Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Superdiffusive gas recovery from nanopores

Haiyi Wu, Yadong He, and Rui Qiao*

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA

Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 074101 – Published 15 November, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.074101

Abstract

Understanding the recovery of gas from reservoirs featuring pervasive nanopores is essential for effective shale gas extraction. Classical theories cannot accurately predict such gas recovery and many experimental observations are not well understood. Here we report molecular simulations of the recovery of gas from single nanopores, explicitly taking into account molecular gas-wall interactions. We show that, in very narrow pores, the strong gas-wall interactions are essential in determining the gas recovery behavior both quantitatively and qualitatively. These interactions cause the total diffusion coefficients of the gas molecules in nanopores to be smaller than those predicted by kinetic theories, hence slowing down the rate of gas recovery. These interactions also lead to significant adsorption of gas molecules on the pore walls. Because of the desorption of these gas molecules during gas recovery, the gas recovery from the nanopore does not exhibit the usual diffusive scaling law (i.e., the accumulative recovery scales as Rt1/2) but follows a superdiffusive scaling law Rtn (n>0.5), which is similar to that observed in some field experiments. For the system studied here, the superdiffusive gas recovery scaling law can be captured well by continuum models in which the gas adsorption and desorption from pore walls are taken into account using the Langmuir model.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. US Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2013 (Washington, DC, 2013).
  2. I. Lunati and S. H. Lee, A dual-tube model for gas dynamics in fractured nanoporous shale formations, J. Fluid Mech. 757, 943 (2014).
  3. A. Amann-Hildenbrand, A. Ghanizadeh, and B. M. Krooss, Transport properties of unconventional gas systems, Mar. Petrol. Geol. 31, 90 (2012).
  4. X. Zhang, L. Xiao, X. Shan, and L. Guo, Lattice Boltzmann simulation of shale gas transport in organic nano-pores, Sci. Rep. 4, 4843 (2014).
  5. M. Firouzi, E. C. Rupp, C. W. Liu, and J. Wilcox, Molecular simulation and experimental characterization of the nanoporous structures of coal and gas shale, Int. J. Coal Geol. 121, 123 (2014).
  6. M. E. Curtis, C. H. Sondergeld, R. J. Ambrose, and C. S. Rai, Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging, AAPG Bull. 96, 665 (2012).
  7. G. R. Chalmers, R. M. Bustin, and I. M. Power, Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: Examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units, AAPG Bull. 96, 1099 (2012).
  8. R. G. Loucks, R. M. Reed, S. C. Ruppel, and D. M. Jarvie, Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the mississippian barnett shale, J. Sediment. Res. 79, 848 (2009).
  9. D. J. Soeder, Porosity and permeability of eastern Devonian gas shale, Spe. Formation Eval. 3, 116 (1988).
  10. F. Javadpour, D. Fisher, and M. Unsworth, Nanoscale gas flow in shale gas sediments, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 46, 55 (2007).
  11. M. Barisik and A. Beskok, Scale effects in gas nano flows, Phys. Fluids 26, 052003 (2014).
  12. F. Civan, C. S. Rai, and C. H. Sondergeld, Shale-gas permeability and diffusivity inferred by improved formulation of relevant retention and transport mechanisms, Transp. Porous Media 86, 925 (2011).
  13. G. E. King, Thirty years of gas shale fracturing: what have we learned? in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010), p. SPE-133456.
  14. K. K. Chong, W. V. Grieser, A. Passman, H. C. Tamayo, N. Modeland, and B. E. Burke, A completions guide book to shale-play development: A review of successful approaches toward shale-play stimulation in the last two decades, in Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010), p. SPE-133874.
  15. S. L. Montgomery, D. M. Jarvie, K. A. Bowker, and R. M. Pollastro, Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, north-central Texas: Gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential, AAPG Bull. 89, 155 (2005).
  16. F. Civan, Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media, Transp. Porous Media 82, 375 (2010).
  17. C. M. Freeman, G. J. Moridis, and T. A. Blasingame, A numerical study of microscale flow behavior in tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems, Transp. Porous Media 90, 253 (2011).
  18. A. S. Ziarani and R. Aguilera, Knudsen's permeability correction for tight porous media, Transp. Porous Media 91, 239 (2012).
  19. S. M. Kang, E. Fathi, R. J. Ambrose, I. Y. Akkutlu, and R. F. Sigal, Carbon dioxide storage capacity of organic-rich shales, SPE J. 16, 842 (2011).
  20. F. Javadpour, Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks (shales and siltstone), J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 48, 16 (2009).
  21. H. Darabi, A. Ettehad, F. Javadpour, and K. Sepehrnoori, Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata, J. Fluid Mech. 710, 641 (2012).
  22. E. Fathi, A. Tinni, and I. Y. Akkutlu, Correction to Klinkenberg slip theory for gas flow in nano-capillaries, Int. J. Coal. Geol. 103, 51 (2012).
  23. V. Swami and A. Settari, A pore scale gas flow model for shale gas reservoir, in SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012), p. SPE-155756.
  24. P. Zhang, L. Hu, J. N. Meegoda, and S. Gao, Micro/nano-pore network analysis of gas flow in shale matrix, Sci. Rep. 5, 135001 (2015).
  25. J.-M. Vanson, F.-X. Coudert, B. Rotenberg, M. Levesque, C. Tardivat, M. Klotz, and A. Boutin, Unexpected coupling between flow and adsorption in porous media, Soft Matter 11, 6125 (2015).
  26. L. Chen, L. Zhang, Q. Kang, H. S. Viswanathan, J. Yao, and W. Tao, Nanoscale simulation of shale transport properties using the lattice Boltzmann method: permeability and diffusivity, Sci. Rep. 5, 8089 (2015).
  27. J. Zhang and G. W. Scherer, Permeability of shale by the beam-bending method, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 53, 179 (2012).
  28. E. Fathi and I. Y. Akkutlu, Mass transport of adsorbed-phase in stochastic porous medium with fluctuating porosity field and nonlinear gas adsorption kinetics, Transp. Porous Media 91, 5 (2012).
  29. O. G. Jepps, S. K. Bhatia, and D. J. Searles, Wall Mediated Transport in Confined Spaces: Exact Theory for Low Density, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 126102 (2003).
  30. H. Pratikno, D. E. Reese, and M. M. Maguire, Production analysis in the Barnett shale-field example for reservoir characterization using public data, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013), p. SPE-166176.
  31. T. W. Patzek, F. Male, and M. Marder, Gas production in the Barnett Shale obeys a simple scaling theory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19731 (2013).
  32. J. D. Baihly, R. M. Altman, R. Malpani, and F. Luo, Shale gas production decline trend comparison over time and basins, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010), p. SPE-135555.
  33. V. Shabro, C. Torres-Verdin, and F. Javadpour, Numerical simulation of shale-gas production: from pore-scale modeling of slip-flow, Knudsen diffusion, and Langmuir desorption to reservoir modeling of compressible fluid, in North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Woodlands, Texas, USA (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2011), p. SPE-144355.
  34. S. K. Bhatia, O. Jepps, and D. Nicholson, Tractable molecular theory of transport of Lennard-Jones fluids in nanopores, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4472 (2004).
  35. O. G. Jepps, S. K. Bhatia, and D. J. Searles, Modeling molecular transport in slit pores, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5396 (2004).
  36. R. J. Ambrose, R. C. Hartman, M. D. Campos, I. Y. Akkutlu, and C. Sondergeld, New pore-scale considerations for shale gas in place calculations, in SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010), p. SPE-131772.
  37. S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
  38. S. Whitaker, Fundamental Principles of Heat Transfer (Elsevier, New York, 2013).
  39. L. S. Darken, Diffusion, mobility and their interrelation through free energy in binary metallic systems, Trans. Aime 175, 184 (1948).
  40. E. J. Maginn, A. T. Bell, and D. N. Theodorou, Transport diffusivity of methane in silicalite from equilibrium and nonequilibrium simulations, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 4173 (1993).
  41. A. Kleinhammes, S.-H. Mao, X.-J. Yang, X.-P. Tang, H. Shimoda, J. P. Lu, O. Zhou, and Y. Wu, Gas adsorption in single-walled carbon nanotubes studied by NMR, Phys. Rev. B 68, 075418 (2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation