- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Unsteady drag following shock wave impingement on a dense particle curtain measured using pulse-burst PIV

Edward P. DeMauro*, Justin L. Wagner†, Steven J. Beresh‡, and Paul A. Farias

  • Sandia National Laboratories, Engineering Sciences Center, P.O. Box 5800, MS-0825, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA

  • *Current address: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 98 Brett Road, Room D102, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA; edward.demauro@rutgers.edu
  • †jwagner@sandia.gov
  • ‡sjberes@sandia.gov
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 064301 – Published 8 June, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.064301

Abstract

High-speed, time-resolved particle image velocimetry with a pulse-burst laser was used to measure the gas-phase velocity upstream and downstream of a shock wave–particle curtain interaction at three shock Mach numbers (1.22, 1.40, and 1.45) at a repetition rate of 37.5 kHz. The particle curtain was formed from free-falling soda-lime particles resulting in volume fractions of 9% or 23% at mid-height, depending on particle diameter (106–125 and 300–355 μm, respectively). Following impingement by a shock wave, a pressure difference was created between the upstream and downstream sides of the curtain, which accelerated flow through the curtain. Jetting of flow through the curtain was observed downstream once deformation of the curtain began, demonstrating a long-term unsteady effect. Using a control volume approach, the unsteady drag on the curtain was estimated from velocity and pressure data. The drag imposed on the curtain has a strong volume fraction dependence with a prolonged unsteadiness following initial shock impingement. In addition, the data suggest that the resulting pressure difference following the propagation of the reflected and transmitted shock waves is the primary component to curtain drag.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. E. J. Chang and K. Kailasanath, Shock wave interactions with particles and liquid fuel droplets, Shock Waves 12, 333 (2003).
  2. B. Vessiere, Detonations in gas-particle mixtures, J. Propul. Power 22, 1269 (2006).
  3. W. Merzkirch and K. Bracht, The erosion of dust by a shock wave in air: Initial stages with laminar flow, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 4, 89 (1978).
  4. S. L. Davis, T. B. Dittmann, G. B. Jacobs, and W. S. Don, Dispersion of a cloud of particles by a moving shock: Effects of the shape, angle of rotation, and aspect ratio, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 54, 900 (2013).
  5. F. Zhang, D. L. Frost, P. A. Thibault, and S. B. Murray, Explosive dispersal of solid particles, Shock Waves 10, 431 (2001).
  6. G. Rudinger, Some properties of shock relaxation in gas flows carrying small particles, Phys. Fluids 7, 658 (1964).
  7. F. E. Marble, Dynamics of dusty gases, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2, 397 (1970).
  8. M. Sommerfeld, The unsteadiness of shock waves propagating through gas-particle mixtures, Exp. Fluids 3, 197 (1985).
  9. J. Magnaudet and I. Eames, The motion of high-Reynolds number bubbles in inhomogeneous flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 659 (2000).
  10. M. Parmar, A. Haselbacher, and S. Balachandar, Modeling of the unsteady force for shock-particle interaction, Shock Waves 19, 317 (2009).
  11. J. L. Wagner, S. J. Beresh, S. P. Kearney, B. O. M. Pruett, and E. K. Wright, Shock tube investigation of quasi-steady drag in shock-particle interactions, Phys. Fluids 24, 123301 (2012).
  12. M. Sun, T. Saito, K. Takayama, and H. Tanno, Unsteady drag on a sphere by shock wave loading, Shock Waves 14, 3 (2004).
  13. E. Loth, Compressibility and rarefaction effects on drag of a spherical particle, AIAA J. 46, 2219 (2008).
  14. A. A. Martinez, G. C. Orlicz, and K. P. Prestridge, A new experiment to measure shocked particle drag using multi-pulse particle image velocimetry and particle tracking, Exp. Fluids 56, 1 (2015).
  15. A. Britan, T. Elperin, O. Igra, and J. P. Jiang, Acceleration of a sphere behind planar shock waves, Exp. Fluids 20, 84 (1995).
  16. B. W. Skews, M. S. Bredin, and M. Efune, Drag measurements in unsteady compressible flow. Part 2: Shock wave loading of spheres and cones, R&D J. South Afr. Inst. Mech. Eng. 23, 13 (2007).
  17. V. M. Boiko, V. P. Kiselev, S. P. Kiselev, A. N. Papyrin, S. V. Poplavsky, and V. M. Formin, Shock wave interaction with a cloud of particles, Shock Waves 7, 275 (1997).
  18. X. Rogue, G. Rodriguez, J. F. Haas, and R. Saurel, Experimental and numerical investigation of the shock-induced fluidization of a particles bed, Shock Waves 8, 29 (1998).
  19. J. L. Wagner, S. J. Beresh, S. P. Kearney, W. M. Trott, J. N. Castaneda, B. O. Pruett, and M. R. Baer, A multiphase shock tube for shock wave interactions with dense particle fields, Exp. Fluids 52, 1507 (2012).
  20. J. L. Wagner, S. P. Kearney, S. J. Beresh, E. P. DeMauro, and B. O. Pruett, Flash x-ray measurements on the shock-induced dispersal of a dense particle curtain, Exp. Fluids 56, 1 (2015).
  21. Y. Ling, J. L. Wagner, S. J. Beresh, S. P. Kearney, and S. Balachandar, Interaction of a planar shock wave with a dense particle curtain: Modeling and experiments, Phys. Fluids 24, 113301 (2012).
  22. J. D. Regele, J. Rabinovitch, T. Colonius, and G. Blanquart, Unsteady effects in dense, high speed, particle laden flows, Multiphas. Flow 61, 1 (2014).
  23. H. Liu, Y. Guo, and W. Lin, Simulation of shock-powder interaction using kinetic theory of granular flow, Powder Technol. 273, 133 (2015).
  24. R. W. Houim and E. S. Oran, A multiphase model for compressible granular-gaseous flows: Formulation and initial tests, J. Fluid Mech. 789, 166 (2016).
  25. M. Kellenberger, C. Johansen, G. Ciccarelli, and F. Zhang, Dense particle cloud dispersion by a shock wave, Shock Waves 23, 415 (2013).
  26. T. G. Theofanous, V. Mitkin, and C. H. Chang, The dynamics of dense particle clouds subjected to shock waves. Part 1. Experiments and scaling laws, J. Fluid Mech. 792, 658 (2016).
  27. J. L. Wagner, S. J. Beresh, E. P. DeMauro, K. M. Casper, D. R. Guildenbecher, B. O. Pruett, and P. Farias, Pulse-burst PIV measurements of transient phenomena in a shock tube, AIAA (2016), doi:10.2514/6.2016-0791.
  28. R. J. Goetsch and J. D. Regele, Discrete element method prediction of particle curtain properties, Chem. Eng. Sci. 137, 852 (2015).
  29. J. H. Arakeri, D. Das, A. Krothapalli, and L. Lourenco, Vortex ring formation at the open end of a shock tube: A particle image velocimetry study, Phys. Fluids 16, 1008 (2004).
  30. K. Prestridge, P. M. Rightley, P. Vorobieff, R. F. Benjamin, and N. A. Kurnit, Simultaneous density-field visualization and PIV of a shock-accelerated gas curtain, Exp. Fluids 29, 339 (2000).
  31. K. Prestridge, P. Vorobieff, P. M. Rightley, and R. F. Benjamin, Validation of an Instability Growth Model Using Particle Image Velcimetry Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4353 (2000).
  32. N. Haehn, C. Weber, J. Oakley, M. Anderson, D. Ranjan, and R. Bonazza, Experimental investigation of a twice-shocked spherical gas inhomogeneity with particle image velocimetry, Shock Waves 21, 225 (2011).
  33. S. J. Beresh, S. P. Kearney, J. L. Wagner, D. R. Guildenbecher, J. F. Henfling, R. W. Spillers, B. O. M. Pruett, N. Jiang, M. N. Slipchenko, J. Mance, and S. Roy, Pulse-burst PIV in a high-speed wind tunnel, Meas. Sci. Technol. 26, 095305 (2015).
  34. M. Samimy and S. K. Lele, Motion of particles with inertia in a compressible free shear layer, Phys. Fluids 3, 1915 (1991).
  35. S. W. Smith, Digital Signal Processing, 2nd ed. (California Technical, San Diego, CA, 1999).
  36. Y. Murai, Y. Oishi, Y. Takeda, and F. Yamamoto, Turbulent shear stress profiles in a bubbly channel flow assessed by particle tracking velocimetry, Exp. Fluids 41, 343 (2006).
  37. W. Zhang, Y. Wang, and S. J. Lee, Simultaneous PIV and PTV measurements of wind and sand particle velocities, Exp. Fluids 45, 241 (2008).
  38. R. S. Figliola and D. E. Beasley, Probability and statistics, in Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2004), pp. 109–148.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 064301– Published 8 June, 2017
  • Received 23 September 2016
  • Revised 9 March 2017
Article part of CHORUS

©2017 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation