A. A. Mironov and A. M. Fedotov
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033005 (2022) - Published 18 February, 2022
In this and a previously published work (PRD 102, 053005, (2020)), the authors have looked at the resummation of corrections to the electron scattering amplitude and to more general contributions to the electron mass operator leading to a corrected electron propagator, in a strong constant crossed electromagnetic field. Additionally they provide a code for loop calculations in strong backgrounds. These works should be of great significance in the field of strong field QED.
Gernot Eichmann, Eduardo Ferreira, and Alfred Stadler
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034009 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
This work introduces a new method for computing correlation functions on the light front. Starting from Bethe-Salpeter equations, the authors present calculations using contour deformation and analytic continuation, finding good agreement with established methods. This approach shows promise as an efficient and generalizable technique with applications to parton distribution functions and related constructions.
Nicolas Kovensky, Aaron Poole, and Andreas Schmitt
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034022 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
By using a holographic “top-down” description of dense baryonic matter, the authors study the construction of neutron stars. They model the crust of the star and compute the location of the crust-core transition dynamically. They find that this description does account for neutron stars that meet the current experimental constraints for mass, radius, and tidal deformability.
T. Appelquist, R. C. Brower, K. K. Cushman, G. T. Fleming, A. Gasbarro, A. Hasenfratz, J. Ingoldby, X. Y. Jin, E. T. Neil, J. C. Osborn, C. Rebbi, E. Rinaldi, D. Schaich, P. Vranas, E. Weinberg, and O. Witzel (Lattice Strong Dynamics (LSD) Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034505 (2022) - Published 9 February, 2022
The authors compute the scattering length of Goldstone boson scattering on the lattice in a gauge theory with a light composite scalar bound state. They show that their results can be well described with a dilaton effective field theory consisting of chiral perturbation theory augmented by the scalar field.
Massimo D’Elia, Lorenzo Maio, Francesco Sanfilippo, and Alfredo Stanzione
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034511 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Using lattice QCD simulations the authors find that the finite temperature crossover in QCD changes to a first-order phase transition in a sufficiently strong magnetic field.
Andrea Caputo, Georg Raffelt, and Edoardo Vitagliano
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035022 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Making use of modern supernova simulations which include muon effects, the authors update constraints on light muon-specific (pseudo) scalars and generic axion-like particles. They find that such scalar solutions to the muon g-2 excess are in conflict with astrophysical observations.
Debasish Banerjee and Shailesh Chandrasekharan
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031507 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Using a clever Monte Carlo method, the authors compute the subleading conformal dimensions of a class of local fields at the O(4) Wilson-Fisher fixed point and compare their results to a large charge expansion. They test whether the charge independent value in this expansion is the same as for the leading conformal dimensions as has been conjectured.
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031101 (2022) - Published 24 February, 2022
Lin Dai, Chul Kim, and Adam K. Leibovich
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031301 (2022) - Published 3 February, 2022
A. I. Milstein and S. G. Salnikov
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031501 (2022) - Published 3 February, 2022
Ignacio Borsa, Rodolfo Sassot, Daniel de Florian, and Marco Stratmann
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031502 (2022) - Published 9 February, 2022
Angelo Esposito, Luciano Maiani, Alessandro Pilloni, Antonio D. Polosa, and Verónica Riquer
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031503 (2022) - Published 14 February, 2022
Petja Paakkinen
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031504 (2022) - Published 17 February, 2022
Tian-Wei Wu, Ya-Wen Pan, Ming-Zhu Liu, Si-Qiang Luo, Li-Sheng Geng, and Xiang Liu
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031505 (2022) - Published 18 February, 2022
Kai Zhu
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031506 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Debasish Banerjee and Shailesh Chandrasekharan
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031507 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Using a clever Monte Carlo method, the authors compute the subleading conformal dimensions of a class of local fields at the O(4) Wilson-Fisher fixed point and compare their results to a large charge expansion. They test whether the charge independent value in this expansion is the same as for the leading conformal dimensions as has been conjectured.
Alexandre Carvunis, Shireen Gangal, Andreas Crivellin, and Diego Guadagnoli
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031701 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
A. W. Thomas, X. G. Wang, and A. G. Williams
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031901 (2022) - Published 4 February, 2022
Qin Qin, Yu-Ji Shi, Wei Wang, Guo-He Yang, Fu-Sheng Yu, and Ruilin Zhu
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031902 (2022) - Published 7 February, 2022
Dean J. Robinson
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031903 (2022) - Published 17 February, 2022
Pulak Banerjee, Tim Engel, Nicolas Schalch, Adrian Signer, and Yannick Ulrich
Phys. Rev. D 105, L031904 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Zhanibek Omarov, Hooman Davoudiasl, Selcuk Hacıömeroğlu, Valeri Lebedev, William M. Morse, Yannis K. Semertzidis, Alexander J. Silenko, Edward J. Stephenson, and Riad Suleiman
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032001 (2022) - Published 3 February, 2022
X. Y. Gao et al. (Belle Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032002 (2022) - Published 8 February, 2022
U. A. Acharya et al. (PHENIX Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032003 (2022) - Published 9 February, 2022
U. A. Acharya et al. (PHENIX Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032004 (2022) - Published 11 February, 2022
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032005 (2022) - Published 16 February, 2022
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032006 (2022) - Published 18 February, 2022
M. S. Abdallah et al. (STAR Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032007 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032008 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032009 (2022) - Published 28 February, 2022
S. Dolan, V. Q. Nguyen, A. Blanchet, S. Bolognesi, M. Buizza Avanzini, J. Chakrani, A. Ershova, C. Giganti, Y. Kudenko, M. Lamoureux, A. Letourneau, M. Martini, C. McGrew, L. Munteanu, B. Popov, D. Sgalaberna, S. Suvorov, and X. Y. Zhao
Phys. Rev. D 105, 032010 (2022) - Published 28 February, 2022
A. Galindo-Uribarri, O. G. Miranda, and G. Sanchez Garcia
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033001 (2022) - Published 3 February, 2022
Lucas Johns
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033002 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
Jian Chai, Shan Cheng, and Ai-Jun Ma
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033003 (2022) - Published 17 February, 2022
Wolfgang Altmannshofer and Nathan Lewis
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033004 (2022) - Published 16 February, 2022
A. A. Mironov and A. M. Fedotov
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033005 (2022) - Published 18 February, 2022
In this and a previously published work (PRD 102, 053005, (2020)), the authors have looked at the resummation of corrections to the electron scattering amplitude and to more general contributions to the electron mass operator leading to a corrected electron propagator, in a strong constant crossed electromagnetic field. Additionally they provide a code for loop calculations in strong backgrounds. These works should be of great significance in the field of strong field QED.
Hai-Yang Cheng, Cheng-Wei Chiang, and Zhi-Qing Zhang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033006 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Roberto Grimaudo, Davide Valenti, Bernardo Spagnolo, Giovanni Filatrella, and Claudio Guarcello
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033007 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
D. F. Tamayo Agudelo, A. Mariano, and D. E. Jaramillo Arango
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033008 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
A. B. Arbuzov, S. G. Bondarenko, L. V. Kalinovskaya, L. A. Rumyantsev, and V. L. Yermolchyk
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033009 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
F. Zaidi, V. Ansari, M. Sajjad Athar, H. Haider, I. Ruiz Simo, and S. K. Singh
Phys. Rev. D 105, 033010 (2022) - Published 28 February, 2022
S. Mohammad Moosavi Nejad and Nahid Amiri
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034001 (2022) - Published 1 February, 2022
G. R. Boroun and B. Rezaei
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034002 (2022) - Published 1 February, 2022
Bing-kai Sheng, Xinyang Wang, and Lang Yu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034003 (2022) - Published 1 February, 2022
Chentao Tan and Zhun Lu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034004 (2022) - Published 1 February, 2022
P. Kroll and K. Passek-Kumerički
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034005 (2022) - Published 3 February, 2022
Zhe Liu, Hong-Tao An, Zhan-Wei Liu, and Xiang Liu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034006 (2022) - Published 3 February, 2022
Shohini Bhattacharya, Zhong-Bo Kang, Andreas Metz, Gregory Penn, and Daniel Pitonyak
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034007 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
C. A. Flett, S. P. Jones, A. D. Martin, M. G. Ryskin, and T. Teubner
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034008 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
Gernot Eichmann, Eduardo Ferreira, and Alfred Stadler
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034009 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
This work introduces a new method for computing correlation functions on the light front. Starting from Bethe-Salpeter equations, the authors present calculations using contour deformation and analytic continuation, finding good agreement with established methods. This approach shows promise as an efficient and generalizable technique with applications to parton distribution functions and related constructions.
Xiang Sun, Ling-Yun Dai, Shi-Qing Kuang, Wen Qin, and A. P. Szczepaniak
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034010 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
Li-Ming Wang, Si-Qiang Luo, and Xiang Liu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034011 (2022) - Published 14 February, 2022
Yi Lu, Muyang Chen, Zhan Bai, Fei Gao, and Yu-xin Liu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034012 (2022) - Published 15 February, 2022
Hao Xu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034013 (2022) - Published 15 February, 2022
V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, and A. V. Nefediev
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034014 (2022) - Published 16 February, 2022
Yuan-Yuan Zhang and Xin-Nian Wang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034015 (2022) - Published 16 February, 2022
Peng-Hui Zhang, Lei Guo, Xu-Chang Zheng, and Qi-Wei Ke
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034016 (2022) - Published 17 February, 2022
Ai-Chao Wang, Neng-Chang Wei, and Fei Huang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034017 (2022) - Published 18 February, 2022
Hong-Tao An, Kan Chen, and Xiang Liu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034018 (2022) - Published 18 February, 2022
Ying-Ying Li, Xing-Lin Liu, Xin-Yi Liu, and Zhen Fang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034019 (2022) - Published 18 February, 2022
Marek Karliner and Jonathan L. Rosner
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034020 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Parada T. P. Hutauruk and Seung-il Nam
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034021 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Nicolas Kovensky, Aaron Poole, and Andreas Schmitt
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034022 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
By using a holographic “top-down” description of dense baryonic matter, the authors study the construction of neutron stars. They model the crust of the star and compute the location of the crust-core transition dynamically. They find that this description does account for neutron stars that meet the current experimental constraints for mass, radius, and tidal deformability.
Sylwia Bazak and Stanisław Mrówczyński
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034023 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Pan-Pan Shi, Zhen-Hua Zhang, Feng-Kun Guo, and Zhi Yang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034024 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Nico Santowsky and Christian S. Fischer
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034025 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Xin-Zhen Weng, Wei-Zhen Deng, and Shi-Lin Zhu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034026 (2022) - Published 24 February, 2022
Kai-bao Chen, Zuo-tang Liang, Yu-kun Song, and Shu-yi Wei
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034027 (2022) - Published 24 February, 2022
Fang-Zheng Peng, Mario Sánchez Sánchez, Mao-Jun Yan, and Manuel Pavon Valderrama
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034028 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Hans Günter Dosch, Guy F. de Téramond, Tianbo Liu, Raza Sabbir Sufian, Stanley J. Brodsky, and Alexandre Deur (HLFHS Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034029 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Constantia Alexandrou, Krzysztof Cichy, Martha Constantinou, Kyriakos Hadjiyiannakou, Karl Jansen, Aurora Scapellato, and Fernanda Steffens
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034501 (2022) - Published 1 February, 2022
Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034502 (2022) - Published 4 February, 2022
G. Martinelli, S. Simula, and L. Vittorio
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034503 (2022) - Published 7 February, 2022
G. Aarts, C. Allton, J. Glesaaen, S. Hands, B. Jäger, S. Kim, M. P. Lombardo, A. A. Nikolaev, S. M. Ryan, J.-I. Skullerud, and L.-K. Wu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034504 (2022) - Published 7 February, 2022
T. Appelquist, R. C. Brower, K. K. Cushman, G. T. Fleming, A. Gasbarro, A. Hasenfratz, J. Ingoldby, X. Y. Jin, E. T. Neil, J. C. Osborn, C. Rebbi, E. Rinaldi, D. Schaich, P. Vranas, E. Weinberg, and O. Witzel (Lattice Strong Dynamics (LSD) Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034505 (2022) - Published 9 February, 2022
The authors compute the scattering length of Goldstone boson scattering on the lattice in a gauge theory with a light composite scalar bound state. They show that their results can be well described with a dilaton effective field theory consisting of chiral perturbation theory augmented by the scalar field.
William Detmold, Anthony V. Grebe, Issaku Kanamori, C.-J. David Lin, Santanu Mondal, Robert J. Perry, and Yong Zhao (HOPE Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034506 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
Colin Egerer, Christos Kallidonis, Joseph Karpie, Nikhil Karthik, Christopher J. Monahan, Wayne Morris, Kostas Orginos, Anatoly Radyushkin, Eloy Romero, Raza Sabbir Sufian, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos (On behalf of the HadStruc Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034507 (2022) - Published 14 February, 2022
Zachary T. Draper and Stephen R. Sharpe
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034508 (2022) - Published 16 February, 2022
Jon A. Bailey, Yong-Chull Jang, Sunkyu Lee, Weonjong Lee, and Jaehoon Leem (LANL-SWME Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034509 (2022) - Published 18 February, 2022
Lorenzo Dini, Prasad Hegde, Frithjof Karsch, Anirban Lahiri, Christian Schmidt, and Sipaz Sharma
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034510 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Massimo D’Elia, Lorenzo Maio, Francesco Sanfilippo, and Alfredo Stanzione
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034511 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Using lattice QCD simulations the authors find that the finite temperature crossover in QCD changes to a first-order phase transition in a sufficiently strong magnetic field.
Julian J. Lenz, Michael Mandl, and Andreas Wipf
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034512 (2022) - Published 24 February, 2022
P. Dimopoulos, L. Dini, F. Di Renzo, J. Goswami, G. Nicotra, C. Schmidt, S. Singh, K. Zambello, and F. Ziesché
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034513 (2022) - Published 24 February, 2022
H.-T. Ding, S.-T. Li, J.-H. Liu, and X.-D. Wang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034514 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Judah F. Unmuth-Yockey
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034515 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
David Ward
Phys. Rev. D 105, 034516 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Tapoja Jha, Sarif Khan, Manimala Mitra, and Ayon Patra
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035001 (2022) - Published 1 February, 2022
Jeffrey M. Berryman, Luis A. Delgadillo, and Patrick Huber
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035002 (2022) - Published 2 February, 2022
Sebastian Tapia, Marcelo Vidal-Bravo, and Jilberto Zamora-Saá
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035003 (2022) - Published 2 February, 2022
P. Martínez-Miravé, S. Molina Sedgwick, and M. Tórtola
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035004 (2022) - Published 2 February, 2022
Patrick Barnes, Zachary Johnson, Aaron Pierce, and Bibhushan Shakya
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035005 (2022) - Published 2 February, 2022
Rathin Adhikari, Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat, Debasish Borah, Ernest Ma, and Dibyendu Nanda
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035006 (2022) - Published 4 February, 2022
Li-Fen Lai, Xin-Qiang Li, Xin-Shuai Yan, and Ya-Dong Yang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035007 (2022) - Published 9 February, 2022
Sunghoon Jung, Zhen Liu, Lian-Tao Wang, and Ke-Pan Xie
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035008 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
Ian Low, Nausheen R. Shah, and Xiao-Ping Wang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035009 (2022) - Published 9 February, 2022
J. C. Carrasco-Martínez, F. N. Díaz, and A. M. Gago
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035010 (2022) - Published 9 February, 2022
Zhen-hua Zhao, Xin-Yu Zhao, and Hui-Chao Bao
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035011 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
Raymond T. Co, Benjamin Sheff, and James D. Wells
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035012 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
Alexandre Alvarez, Ricardo Cepedello, Martin Hirsch, and Werner Porod
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035013 (2022) - Published 15 February, 2022
Linda M. Carpenter, Taylor Murphy, and Tim M. P. Tait
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035014 (2022) - Published 14 February, 2022
Mario Fernández Navarro and Stephen F. King
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035015 (2022) - Published 14 February, 2022
Giorgio Arcadi, Jacinto Paulo Neto, Farinaldo S. Queiroz, and Clarissa Siqueira
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035016 (2022) - Published 15 February, 2022
Shi-Ping He
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035017 (2022) - Published 17 February, 2022
G. Bélanger, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035018 (2022) - Published 16 February, 2022
Carlos H. de Lima, Daniel Stolarski, and Yongcheng Wu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035019 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Andréa Gaspert, Pietro Giampa, and David E. Morrissey
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035020 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
M. L. López-Ibáñez, Aurora Melis, M. Jay Pérez, Moinul Hossain Rahat, and Oscar Vives
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035021 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Andrea Caputo, Georg Raffelt, and Edoardo Vitagliano
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035022 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Making use of modern supernova simulations which include muon effects, the authors update constraints on light muon-specific (pseudo) scalars and generic axion-like particles. They find that such scalar solutions to the muon g-2 excess are in conflict with astrophysical observations.
Rahool Kumar Barman, Dorival Gonçalves, and Felix Kling
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035023 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Rabindra N. Mohapatra and Nobuchika Okada
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035024 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Csaba Csáki, Sungwoo Hong, Gowri Kurup, Seung J. Lee, Maxim Perelstein, and Wei Xue
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035025 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Andrei Angelescu, Andreas Bally, Simone Blasi, and Florian Goertz
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035026 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
D. Aristizabal Sierra, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, and G. Sanchez Garcia
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035027 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Sang Hui Im, Kwang Sik Jeong, and Yeseong Lee
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035028 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Alexander V. Gramolin, Arne Wickenbrock, Deniz Aybas, Hendrik Bekker, Dmitry Budker, Gary P. Centers, Nataniel L. Figueroa, Derek F. Jackson Kimball, and Alexander O. Sushkov
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035029 (2022) - Published 24 February, 2022
Sara Algeri
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035030 (2022) - Published 24 February, 2022
K. A. Beyer, G. Marocco, R. Bingham, and G. Gregori
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035031 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Sayan Dasgupta, Rohan Pramanick, and Tirtha Sankar Ray
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035032 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
David Curtin, Shayne Gryba, Jack Setford, Dan Hooper, and Jakub Scholtz
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035033 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Jens Boos and Christopher D. Carone
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035034 (2022) - Published 28 February, 2022
Tomoya Hara, Shinya Kanemura, and Taisuke Katayose
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035035 (2022) - Published 28 February, 2022
Philip Schuster, Natalia Toro, and Kevin Zhou
Phys. Rev. D 105, 035036 (2022) - Published 28 February, 2022
Zheng Zhao, Kai Xu, Attaphon Kaewsnod, Xuyang Liu, Ayut Limphirat, and Yupeng Yan
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036001 (2022) - Published 4 February, 2022
Hong Chen, Qi Huang, and Rong-Gang Ping
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036002 (2022) - Published 4 February, 2022
Jens Braun and Benedikt Schallmo
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036003 (2022) - Published 7 February, 2022
Ariel Arza
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036004 (2022) - Published 8 February, 2022
Elliot Leader
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036005 (2022) - Published 7 February, 2022
Grant N. Remmen and Nicholas L. Rodd
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036006 (2022) - Published 10 February, 2022
Adrian Dumitru, Heikki Mäntysaari, and Risto Paatelainen
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036007 (2022) - Published 16 February, 2022
V. A. Khoze, V. V. Khoze, D. L. Milne, and M. G. Ryskin
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036008 (2022) - Published 17 February, 2022
Colin M. Weller and Gerald A. Miller
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036009 (2022) - Published 17 February, 2022
B. Tripathi
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036010 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Andrei Kovtun
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036011 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Andrew Eberhardt, Alvaro Zamora, Michael Kopp, and Tom Abel
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036012 (2022) - Published 22 February, 2022
Esteban Calzetta
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036013 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Jan Horak, Jan M. Pawlowski, José Rodríguez-Quintero, Jonas Turnwald, Julian M. Urban, Nicolas Wink, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036014 (2022) - Published 23 February, 2022
Bo Feng, Chang Hu, and Yaobo Zhang
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036015 (2022) - Published 24 February, 2022
Bo-Lin Huang, Zi-Yang Lin, and Shi-Lin Zhu
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036016 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
M. Loewe, D. Valenzuela, and R. Zamora
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036017 (2022) - Published 25 February, 2022
Tatsuo Kobayashi and Hikaru Uchida
Phys. Rev. D 105, 036018 (2022) - Published 28 February, 2022