Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Extended self-similarity in moment-generating-functions in wall-bounded turbulence at high Reynolds number

X. I. A. Yang1, C. Meneveau1, I. Marusic2, and L. Biferale3

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering and Center for Environmental and Applied Fluid Mechanics, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • 3Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Universita di Roma “Tor Vergata,” Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy

Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 044405 – Published 9 August, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.044405

Abstract

In wall-bounded turbulence, the moment generating functions (MGFs) of the streamwise velocity fluctuations exp(quz+) develop power-law scaling as a function of the wall normal distance z/δ. Here u is the streamwise velocity fluctuation, + indicates normalization in wall units (averaged friction velocity), z is the distance from the wall, q is an independent variable, and δ is the boundary layer thickness. Previous work has shown that this power-law scaling exists in the log-region 3Reτ0.5z+,z0.15δ where Reτ is the friction velocity-based Reynolds number. Here we present empirical evidence that this self-similar scaling can be extended, including bulk and viscosity-affected regions 30<z+,z<δ, provided the data are interpreted with the Extended-Self-Similarity (ESS), i.e., self-scaling of the MGFs as a function of one reference value, qo. ESS also improves the scaling properties, leading to more precise measurements of the scaling exponents. The analysis is based on hot-wire measurements from boundary layers at Reτ ranging from 2700 to 13000 from the Melbourne High-Reynolds-Number-Turbulent-Boundary-Layer-Wind-Tunnel. Furthermore, we investigate the scalings of the filtered, large-scale velocity fluctuations uzL and of the remaining small-scale component, uzS=uzuzL. The scaling of uzL falls within the conventionally defined log region and depends on a scale that is proportional to l+Reτ1/2; the scaling of uzS extends over a much wider range from z+30 to z0.5δ. Last, we present a theoretical construction of two multiplicative processes for uzL and uzS that reproduce the empirical findings concerning the scalings properties as functions of z+ and in the ESS sense.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. I. Marusic, B. J. McKeon, P. A. Monkewitz, H. M. Nagib, A. J. Smits, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers: Recent advances and key issues, Phys. Fluids 22, 065103 (2010).
  2. J. Jiménez, Cascades in wall-bounded turbulence, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 27 (2011).
  3. A. J. Smits, B. J. McKeon, and I. Marusic, High-Reynolds number wall turbulence, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353 (2011).
  4. L. Prandtl, Report on investigation of developed turbulence, NACA Report TM-1231 (1925).
  5. M. Hultmark, M. Vallikivi, S. C. C. Bailey, and A. J. Smits, Turbulent Pipe Flow at Extreme Reynolds Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 094501 (2012).
  6. I. Marusic, J. P. Monty, M. Hultmark, and A. J. Smits, On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3 (2013).
  7. M. Lee and R. D. Moser, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ5200, J. Fluid Mech. 774, 395 (2015).
  8. I. Marusic and G. J. Kunkel, Streamwise turbulence intensity formulation for flat-plate boundary layers, Phys. Fluids 15, 2461 (2003).
  9. G. J. Kunkel and I. Marusic, Study of the near-wall-turbulent region of the high-Reynolds-number boundary layer using an atmospheric flow, J. Fluid Mech. 548, 375 (2006).
  10. R. J. A. M. Stevens, M. Wilczek, and C. Meneveau, Large-eddy simulation study of the logarithmic law for second- and higher-order moments in turbulent wall-bounded flow, J. Fluid Mech. 757, 888 (2014).
  11. A. A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976).
  12. C. Meneveau and I. Marusic, Generalized logarithmic law for high-order moments in turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 719, R1 (2013).
  13. C. M. de Silva, I. Marusic, J. D. Woodcock, and C. Meneveau, Scaling of second- and higher-order structure functions in turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 769, 654 (2015).
  14. X. I. A. Yang, I. Marusic, and C. Meneveau, Moment generating functions and scaling laws in the inertial layer of turbulent wall-bounded flows, J. Fluid Mech. 791, R2 (2016).
  15. A. E. Perry and M. S. Chong, On the mechanism of wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173 (1982).
  16. A. E. Perry, I. Marušić, and J. D. Li, Wall turbulence closure based on classical similarity laws and the attached eddy hypothesis, Phys. Fluids 6, 1024 (1994).
  17. I. Marusic and A. E. Perry, A wall-wake model for the turbulence structure of boundary layers. Part 2. Further experimental support, J. Fluid Mech. 298, 389 (1995).
  18. J. D. Woodcock and I. Marusic, The statistical behavior of attached eddies, Phys. Fluids 27, 015104 (2015).
  19. K. J. Bullock, R. E. Cooper, and F. H. Abernathy, Structural similarity in radial correlations and spectra of longitudinal velocity fluctuations in pipe flow, J. Fluid Mech. 88, 585 (1978).
  20. C. M. de Silva, N. Hutchins, and I. Marusic, Uniform momentum zones in turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 786, 309 (2016).
  21. J. C. Del Álamo, J. Jimenez, P. Zandonade, and R. D. Moser, Self-similar vortex clusters in the turbulent logarithmic region, J. Fluid Mech. 561, 329 (2006).
  22. J. Klewicki, J. Philip, I. Marusic, K. Chauhan, and C. Morrill-Winter, Self-similarity in the inertial region of wall turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 90, 063015 (2014).
  23. R. Benzi, S. Ciliberto, R. Tripiccione, C. Baudet, F. Massaioli, and S. Succi, Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. E 48, R29 (1993).
  24. R. Benzi, S. Ciliberto, C. Baudet, and G. R. Chavarria, On the scaling of three-dimensional homogeneous and isotropic turbulence, Physica D 80, 385 (1995).
  25. R. Benzi, L. Biferale, S. Ciliberto, M. V. Struglia, and R. Tripiccione, Generalized scaling in fully developed turbulence, Physica D 96, 162 (1996).
  26. A. Arnéodo, C. Baudet, F. Belin, R. Benzi, B. Castaing, B. Chabaud, R. Chavarria, S. Ciliberto, R. Camussi, F. Chilla et al., Structure functions in turbulence, in various flow configurations, at Reynolds number between 30 and 5000, using extended self-similarity, Europhys. Lett. 34, 411 (1996).
  27. V. Carbone, P. Veltri, and R. Bruno, Experimental Evidence for Differences in the Extended Self-Similarity Scaling Laws Between Fluid and Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulent Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3110 (1995).
  28. R. Benzi, M. V. Struglia, and R. Tripiccione, Extended self-similarity in numerical simulations of three-dimensional anisotropic turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 53, R5565 (1996).
  29. V. Carbone, R. Bruno, and P. Veltri, Evidences for extended self-similarity in hydromagnetic turbulence, Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 121 (1996).
  30. S. Grossmann, D. Lohse, and A. Reeh, Application of extended self-similarity in turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5473 (1997).
  31. R. Benzi, L. Biferale, S. Ciliberto, M. V. Struglia, and R. Tripiccione, On the intermittent energy transfer at viscous scales in turbulent flows, Europhys. Lett. 32, 709 (1995).
  32. C. Meneveau, Transition between viscous and inertial-range scaling of turbulence structure functions, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3657 (1996).
  33. N. Hutchins, T. B. Nickels, I. Marusic, and M. S. Chong, Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 635, 103 (2009).
  34. I. Marusic, K. A. Chauhan, V. Kulandaivelu, and N. Hutchins, Evolution of zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers from different tripping conditions, J. Fluid Mech. 783, 379 (2015).
  35. S. J. Kline, W. C. Reynolds, F. A. Schraub, and P. W. Runstadler, The structure of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech 30, 741 (1967).
  36. B. J. Cantwell, Organized motion in turbulent flow, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 457 (1981).
  37. G. Katul, D. Poggi, D. Cava, and J. Finnigan, The relative importance of ejections and sweeps to momentum transfer in the atmospheric boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 120, 367 (2006).
  38. B. J. McKeon and J. F. Morrison, Asymptotic scaling in turbulent pipe flow, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 365, 771 (2007).
  39. N. Hutchins and I. Marusic, Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 579, 1 (2007).
  40. I. Marusic, R. Mathis, and N. Hutchins, Predictive model for wall-bounded turbulent flow, Science 329, 193 (2010).
  41. R. Mathis, N. Hutchins, and I. Marusic, A predictive inner–outer model for streamwise turbulence statistics in wall-bounded flows, J. Fluid Mech. 681, 537 (2011).
  42. B. Ganapathisubramani, N. Hutchins, J. P. Monty, D. Chung, and I. Marusic, Amplitude and frequency modulation in wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 712, 61 (2012).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation