Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Streak instability in viscoelastic Couette flow

L. Biancofiore1,2, L. Brandt3, and T. A. Zaki4,*

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
  • 3Linné Flow Centre and SeRC (Swedish e-Science Research Centre), KTH Mechanics, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218-2681, USA

  • *Corresponding author: t.zaki@jhu.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 043304 – Published 28 April, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.043304

Abstract

The secondary instability of nonlinear streaks and transition to turbulence in viscoelastic Couette flow are studied using direct numerical simulations. Viscoelasticity is modeled using the FENE-P constitutive equations. Both the polymer concentration β and Weissenberg number Wi are varied in order to assess their effects on transition at moderate Reynolds number. The base streaks are obtained from nonlinear simulations of the Couette flow response to a streamwise vortex. We select the initial amplitude of the vortex which yields a desired maximum amplitude of the nonlinear streaks during their temporal evolution. The development of streaks in both Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows is primarily due to the action of streamwise vorticity onto the mean shear. In the viscoelastic case, it is also affected by the polymer torque, which opposes the vorticity and becomes more pronounced at large Weissenberg number. Streaks with the same maximum streamwise velocity perturbation can therefore have different total kinetic energy at higher Weissenberg number. At every streak amplitude of interest, harmonic forcing is introduced along the transverse direction to trigger the secondary instability and breakdown to turbulence. We demonstrate that the critical amplitude of the forcing, Ad, increases at large Weissenberg number. The degree of stabilization due to elasticity depends on the initial streak intensity, As,in. For weak streaks the critical amplitude for secondary instability is more sensitive to Wi than for strong ones. This is explained by the existence of two different mechanisms that can trigger transition to turbulence. The perturbation to weak streaks is initially stabilized by the polymer torque which acts to oppose the amplification of wall-normal vorticity and, as a result, delays breakdown to turbulence. The secondary instability of strong streaks, on the other hand, is more immune to this stabilizing influence of the polymer.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. T. A. Zaki, From streaks to spots and on to turbulence: Exploring the dynamics of boundary layer transition, Flow Turbul. Combust. 91, 451 (2013).
  2. M. T. Landahl, A note on an algebraic instability of inviscid parallel shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 98, 243 (1980).
  3. K. M. Butler and B. F. Farrell, Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow, Phys. Fluids A 4, 1637 (1992).
  4. L. Brandt, The lift-up effect: The linear mechanism behind transition and turbulence in shear flows, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 47, 80 (2014).
  5. C. Cossu, L. Brandt, S. Bagheri, and D. S. Henningson, Secondary threshold amplitudes for sinuous streak breakdown, Phys. Fluids 23, 074103 (2011).
  6. F. Waleffe, Hydrodynamic stability and turbulence: Beyond transients to a self-sustaining process, Stud. Appl. Math. 95, 319 (1995).
  7. P. Andersson, L. Brandt, A. Bottaro, and D. S. Henningson, On the breakdown of boundary layer streaks, J. Fluid Mech. 428, 29 (2001).
  8. N. J. Vaughan and T. A. Zaki, Stability of zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer distorted by unsteady Klebanoff streaks, J. Fluid Mech. 681, 116 (2011).
  9. J. Hoepffner, L. Brandt, and D. S. Henningson, Transient growth on boundary layer streaks, J. Fluid Mech. 537, 91 (2005).
  10. F. Waleffe, On a self-sustaining process in shear flows, Phys. Fluids 9, 883 (1997).
  11. P. K. Ray and T. A. Zaki, Absolute instability in viscoelastic mixing layers, Phys. Fluids 26, 014103 (2014).
  12. P. K. Ray and T. A. Zaki, Absolute/convective instability of planar viscoelastic jets, Phys. Fluids 27, 014110 (2015).
  13. M. R. Jovanović and S. Kumar, Transient growth without inertia, Phys. Fluids 22, 023101 (2010).
  14. B. K. Lieu, M. R. Jovanović, and S. Kumar, Worst-case amplification of disturbances in inertialess Couette flow of viscoelastic fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 723, 232 (2013).
  15. E. S. G. Shaqfeh, Purely elastic instabilities in viscometric flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28, 129 (1996).
  16. A. Agarwal, L. Brandt, and T. A. Zaki, Linear and nonlinear evolution of a localized disturbance in polymeric channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 760, 278 (2014).
  17. J. Page and T. A. Zaki, Streak evolution in viscoelastic Couette flow, J. Fluid Mech. 742, 520 (2014).
  18. N. Hoda, M. R. Jovanović, and S. Kumar, Energy amplification in channel flows of viscoelastic fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 601, 407 (2008).
  19. N. Hoda, M. R. Jovanović, and S. Kumar, Frequency responses of streamwise-constant perturbations in channel flows of Oldroyd-B fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 625, 411 (2009).
  20. P. J. Oliveira, An exact solution for tube and slit flow of a FENE-P fluid, Acta Mech. 158, 157 (2002).
  21. Q. Zhou and R. Akhavan, A comparison of FENE and FENE-P dumbbell and chain models in turbulent flow, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 109, 115 (2003).
  22. P. A. Stone and M. D. Graham, Polymer dynamics in a model of the turbulent buffer layer, Phys. Fluids 15, 1247 (2003).
  23. Y. Dubief, C. M. White, V. E. Terrapon, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, P. Moin, and S. K. Lele, On the coherent drag-reducing and turbulence-enhancing behaviour of polymers in wall flows, J. Fluid Mech. 514, 271 (2004).
  24. V. Dallas, J. C. Vassilicos, and G. F. Hewitt, Strong polymer-turbulence interactions in viscoelastic turbulent channel flow, Phys. Rev. E 82, 066303 (2010).
  25. D. Richter, G. Iaccarino, and E. S. G. Shaqfeh, Simulations of three-dimensional viscoelastic flows past a circular cylinder at moderate Reynolds numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 651, 415 (2010).
  26. R. Sureshkumar and A. N. Beris, Effect of artificial stress diffusivity on the stability of numerical calculations and the flow dynamics of time-dependent viscoelastic flows, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 60, 53 (1995).
  27. T. Vaithianathan and L. R. Collins, Numerical approach to simulating turbulent flow of a viscoelastic polymer solution, J. Comput. Phys. 187, 1 (2003).
  28. T. Min, J. Y. Yoo, and H. Choi, Effect of spatial discretization schemes on numerical solutions of viscoelastic fluid flows, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 100, 27 (2001).
  29. T. Min, H. Choi, and J. Y. H. Yoo, Maximum drag reduction in a turbulent channel flow by polymer additives, J. Fluid Mech. 492, 91 (2003).
  30. M. J. P. Hack and T. A. Zaki, Streak instabilities in boundary layers beneath free-stream turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 741, 280 (2014).
  31. Y. Dubief, V. E. Terrapon, C. M. White, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, P. Moin, and S. K. Lele, New answers on the interaction between polymers and vortices in turbulent flows, Flow Turbul. Combust. 74, 311 (2005).
  32. L. Xi and M. D. Graham, Active and Hibernating Turbulence in Minimal Channel Flow of Newtonian and Polymeric Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 218301 (2010).
  33. M. Zhang, I. Lashgari, T. A. Zaki, and L. Brandt, Linear stability analysis of channel flow of viscoelastic Oldroyd-B and FENE-P fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 737, 249 (2013).
  34. T. A. Zaki and P. A. Durbin, Mode interaction and the bypass route to transition, J. Fluid Mech. 531, 85 (2005).
  35. J. Page and T. A. Zaki, The dynamics of spanwise vorticity perturbations in homogeneous viscoelastic shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 777, 327 (2015).
  36. P. A. Stone, A. Roy, R. G. Larson, F. Waleffe, and M. D. Graham, Polymer drag reduction in exact coherent structures of plane shear flow, Phys. Fluids 16, 3470 (2004).
  37. W. Li and M. D. Graham, Polymer induced drag reduction in exact coherent structures of plane Poiseuille flow, Phys. Fluids 19, 083101 (2007).
  38. L. Brandt and H. C. De Lange, Streak interactions and breakdown in boundary layer flows, Phys. Fluids 20, 024107 (2008).
  39. M. J. P. Hack and T. A. Zaki, Data-enabled prediction of streak breakdown in pressure-gradient boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 801, 43 (2016).
  40. M. D. Graham, Drag reduction in turbulent flow of polymer solutions, Rheol. Rev. 2, 143 (2004).
  41. K. Kim, C.-F. Li, R. Sureshkumar, S. Balachandar, and R. J. Adrian, Effects of polymer stresses on eddy structures in drag-reduced turbulent channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 584, 281 (2007).
  42. K. Kim and R. Sureshkumar, Spatiotemporal evolution of hairpin eddies, Reynolds stress, and polymer torque in polymer drag-reduced turbulent channel flows, Phys. Rev. E 87, 063002 (2013).
  43. A. Groisman and V. Steinberg, Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow, Nature (London) 405, 53 (2000).
  44. R. G. Larson, Fluid dynamics: Turbulence without inertia, Nature (London) 405, 27 (2000).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation