Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Influence of ion sterics on diffusiophoresis and electrophoresis in concentrated electrolytes

Robert F. Stout and Aditya S. Khair*

  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA

  • *akhair@andrew.cmu.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 014201 – Published 6 January, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.014201

Abstract

We quantify the diffusiophoresis and electrophoresis of a uniformly charged, spherical colloid in a binary electrolyte using modified Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations that account for steric repulsion between finite sized ions. Specifically, we utilize the Bikerman (Bik) lattice gas model and the Carnahan-Starling (CS) and Boublik-Mansoori-Carnahan-Starling-Leland (BMCSL) equations of state for monodisperse and polydisperse, respectively, hard spheres. We compute the phoretic mobility for weak applied fields using an asymptotic approach for thin diffuse layers, where ion steric effects are expected to be most prevalent. The thin diffuse layer limit requires λD/R0, where λD is the Debye screening length and R is the particle radius; this limit is readily attained for micron-sized colloids in concentrated electrolytic solutions. It is well known that the classic Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) model for pointlike, noninteracting ions leads to a prediction of a maximum in both the diffusiophoretic and electrophoretic mobilities with increasing particle zeta potential (at fixed λD/R). In contrast, we find that ion sterics essentially eliminate this maximum (for reasonably attainable zeta potentials) and increase the mobility relative to PB. Next, we consider the more experimentally relevant case of a particle with a constant surface charge density and vary the electrolyte concentration, neglecting charge regulation on surface active sites. Rather surprisingly, there is little difference between the predictions of the four models (PB, Bik, CS, and BMCSL) for electrophoretic mobility in concentrated solutions, at reasonable surface charge densities (110μC/cm2). This is because as the concentration increases, the zeta potential is reduced (to below the thermal voltage for concentrations above about 1 M) and therefore the diffuse layer structure is largely unaffected by ion sterics. For gradients of symmetric electrolytes (equal diffusivities, charge, and size) diffusiophoresis is also essentially unaffected by ion sterics, with a mobility that approaches zero with increasing concentration, just as in electrophoresis. For gradients of asymmetric electrolytes, the difference in diffusivities of the cation and anions leads to an induced electric field that acts on the charged particle. Importantly, we show that ion sterics leads to an excess contribution to the induced electric field, which increases rapidly with concentration. This increase overwhelms the accompanying decrease in zeta potential. The result is the diffusiophoretic mobility increases with concentration, rather than approaching zero. Therefore, diffusiophoresis could be an appealing alternative transport mechanism to electrophoresis in concentrated electrolyte solutions.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. W. B. Russel, D. A. Saville, and W. R. Schowalter, Colloidal Dispersions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1989).
  2. D. C. Prieve, J. L. Anderson, J. P. Ebel, and M. E. Lowell, Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part 2. Electrolytes, J. Fluid Mech. 148, 247 (1984).
  3. J. L. Anderson, M. E. Lowell, and D. C. Prieve, Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part 1. Non-electrolytes, J. Fluid Mech. 117, 107 (1982).
  4. J. S. Paustian, C. D. Angulo, R. Nery-Azevedo, N. Shi, A. I. Abdel-Fattah, and T. M. Squires, Direct measurements of colloidal solvophoresis under imposed solvent and solute gradients, Langmuir 31, 4402 (2015).
  5. B. V. Derjaguin, G. P. Sidorenkov, E. A. Zubashchenkov, and E. V. Kiseleva, Kinetic phenomena in boundary films of liquids, Kolloidn. Zh. 9, 335 (1947).
  6. J. L. Anderson and D. C. Prieve, Diffusiophoresis caused by gradients of strongly adsorbing solutes, Langmuir 7, 403 (1991).
  7. N. Sharifi-Mood, J. Koplik, and C. Maldarelli, Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Motion of Colloidal Nanoparticles in a Solute Concentration Gradient and a Comparison to the Continuum Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 184501 (2013).
  8. N. Sharifi-Mood, J. Koplik, and C. Maldarelli, Diffusiophoretic self-propulsion of colloids driven by a surface reaction: The sub-micron particle regime for exponential and van der Waals interactions, Phys. Fluids. 25, 012001 (2013).
  9. M. von Smoluchowski, Contribution à la théorie de l'endosmose électrique et de quelques phenomènes corrélatifs, Bull. Int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie 8, 182 (1903).
  10. T. M. Squires and S. R. Quake, Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 977 (2005).
  11. K. D. Dorfman, DNA electrophoresis in microfabricated devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2903 (2010).
  12. A. A. Elbashir and H. Y. Aboul-Enein, Capillary electrophoresis and molecular modeling as a complementary technique for chiral recognition mechanism, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 43, 131 (2013).
  13. R. Guha, X. Shang, A. L. Zydney, D. Velegol, and M. Kumar, Diffusiophoresis contributes significantly to colloidal fouling in low salinity reverse osmosis systems, J. Membrane Sci. 479, 67 (2015).
  14. A. Kar, R. Guha, N. Dani, D. Velegol, and M. Kumar, Particle deposition on microporous membranes can be enhanced or reduced by salt gradients, Langmuir 30, 793 (2014).
  15. A. Kar, T. Chiang, I. O. Rivera, A. Sen, and D. Velegol, Enhanced transport into and out of dead-end pores, ACS Nano 9, 746 (2015).
  16. B. Abécassis, C. Cottin-Bizonne, C. Ybert, A. Ajdari, and L. Bocquet, Boosting migration of large particles by solute contrasts, Nat. Mater. 7, 785 (2008).
  17. V. Yadav, J. D. Freedman, M. Grinstaff, and A. Sen, Bone-crack detection, targeting, and repair using ion gradients, Angew. Chem.- Int. Ed. 52, 10997 (2013).
  18. V. Yadav, R. A. Pavlick, S. M. Meckler, and A. Sen, Triggered detection and deposition: Toward the repair of microcracks, Chem. Mater. 26, 4647 (2014).
  19. D. Velegol, A. Garg, R. Guha, A. Kar, and M. Kumar, Origins of concentration gradients for diffusiophoresis, Soft Matter. 12, 4686 (2016).
  20. M. S. Kilic, M. Z. Bazant, and A. Ajdari, Steric effects in the dynamics of electrolytes at large applied voltages, I. Double-layer charging, Phys. Rev. E. 75, 021502 (2007).
  21. H. Ohtaki and T. Radnai, Structure and dynamics of hydrated ions, Chem. Rev. 93, 1157 (1993).
  22. M. Z. Bazant, M. S. Kilic, B. D. Storey, and A. Ajdari, Towards an understanding of induced-charge electrokinetics at large applied voltages in concentrated solutions, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 152, 48 (2009).
  23. H. G. Bagaria, Z. Xue, B. M. Neilson, A. J. Worthen, K. Y. Yoon, S. Nayak, V. Cheng, J. H. Lee, C. W. Bielawski, and K. P. Johnston, Iron oxide nanoparticles grafted with sulfonated copolymers are stable in concentrated brine at elevated temperatures and weakly adsorb on silica, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 3329 (2013).
  24. A. Lager, K. J. Webb, I. R. Collins, and D. M. Richmond, LoSal Enhanced Oil Recovery: Evidence of Enhanced Oil Recovery at the Reservoir Scale, SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK (Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas, 2008).
  25. B. E. Logan and M. Elimelech, Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water, Nature (London) 488, 313 (2012).
  26. A. S. Khair and T. M. Squires, Ion steric effects on electrophoresis of a colloidal particle, J. Fluid Mech. 640, 343 (2009).
  27. P. M. Biesheuvel and M. van Soestbergen, Counterion volume effects in mixed electrical double layers, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 316, 490 (2007).
  28. M. Manciu and E. Ruckenstein, Lattice site exclusion effect on the double layer interaction, Langmuir 18, 5178 (2002).
  29. J. J. Bikerman, XXXIX. Structure and capacity of electrical double layer, Philos. Mag. 33, 384 (1942).
  30. N. F. Carnahan and K. E. Starling, Equation of state for nonattracting rigid spheres, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 635 (1969).
  31. D. Gillespie, A review of steric interactions of ions: Why some theories succeed and others fail to account for ion size, Microfluid Nanofluid 18, 717 (2015).
  32. B. Giera, N. Henson, E. M. Kober, M. S. Shell, and T. M. Squires, Electric double-layer structure in primitive model electrolytes: Comparing molecular dynamics with local-density approximations, Langmuir 31, 3553 (2015).
  33. R. W. O'Brien and L. R. White, Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 74, 1607 (1978).
  34. S. S. Dukhin and B. V. Deryaguin, in Encylcopedia of Surface and Colloid Science (Wiley, New York, 1974), Vol. 7.
  35. R. W. O'Brien, The solution of the electrokinetic equations for colloidal particles with thin double layers, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 92, 204 (1983).
  36. A. S. Khair and T. M. Squires, The influence of hydrodynamic slip on the electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle, Phys. Fluids. 21, 042001 (2009).
  37. T. Boublik, Hard-sphere equation of state, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 471 (1970).
  38. G. A. Mansoori, N. F. Carnahan, K. E. Starling, and T. W. Leland, Equilibrium thermodynamic properties of the mixture of hard spheres, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 1523 (1971).
  39. M. M. J. Lin and D. C. Prieve, Electromigration of latex induced by a salt gradient, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 95, 327 (1983).
  40. J. Newman and K. E. Thomas-Alyea, Electrochemical Systems (Wiley, New York, 2004).
  41. T. Chiang and D. Velegol, Multi-ion diffusiophoresis, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 424, 120 (2014).
  42. O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, Strong-field electrophoresis, J. Fluid Mech. 701, 333 (2012).
  43. E. Yariv, An asymptotic derivation of the thin-debye-layer limit for electrokinetic phenomena, Chem. Eng. Commun. 197, 3 (2009).
  44. J. L. Anderson, Colloid transport by interfacial forces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 61 (1989).
  45. M. Flury and T. F. Gimmi, Solute diffusion, in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Methods, edited by J. H. Dane and G. C. Topp (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 2002), p. 1323.
  46. T. R. Ferguson and M. Z. Bazant, Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of porus electrodes, J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, A1967 (2012).
  47. J. Lyklema, Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science. Volume II: Solid-Liquid Interfaces (Academic, London, England, 1995).
  48. H. Ohshima, Limiting electrophoretic mobility of a highly charged soft particle in an electrolyte solution: Solidification effect, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 349, 641 (2010).
  49. J. C. Berg, An Introduction to Interfaces and Colloids, The Bridge to Nanoscience (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010).
  50. M. Kosmulski, Electric charge density of silica, alumina, and related surfaces, in Encyclopedia of Surface and Colloid Science, Volume 3, 2nd edition, edited by P. Somasundaran (Taylor and Francis Group, London, 2006).
  51. S.-L. Tsaur and R. M. Fitch, Preparation and properties of polystyrene model colloids: II. Effect of surface charge density on coagulation behavior, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 115, 463 (1987).
  52. M. Z. Bazant, B. D. Storey, and A. A. Kornyshev, Double Layer in Ionic Liquids: Overscreening versus Crowding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 046102 (2011).
  53. B. D. Storey and M. Z. Bazant, Effects of electrostatic correlations on electrokinetic phenomena, Phys. Rev. E 86, 056303 (2012).
  54. R. F. Stout and A. S. Khair, A continuum approach to predicting electrophoretic mobility reversals, J. Fluid Mech. 752, R1 (2014).
  55. R. A. Rica and M. Z. Bazant, Electrodiffusiophoresis: Particle motion in electrolytes under direct current, Phys. Fluids. 22, 112109 (2010).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation