- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Influence of the Coriolis force on the structure and evolution of wind turbine wakes

Mahdi Abkar*

Fernando Porté-Agel†

  • Wind Engineering and Renewable Energy Laboratory (WiRE), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland and Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

  • Wind Engineering and Renewable Energy Laboratory (WiRE), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

  • *abkar@stanford.edu
  • †fernando.porte-agel@epfl.ch
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 063701 – Published 24 October, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.063701

Abstract

In this study, large-eddy simulation combined with a turbine model is used to investigate the effect of vertical wind veer associated with the Coriolis force on the structure and evolution of wind turbine wakes. In order to isolate the Coriolis effect on the wake, two cases are considered. In the first case, atmospheric boundary-layer flow is driven by a geostrophic wind, including the effect of Earth's rotation and the Coriolis force. In the second case, the boundary-layer flow is unidirectional and is forced by an imposed pressure gradient. Both cases have the same mean horizontal velocity and turbulence intensity at the hub height. The simulation results show that the Coriolis force significantly affects the aerodynamics of the wake including the mean velocity deficit, turbulence statistics, and wake-meandering characteristics downwind of the turbine. In particular, when the flow is forced by a geostrophic wind, vertical wind veer causes a skewed spatial structure in the wake. Moreover, the presence of lateral wind shear, in addition to the vertical one, enhances the shear production of turbulent kinetic energy and the turbulent momentum flux. This leads to a larger flow entrainment and, thus, a faster wake recovery compared to the case forced by unidirectional pressure gradient. Consistent with this result, wake meandering is also stronger in both lateral and vertical directions in the case of geostrophic forcing compared to the case with pressure-gradient forcing.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (84)

  1. L. J. Vermeer, J. N. Sørensen, and A. Crespo, Wind turbine wake aerodynamics, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39, 467 (2003).
  2. M. Hansen, J. N. Sørensen, S. Voutsinas, N. Sørensen, and H. Madsen, State of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 42, 285 (2006).
  3. B. Sanderse, S. P. Pijl, and B. Koren, Review of computational fluid dynamics for wind turbine wake aerodynamics, Wind Energy 14, 799 (2011).
  4. J. N. Sørensen, Aerodynamic aspects of wind energy conversion, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 427 (2011).
  5. D. Mehta, A. Van Zuijlen, B. Koren, J. Holierhoek, and H. Bijl, Large eddy simulation of wind farm aerodynamics: A review, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 133, 1 (2014).
  6. S. E. Larsen, S.-E. Gryning, N. Jensen, H. Jørgensen, and J. J. Mann, Mean wind and turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer above the surface layer, in Wind Energy (Springer, Berlin, 2007), p. 21.
  7. R. J. Barthelmie, S. T. Frandsen, M. N. Nielsen, S. C. Pryor, P. E. Rethore, and H. E. Jørgensen, Modelling and measurements of power losses and turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore wind farm, Wind Energy 10, 517 (2007).
  8. R. J. Barthelmie, S. C. Pryor, S. T. Frandsen, K. S. Hansen, J. G. Schepers, K. Rados, W. Schlez, A. Neubert, and L. E. Jensen, Quantifying the impact of wind turbine wakes on power output at offshore wind farms, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 27, 1302 (2010).
  9. R. J. Barthelmie and L. E. Jensen, Evaluation of wind farm efficiency and wind turbine wakes at the Nysted offshore wind farm, Wind Energy 13, 573 (2010).
  10. K. S. Hansen, R. J. Barthelmie, L. E. Jensen, and A. Sommer, The impact of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm, Wind Energy 15, 183 (2012).
  11. M. J. Churchfield, S. Lee, P. J. Moriarty, Y. Hao, M. A. Lackner, R. Barthelmie, J. K. Lundquist, and G. Oxley, A comparison of the dynamic wake meandering model, large-eddy simulation, and field data at the Egmond aan Zee offshore wind plant, in 33rd Wind Energy Symposium, AIAA SciTech, (AIAA 2015-0724), http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2015-0724.
  12. J. P. Goit and J. Meyers, Optimal control of energy extraction in wind-farm boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 768, 5 (2015).
  13. N. Troldborg, J. Sørensen, and R. Mikkelsen, Actuator line simulation of wake of wind turbine operating in turbulent inflow, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 75, 012063 (2007).
  14. J. N. Sørensen, R. F. Mikkelsen, D. S. Henningson, S. Ivanell, S. Sarmast, and S. J. Andersen, Simulation of wind turbine wakes using the actuator line technique, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140071 (2015).
  15. H. Sarlak, C. Meneveau, and J. N. Sørensen, Role of subgrid-scale modeling in large eddy simulation of wind turbine wake interactions, Renewable Energy 77, 386 (2015).
  16. L. Chamorro and F. Porté-Agel, A wind-tunnel investigation of wind turbine wakes: Boundary-layer turbulence effects, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 132, 129 (2009).
  17. R. B. Cal, J. Lebrón, L. Castillo, H. S. Kang, and C. Meneveau, Experimental study of the horizontally averaged flow structure in a model wind turbine array boundary layer, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 2, 013106 (2010).
  18. Y. T. Wu and F. Porté-Agel, Atmospheric turbulence effects on wind-turbine wakes: An LES study, Energies 5, 5340 (2012).
  19. C. D. Markfort, W. Zhang, and F. Porté-Agel, Turbulent flow and scalar transport through and over aligned and staggered wind farms, J. Turbul. 13, 1 (2012).
  20. N. Hamilton, H. S. Kang, C. Meneveau, and R. B. Cal, Statistical analysis of kinetic energy entrainment in a model wind turbine array boundary layer, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 4, 063105 (2012).
  21. L. Chamorro, C. Hill, S. Morton, C. Ellis, R. Arndt, and F. Sotiropoulos, On the interaction between a turbulent open channel flow and an axial-flow turbine, J. Fluid Mech. 716, 658 (2013).
  22. G. V. Iungo, Y. T. Wu, and F. Porté-Agel, Field measurements of wind turbine wakes with lidars, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 30, 274 (2013).
  23. W. Tian, A. Ozbay, and H. Hu, Effects of incoming surface wind conditions on the wake characteristics and dynamic wind loads acting on a wind turbine model, Phys. Fluids 26, 125108 (2014).
  24. G. Espana, S. Aubrun, S. Loyer, and P. Devinant, Wind tunnel study of the wake meandering downstream of a modelled wind turbine as an effect of large scale turbulent eddies, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 101, 24 (2012).
  25. R. E. Keck, M. Mare, J. M. Churchfield, S. Lee, and G. Larsen, On atmospheric stability in the dynamic wake meandering model, Wind Energy 17, 1689 (2014).
  26. M. Abkar and F. Porté-Agel, Influence of atmospheric stability on wind turbine wakes: A large-eddy simulation study, Phys. Fluids 27, 035104 (2015).
  27. K. Rados, G. Larsen, R. Barthelmie, W. Schlez, B. Lange, G. Schepers, T. Hegberg, and M. Magnisson, Comparison of wake models with data for offshore wind farms, Wind Eng. 25, 271 (2001).
  28. P. E. Rethore, N. N. Sørensen, A. Bechmann, and F. Zahle, Study of the atmospheric wake turbulence of a CFD actuator disc model, in Proceedings of European Wind Energy Conference, Marseille, France, 2009.
  29. M. J. Churchfield, S. Lee, J. Michalakes, and P. J. Moriarty, A numerical study of the effects of atmospheric and wake turbine dynamics, J. Turbul. 13, N14 (2012).
  30. M. L. Aitken, B. Kosović, J. D. Mirocha, and J. K. Lundquist, Large eddy simulation of wind turbine wake dynamics in the stable boundary layer using the weather research and forecasting model, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 6, 033137 (2014).
  31. J. D. Mirocha, D. A. Rajewski, N. Marjanovic, J. K. Lundquist, B. Kosović, C. Draxl, and M. J. Churchfield, Investigating wind turbine impacts on near-wake flow using profiling lidar data and large-eddy simulations with an actuator disk model, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 7, 043143 (2015).
  32. K. Bhaganagar and M. Debnath, The effects of mean atmospheric forcings of the stable atmospheric boundary layer on wind turbine wake, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 7, 013124 (2015).
  33. J. Lundquist, M. Churchfield, S. Lee, and A. Clifton, Quantifying error of lidar and sodar Doppler beam swinging measurements of wind turbine wakes using computational fluid dynamics, Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 907 (2015).
  34. M. Bromm, L. Vollmer, and M. Kühn, Numerical investigation of wind turbine wake development in directionally sheared inflow, Wind Energy (2016), doi: 10.1002/we.2010.
  35. D. Medici and P. H. Alfredsson, Measurements on a wind turbine wake: 3d effects and bluff body vortex shedding, Wind Energy 9, 219 (2006).
  36. T. Maeda, Y. Kamada, J. Murata, S. Yonekura, T. Ito, A. Okawa, and T. Kogaki, Wind tunnel study on wind and turbulence intensity profiles in wind turbine wake, J. Thermal Sci. 20, 127 (2011).
  37. M. Magnusson and A. S. Smedman, Influence of atmospheric stability on wind turbine wakes, Wind Eng. 18, 139 (1994).
  38. W. Zhang, C. D. Markfort, and F. Porté-Agel, Wind-turbine wakes in a convective boundary layer: A wind-tunnel study, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 146, 161 (2013).
  39. G. V. Iungo and F. Porté-Agel, Volumetric lidar scanning of wind turbine wakes under convective and neutral atmospheric stability regimes, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 31, 2035 (2014).
  40. P. E. Hancock and F. Pascheke, Wind-tunnel simulation of the wake of a large wind turbine in a stable boundary layer: Part 2, The wake flow, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 151, 23 (2014).
  41. M. L. Aitken, R. M. Banta, Y. L. Pichugina, and J. K. Lundquist, Quantifying wind turbine wake characteristics from scanning remote sensor data, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 31, 765 (2014).
  42. M. L. Aitken and J. K. Lundquist, Utility-scale wind turbine wake characterization using nacelle-based long-range scanning lidar, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 31, 1529 (2014).
  43. P. E. Hancock and S. Zhang, A wind-tunnel simulation of the wake of a large wind turbine in a weakly unstable boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 156, 395 (2015).
  44. M. Dörenkämper, B. Witha, G. Steinfeld, D. Heinemann, and M. Kühn, The impact of stable atmospheric boundary layers on wind turbine wakes within offshore wind farms, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 144, 146 (2015).
  45. G. V. Iungo, Experimental characterization of wind turbine wakes: Wind tunnel tests and wind LiDAR measurements, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 149, 35 (2016).
  46. E. Machefaux, G. C. Larsen, T. Koblitz, N. Troldborg, M. C. Kelly, A. Chougule, K. S. Hansen, and J. S. Rodrigo, An experimental and numerical study of the atmospheric stability impact on wind turbine wakes, Wind Energy 19, 1785 (2016).
  47. I. N. Esau and S. S. Zilitinkevich, Universal dependences between turbulent and mean flow parameters instably and neutrally stratified planetary boundary layers, Nonlin. Processes Geophys. 13, 135 (2006).
  48. F. Zahle, N. Sørensen, and H. Madsen Aagaard, The influence of wind shear and tower presence on rotor and wake aerodynamics using CFD, in Research in Aeroelasticity EFP-2007, edited by C. Bak (Risø National Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark, 2008), pp. 17–34.
  49. H. Lu and F. Porté-Agel, Large-eddy simulation of a very large wind farm in a stable atmospheric boundary layer, Phys. Fluids 23, 065101 (2011).
  50. L. Vollmer, M. van Dooren, D. Trabucchi, J. Schneemann, G. Steinfeld, B. Witha, J. Trujillo, and M. Kuhn, First comparison of LES of an offshore wind turbine wake with dual-Doppler lidar measurements in a German offshore wind farm, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 625, 012001 (2015).
  51. M. Abkar, A. Sharifi, and F. Porté-Agel, Wake flow in a wind farm during a diurnal cycle, J. Turbul. 17, 420 (2016).
  52. D. Allaerts and J. Meyers, Effect of inversion-layer height and Coriolis forces on developing wind-farm boundary layers, in 34th Wind Energy Symposium, AIAA SciTech, (AIAA 2016-1989), http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-1989.
  53. F. Porté-Agel, Y. T. Wu, H. Lu, and R. J. Conzemius, Large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flow through wind turbines and wind farms, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 99, 154 (2011).
  54. Y. T. Wu and F. Porté-Agel, Simulation of turbulent flow inside and above wind farms: Model validation and layout effects, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 146, 181 (2013).
  55. F. Porté-Agel, Y. T. Wu, and C. H. Chen, A numerical study of the effects of wind direction on turbine wakes and power losses in a large wind farm, Energies 6, 5297 (2013).
  56. M. Abkar and F. Porté-Agel, The effect of free-atmosphere stratification on boundary-layer flow and power output from very large wind farms, Energies 6, 2338 (2013).
  57. J. W. Deardorff, Three-dimensional numerical study of the height and mean structure of a heated planetary boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 81 (1974).
  58. R. Stoll and F. Porté-Agel, Dynamic subgrid-scale models for momentum and scalar fluxes in large-eddy simulations of neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layers over heterogeneous terrain, Water Resour. Res. 42, W01409 (2006).
  59. Y. T. Wu and F. Porté-Agel, Modeling turbine wakes and power losses within a wind farm using LES: An application to the Horns Rev offshore wind farm, Renewable Energy 75, 945 (2015).
  60. Y. T. Wu and F. Porté-Agel, Large-eddy simulation of wind-turbine wakes: Evaluation of turbine parametrisations, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 138, 345 (2011).
  61. R. J. Beare, M. K. MacVean, A. A. M. Holtslag, J. Cuxart, I. Esau, J.-C. Golaz, M. A. Jimenez, M. Khairoutdinov, B. Kosovic, D. Lewellen, T. S. Lund, J. K. Lundquist, A. McCabe, A. F. Moene, Y. Noh, S. Raasch, and P. Sullivan, An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 118, 247 (2006).
  62. A. Sescu and C. Meneveau, A control algorithm for statistically stationary large-eddy simulations of thermally stratified boundary layers, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 2017 (2014).
  63. M. Abkar and F. Porté-Agel, A new wind-farm parameterization for large-scale atmospheric models, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 7, 013121 (2015).
  64. D. Allaerts and J. Meyers, Large eddy simulation of a large wind-turbine array in a conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer, Phys. Fluids 27, 065108 (2015).
  65. S. Zilitinkevich and I. Esau, The effect of baroclinicity on the depth of neutral and stable planetary boundary layers, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 129, 3339 (2003).
  66. F. T. Nieuwstadt, The turbulent structure of the stable, nocturnal boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2202 (1984).
  67. F. T. Nieuwstadt, A model for the stationary, stable boundary layer, in Turbulence and Diffusion in Stable Environments, edited by J. C. R. Hunt (Oxford University, Oxford, 1985), p. 149.
  68. G. N. Coleman, J. H. Ferziger, and P. R. Spalart, Direct simulation of the stably stratified turbulent ekman layer, J. Fluid Mech. 244, 677 (1992).
  69. B. Kosovic and J. A. Curry, A large eddy simulation study of a quasi-steady, stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci. 57, 1052 (2000).
  70. S. Basu and F. Porté-Agel, Large-eddy simulation of stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer turbulence: A scale-dependent dynamic modeling approach, J. Atmos. Sci. 63, 2074 (2006).
  71. R. Stoll and F. Porté-Agel, Large-eddy simulation of the stable atmospheric boundary layer using dynamic models with different averaging schemes, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 126, 1 (2008).
  72. Y. H. Tseng, C. Meneveau, and M. B. Parlange, Modeling flow around bluff bodies and predicting urban dispersion using large eddy simulation, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 2653 (2006).
  73. M. Abkar and F. Porté-Agel, A new boundary condition for large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer flow over surface roughness transitions, J. Turbul. 13, N23 (2012).
  74. W. Munters, C. Meneveau, and J. Meyers, Turbulent inflow precursor method with time-varying direction for large-eddy simulations and applications to wind farms, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 159, 305 (2016).
  75. S. Xie and C. Archer, Self-similarity and turbulence characteristics of wind turbine wakes via large-eddy simulation, Wind Energy 18, 1815 (2015).
  76. A. Rosen and Y. Sheinman, The power fluctuations of a wind turbine, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 59, 51 (1996).
  77. R. Johnstone and G. Coleman, The turbulent Ekman boundary layer over an infinite wind turbine array, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 100, 46 (2012).
  78. M. Abkar and F. Porté-Agel, Mean and turbulent kinetic energy budgets inside and above very large wind farms under conventionally-neutral condition, Renewable Energy 70, 142 (2014).
  79. S. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University, New York, 2000).
  80. S. A. Orszag, Transform method for calculation of vector coupled sums: Application to the spectral form of the vorticity equation, J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 890 (1970).
  81. C. Canuto, M. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, and T. Zang, Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, 1988).
  82. C. Moeng, A large-eddy simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 2311 (1984).
  83. J. A. Businger, J. C. Wyngaard, Y. Izumi, and E. F. Bradley, Flux-profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer, J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 181 (1971).
  84. R. Stull, An Introduction to Boundary-Layer Meteorology (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 063701– Published 24 October, 2016
  • Received 7 March 2016

©2016 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation