Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Scaling properties of the mean wall-normal velocity in zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers

Tie Wei*

Joseph Klewicki

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801-4797, USA

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia

  • *tie.wei@nmt.edu
  • joe.klewicki@unh.edu; klewicki@unimelb.edu.au

Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 082401(R) – Published 7 December, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.082401

Abstract

The scaling properties of the mean wall-normal velocity V(x,y) in zero-pressure-gradient laminar and turbulent boundary-layer flows are investigated using numerical simulation data, physical experiment data, and integral analyses of the governing equations. The maximum mean wall-normal velocity V and the boundary-layer thickness δ are evidenced to be the proper scaling for V over most if not all of the boundary layer. This is different from the behavior of the mean streamwise velocity U or the turbulent shear stress T=ρuv, which depend on different characteristic length scales in the regions near and away from the surface, respectively. The reason for this apparent difference in scaling behaviors is described physically relative to the downstream development of the U velocity profile and the mechanisms of boundary-layer growth. Insights pertaining to this are further surmised from an analytical relationship for the ratio of the displacement to momentum thickness, i.e., shape factor H. Integral analyses using the continuity and mean momentum equation show that UV/uτ2=H, where uτ is the friction velocity. Both the laminar similarity solution and direct numerical simulation data in post-transitional flows convincingly support this relation. Over the transitional regime, data of sufficiently high quality are lacking to check if this relation remains valid.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (20)

  1. H. Schlichting and K. Gersten, Boundary-Layer Theory (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2000).
  2. M. Gad-el Hak and P. R. Bandyopadhyay, Reynolds number effects in wall-bounded turbulent flows, Appl. Mech. Rev. 47, 307 (1994).
  3. A. J. Smits, B. J. McKeon, and I. Marusic, High-Reynolds number wall turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353 (2011).
  4. I. Marusic, B. J. McKeon, P. A. Monkewitz, H. M. Nagib, A. J. Smits, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers: Recent advances and key issues, Phys. Fluids 22, 065103 (2010).
  5. J. C. Klewicki, Reynolds number dependence, scaling, and dynamics of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluids Eng. 132, 094001 (2010).
  6. M. P. Simens, J. Jimenez, S. Hoyas, and Y. Mizuno, A high-resolution code for turbulent boundary layers, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 4218 (2009).
  7. P. Schlatter and R. Örlü, Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 659, 116 (2010).
  8. T. Wei, P. Fife, J. C. Klewicki, and P. A. McMurtry, Properties of the mean momentum balance in turbulent boundary layer, pipe and channel flows, J. Fluid Mech. 522, 303 (2005).
  9. J. C. Klewicki, R. Ebner, and X. Wu, Mean dynamics of transitional boundary-layer flow, J. Fluid Mech. 682, 617 (2011).
  10. H. Blasius, Grenzschichten in Flussigkeiten mit Kleiner Reibung, Z. Math. Phys. 56, 1 (1908).
  11. J. C. Klewicki, A description of turbulent wall-flow vorticity consistent with mean dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 737, 176 (2013).
  12. J. M. Österlund, Experimental studies of zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow, Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, 1999.
  13. J. Coupland, ERCOFTAC special interest group on laminar to turbulent transition and retransition T3A and T3B test cases, ERCOFTAC report, 1990 (unpublished).
  14. X. Wu and P. Moin, Transitional and turbulent boundary layer with heat transfer, Phys. Fluids 22, 085105 (2010).
  15. P. E. Roach and D. H. Brierley, in Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Flows and Transition to Turbulence, edited by O. Pironneau, W. Rodi, I. L. Ryhming, A. M. Savill, and T. V. Truong (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992), p. 319.
  16. X. Wu and P. Moin, Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 630, 5 (2009).
  17. T. Sayadi, C. W. Hamman, and P. Moin, Direct numerical simulation of complete H-type and K-type transitions with implications for the dynamics of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 724, 480 (2013).
  18. K. A. Chauhan, P. A. Monkewitz, and H. M. Nagib, Criteria for assessing experiments in zero pressure gradient boundary layers, Fluid Dyn. Res. 41, 021404 (2009).
  19. N. Hutchins, Caution: Tripping hazards.J. Fluid Mech. 710, 1 (2012).
  20. I. Marusic, K. A. Chauhan, V. Kulandaivelu, and N. Hutchins, Evolution of zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers from different tripping conditions, J. Fluid Mech. 783, 379 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation