A. Aab et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082002 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
The existence of magnetic monopoles is an interesting theoretical possibility generically predicted by grand unified theories (GUTs). Based on over 8 years of data, the Pierre Auger Observatory reports no detection of monopoles but do set the best limits to date on the flux of ultrarelativistic intermediate-mass monopoles by looking for the distinctive signatures of monopole-induced air showers.
Nicolás Yunes, Kent Yagi, and Frans Pretorius
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084002 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
The recent gravitational wave observations GW150914 and GW151226 reported by the LIGO and Virgo collaborations confirmed a key prediction of general relativity (GR). In this recent Physical Review D paper, the authors ask whether these events are also compatible with a variety of modifications of GR and alternative theories of gravity. In this wide-ranging and thorough study, the authors find that the recent observations put severe constraints on these non-standard theories.
Florent Michel, Jean-François Coupechoux, and Renaud Parentani
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084027 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
This paper provides a theoretical underpinning to the recent experimental observation of the analog Hawking effect in a BEC system, while also raising some relevant issues that need to be addressed to make the observation entirely reliable. Additionally, the paper unveils a new effect through the density two point function, which will certainly trigger new work in the active field of analog gravity.
Luis Lehner, Robert C. Myers, Eric Poisson, and Rafael D. Sorkin
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084046 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
The present paper provides a complete treatment of boundary terms in general relativity to include cases with lightlike boundary segments along with the usual spacelike and timelike ones. Applications of this exhaustive treatment includes a recent conjecture on computational complexity in the context of AdS/CFT.
Céline Degrande, Valentin V. Khoze, and Olivier Mattelaer
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085031 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
For high multiplicities of Higgs bosons produced in gluon-gluon fusion, the cross-section appears to grow with increasing numbers of Higgs due to the factorial explosion of relevant graphs. This ultimately signals a breakdown of perturbation theory in electroweak physics. By estimating the leading contributions to these cross-sections the authors find that such effects would be observable at a next-generation 50 or 100 TeV collider.
Massimo Tinto and José C. N. de Araujo
Phys. Rev. D 94, 081101(R) (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
N. M. Kondratiev and M. L. Gorodetsky
Phys. Rev. D 94, 081102(R) (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Massimo Giovannini
Phys. Rev. D 94, 081301(R) (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Carlos Sabín
Phys. Rev. D 94, 081501(R) (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
C. T. Marco Ho (何宗泰), Daiqin Su (粟待欽), Robert B. Mann, and Timothy C. Ralph
Phys. Rev. D 94, 081502(R) (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
J. Hoskins et al.
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082001 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
A. Aab et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082002 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
The existence of magnetic monopoles is an interesting theoretical possibility generically predicted by grand unified theories (GUTs). Based on over 8 years of data, the Pierre Auger Observatory reports no detection of monopoles but do set the best limits to date on the flux of ultrarelativistic intermediate-mass monopoles by looking for the distinctive signatures of monopole-induced air showers.
K. Haughian, D. Chen, L. Cunningham, G. Hofmann, J. Hough, P. G. Murray, R. Nawrodt, S. Rowan, A. A. van Veggel, and K. Yamamoto
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082003 (2016) - Published 12 October, 2016
L. Sun, A. Melatos, P. D. Lasky, C. T. Y. Chung, and N. S. Darman
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082004 (2016) - Published 19 October, 2016
D. F. Jackson Kimball, J. Dudley, Y. Li, S. Thulasi, S. Pustelny, D. Budker, and M. Zolotorev
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082005 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082006 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
A. E. Chavarria, J. I. Collar, J. R. Peña, P. Privitera, A. E. Robinson, B. Scholz, C. Sengul, J. Zhou, J. Estrada, F. Izraelevitch, J. Tiffenberg, J. R. T. de Mello Neto, and D. Torres Machado
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082007 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Sylvia J. Zhu, Maria Alessandra Papa, Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein, Reinhard Prix, Karl Wette, Bruce Allen, Oliver Bock, David Keitel, Badri Krishnan, Bernd Machenschalk, Miroslav Shaltev, and Xavier Siemens
Phys. Rev. D 94, 082008 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
Masahiro Hotta, Jose Trevison, and Koji Yamaguchi
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083001 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
Douglas P. Finkbeiner and Neal Weiner
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083002 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Marta D’Angelo, Pasquale Blasi, and Elena Amato
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083003 (2016) - Published 5 October, 2016
Yuichi Ohara
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083004 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Rafael Alves Batista, Andrey Saveliev, Günter Sigl, and Tanmay Vachaspati
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083005 (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
M. E. Gusakov and V. A. Dommes
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083006 (2016) - Published 13 October, 2016
Pierre-Henri Chavanis
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083007 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
I. de Martino, C. J. A. P. Martins, H. Ebeling, and D. Kocevski
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083008 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
A. Bartl, R. Bollig, H.-T. Janka, and A. Schwenk
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083009 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
Ang Li, Bing Zhang, Nai-Bo Zhang, He Gao, Bin Qi, and Tong Liu
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083010 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
Luke M. Butcher
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083011 (2016) - Published 31 October, 2016
Tharake Wijenayake, Weikang Lin, and Mustapha Ishak
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083501 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
Xunyu Liang and Ariel Zhitnitsky
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083502 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
Maresuke Shiraishi
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083503 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Bernard Carr, Florian Kühnel, and Marit Sandstad
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083504 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Lucas Johns, Mattia Mina, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Mark W. Paris, and George M. Fuller
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083505 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
José Manuel Zorrilla Matilla, Zoltán Haiman, Daniel Hsu, Arushi Gupta, and Andrea Petri
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083506 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Nelson A. Lima, Vanessa Smer-Barreto, and Lucas Lombriser
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083507 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Robert H. Brandenberger, Elisa G. M. Ferreira, Ian A. Morrison, Yi-Fu Cai, Sumit R. Das, and Yi Wang
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083508 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
R. A. C. Correa, P. H. R. S. Moraes, A. de Souza Dutra, W. de Paula, and T. Frederico
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083509 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Eric V. Linder
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083510 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Oliver Hahn and Aseem Paranjape
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083511 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Debika Chowdhury, L. Sriramkumar, and Rajeev Kumar Jain
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083512 (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
Kazuharu Bamba, G. G. L. Nashed, W. El Hanafy, and Sh. K. Ibraheem
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083513 (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
Aaron M. Levy and Gustavo J. Turiaci
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083514 (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
Cornelius Rampf, Eleonora Villa, Daniele Bertacca, and Marco Bruni
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083515 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
Tommi Tenkanen and Ville Vaskonen
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083516 (2016) - Published 14 October, 2016
Andrina Nicola, Alexandre Refregier, and Adam Amara
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083517 (2016) - Published 18 October, 2016
John D. Barrow and Andronikos Paliathanasis
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083518 (2016) - Published 19 October, 2016
Sai Wang, Yi-Fan Wang, Dong-Mei Xia, and Xin Zhang
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083519 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
Yu Yu, Pengjie Zhang, and Yipeng Jing
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083520 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
Yun Wang and Mi Dai
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083521 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
Elena Giusarma, Martina Gerbino, Olga Mena, Sunny Vagnozzi, Shirley Ho, and Katherine Freese
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083522 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Masahiro Kawasaki, Alexander Kusenko, Yuichiro Tada, and Tsutomu T. Yanagida
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083523 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Peng Qian, Yi-Fu Cai, Damien A. Easson, and Zong-Kuan Guo
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083524 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Peter K. S. Dunsby, Orlando Luongo, and Lorenzo Reverberi
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083525 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Radek Stompor, Josquin Errard, and Davide Poletti
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083526 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Ole Svendsen, Hossein Bazrafshan Moghaddam, and Robert Brandenberger
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083527 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Saroj Adhikari, Donghui Jeong, and Sarah Shandera
Phys. Rev. D 94, 083528 (2016) - Published 31 October, 2016
Nahomi Kan, Takuya Maki, and Kiyoshi Shiraishi
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084001 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
Nicolás Yunes, Kent Yagi, and Frans Pretorius
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084002 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
The recent gravitational wave observations GW150914 and GW151226 reported by the LIGO and Virgo collaborations confirmed a key prediction of general relativity (GR). In this recent Physical Review D paper, the authors ask whether these events are also compatible with a variety of modifications of GR and alternative theories of gravity. In this wide-ranging and thorough study, the authors find that the recent observations put severe constraints on these non-standard theories.
Noah Sennett, Sylvain Marsat, and Alessandra Buonanno
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084003 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Marcus Bugner, Tim Dietrich, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Andreas Weyhausen, and Bernd Brügmann
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084004 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
Kevin Falls and Nobuyoshi Ohta
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084005 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Orr Sela
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084006 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
Nirmalya Kajuri
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084007 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
J. M. Carmona, J. L. Cortés, and J. J. Relancio
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084008 (2016) - Published 5 October, 2016
Abraham I. Harte and Justin Vines
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084009 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Andrew Finch and Jackson Levi Said
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084010 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Miguel Bezares, Érico Goulart, Gonzalo Palomera, Daniel J. Pons, and Enrique G. Reyes
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084011 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Carsten Gundlach and Thomas W. Baumgarte
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084012 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Ilias Cholis, Ely D. Kovetz, Yacine Ali-Haïmoud, Simeon Bird, Marc Kamionkowski, Julian B. Muñoz, and Alvise Raccanelli
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084013 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Andrew Coates, Mattia Colombo, A. Emir Gümrükçüoğlu, and Thomas P. Sotiriou
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084014 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Asahi Ishihara, Yusuke Suzuki, Toshiaki Ono, Takao Kitamura, and Hideki Asada
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084015 (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
Cecilia Chirenti and Luciano Rezzolla
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084016 (2016) - Published 11 October, 2016
Samuel E. Gralla, Aaron Zimmerman, and Peter Zimmerman
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084017 (2016) - Published 13 October, 2016
I. Antoniou, D. Papadopoulos, and L. Perivolaropoulos
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084018 (2016) - Published 13 October, 2016
Sergey A. Pavluchenko
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084019 (2016) - Published 13 October, 2016
Nezihe Uzun
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084020 (2016) - Published 13 October, 2016
Giovanni Otalora and Emmanuel N. Saridakis
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084021 (2016) - Published 13 October, 2016
Alexandre Barreira, Ariel G. Sánchez, and Fabian Schmidt
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084022 (2016) - Published 13 October, 2016
Sridip Pal
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084023 (2016) - Published 14 October, 2016
Swetha Bhagwat, Duncan A. Brown, and Stefan W. Ballmer
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084024 (2016) - Published 17 October, 2016
Ziri Younsi, Alexander Zhidenko, Luciano Rezzolla, Roman Konoplya, and Yosuke Mizuno
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084025 (2016) - Published 18 October, 2016
Karim Benakli, Shira Chapman, Luc Darmé, and Yaron Oz
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084026 (2016) - Published 19 October, 2016
Florent Michel, Jean-François Coupechoux, and Renaud Parentani
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084027 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
This paper provides a theoretical underpinning to the recent experimental observation of the analog Hawking effect in a BEC system, while also raising some relevant issues that need to be addressed to make the observation entirely reliable. Additionally, the paper unveils a new effect through the density two point function, which will certainly trigger new work in the active field of analog gravity.
E. Alesci, J. Lewandowski, and I. Mäkinen
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084028 (2016) - Published 19 October, 2016
Xilong Fan, Yanbei Chen, and Christopher Messenger
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084029 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
Enrico D. Schiappacasse and L. H. Ford
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084030 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
Vitor Cardoso, Seth Hopper, Caio F. B. Macedo, Carlos Palenzuela, and Paolo Pani
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084031 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
Motoyuki Saijo and Shin’ichirou Yoshida
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084032 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
F. Dahia and A. S. Lemos
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084033 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
Fabio Sanches and Sean J. Weinberg
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084034 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Marios Christodoulou, Carlo Rovelli, Simone Speziale, and Ilya Vilensky
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084035 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
Davi C. Rodrigues, Sebastião Mauro, and Álefe O. F. de Almeida
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084036 (2016) - Published 24 October, 2016
B. Cvetković and D. Simić
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084037 (2016) - Published 24 October, 2016
Kuo-Wei Lee
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084038 (2016) - Published 24 October, 2016
Masato Minamitsuji
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084039 (2016) - Published 24 October, 2016
I. Sakalli
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084040 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Erwan Allys, Patrick Peter, and Yeinzon Rodríguez
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084041 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Sebastian Bahamonde, Ugur Camci, Salvatore Capozziello, and Mubasher Jamil
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084042 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Katerina Chatziioannou, Eric Poisson, and Nicolás Yunes
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084043 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Francesco Cianfrani, Jerzy Kowalski-Glikman, Daniele Pranzetti, and Giacomo Rosati
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084044 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
F. H. Vincent, E. Gourgoulhon, C. Herdeiro, and E. Radu
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084045 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Luis Lehner, Robert C. Myers, Eric Poisson, and Rafael D. Sorkin
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084046 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
The present paper provides a complete treatment of boundary terms in general relativity to include cases with lightlike boundary segments along with the usual spacelike and timelike ones. Applications of this exhaustive treatment includes a recent conjecture on computational complexity in the context of AdS/CFT.
Fabio Anza and Goffredo Chirco
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084047 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Jerzy Matyjasek
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084048 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Lior M. Burko and Gaurav Khanna
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084049 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Alejandro Corichi, Javier Olmedo, and Saeed Rastgoo
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084050 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Gia Dvali, Cesar Gomez, and Nico Wintergerst
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084051 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
Raziyeh Zaregonbadi, Mehrdad Farhoudi, and Nematollah Riazi
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084052 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
Dražen Glavan, Tomislav Prokopec, and Tomo Takahashi
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084053 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
Philippe Brax, Clare Burrage, Christoph Englert, and Michael Spannowsky
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084054 (2016) - Published 31 October, 2016
Eugeny Babichev, Luca Marzola, Martti Raidal, Angnis Schmidt-May, Federico Urban, Hardi Veermäe, and Mikael von Strauss
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084055 (2016) - Published 31 October, 2016
Chris L. Lin and Carlos R. Ordóñez
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085001 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
Michał Spaliński
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085002 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
Flavio S. Nogueira, Zohar Nussinov, and Jeroen van den Brink
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085003 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
Michele Arzano and Francisco Nettel
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085004 (2016) - Published 3 October, 2016
A. N. Ivanov, G. Cronenberg, R. Höllwieser, T. Jenke, M. Pitschmann, M. Wellenzohn, and H. Abele
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085005 (2016) - Published 4 October, 2016
A. G. Quinto and A. F. Ferrari
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085006 (2016) - Published 5 October, 2016
Canisius Bernard
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085007 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
I. Takyi and H. Weigel
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085008 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Shamit Kachru, Michael Mulligan, Gonzalo Torroba, and Huajia Wang
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085009 (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
Yang Li, Kimball A. Milton, Pushpa Kalauni, and Prachi Parashar
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085010 (2016) - Published 13 October, 2016
O. A. Battistel, T. H. Pimenta, and G. Dallabona
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085011 (2016) - Published 17 October, 2016
Tobias Fischer, Sovan Chakraborty, Maurizio Giannotti, Alessandro Mirizzi, Alexandre Payez, and Andreas Ringwald
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085012 (2016) - Published 19 October, 2016
Alexander Monin
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085013 (2016) - Published 19 October, 2016
Yurii A. Sitenko
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085014 (2016) - Published 19 October, 2016
Christian Schneider and Ralf Schützhold
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085015 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
Shiyong Li, Kiminad A. Mamo, and Ho-Ung Yee
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085016 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
Claudio Bonati, Massimo D’Elia, Paolo Rossi, and Ettore Vicari
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085017 (2016) - Published 20 October, 2016
Boye Buyens, Frank Verstraete, and Karel Van Acoleyen
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085018 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
A. Martín-Ruiz, M. Cambiaso, and L. F. Urrutia
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085019 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
Badis Ydri, Ramda Khaled, and Rouag Ahlam
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085020 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
Giuseppe Bimonte
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085021 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
Victor E. Ambruş and Ion I. Cotăescu
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085022 (2016) - Published 21 October, 2016
O. Dubinkin, A. Gorsky, and E. Gubankova
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085023 (2016) - Published 24 October, 2016
C. D. Fosco, F. C. Lombardo, and F. D. Mazzitelli
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085024 (2016) - Published 24 October, 2016
J. S. Díaz, F. R. Klinkhamer, and M. Risse
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085025 (2016) - Published 25 October, 2016
Nirmalendu Acharyya, A. P. Balachandran, Verónica Errasti Díez, P. N. Bala Subramanian, and Sachindeo Vaidya
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085026 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
T. R. S. Santos, R. F. Sobreiro, and A. A. Tomaz
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085027 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Zygmunt Lalak, Marek Lewicki, and Paweł Olszewski
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085028 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Manu Mathur and T. P. Sreeraj
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085029 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Fabrizio Canfora
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085030 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Céline Degrande, Valentin V. Khoze, and Olivier Mattelaer
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085031 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
For high multiplicities of Higgs bosons produced in gluon-gluon fusion, the cross-section appears to grow with increasing numbers of Higgs due to the factorial explosion of relevant graphs. This ultimately signals a breakdown of perturbation theory in electroweak physics. By estimating the leading contributions to these cross-sections the authors find that such effects would be observable at a next-generation 50 or 100 TeV collider.
Adam Bednorz
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085032 (2016) - Published 31 October, 2016
Juan Pablo Babaro, Gaston Giribet, and Arash Ranjbar
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086001 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Ali Jalali and Mohammad R. Garousi
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086002 (2016) - Published 7 October, 2016
Pramod Shukla
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086003 (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
Jiunn-Wei Chen, Shou-Huang Dai, Debaprasad Maity, and Yun-Long Zhang
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086004 (2016) - Published 10 October, 2016
Sunly Khimphun, Bum-Hoon Lee, and Chanyong Park
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086005 (2016) - Published 14 October, 2016
Martin Blaschke and Zdeněk Stuchlík
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086006 (2016) - Published 18 October, 2016
Antonio M. García-García, Bruno Loureiro, and Aurelio Romero-Bermúdez
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086007 (2016) - Published 24 October, 2016
Giorgos Anastasiou and Rodrigo Olea
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086008 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
E. Bianchi, J. Guglielmon, L. Hackl, and N. Yokomizo
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086009 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016
Masanori Hanada, Yoshifumi Hyakutake, Goro Ishiki, and Jun Nishimura
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086010 (2016) - Published 27 October, 2016
Dimitri Polyakov and Chaiho Rim
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086011 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
Ana Achúcarro, Pablo Ortiz, and Kepa Sousa
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086012 (2016) - Published 28 October, 2016
Dennis D. Dietrich
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086013 (2016) - Published 31 October, 2016
Mike Blake
Phys. Rev. D 94, 086014 (2016) - Published 31 October, 2016
Peng Xu and Ho Jung Paik
Phys. Rev. D 94, 089901 (2016) - Published 6 October, 2016
Mark Hindmarsh, Kari Rummukainen, Tuomas V. I. Tenkanen, and David J. Weir
Phys. Rev. D 94, 089902 (2016) - Published 26 October, 2016