Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of a forward-facing step on the disturbance amplification in a flat-plate boundary layer

Nathaniel Hildebrand1,*, Pedro Paredes2, and Meelan M. Choudhari1

  • *Contact author: nathaniel.j.hildebrand@nasa.gov

Phys. Rev. Fluids 10, 043901 – Published 14 April, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.10.043901

Abstract

We apply linear stability analysis to nearly incompressible flow over a two-dimensional zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer in the presence of a forward-facing step (FFS), with step height to local displacement thickness ratios between 0<h/δs*<3.2. We employ a nominally sharp FFS with a 1 µm radius to closely resemble a prior wind tunnel experiment, but we also examine the impact of various step corner radii and slopes. The Navier-Stokes equations are solved on curvilinear grids to obtain the laminar basic states. After that, we use a combination of the harmonic linearized Navier-Stokes equations and the parabolized stability equations to compute the linear amplification of Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities. The N-factor envelopes for the FFS reveal crucial differences with respect to those obtained previously for backward-facing steps (BFS) with 0<h/δs*<1.3, for which accurate predictions of transition onset could be obtained via N-factor correlations. As the boundary-layer flow recovers to its unperturbed state in the far wake of the BFS, the slope of the N-factor envelope is nearly the same as that of the unperturbed flat-plate boundary layer. In contrast, the N-factor envelope downstream of the FFS becomes flatter as the step height increases, i.e., dN/dx becomes nearly 0, which causes the N-factor method to become sensitive to the prescribed value of the correlating N-factor value. In spite of this difficulty, the N-factor method still captures the overall trend associated with a progressively upstream shift in the transition location as the FFS height becomes larger. However, the critical step height corresponding to the onset of a significant upstream shift in transition location is not very well predicted when compared with the measured data. Within the framework of a variable N-factor method, the predicted reduction in the transition N-factor is given by ΔN=1.89arctan[(h/δs*1.29)/0.179]2.73.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. F. Collier, Subsonic fixed wing project overview, NASA FAP Annual Meeting, October 2008.
  2. P. Argüelles, J. Lumsden, M. Bischoff, D. Ranque, P. Busquin, S. Rasmussen, B. A. C. Droste, P. Reutlinger, R. Evans, R. Robins, W. Kröll, H. Terho, J.-L. Lagardére, A. Wittlöv, and A. Lina, European aeronautics: A vision for 2020, Europan Commission Rept. KI-34-01-827-EN-C, January 2001.
  3. G. Schrauf, Status and perspectives of laminar flow, Aeronaut. J. 109, 639 (2005).
  4. W. S. Saric, D. E. West, M. W. Tufts, and H. L. Reed, Experiments on discrete roughness element technology for swept-wing laminar flow control, AIAA J. 57, 641 (2019).
  5. Y. Wang and M. Gaster, Effect of surface steps on boundary layer transition, Exp. Fluids 39, 679 (2005).
  6. J. D. Crouch, V. S. Kosorygin, and L. L. Ng, Modeling the effects of steps on boundary-layer transition, in IUTAM Symposium on Laminar-Turbulent Transition, edited by R. Govindarajan (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2006), pp. 37–44.
  7. J. Slotnick, A. Khodadoust, J. Alonso, D. Darmofal, W. Gropp, D. Mavriplis, and E. Lurie, CFD vision 2030 study: A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences, NASA/CR-2014-218178, 2014, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140003093.
  8. D. Barkley, M. G. M. Gomez, and R. D. Henderson, Three-dimensional instability in flow over a backward-facing step, J. Fluid Mech. 473, 167 (2002).
  9. J.-C. Loiseau, J.-C. Robinet, S. Cherubini, and E. Leriche, Investigation of the roughness-induced transition: global stability analyses and direct numerical simulations, J. Fluid Mech. 760, 175 (2014).
  10. P. Klebanoff and K. Tidstrom, Mechanism by which a two-dimensional roughness element induces boundary layer transition, Phys. Fluids 15, 1173 (1972).
  11. M. E. Goldstein, Scattering of acoustic waves into Tollmien-Schlichting waves by small streamwise variations, J. Fluid Mech. 154, 509 (1985).
  12. M. M. Choudhari, Boundary-layer receptivity to three-dimensional unsteady vortical disturbances in free stream, in Proceedings of the 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1996), AIAA Paper 96-0181.
  13. M. Asai, M. Minagawa, and M. Nishioka, The instability and breakdown of a near-wall low-speed streak, J. Fluid Mech. 455, 289 (2002).
  14. M. M. Choudhari and C. Streett, Theoretical prediction of boundary-layer receptivity, in Proceedings of the 25th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1994), AIAA Paper 94-2223.
  15. B. Holmes, C. Obara, G. Martin, and C. Domack, Manufacturing tolerances for natural laminar flow airframe surfaces, SAE Paper No. 850863, 1985.
  16. A. V. Boiko, A. V. Dovgal, V. V. Kozlov, and V. A. Shcherbakov, Flow instability in the laminar boundary layer separation zone created by a small roughness element, Fluid Dyn. 25, 12 (1990).
  17. A. V. Dovgal and V. V. Kozlov, Hydrodynamic instability and receptivity of small scale separation regions, in Laminar-Turbulent Transition, edited by D. Arnal and R. Michel (Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, 1990), pp. 523–531.
  18. A. Heintz and P. Scholz, Measurements on the effect of steps on the transition of laminar boundary layers, Exp. Fluids 64, 76 (2023).
  19. S. Ragab, A. Nayfeh, and R. C. Krishna, Stability of compressible boundary layers over a smooth backward-facing step, in Proceedings of the 21st Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics, and Lasers Conference (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1990), AIAA Paper 1990-1449.
  20. J. Perraud and A. Seraudie, Effects of steps and gaps on 2d and 3d transition, European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Science and Engineering, The International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (Barcelona, Spain, 2000), pp. 1–18.
  21. C. A. Edelmann and U. Rist, Impact of forward-facing steps on laminar-turbulent transition in transonic flows, AIAA J. 53, 2504 (2015).
  22. N. Hildebrand, M. M. Choudhari, and P. Paredes, Predicting boundary-layer transition over backward-facing steps via linear stability analysis, AIAA J. 58, 3728 (2020).
  23. M. W. Tufts, H. L. Reed, B. K. Crawford, G. T. Duncan, and W. S. Saric, Computational investigation of step excrescence sensitivity in a swept-wing boundary layer, J. Aircr. 54, 602 (2017).
  24. J. L. Eppink, R. W. Wlezien, R. A. King, and M. M. Choudhari, Influence of a backward-facing step on swept-wing boundary-layer transition, AIAA J. 57, 267 (2019).
  25. A. F. Rius-Vidales and M. Kotsonis, Impact of a forward-facing step on the development of crossflow instability, J. Fluid Mech. 924, A34 (2021).
  26. A. F. Rius-Vidales and M. Kotsonis, Unsteady interaction of crossflow instability with a forward-facing step, J. Fluid Mech. 939, A19 (2022).
  27. J. D. Crouch, Modeling transition physics for laminar flow control, in Proceedings of the 38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2008), AIAA Paper 2008-3832.
  28. M. Costantini, S. Risius, C. Klein, and W. Kühn, Effect of forward-facing steps on boundary layer transition at a subsonic Mach number, New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics X, edited by A. Dillmann, G. Heller, E. Krämer, C. Wagner, and C. Breitsamter (Springer, Cham, 2014), pp. 203–213.
  29. J. D. Crouch and V. S. Kosorygin, Surface step effects on boundary-layer transition dominated by tollmien-schlichting instability, AIAA J. 58, 2943 (2020).
  30. J. A. Masad and M. R. Malik, Link between flow separation and transition onset, AIAA J. 33, 882 (1995).
  31. A. Wörner, U. Rist, and S. Wagner, Humps/steps influence on stability characteristics of two-dimensional laminar boundary layer, AIAA J. 41, 192 (2003).
  32. D. J. Wise, V. Nguyen, K. T. E. Chua, Q. V. Nguyen, T. Nadesan, and Y. Cui, DNS investigation of laminar-to-turbulent transition with favorable pressure gradient: Effects of surface imperfections, AIAA SciTech 2020 Forum (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2020), AIAA Paper 2020-1581.
  33. D. P. Rizzetta and M. R. Visbal, Numerical simulation of excrescence generated transition, AIAA J. 52, 385 (2014).
  34. M. Dong and A. Zhang, Scattering of Tollmien-Schlichting waves as they pass over Forward-/Backward-Facing steps, Appl. Mathem. Mech. 39, 1411 (2018).
  35. C. Thomas, S. M. Mughal, H. Roland, R. Ashworth, and A. Martinez-Cava, Effect of small surface deformations on the stability of Tollmien-Schlichting disturbances, AIAA J. 56, 2157 (2018).
  36. J. A. Franco, S. Hein, and E. Valero, On the influence of two-dimensional hump roughness on laminar-turbulent transition, Phys. Fluids 32, 034102 (2020).
  37. N. Hildebrand, P. V. Mysore, M. M. Choudhari, B. S. Venkatachari, and P. Paredes, Transition prediction of boundary layers in the presence of backward-facing steps, AIAA J. 60, 4149 (2022).
  38. P. R. Amestoy, I. S. Duff, J. Koster, and J.-Y. L'Excellent, A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 23, 15 (2001).
  39. C. Streett, Direct harmonic linear Navier-Stokes methods for efficient simulation of wave packets, in Proceedings of the 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1998), AIAA Paper 98-0784.
  40. P. Paredes, M. M. Choudhari, F. Li, J. Jewell, R. Kimmel, E. Marineau, and G. Grossir, Nosetip bluntness effects on transition at hypersonic speeds: Experimental and numerical analysis, J. Spacecr. Rockets 56, 369 (2019).
  41. A. P. Haas, O. M. F. Browne, H. F. Fasel, and C. Brehm, A time-spectral approximate jacobian based linearized compressible navier-stokes solver for high-speed boundary-layer receptivity and stability, J. Comput. Phys. 405, 108978 (2020).
  42. T. Herbert, Parabolized stability equations, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 245 (1997).
  43. Y. Saad, Variations of arnoldi's method for computing eigenelements of large unsymmetric matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 34, 269 (1980).
  44. P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson, Stability and Transition in Shear Flows, Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol. 142 (Springer, 2012).
  45. J. L. Eppink and C. Casper, Effects of forward-facing step shape on stationary crossflow instability growth and breakdown, AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum (AIAA, Reston, Va, 2019), AIAA Paper 2019-3532.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation