Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of pivot location and passive heave on propulsion from a pitching airfoil

A. W. Mackowski and C. H. K. Williamson

  • Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 013101 – Published 4 January, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.013101

Abstract

We experimentally investigate the propulsive characteristics of a pitching NACA 0012 airfoil section, with emphasis on thrust and propulsive efficiency, at a Reynolds number of 1.7×104. For the sake of mechanical simplicity, we consider an airfoil restricted to a single actuator in the pitching direction. We examine the effect of changing the airfoil's axis of rotation, finding that contrary to Garrick's linear theory, there exists a pitching axis near the airfoil that maximizes propulsive efficiency. Next, we examine the effect of placing passive springs on the airfoil in the heave (transverse) direction using our Cyber-Physical Fluid Dynamics technique. This elastic heaving motion allows the airfoil to combine pitching and heaving modes while being actuated only in the pitching direction. Two sets of dynamics are considered: one case where the airfoil is weighted unevenly and pitched about its center of mass (so that the resulting heaving motion is independent of inertial forces), and another case where the airfoil's center of mass is fixed at its centroid. For pitching at an amplitude of 8 and a reduced frequency k of two, we find that elastic heave produces a maximum propulsive efficiency of 35%, compared to 25% without any heave motion. Further, while operating at the same efficiency as the static-pivot case, we find that passive heaving greatly increases the magnitude of the airfoil's thrust. The airfoil configurations with highest propulsive efficiency generally involve pitching near or ahead of the airfoil's leading edge.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. J. M. Anderson, K. Streitlien, D. S. Barrett, and M. S. Triantafyllou, Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency, J. Fluid Mech. 360, 41 (1998).
  2. S. Heathcote and I. Gursul, Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA J. 45, 1066 (2007).
  3. M. A. Ashraf, J. Young, and J. C. S. Lai, Oscillation frequency and amplitude effects on plunging airfoil propulsion and flow periodicity, AIAA J. 50, 2308 (2012).
  4. J. H. J. Buchholz and A. J. Smits, The wake structure and thrust performance of a rigid low-aspect-ratio pitching panel, J. Fluid Mech. 603, 331 (2008).
  5. A. W. Mackowski and C. H. K. Williamson, Direct measurement of thrust and efficiency of an airfoil undergoing pure pitching, J. Fluid Mech. 765, 524 (2015).
  6. D. A. Read, F. S. Hover, and M. S. Triantafyllou, Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering, J. Fluids Struct. 17, 163 (2003).
  7. Q. Xiao and W. Liao, Numerical investigation of angle of attack profile on propulsion performance of an oscillating foil, Comput. Fluids 39, 1366 (2010).
  8. W. McKinney and J. DeLaurier, Wingmill: An oscillating-wing windmill, AIAA J. Energy 5, 109 (1981).
  9. J. M. Miao and M. H. Ho, Effect of flexure on aerodynamic propulsive efficiency of flapping flexible airfoil, J. Fluids Struct. 22, 401 (2006).
  10. Q. Zhu, Numerical simulation of a flapping foil with chordwise or spanwise flexibility, AIAA J. 45, 2448 (2007).
  11. E. R. Israeli, Simulations of a passively actuated oscillating airfoil using a discontinuous Galerkin method, Master's thesis, MIT, 2008.
  12. D.-w. Peng and M. Milano, Lift generation with optimal elastic pitching for a flapping plate, J. Fluid Mech. 717, R1 (2013).
  13. M. M. Murray and L. E. Howle, Spring stiffness influence on an oscillating propulsor, J. Fluids Struct. 17, 915 (2003).
  14. A. W. Mackowski and C. H. K. Williamson, Developing a cyber-physical fluid dynamics facility for fluid-structure interaction studies, J. Fluids Struct. 27, 748 (2011).
  15. A. W. Mackowski and C. H. K. Williamson, An experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration with nonlinear restoring forces, Phys. Fluids 25, 087101 (2013).
  16. I. E. Garrick, Propulsion of a Flapping and Oscillating Airfoil, Report 567 (NACA, 1936).
  17. T. Theodorsen, General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability And the Mechanism of Flutter, Report 496 (NACA, 1935).
  18. T. von Kármán and J. M. Burgers, General aerodynamic theory: Perfect fluids, in Aerodynamic Theory, edited by W. F. Durand (Springer, Berlin, 1935), Vol. II.
  19. T. Theodorsen and I. E. Garrick, Mechanism of Flutter: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of the Flutter Problem, Report 685 (NACA, 1940).
  20. S. L. Brunton and C. W. Rowley, Empirical state-space representations for Theodorsen's lift model, J. Fluids Struct. 38, 174 (2013).
  21. K. A. Harper, M. D. Berkemeier, and S. Grace, Modeling the dynamics of spring-driven oscillating-foil propulsion, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 23, 285 (1998).
  22. G. S. Triantafyllou, M. S. Triantafyllou, and M. A. Grosenbaugh, Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion, J. Fluids Struct. 7, 205 (1993).
  23. M. J. Lighthill, Aquatic animal propulsion of high hydromechanical efficiency, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 265 (1970).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation