Brenguier, L. R. Collins, W. W. Grabowski, R. H. A. IJzermans, S. P. Malinowski, M. W. Reeks, J. C. Vassilicos, L.-P. Wang et al., Droplet growth in warm turbulent clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 138, 1401 (2012).
- H. Siebert, R. A. Shaw, J. Ditas, T. Schmeissner, S. P. Malinowski, E. Bodenschatz, and H. Xu, High-resolution measurement of cloud microphysics and turbulence at a mountaintop station, Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 3219 (2015).
- E. Toprak and M. Schnaiter, Fluorescent biological aerosol particles measured with the waveband integrated bioaerosol sensor wibs-4: Laboratory tests combined with a one-year field study, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 225 (2013).
- I. Ahmad, T. Mielonen, D. P. Grosvenor, H. J. Portin, A. Arola, S. Mikkonen, T. Khn, A. Leskinen, J. Joutsensaari, M. Komppula et al., Long-term measurements of cloud droplet concentrations and aerosol-cloud interactions in continental boundary layer clouds, Tellus B 65, 20138 (2013).
- G. Boffetta, F. De Lillo, and A. Gamba, Large-scale inhomogeneity of inertial particles in turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 16, L20 (2004).
- S. Goto and J. C. Vassilicos, Self-similar clustering of inertial particles and zero-acceleration points in fully developed two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Fluids 18, 115103 (2006).
- A. A. Ovchinnikov and Y. B. Zeldovich, Role of density fluctuations in bimolecular reaction kinetics, Chem. Phys. 28, 215 (1978).
- J. Møller and R. P. Waagepetersen, Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003).
- M. R. Maxey, The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields, J. Fluid. Mech. 174, 441 (1987).
- L. Schmidt, I. Fouxon, D. Krug, M. van Reeuwijk, and M. Holzner, Clustering of particles in turbulence due to phoresis, Phys. Rev. E 93, 063110 (2016).
- W. M. Durham, E. Climent, M. Barry, F. De Lillo, G. Boffetta, M. Cencini, and R. Stocker, Turbulence drives microscale patches of motile phytoplankton, Nat. Commun. 4, 2148 (2013).
- I. Fouxon and A. Leshansky, Phytoplankton's motion in turbulent ocean, Phys. Rev. E 92, 013017 (2015).
- O. Ayala, B. Rosa, L.-P. Wang, and W. W. Grabowski, Effects of turbulence on the geometric collision rate of sedimenting droplets. Part 1. Results from direct numerical simulation, New J. Phys. 10, 075015 (2008).
- G. Falkovich, A. Fouxon, and M. G. Stepanov, Acceleration of rain initiation by cloud turbulence, Nature (London) 419, 151 (2002).
- J. L. Kaplan and J. A. Yorke, Chaotic behavior of multidimensional difference equations, in Functional Differential Equations and Approximation of Fixed Points, Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 730, edited by H.-O. Peitgen and H.-O. Walther (Springer, Berlin, 1979), p. 204.
- G. Falkovich and A. Fouxon, Entropy production and extraction in dynamical systems and turbulence, New J. Phys. 6, 50 (2004).
- E. Balkovsky, G. Falkovich, and A. Fouxon, Intermittent Distribution of Inertial Particles in Turbulent Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2790 (2001).
- E. Balkovsky and A. Fouxon, Universal long-time properties of Lagrangian statistics in the batchelor regime and their application to the passive scalar problem, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4164 (1999).
- G. Falkovich, K. Gawędzki, and M. Vergassola, Particles and fields in fluid turbulence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 913 (2001).
- J. Grandell, Doubly Stochastic Poisson Processes (Springer, Berlin, 1976).
- J. F. C. Kingman, On doubly stochastic poisson processes, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 60, 923 (1964).
- J. Møller, A. R. Syversveen, and R. P. Waagepetersen, Log Gaussian Cox processes, Scand. J. Stat. 25, 451 (1998).
- G. K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
- S. K. Ma, Statistical Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985).
- E. W. Weisstein, CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002).
- S. Asmussen, J. L. Jensen, and L. Rojas-Nandayapa, On the Laplace transform of the log-normal distribution, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Prob. 18, 441 (2016).
- C. Tellambura and D. Senaratne, Accurate computation of the MGF of the log-normal distribution and its application to sum of log-normals, Trans. Comm. 58, 1568 (2010).
- J. P. L. C. Salazar, J. De Jong, L. Cao, S. H. Woodward, H. Meng, and L. R. Collins, Experimental and numerical investigation of inertial particle clustering in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid. Mech. 600, 245 (2008).
- V. I. Arnold, Sur La Topologie Des Écoulements Stationnaires Des Fluides Parfait (Springer, Berlin, 2013).
- T. Dombre, U. Frisch, J. M. Greene, M. Hénon, A. Mehr, and A. M. Soward, Chaotic streamlines in the abc flows, J. Fluid Mech. 167, 353 (1986).
- P. L. Johnson, S. S. Hamilton, R. Burns, and C. Meneveau, Analysis of geometrical and statistical features of Lagrangian stretching in turbulent channel flow using a database task-parallel particle tracking algorithm, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 014605 (2017).
- M. Wilkinson and B. Mehlig, Caustics in turbulent aerosols, Europhys. Lett. 71, 186 (2005).
- G. P. Bewley, E.-W. Saw, and E. Bodenschatz, Observation of the sling effect, New J. Phys. 15, 083051 (2013).
- T. Ishihara, Y. Kaneda, and J. C. R. Hunt, Thin shear layers in high Reynolds number turbulence-DNS results, Flow, Turbulence Combust. 91, 895 (2013).
- M. Voßkuhle, A. Pumir, E. Lévêque, and M. Wilkinson, Prevalence of the sling effect for enhancing collision rates in turbulent suspensions, J. Fluid Mech. 749, 841 (2014).