Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Extraction of coherent clusters and grid adaptation in particle-laden turbulence using wavelet filters

Maxime Bassenne1,*, Javier Urzay1, Kai Schneider2, and Parviz Moin1

  • 1Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-3024, USA
  • 2I2M-CNRS, Centre de Mathématiques et d'Informatique, Aix-Marseille Université Marseille, France

  • *Corresponding author: bassenne@stanford.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 054301 – Published 24 May, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.054301

Abstract

In this study, a wavelet-based method for extraction of clusters of inertial particles in turbulent flows is presented that is based on decomposing Eulerian particle-number-density fields into the sum of coherent (organized) and incoherent (disorganized) components. The coherent component is associated with the clusters and is extracted by filtering the wavelet-transformed particle-number-density field based on an energy threshold. The method is applied to direct numerical simulations of homogeneous-isotropic turbulence laden with small Lagrangian particles. The analysis shows that in regimes where the preferential concentration is important, the coherent component representing the clusters can be described by just 1.6% of the total number of wavelet coefficients, thereby illustrating the sparsity of the particle-number-density field. On the other hand, the incoherent portion is visually structureless and much less correlated than the coherent one. An application of the method, motivated by particle-laden radiative-heat-transfer simulations, is illustrated in the form of a grid-adaptation algorithm that results in nonuniform meshes with fine and coarse elements near and away from particle clusters, respectively. In regimes where preferential concentration in clusters is important, the grid adaptation leads to a significant reduction of the number of control volumes by one to two orders of magnitude.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (32)

  1. S. Balachandar and J. K. Eaton, Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111 (2010).
  2. A. L. Sánchez, J. Urzay, and A. Liñán, The role of separation of scales in the description of spray combustion, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35, 1549 (2015).
  3. M. Rahmani, G. Geraci, G. Iaccarino, and A. Mani, Polydisperse Particles in an Irradiated Turbulent Gas-Particle Mixture, Annual Research Briefs 2015, Center for Turbulence Research (Stanford University, Stanford, 2015), pp. 27–41.
  4. H. Pouransari and A. Mani, Effects of preferential concentration on heat transfer in particle-based solar receivers, J. Sol. Energy Eng. 139, 021008 (2017).
  5. A. Ferrante and S. Elghobashi, On the physical mechanisms of two-way coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 15, 315 (2003).
  6. D. H. Richter, O. Garcia, and C. Astephen, Particle stresses in dilute, polydisperse, two-way coupled turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. E 93, 013111 (2016).
  7. A. Frankel, H. Pouransari, F. Coletti, and A. Mani, Settling of heated particles in homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 792, 869 (2016).
  8. R. Monchaux, M. Bourgoin, and A. Cartellier, Analyzing preferential concentration and clustering of inertial particles in turbulence, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 40, 1 (2012).
  9. C. Marchioli, Large-eddy simulation of turbulent dispersed flows: A review of modeling approaches, Acta Mech. 228, 741 (2017).
  10. M. Farge, G. Pellegrino, and K. Schneider, Coherent Vortex Extraction in 3D Turbulent Flows Using Orthogonal Wavelets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 054501 (2001).
  11. A. B. Romeo, C. Horellou, and J. Bergh, N-body simulations with two-orders-of-magnitude higher performance using wavelets, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 342, 337 (2003).
  12. B. Terzić and G. Bassi, New density estimation methods for charged particle beams with applications to microbunching instability, Phys. Rev. Spec. Top-Ac 14, 070701 (2011).
  13. T. Peterka, H. Croubois, N. Li, E. Rangel, and F. Cappello, Self-adaptive density estimation of particle data, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 38, S646 (2016).
  14. F. A. Williams, Combustion Theory (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, 1985).
  15. D. Kah, A. Vié, C. Chalons, and M. Massot, Second Order Scheme for Quadrature-Based Velocity High Order Moment Methods for Disperse Two-Phase Flows, Annual Research Briefs 2011, Center for Turbulence Research (Stanford University, Stanford, 2011), pp. 312–334.
  16. K. D. Squires and J. K. Eaton, Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence, Phys. Fluids 3, 1169 (1991).
  17. N. Okamoto, K. Yoshimatsu, K. Schneider, M. Farge, and Y. Kaneda, Coherent vortices in high resolution direct numerical simulation of homogeneous isotropic turbulence: A wavelet viewpoint, Phys. Fluids 19, 115109 (2007).
  18. S. G. Mallat, A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation, IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 11, 674 (1989).
  19. M. Farge and G. Rabreau, Transformée en ondelettes pour détecter et analyser les structures cohérentes dans les écoulements turbulents bidimensionnels, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. 307, 1479 (1988).
  20. C. Meneveau, Analysis of turbulence in the orthonormal wavelet representation, J. Fluid Mech. 232, 469 (1991).
  21. K. Schneider and O. Vasilyev, Wavelet methods in computational fluid dynamics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 473 (2010).
  22. D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone, Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage, Biometrika 81, 425 (1994).
  23. A. Azzalini, M. Farge, and K. Schneider, Nonlinear wavelet thresholding: A recursive method to determine the optimal denoising threshold, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 18, 177 (2005).
  24. M. Bassenne, J. Urzay, G. I. Park, and P. Moin, Constant-energetics physical-space forcing methods for improved convergence to homogeneous-isotropic turbulence with application to particle-laden flows, Phys. Fluids 28, 035114 (2016).
  25. H. Pouransari, M. Mortazavi, and A. Mani, Parallel Variable-Density Particle-Laden Turbulence Simulation, Annual Research Briefs 2015, Center for Turbulence Research (Stanford University, Stanford, 2015), pp. 43–54.
  26. A. B. Romeo, C. Horellou, and J. Bergh, A wavelet add-on code for new-generation n-body simulations and data de-noising (jofiluren), Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 354, 1208 (2004).
  27. R. Nguyen Van Yen, D. del Castillo-Negrete, K. Schneider, M. Farge, and G. Chen, Wavelet-based density estimation for noise reduction in plasma simulations using particles, J. Comput. Phys. 229, 2821 (2010).
  28. F. J. Anscombe, The transformation of poisson, binomial, and negative-binomial data, Biometrika 35, 246 (1948).
  29. D. Martínez-Ruiz, J. Urzay, A. L. Sánchez, A. Liñán, and F. A. Williams, Dynamics of thermal ignition of spray flames in mixing layers, J. Fluid Mech. 734, 387 (2013).
  30. R. A. Shaw, A. B. Kostinski, and D. D Lanterman, Super-exponential extinction of radiation in a negatively correlated random medium, J. Quantum Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 75, 13 (2002).
  31. A. Frankel, G. Iaccarino, and A. Mani, Convergence of the Bouguer-Beer law for radiation extinction in particulate media, J. Quantum Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 182, 45 (2016).
  32. T. Sakurai, K. Yoshimatsu, K. Schneider, M. Farge, K. Morishita, and T. Ishihara, Coherent structure extraction in turbulent channel flow using boundary adapted wavelets, J. Turbulence 18, 352 (2017).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation